Review

Surgeon Simulator 2013 Review

  • First Released Apr 19, 2013
    released
  • PC

Surgeon Simulator 2013 is hardly a simulation, but it makes medical malpractice an absolute delight.

"Perform a heart transplant." These are the words that greet you at the beginning of Surgeon Simulator 2013. Beyond that, there are no instructions to speak of: it's just you, a table full of surgical instruments, and a patient whose life you hold in your woefully unprepared hands. While that may sound like a recipe for disaster, it's also what makes Surgeon Simulator so wonderful. This is an absurdist parody of one of the world's most skillful occupations, a game that has you fumbling your way through one operation after the other as you drop your watch inside a patient's abdominal cavity, lose entire organs out of the back of a moving ambulance, and giggle with delight over your own surgical incompetence.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Surgeon Simulator 2013 - Video Review

In Surgeon Simulator, you exist as an arm hovering above an operating table. Dragging the mouse moves your hand about the screen, and from there you can control the grip of each finger through five keys on the keyboard. Clicking the right mouse button as you drag left and right lets you rotate your hand side to side, while dragging up and down lets you adjust the angle of your wrist. If all this sounds a bit confusing, that's because it absolutely is. Surgeon Simulator makes it incredibly complicated to so much as pick up a scalpel. Performing a successful operation, meanwhile, is like juggling and riding a bicycle at the same time.

And yet, that ungainly control scheme is one of the biggest reasons Surgeon Simulator is such dumb fun. This is surgery as a slapstick vaudeville routine, an eccentric comedy of errors where everything can and will go wrong. Whether you're causing massive blood loss by dropping an electric drill inside a patient's abdominal cavity or seeing hallucinations after accidentally pricking yourself with a syringe, this game is littered with hazards meant to make you giggle with morbid delight. Surgeon Simulator has all the potential to be frustrating, but the sense of humor is so pervasive (the game-over screen reads "Brutal murder achieved") and the gore is so whimsically over the top (performing a brain transplant is like cracking a hard-boiled egg) that you can't help but cackle with glee even as you're fumbling a patient's life away. It's a game that's acutely aware of its own ridiculousness and wants you to join in on the fun.

The ease with which your watch falls off is one of this game's many clever touches.
The ease with which your watch falls off is one of this game's many clever touches.

That fun is spread across three basic types of operations: a heart transplant, a double kidney transplant, and a brain transplant. No matter the procedure, your goal is always to complete the operation before your patient runs out of blood. The challenge lies in removing any ribs and extraneous organs in your way without causing too much collateral damage. When you're done, the game assigns you a grade based on how quickly and carefully you completed the job. It's too bad there aren't more types of procedures, because in addition to some occasionally wonky physics issues, that relatively limited selection of surgeries is one of the game's only flaws.

Fortunately, Surgeon Simulator gives you plenty of reasons to keep coming back. For one thing, each of those three surgeries can be performed in a ridiculously difficult alternate scenario that has you operating during a very bumpy ambulance ride. Your utensils and replacement organs go bouncing all over the place, and the back doors randomly swing open--it's pure chaos. On top of this, there are a number of Easter eggs to discover (like a top secret heart transplant performed in zero-gravity space) as well as some truly inventive achievements, such as completing an operation with less than 10 milliliters of blood remaining, or dressing your patient in a scarf made from his own large intestine.

Extracting the brain should be a slow and delicate process. But who cares about that when you've got an A rank to achieve?
Extracting the brain should be a slow and delicate process. But who cares about that when you've got an A rank to achieve?

Throughout all this, Surgeon Simulator strikes a terrific balance between realism--or at least relative realism--and all-out absurdity. Hack away at your patient's ribs with a bone saw, and you might put the whole operation at risk by slicing open a lung; but the only way to get at the heart is to remove the lungs entirely, at which point you can toss them to the floor without the slightest concern. If your patient starts losing too much blood, you need to slow the bleeding with a hemostasis shot; but you can use that very syringe to haphazardly stab your patient in the face as many times as you like, and he'll be right as rain. It all adds up to a wonderful contrast between the grounded and the ridiculous. The result is a game that's both challenging and lighthearted, clumsy and clever.

