WladolfPutler's forum posts

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

Why is this thread still going on?

...and why are you people so hatefully toxic, evil, rude, crude, sarcastic, rude, mad, angry and so extremely toxic to each others and towards devs?

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

@DEVILinIRON said:

@wladolfputler: I'm currently playing DOOM (2016). Should I skip to DOOM ETERNAL?

Nope. It´s still a great game, it´s just ETERNAL feeling like being on steroids and meth, compared to the 2016 version.

I am basically as well still enjoying the old DOOM II or CASTLE WOLFENSTEIN, even that they´re rather "awful" compared to their next-gen sequels.

R u playing it on harder difficulty level? This is where the game actually shines, but i also have to admit my nerves weren´t strong enough to handle DOOM ETERNAL on its heaviest difficulty level, so i re-started with one level below, that was just right then and i wasn´t in trouble of damaging my precious keyboard while throwing it through the closed window out onto da streets on multiple occiasons.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

DOOM ETERNAL

DOOM 2016 kinda feels like a slow and limping, crippled old lady suffering a serious covid-infection and being way too easy getting laid, compared to DOOM ETERNAL, that´s why.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

@zmanbarzel said:

@wladolfputler: ”all good ole 80s cult franchises”

You pretty much answered your own question: These are cult IPs. Asymmetrical games are cheaper to make

Asssymetrical Multiplayer-Only games are cheaper than regular old-school Multiplayer-Only Games and this is why CULT FRANCHISES have been picked for that?

Or isn´t it more the fact that sadly the same sack of shits who already made FXIII are also making those other CULT FRANCHISES along with the fact that those CULT FRANCHISES are "just" having one or a handful of VILLAINS/HEROES so that makes it "great" for asssymetrical crap rather than "regular" multiplayer-only games to begin with?

Does this really answer my question at all?

My point is, they could as well make a "cheap" HITMAN as well as other certain well-known-games being asssymetrical multiplayer, so why don´t we still have those yet but instead almost the complete bunch of classic horror-cult franchises from the 80s.

They could service Fans with giving every one of those lousy asssymetrical-bullshit-games at least the same style of "Hitman-Mode" they already gave FRIDAY THE 13th, which was actually a great success with people loving it. But no. It has to be cheap!

But it´s ok, if all games are asssimilated with asssymetrical retard-games because it´s so cheap and rewarding for devs and publishers, then i probably have to just swallow that buttugly shitpill.

Can´t wait for HALO turning asssymetrical cheap crap shit or better yet STAR WARS or why not making an asssymetrical GTA-ONLINE shit-game.

Fu** that cheap-shit asssymetrical industry and their fu**ing cheap shit, worthless asssymetrical crap games.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

It´s still a miracle to me how VR can be immersive with stuttering sup-par console-graphics hehe.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

@gifford38 said:
@Juub1990 said:
@gifford38 said:

he is kind of right. its not the 90's were developers loved to make pc exclusives. the pc exclusives are not huge budget graphical games.

And this matters, why? PC gets every game on Xbox, lots of Playstation games and their exclusives, and a ton of games not even on consoles. It's certainly not the place starving for games since it has by far the most games.

spiderman must look so good on a 3080 gpu.

can you imagine hzd2 and ghost on a high end pc?

Don´t bother, there are some hardcore console-people here, living in their own safe reality of a bubble-universe, carrying its own set of facts, regardless of any facts being fact in the outside universe beyond their bubble.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts
@KHAndAnime said:

Instead of movies lately, I've been watching Hannibal (Tv Show). It's great.

I came to the conclusion that TV-Shows these days are actually way more worth their time and entertaining than wasting time with most 90 minutes garbage-movies they throw onto the market today.

By the way HANNIBAL was one of the best shows i ever watched, you can practically take BREAKING BAD and even BETTER CAUL SAUL (..and i really love the latter one!) and throw them into the gutter alltogether.

My latest show was THE UMBRELLA ACADEMY and i´d really love to see another season.

I guess now it´s time to start with THE BOYS.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

Porting their games to PC seems to be working quite well for Sony so far.

Of course!

You have mediocre games with sub-par graphics on low and cheap hardware and then it´s getting a master-overhaul shining on superior, top-notch masterclass hardware, making the titles shine like never before!

We, the superior PC-Masterrace, are the ruling class in every way.

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

@Maroxad said:

Probably due to the success of Dead By Daylight. Devs wanting to cash in on that.

That´s why we are getting flooded with BATTLE-ROYALE multiplayer-only games since PUBG.

Of course they all want to have a big piece of the cake, so then there we have way too many multiplayer-only games and as a matter of fact those who aren´t top-notch are already struggling to keep their heads over water at their initial release dates, so then most of them are good as dead two or three years later.

There are countless Steam User-Reviews claiming "Don´t even bother, dead already!" and so are games getting flushed down the toilet! It doesn´t even matters much if its F2P or a 60 Bucks title, coz once there aren´t enough users playing, servers will be shut down and then you can´t even play it if your life depends on it.

@RSM-HQ said:

Ghostbusters: The Video Game is a thing. May just be a port of an older game but it's still kinda what you are looking for.

Probably worth looking into Terminator: Resistance by Teyon too, and they're working on RoboCop: Rogue City, which I believe is also Single-Player focused. The team also made a Rambo game but I've read they've come along way since that disaster.

As such seen the same argument be made when games are only Single-Player, honestly plenty of both so I don't personally consider it an issue.

Plus I read the Evil Dead game is pretty good. Was considering looking into it with a few friends once all the major bugs are ironed out.

@Maroxad said:

Probably due to the success of Dead By Daylight. Devs wanting to cash in on that.

Multiplayer games also typically make more money and sell more copies.

Are in fact all multiplayer-only games making more money while selling more copies or did you actually wanted to say "They just try to make more money and sell more copies."?

Avatar image for wladolfputler
WladolfPutler

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 WladolfPutler
Member since 2022 • 256 Posts

I love the trash-genre but this one somehow seems to be taking itself "serious" somehow with most characters not being "trashy" enough for this flick to go through as "trash" to begin with, so this one is probably not sure what it wants to be and this seems to be its biggest problem.

As to the question how much this is "Grindhouse" or "Trash" or how those genres are basically the same or not, theres for sure room to argue, but "Trash" never takes itself any serious and this one would be better off not even trying for the slightest.