@Sozialminister: Fortunately I can read, and I see you're still avoiding the topic again and using the ad hominem. Stay classy.

@Sozialminister: Oh, look, you actually do have nothing to contribute. Thanks for proving my point.

@Sozialminister: You literally said there shouldn't be diverse characters because it's all part of a political agenda. Please explain how having different kinds in of people in a video game is an agenda.

@Sozialminister: Still resorting to the ad hominem I see, please come back when you actually have something to contribute.

@Sozialminister: That's rich coming from you, especially since you blatantly contradict yourself in your original post. You claim you have nothing against gay characters being in video games, yet state there shouldn't be any because it's part of political agenda. Since when is mixing it up and adding different kinds of characters with different backgrounds a political agenda?

@Sozialminister: Ah, name-calling, that last resort of a person on the losing side of the argument.

@Sozialminister: So anything a developer decides to implement in their game that's outside your comfort zone is all part of an agenda? Damn, someone needs a safe space.

@Saladudo: Still beating around the bush I see, that's alright, you've already proven to me that you have nothing to back up your stance on the subject at hand.

@Saladudo: That deflection. Still afraid to actually discuss the main subject at hand?

@Saladudo: How many more of these made-up rules are you going to post before you realize that none of them qualify as a counter-argument?