Surgeon Simulator is a game that defies logic. Even the oddly dance-worthy synth soundtrack has no business working as well as it does. And yet, it all comes together beautifully in one great big symphony of eccentricity. This is a game that makes it an absolute joy to not only fail, but fail spectacularly. And the best part is, you don't even have to worry about malpractice suits.

Back To Top

The Good

  • Makes failing at surgery a joyous experience
  • Wonderful use of over-the-top humor
  • Lots of little hidden extras
  • Music is oddly complimentary

The Bad

  • Only three types of transplants
  • Physics can sometimes get wonky

About the Author

463 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for patrick112
patrick112

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

This has got to be a joke? 8.0... WHAT ABOUT RESIDENTEVIL6? SMILEYFACE SMILEYFACE SMILEYFACE! HULK SMAAAAAAAAASH! @@@@@

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hlmcpherson
hlmcpherson

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Riptide gets a 4 while they even CONSIDER doing a review on this bit of dung?!? And this animated plastic toy gets an 8!! OK, reviews here now officially mean nothing to me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Stebsis
Stebsis

702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@hlmcpherson So you're basically saying that they should've compared Surgeon Simulator that's a ten buck indie game, and Dead Island that's almost full priced glorified DLC, and considered the score they gave to DI when giving score to this? I don't really get it...

3 • 
Avatar image for hlmcpherson
hlmcpherson

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@Stebsis @hlmcpherson ok then with your perspective I would expect them to put this review in the "Crap Game Reviews" bin and not on the site banner page. understand where I'm coming from?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OldKye
OldKye

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

Edited By OldKye

@hlmcpherson @Stebsis So a indie game does really well at what it set our to do and has good value but needs to be reviewed against full priced titles?

You right maybe Gamespot does need two pages one for gentlemen like yourself that only covers Call of Duty and Assassins Creed releases and reviews and then this sight for the rest of us (^.^)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Clavera
Clavera

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

@hlmcpherson @Stebsis France, Russia? No? Do tell!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mastermetal777
mastermetal777

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 2

@hlmcpherson I don't think this was a game that was meant to be taken seriously, unlike Dead Island Riptide. The reviews for both are justified.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Snaptrap
Snaptrap

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Rename the game to Stoned Surgeon Simulator.

4 • 
Avatar image for msfan1289
msfan1289

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By msfan1289

its actually fun, for $9 why not.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sonyfreak456
sonyfreak456

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Every heard of Edheads anyone. Edheads is a medical game site where you do operations on people. A much less bloody and free surgeon simulation.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EvilShabazz
EvilShabazz

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EvilShabazz

Well, I know it's time to find another gaming site. The reviews on this site are just getting stupid.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EvilShabazz
EvilShabazz

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

How does one delete their own account? This site hasn't been accurate on a review in months.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cannedstingray
cannedstingray

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@EvilShabazz A review, is a person giving his, opinion, on a given product.. Opinions, by definition cannot be wrong, or right. They are simply a person telling others what they think of something..

People may have different opinions about things than you do, but that simply means that you disagree with them about said product. Again, it does not make them wrong or right..

For me, the nice thing about sites like Gamespot, and GiantBomb are that I know most of the reviewers opinions well enough by now to be able to inform my own opinions about things. For instance on GB, I know that Vinny has taste in games that lines up pretty well with my own tastes, when it comes to less known titles. Jeff's thoughts on shooters, and sci-fy are similar enough with my own that I can trust his opinions in those categories.. Whereas Brad likes some genres that I am not very interested in, and so on..

Discounting an entire website because some reviewers like games that you don't like seems a little petty to me..

3 • 
Avatar image for tushwacker
tushwacker

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@cannedstingray @EvilShabazz well, yes and no. A professional game reviewer isn't simply providing their own opinion - they are also trying to determine if the majority of their audience is going to like the game or not. That's why they have their rating systems. Obviously, not everyone is going to agree, but if the review is well made, it will at least be close to the average score of other professional reviewers.. the Dead Island Riptide review was a poor review, in my opinion, because it was primarily personal opinion and made virtually no attempt to determine if most of their audience would enjoy the game or not. If the average score was 5 and they gave it a 4, then that's a fair review. But when they are a full 3 points lower than the average, one can tell that personal bias has made too big of an impact on their score.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Col_Swamp
Col_Swamp

937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

I've trusted GS for years....and will continue. Thanks GS!

