SPOILING the Ending - BioShock Infinite

No wonder they included Bioshock game with infinite. So now i understand infinite ..infinite doors, infinite possibilities.

i understand the ending...but what is the DEBT that Booker owe?? maybe its explained and i did not get it..

Can't wait to see what we learn in the DLC!!!!!!!!

Comstock believed that baptism absolved him of his sins. Freed of guilt over his crimes, he was free to then commit far worse ones and rationalize them away as necessary for his righteous cause. Dewitt rejected baptism, retained his guilt and shame, and it was that guilt and shame which motivated him to try to become a better person. Dewitt was no saint, but he was aware of his own failings and conflicted about them, whereas there was no such barrier to Comstock's atrocities.

I LOVE how after I finished I immediately started it back , and even when you are in the row boat, the twins are talking to each other, and one goes "he doesn't row", and the other goes "well make him" then he goes "no, he DOESN'T row". That was just masterful.

Nice to see two guys talking together about Bioshock ending. Nothing looks weird.. Absolutely.

Something that is bugging me that I can't quite figure out, maybe you guys can for me. So at the end of the game when Booker is drowned by all the Elizabeth's it kills off all the possible existences of Elizabeth and Comstock, but as most people have stated not Anna. I'm asking why not? If Anna was born before the baptism where Booker becomes Comstock then why wouldn't Comstock take Anna from his own Universe and do all that crazy stuff that he does to "make" Elizabeth? Does Comstock just reject and neglect the Anna in his Universe? and if so wouldn't that create a paradox when he takes Anna from another universe?

Now let's say that Anna is only born after Dewitt rejects the baptism, that would make sense why Comstock would take Anna from the other Universe because she does not exist in his universe. But that would also mean in the final scene when the Elizabeth's drowned Dewitt, that they're not only stopping the existence of Comstock and Elizabeth, but Anna as well. Does Dewitt fully understand that he is stopping the existence of his daughter?

It changes the outcome of the game for me at least, from Booker stopping all this madness and letting his child hopefully have a somewhat normal life, to now he saves the world at a cost of everything to him..

I don't know am I wrong, or am I missing something?
Help me out, thanks.

Did i get this right? is it possible that Booker is/was in a endless loop saving Elizabeth? in coin flip act the brother twin wares a board with hundreds of marks on the Heads side. did Booker flipped the coin in each visit? each time resulting Heads?

Also, How did the Shepperd found that his other version in a different universe (Booker) has a baby daughter?

Great Game

agh! where is my long thought out comment! oh the humanity.

why when booker falls he doesnt loose heath just wakes on the ground? I think its called false awakening

Also, the biggest thing that bothered me was that, if comstock is booker why the hell dont they look the same? or even sound the same? They have different voices and facial features! But even that is explained in one of the voxophones... Comstock's little trips through the tears actually changed his genetics over time. (which is also what made him sterile). Crazy-nesss!!!

well.. definitely my fav bioshock game.

Graphical explanation of Bioshock Infinite. (Warning: Huge spoilers!)

http://i.imgur.com/ld70tjG.jpg

I know, when I saw Rapture I was totally shocked!!! Booker's line on Rapture made me crack up in laughter.

Elizabeth being Booker's daughter... makes so much sense and wraps everything up. The fact that the game make you care so much about the girl just makes this so much powerfull.

I remember that in one of the trailers someone complained that in BioShock Infinite trailers and whatever Elizabeth never looked the same... In the scene where all the multiple Elizabeths apear it all makes sense =)

I now understand why one of the programmers quit after playing the game.

Booker being Cumstock... Phewww...!!!, Wow... I think the tortured Elizabeth no longer exists, but the happy without a father Ana does... Sooo many questions, so few answers... I'm gonna go and play the game again in 1999's mode

I agree with the game's views on religious fanatism. I don't think it's about religion or christianity in particular. I think the criticism is more on religion when taken to the extreme, and how people buy into it without any questioning...

Great video you guys!!!

If there are infinite possibilities,Then what stops a different Booker to accept the baptism in an another demension?

My wife watched me play the game and the ending and we discussed it last week. After watching this yesterday I went home and discussed this with her and she raised her eyebrow and said "you came up with this by yourself" lol...i said no i watched a video on gamespot and we both laughed and said she like how it tied the game together and opened up infinite possibilities.....

Surely one of the most memorable and outstanding endings of all time.

The story at the end was a bit "murky" to say the least. I was hoping that like in Bioshock 1 there would be a "good and "bad" ending based off the decisions I had made. Yet, basically I got a not-quite-bad ending with an ambiguous epilogue. I felt they went a tad overboard with the alternate universes and that muddled up the ending too. The end scene in Rapture was essentially utterly pointless to the story.

The whole Booker is Comstock thing didn't make a lot of sense, especially since early on they said that Elizabeth is not Comstock's daughter, then they changed their minds and said yes she is his daughter since Booker/Comstock are the same person. Slate should of recognized Booker or at the very least mentioned a resemblace to Comstock.

They never explained why Elizabeth can do what she does. We know Comstock stole her (as Anna) as a baby and raised her in Columbia, but the how & why of her abilities are never explained. If anyone could do it using Columbia tech, why did Comstock have to use his daughter from the past?

Why did Booker have to drown to kill "all" the Comstocks of the multiverse? That would cause a paradox. If Anna was kidnapped then Booker didn't have a debt, Anna wasn't sold, Anna didn't learn tears and become Elizabeth, and the whole game wouldn't of happened.

What was "the debt"? He said he got him gambling, but that didn't explain why one of the Twins would be able to "wipe" it away.

Don't get me wrong I loved the game, but the story in Bioshock 1 was better.

Clarify some things , who was the guy at the lighthouse with the note

One thing I didn't understand while playing through the game was the timeline of events, in particular, the timeline that is in the Hall of Heroes. On that timeline, it says the Prophet is born in 1874, Wounded Knee occurs in 1890, Columbia launches and the lamb are born in 1893. At the end, when you get the baptism part (the first time when Booker rejects it), he says something like I remember this place, I was here after Wounded Knee. And what doesn't make sense is by my math, Comstock is 38 years old in 1912 even though he looks like an old man. Booker becomes born again in 1890, 3 years before Anna/Elizabeth is born. So does that mean that the Comstock in Columbia is really a futuristic version of himself since he looks so much older. And also, why did Slate not recognize Booker as really being Comstock when you get to Hall of Heroes? Or are we supposed to assume that everything in Hall of Heroes is just a lie including the timeline?

Excellent job Kevin Carol on this. I so loved this game so much and got goosebumps at the end when we ended up in Rapture. It all became so clear to me at that point what really was going one. For me... this is the best game I have played this year. The story, the graphics, the music, and just overall... it was AWESOME!!! :)

"The impulse to accept the experience as real is so strong the dreamer will often invent a memory or a story to cover up an incongruous or unrealistic event in the dream" wiki about lucid dreams.
when Booker tells "I'm afraid of you" to Elizabeth, he is afraid of the responsabilities of taking care of her alone being poor and how his decisions are going to affect her in the future. I broke the code!!!