xdude85's forum posts

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

About half a year.

School, work, and personal problems are always the cause.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

@Jacanuk said:
@xdude85 said:

@Jacanuk:

When you're terminally ill, that means there is no treatment of any kind that can cure you. Saying that someone is terminally ill while saying that they still "have a chance" is a complete contradiction.

The problems the NHS is facing is the result of conservative policies in the U.K., who have cut funding and have privatized some parts of it.

Don´t be a muppet. Saying someone is terminally ill does not mean they should stop trying to find something that may be that one in a trillion shot.

The NHS did what did, gave up all hope and just went on with their lives. Where as to the us doctors well they never gave up hope, and that is one of the worst things about a single payer system, the doctors have no drive.

And who cares why the NHS is underfunded, it´s underfunded is the main problem.

Except that's what being terminally ill means, there's no cure or treatment of any kind to prevent you from dying. Just because you let someone go due to them having an incurable disease or condition doesn't make you a quitter.

The reasons to why the NHS is underfunded is a big deal. You brought it up after all.

Your complaint that the U.K. healthcare is inadequate and falling short is due to U.K. conservative policies. The U.K.'s healthcare system wouldn't be facing these problems if it weren't for spending cuts made by conservative policies.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

@Jacanuk:

When you're terminally ill, that means there is no treatment of any kind that can cure you. Saying that someone is terminally ill while saying that they still "have a chance" is a complete contradiction.

The problems the NHS is facing is the result of conservative policies in the U.K., who have cut funding and have privatized some parts of it.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts
@Jacanuk said:
@xdude85 said:

Every first-world industrialized country has universal healthcare, and it works.

At no point ever have we seen people in the U.K., France, Germany, Australia, Japan, or South Korea protesting and demanding that their healthcare be privatized, and or declaring that universal healthcare is a "government takeover." Why? Because it never fucking happened, and that stupid notion is why America will never follow the model.

Plus, even if America adopted universal healthcare, I guarantee you there would be a good percentage of Americans that would take it as "selling out" or being "un-American." Because every country in the world is small, weak, wimpy, and stupid and America is #1 in everything and we have to keep believing in that stance because we helped win a war over 70 years ago.

Well, if you follow the news, you would have heard that the NHS is heavily criticized and underfunded. particularly not forgetting the NHS pretty much doomed a little baby to die because of their ignorance.

You can say many things about the US healthcare, but you get a higher level of care in the us then most of the European universal healthcare systems. (if you can afford it of course)

Charlie Gard was terminally ill and was going to die anyway. The NHS is not underfunded either, it has a budget of over £120 billion.

NHS Budget and Future Projection

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Every first-world industrialized country has universal healthcare, and it works.

At no point ever have we seen people in the U.K., France, Germany, Australia, Japan, or South Korea protesting and demanding that their healthcare be privatized, and or declaring that universal healthcare is a "government takeover." Why? Because it never fucking happened, and that stupid notion is why America will never follow the model.

Plus, even if America adopted universal healthcare, I guarantee you there would be a good percentage of Americans that would take it as "selling out" or being "un-American." Because every country in the world is small, weak, wimpy, and stupid and America is #1 in everything and we have to keep believing in that stance because we helped win a war over 70 years ago.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

As long as Steam is around and generating millions, there will never be another Half-Life.

That's the unfortunate truth, Valve is a business first, and they're going to stay the course on what's generating revenue for them.

The irony is that a new Half-Life would also generate millions in revenue.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Gamer logic: Optional same-sex relationships are why this game didn't turn out that good.

Yeah, it had nothing to with major franchise being handled by an inexperienced developer.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

398

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Fallout 4. Bought it when it first came out at $60, and paid $30 for the season pass when it was on sale.