2 • 
Avatar image for volc-123
volc-123

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

the only real fun in this game is ambulance mode.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for avi1708
avi1708

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By avi1708

gamespot you are fast losing my trust..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ZachBobBob
ZachBobBob

249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ZachBobBob

As if there's a review! xD ahahah

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alechair
alechair

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By alechair

Note to self: "If someday you make your own game, make sure you bribe gamespot for a good score, you'll get a lot of attention."

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OldKye
OldKye

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

Edited By OldKye

@alechair This is a Green lite kick-starter game on steam... I'm sure they slipped Gamespot billions of dollars to give their $10 game a good review as sure as I am that Elvis Presley is still alive.

Here take a look for yourself at the "suits" who made and published this game(^.^)

http://www.bossastudios.com/about-us/

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alechair
alechair

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@OldKye Well, Mr Sarcasm... You have been a Gamespot member for so long, at this point you should know there's a lot a of people all around the world that actually make desicions about buying a game (or not) based on the score they see here. And a game with broken controls never gets an 8 (indie or not).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OldKye
OldKye

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

Edited By OldKye

@alechair @OldKye Unless the point is broken controls lol if you've ever read how they do the scores here they score it based on how well a game does what it set out to do.

Example: Cooking Mama was scored based on how well it mad a cute and interesting cooking game for the DS not based on how much it differs from CoD.

The reason for this is because people who buy say Barbie horse ridding adventures aren't expecting a Call of Duty game nor do they want one they want a barbie game.

Which makes it your mistake for seeing a $10 indie game labeled "comical surgery with bad controls" in the description and think it should lose points for lack of realism.

Would you take points off of Crysis or Dark Souls for lack of blue monkeys and not effectively teaching you Spanish?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for murin1111
murin1111

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

you are all wrong about GS. Compare their score to the Metacritic score. In this case the GS 80 is pretty close to the Metacritic 76 so stop hating on GS. Clearly, every other critic review of this game agrees with GS....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hlmcpherson
hlmcpherson

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By hlmcpherson

@murin1111 gamespot was one of 5!! that even cared to rate the stupid game. the fact they rated it at all should cause you alarm...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Stebsis
Stebsis

702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Stebsis

@hlmcpherson @murin1111 What's wrong with them reviewing the game exactly? Care to elaborate a bit because I'm not sure if I'm just stupid or is it you, but I don't get why they shouldn't have review this. It costs about 10 bucks on steam and I think people should know what the game is about through reviews if they're considering putting money on it.

4 • 
Avatar image for heat_masheet
heat_masheet

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@murin1111 wow, who could argue with that logic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for octabrain111
octabrain111

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

jesus....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for heat_masheet
heat_masheet

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By heat_masheet

300 users actually thought this was a game....lol

Upvote • 
Avatar image for heat_masheet
heat_masheet

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@i_like_pie223 @cuddlyfuzzle @Stardust7 it's a game where having CP and Parkinson's is fun! o_0

Upvote • 
Avatar image for heat_masheet
heat_masheet

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@i_like_pie223 You don't get out much, do you?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for 5529319
5529319

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

This review is... wow, just wow... an 8.0? Really? From the sounds of it, even RE6 sounds better!! I somewhat get that this game is "so bad that it's good", but still... an 8.0 is a bit much from what I've read. Maybe I should pirate it first and see how the game goes or something.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for m_bd89
m_bd89

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By m_bd89

@5529319 No, this is not a so bad it's good situation, it's just a ton of fun. Apparently even when gamespot's score is more in line with other critics and is close to the metacritic score, people will still whine. Goddamn kids and their video games. And will you just let RE6 go, what is wrong with you people? Don't you guys know any other games?

7 • 
Avatar image for cuddlyfuzzle
cuddlyfuzzle

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@5529319 just wait for a steam sale and you can buy it for like 2$

Upvote • 
Avatar image for 5529319
5529319

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I'm saying first that I haven't read the review (and am about to). But first things first, this is probably the only positively reviewed simulator in a long time, for as far as I can remember. Wow, just... wow.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cuddlyfuzzle
cuddlyfuzzle

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@i_like_pie223 @cuddlyfuzzle @Stardust7 You disagree, wow it's 10$ and is great fun for like 1 hour and deserves a 9 imo. How many operations types can this great game perform?

