[QUOTE="youarecry"]

35 fps on oblivion?  thats pathetic for any 8800 series card

at 2048 x 1536 the fps drops to 13

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6165714/p-2.html

muscleserge

actually xenos is comparable to the x1900xtx video card. Its hard to compare the card to any card really, because of the unique arc.

im just upset because i was going to buy this card,  now im thinking instead to get the gtx or else wait for the r600

its going to take a hit to my wallet so you can understand why im upset

I really hope this thread is a joke.Velocitas8

the only joke here is the 8800 gts video card

[QUOTE="youarecry"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="baddog121390"]At 1600x1200 res with 4xAA and 16xAF, and is only a DX9 game, that is EXTREMELY impressive. Not to mention 35 frames is higher than what console version go at.baddog121390

games that dont utilize the unified shader in the 360 make the card perform up to 24% slower, but the point is not many actually do. Same thing with this video card. How many games out right now support dx10? exactly

its no excuse

how am i damage controling ? the only damage thats been delt it to the ego of nivda and the new cards. Im just saying if this card does oblivion at 35fps,  what will it run crysis at max settings?  20?

[QUOTE="youarecry"]i was hoping for a little better than that, i mean oblivion is an old game now, it shouldnt have that much trouble with the gamebaddog121390

[QUOTE="baddog121390"]At 1600x1200 res with 4xAA and 16xAF, and is only a DX9 game, that is EXTREMELY impressive. Not to mention 35 frames is higher than what console version go at.mattbbpl

games that dont utilize the unified shader in the 360 make the card perform up to 24% slower, but the point is not many actually do. Same thing with this video card. How many games out right now support dx10? exactly

its no excuse

35 fps on oblivion?  thats pathetic for any 8800 series card

at 2048 x 1536 the fps drops to 13

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6165714/p-2.html

[QUOTE="blurb1324"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]*waits for cows to say only gamespot matters*Kahuna_1

Thats what all the 360 fans said for GOW2, i usually like to wait on game mags and site i have heard of

No, I meant God of War 2, sorry I misspelled it. It scored a 9.7 on IGN and 360 fans said this is GS not IGN.

yes thats true, but i highly doubt that a game that got a 4 out of 10 will get a good score here on gamespot. Lets be logical here, F1 wont get higher than a 6.0 on gamespot

[QUOTE="youarecry"]

seriously this is the only genre that the 360 sucks at

• playstation has both the devil may cry series and god of war series

we use to have  ninja gaiden but now that game is on the ps3 as well

• we have nothing

too human better turn out to be an awesome game

if not then im probably going to buy a ps3 and i dont want to blow $600

bb2jidm

no i dont think you understand

god of war3 will be on the ps3 and thats the game the im really interested in. I also made the point that the closest game to god of war on the xbox is ninja gaiden, but thats multiplat right now and also in my opinion not as good as god of war, gow actually had a story. And ninja gaiden is too hard in the beginning of the game and by the end its way too easy, if you upgrade the wooden sword all the way you get the unlabored flawlessness and that makes the boss fights a complete joke. Also i like the way that gow plays with mythology, the whole becoming a god concept interests me and i love the brutality of the game, ninja gaiden completely lacked that and instead was more about killing your enemies with finese

btw i have a ps2, but im more interested in the future right now and i was trying to get my point across that too human better be an awesome game