[QUOTE="x-V1CTOR-x"][QUOTE="cecx"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="cecx"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I dont care what the haters say, I want this game badly.

shadyd1717

I will take Warhawk over Halo 2.5 any day. :D

i played both betas and i liked warhawk better, (You never played both of them, CLEARLY, so how can you even talk?)

Finally a post from someone who has played Halo 3 and Warhawk beta's!! See he preffers Warhawk... :)

And do you really want a warhawk screen from me? cause' of that game i took a bunch (but their on my phone)

Owned.

XD yeah and notice how he didnt reply, or come back......

[QUOTE="cecx"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="cecx"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I dont care what the haters say, I want this game badly.

x-V1CTOR-x

I will take Warhawk over Halo 2.5 any day. :D

i played both betas and i liked warhawk better, (You never played both of them, CLEARLY, so how can you even talk?)

Finally a post from someone who has played Halo 3 and Warhawk beta's!! See he preffers Warhawk... :)

And do you really want a warhawk screen from me? cause' of that game i took a bunch (but their on my phone)

[QUOTE="x-V1CTOR-x"][QUOTE="whoody12"]

[QUOTE="da1on2"]Battlefield is like a Battlefield, WarHawk is like a full scale warBebi_vegeta

so a war has 16 players, and a Battle 32, I really mis the logic here, but then again, this is SW

battlefield was boooring i would walk around too much without finding enemies, while in warhawk, i didnt have that problem (and it was just a Beta).

Maybe you should learn how to play?

hahaha, true. Even tough i was playing with my good friends noodleman89 and HistorikL, the game bored me..

[QUOTE="x-V1CTOR-x"][QUOTE="cecx"][QUOTE="x-V1CTOR-x"][QUOTE="cecx"]

Warhawk: Not Fun

Battlefield: Somewhat fun

There you go! :wink:

cecx

How would someone without a PS3 even say that? (FANBOY) I played the Beta, and with the vehicles i say it was more fun than the Halo 3 Beta (which i also played)

umm....cause' i dont spend all my time on this website (unlike you) i only use the forums sometimes, i have never even done anything to my profile (exept put the MGS pic) Ohh, and if i were to look at your profile i would see you are the Microsoft Union Leader, so i would care less about your opinion (Union leader of Microsoft = Microsoft fanboy, same goes for Sony and Nintendo unions).

LMAO at u, that mgs pic is cool. and i only put my PSN because i go to the RFoM boards in here too, and im in a clan thingy and the clan leader asked me too (hence the TFH- member thing) if not i wouldnt put either. keep trying nerdy @$$ fanboy *bleep*.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="cecx"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I dont care what the haters say, I want this game badly.

cecx

I will take Warhawk over Halo 2.5 any day. :D

i played both betas and i liked warhawk better, (You never played both of them, CLEARLY, so how can you even talk?)

Finally a post from someone who has played Halo 3 and Warhawk beta's!! See he preffers Warhawk... :)

And do you really want a warhawk screen from me? cause' of that game i took a bunch (but their on my phone)

[QUOTE="whoody12"][QUOTE="PotatoSan"]

Well, since all PS3's are equal in terms of power, there won't be people lagging during load screens and having the game looking like N64, like my laptop playing BF2.

They look a bit different, so who knows which one will be more fun. But Warhawk doesn't look tooooo special.

MGS9150

you are trying to say Warhawk will not lag when it is 16v16 ?

Resistance doesnt lag when its 20 vs 20 so I see no reason why Warhawk should.

arent the devs still discussing 32 v 32? i heard that in an interview.....(migth be wrong though)

[QUOTE="da1on2"]Battlefield is like a Battlefield, WarHawk is like a full scale warwhoody12

so a war has 16 players, and a Battle 32, I really mis the logic here, but then again, this is SW

battlefield was boooring i would walk around too much without finding enemies, while in warhawk, i didnt have that problem (and it was just a Beta).

[QUOTE="x-V1CTOR-x"][QUOTE="cecx"]

Warhawk: Not Fun

Battlefield: Somewhat fun

There you go! :wink:

cecx

How would someone without a PS3 even say that? (FANBOY) I played the Beta, and with the vehicles i say it was more fun than the Halo 3 Beta (which i also played)

umm....cause' i dont spend all my time on this website (unlike you) i only use the forums sometimes, i have never even done anything to my profile (exept put the MGS pic) Ohh, and if i were to look at your profile i would see you are the Microsoft Union Leader, so i would care less about your opinion (Union leader of Microsoft = Microsoft fanboy, same goes for Sony and Nintendo unions). Also even if you did own a PS3 (which i doubt) i could bet $50 that you were not in the Beta.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I dont care what the haters say, I want this game badly.

Impex

I will take Warhawk over Halo 2.5 any day. :D

I watched the videos. The dog fights looked fun, but the ground combat looks mediocre. And, there is no Halo 2.5. It's Halo 3. You don't see me calling MGS3.5, or FF(which one are we on again?).

LMFAO at you.