2 • 
Avatar image for Warsilver
Warsilver

291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

Edited By Warsilver

@Stardust7 @saadomar90 @edpeterson @Thokamb There is something to be said for a game that is just fun. So it's not intricate or big budget, that doesn't mean it isn't a good game. And btw, reviews are guidance not rules... just because you may not like this game doesn't mean a lot of other people wont find it entertaining. It's unique... you can't just compare this to another 8.0 like Sleeping Dogs for example... Compare it to any other simulator games you know, chances are this game does a great job.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thokamb
Thokamb

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thokamb

I get it. Its basicly so bad, that it becomes some kind of good. And it got no problem one being ironic when actually writing the review, but to seriously give it an 8, thats just unproffesional, people are supose to buy games based on the review scores.. You really belive this pos belongs up among the AAA games? But maybe its just me, and i dont understand the grading system.

If i were look only at the score, i would belive that this would be a good game, when in fact i would feel pritty cheated.. It's getting harder to know when GS is being ironic and when they're serious, seing as the text says one thing and the number score another..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for GITY69
GITY69

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Thokamb I really shouldn't have to explain this but.... Games are reviewed based on their context i.e. a $9 indie will not be reviewed with the same bias as a $60 AAA game. The scores are relevant to their respective context. It is a 8/10 for $9. Also it succeeds at what it tries to do and is hilarious in the process, garnering a well deserved score.

2 • 
Avatar image for parrot_of_adun
parrot_of_adun

7177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By parrot_of_adun

@Thokamb Uh... Have you played it?

2 • 
Avatar image for edpeterson
edpeterson

897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By edpeterson

This is kind of why I don't trust GS reviews anymore, besides slender getting an 8.5, Dead Island 2 getting a 4.0, and Evoland got a 5.0, it sure seems like GS kind of forgot what to look for in games and do good reviews. They're basically turning into ign. Sure this game is enjoyable to mess around in, but by all means it's not a great game, it's not even a good game. How did it even get a high score and seen as a good game when it has obvious bugs among other things?

At least we have user reviews, which is always nice. GS reviewers should really just keep their own personal bias aside and focus on being a critic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Stardust7
Stardust7

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Stardust7

I usually dont complain about reviews ,but this time gamespot gone too far..... The game is funny like hell ,but I would never give a score higher than 5.0 to it....I believe there are too many young players here and this game have a very sadistic dark humor not recommended to young players.....by the way ,this review makes me wonder what criteria are used to review games here ....

5 • 
Avatar image for cuddlyfuzzle
cuddlyfuzzle

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By cuddlyfuzzle

@Stardust7 very difficult to control the character...that deserves an 8? lol. In any other game it would have been penalized for it. While this game may have a 'ya but it's fun' aspect, ALL games should be reviewed using the same yardstick.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for saadomar90
saadomar90

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By saadomar90

Wow really? a 8.0 rating for a game with such crappy development? There are games out there that have been worked on for years, with plenty of enjoyable things and heck of a lot more replayability than this that gamespot gave 7.5 or worse. Give me a break Gamespot. This is tasteless humor.

5 • 
Avatar image for cuddlyfuzzle
cuddlyfuzzle

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@saadomar90 it's the frustration of failing and lack of coordination that makes this game fun. for a whole 5 minutes. my toast is ready... ;)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for josh7845
josh7845

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cuddlyfuzzle @saadomar90 Also the weird attention to detail is lovely, like the computer disks or the consequences of pricking yourself on that needle.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dexxor245
dexxor245

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is why this game deserves an 8.0.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGhc31X3fTs

Skip to 16:30 to see Markiplier's rage.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Gbullet
Gbullet

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

8.0 WTF !?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Yulaw2000
Yulaw2000

791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

To call this game distasteful is an understatement.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for heat_masheet
heat_masheet

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By heat_masheet

@Yulaw2000but it isn't a game. it's a ruse to get money from people in an attempt to claim it as humourous. peoples sense of humour differs substantially but it's just a video game, sort of.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for meatz666
meatz666

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I believe that Gaming Journalism could go next gen too, and base the score on the categories. 10 and 9 would go to games that "you might not like RPG, but you should try this one"... 8,7,6 to games that are good, but will only appeal fans of that particular genre. 5 and above to universal crap... :)

And this game is a Simulation? Like Flight Simulator? lol.

Let's change the genre of Postal to "Logistics"... :)

Upvote •