Zergforlife's forum posts

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@brah4ever said:
@zergforlife said:
@brah4ever said:
@Vaasman said:

But could I play my waifu in UT2004? Didn't think so!

Yep I keep saying UT2003 and 2004 are crystal clear proof that multiplayer only games have turned sour, expecting people to be satisfied with a 40-60 dollar product that has a pathetic content listing. Titanfall, Evolve, R6 Siege, Battlefront, now Overwatch.

Yeah, I refuse to pay $40-60 for MP games that even while lacking an offline or single player component also have barebones multiplayer.

I'm surprised the average consumer is accepting of this (Battlefront selling 15 million copies, etc), I'm going to assume they probably don't know any better.

Any gamer with some gaming experience spanning anywhere in the last 15 years+ knows these games are a joke content wise nowadays.

I get what you're saying, but for today's standards Overwatch is still the best option other than CS:GO as far as skill shooters go. All the real content will be free updates rather than shitty season passes, and it will be getting a lot of those since Blizzard.

On PC that is. This is unplayable on console and probably won't even last nearly as long, like CS and TF I basically consider it exclusive...IMO.

So what does that say about the state of the genre, today?

Less content on launch, but we knew that. The skill, teamwork, and gameplay are great as ever in OW, IMO.

Fortunately it will only increase, and for free. OW on PC is going to be majestic, count on it.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

PS4's second place has really got you gitty, aint it?

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@Zidaneski said:

Hmmm, does seem a lot like SFV now that I think about it. I mean, I love SFV and would give it at least a 9. Sure I wouldn't have minded it having a story and other crap thrown in but as a clearly competitive fighting game it is top-notch.

Seeing the scores for overwatch it all makes sense now. Its a new ip and we all knew what it was going for from the beginning without expectatons of past franchises so naturally it will be graded on what it set out to do. If there is confusion in what the game is going for it will be scored less favorably in the case of SFV and Battleborn. So interestingly the way you market a game will affect reviews in the way that reviewers have a better idea of what your game is and what it set out to do.

And being more fun and polished also effects the review.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@brah4ever said:
@Vaasman said:

But could I play my waifu in UT2004? Didn't think so!

Yep I keep saying UT2003 and 2004 are crystal clear proof that multiplayer only games have turned sour, expecting people to be satisfied with a 40-60 dollar product that has a pathetic content listing. Titanfall, Evolve, R6 Siege, Battlefront, now Overwatch.

Yeah, I refuse to pay $40-60 for MP games that even while lacking an offline or single player component also have barebones multiplayer.

I'm surprised the average consumer is accepting of this (Battlefront selling 15 million copies, etc), I'm going to assume they probably don't know any better.

Any gamer with some gaming experience spanning anywhere in the last 15 years+ knows these games are a joke content wise nowadays.

I get what you're saying, but for today's standards Overwatch is still the best option other than CS:GO as far as skill shooters go. All the real content will be free updates rather than shitty season passes, and it will be getting a lot of those since Blizzard.

On PC that is. This is unplayable on console and probably won't even last nearly as long, like CS and TF I basically consider it exclusive...IMO.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

The fact you still don't realize the cutscenes and gameplay are the same in UC4 shows how clueless you are.

Oh buzz off, you annoying liar. Digital Foundry already told you to go screw yourself, listen to them.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:
@zergforlife said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:
@zergforlife said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

Calm down Mooch78. Don't you have another podcast with crapgamer to do crying over Uncharted 4 and the PS4?

You got destroyed by him and are now changing subjects to a movie-game? lol...

Member Since:May 5, 2016Posts:424

Defending yourself under a new alt I see.

Looks like @casharmy was right when he said the so called "hermits" on this site are just salty xbots. How does it feel to have no exclusives left? Go cry and make another alt.

I'm not a lemming.....

Stop going off topic with random bullshit.

Sure you're not. A fresh new alt account that pretends to be a hermit yet gets offended anytime someone says something about Xbox. It's really sad how many accounts you have on here nyadc. Maybe someday you'll get a life.

Nope. Not a lemming. Next.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:
@zergforlife said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:
@dynamitecop said:

Let's see your Steam account, CPU-Z and GPU-Z, clearly you've got a beast PC that renders the Xbox One redundant.... RIGHT...

RIGHT...

Calm down Mooch78. Don't you have another podcast with crapgamer to do crying over Uncharted 4 and the PS4?

You got destroyed by him and are now changing subjects to a movie-game? lol...

Member Since:May 5, 2016Posts:424

Defending yourself under a new alt I see.

Looks like @casharmy was right when he said the so called "hermits" on this site are just salty xbots. How does it feel to have no exclusives left? Go cry and make another alt.

I'm not a lemming.....

Stop going off topic with random bullshit.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:
@dynamitecop said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

Well there it is. No more exclusive games for Xbox. There is officially no reason at all to own one.

Let's see your Steam account, CPU-Z and GPU-Z, clearly you've got a beast PC that renders the Xbox One redundant.... RIGHT...

RIGHT...

Calm down Mooch78. Don't you have another podcast with crapgamer to do crying over Uncharted 4 and the PS4?

You got destroyed by him and are now changing subjects to a movie-game? lol...

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

OW is better in literally every way possible than shitty casual shooters like Halo.

Avatar image for zergforlife
Zergforlife

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Zergforlife
Member since 2016 • 467 Posts

@m3dude1 said:

ut2004 is leagues better than overwatch. overwatch is a shallow, barely skillfull f2p game they are charging full price for. like 95% of the shit in the game doesnt even require aim. just look in the general direction of an enemy and everything else is done for you

Whats funny is, even after what you said, OW on PC has a higher skill ceiling than literally any console game and will have a bigger e-sports scene than anything on consoles. Your 95% figure is a flat out lie, over half the classes require great aim and quick reflexes. Then the rest have hybrid situations were aim is mostly still required.

But UT2004 was better, I'll agree on that. Nothing really touches that game, you have to compare Overwatch to current gen titles. Like, OW destroys recent slow paced casual shit such as BF, Evolve, Battleborne, Division, Halo, Destiny, Titan Fall, or CoD. Which is why it is getting rave reviews, they are comparing it to recent shooters, not a 12 year old gem.