When there is no standard to adhere to, who can say that my argument (that was in quotes) was wrong? How can anyone dispute that when there is no evidence to back any point of view?
realguitarhero5
And why should the standard be based on a religion or religions that not everyone they affect follow? The standard is morality and decency.
Why should it be based off nothing in the name of "progress"?
No one made that claim. Clearly anything besides religion doesnt exist. It could be based in law and ethics. In protecting the minority of people who love someone of the same sex from ignorant people who see them as less. Which they clealy do, because they don't want them to have the same rights as they do.
When there is no standard to adhere to, who can say that my argument (that was in quotes) was wrong? How can anyone dispute that when there is no evidence to back any point of view?
realguitarhero5
And why should the standard be based on a religion or religions that not everyone they affect follow? The standard is morality and decency.
[QUOTE="Makalano"] And you deflected the point.Makalano
Then it's your fault for not making your "point" clear. I'm sorry I don't view America as the entire world like you apparently do (and like the rest of atheists who seem to ignore the destructive nature of the Islamic world)
Feel free to elaborate. I'm sure you knowledge of Islam is completely unbiased and comes from great sources other than fox news and your preacher.
Actually, it comes from Richard Dawkins and an Atheist Media Blog on YouTube. Why do people always bring up Fox News? Yeah, we get it... they're stupid and biased. Not every conservative and/or religious person likes them.
Islam is not a violent religion, anymore than Christianity is. The middle east and prominent Islamic countries have completely unstructured governments and law systems. To draw the conclussion that Islam is destructive is ridiculous.
Log in to comment