... I don't know about this. We're talking about the Marvel that has evolved from the fun old days of wild fun to the one that has brought us shenanigans like "One More Day". Well, can't be worse than anything Sony has to pull.
@Auction_Sniper: To endorse sales in older games of course. Some people would want to replay those games but find little motivation to play through everything again.
Cheating in a newer game would be more problematic for the company - especially if it's competitive / online-based in nature.
Easily one of the better RPG on Steam though I'd always wondered if it's necessary to release such games on consoles. It's not exactly specs-heavy - even a potato should be able to run it.
@regix416_basic: FE has already sunk to that level bruh. Furthermore, it's just a non-canon crossover spin-off that wouldn't influence the directive of the main games - I wouldn't get my undies in a twist over it.
@Doomerang: ... at the cost of turning a certain character into a spirit-speaking tribal cowgirl with a design that's worse off than the original. Nah, it's a bad change.
"Learn techniques from the best players!: Low experienced players can learn how to become stronger with master players via the Online Training feature. Both players can communicate with each other with the common goal of strengthening the disciple"
... This... is actually a really good feature. I'm surprised that it's not implemented in more fighter games.
... Though I'm not really sure what to feel about this "Rush" mechanic.
@ballashotcaller: .... No. Witcher 1 was an extremely decent RPG with a unique take on the point-and-click formula. Derps that started off from Witcher 2 should stop claiming that the first one was a bad game just because it wasn't a full-blown action game.
z827's comments