Update: MS: GAF Share threads OK! Your library. Any 10 gamers. Dogs too!

  • 187 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HipHopBeats
HipHopBeats

2850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#151 HipHopBeats
Member since 2011 • 2850 Posts

Why go through all that work around just to play used or borrowed games? I'd rather just stick with a PS3 or get a PS4. And even then, Sony is leaving that decision up to the devs. I don't see how a AAA multiplat game will have coded bullshit for one console and not the other. Sony made off like the knight in shining armor now, but time will tell.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#152 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73940 Posts

No.

But if you want to share your game with SS, just mail it using USPS.:P

alexwatchtower

Oh I just don't. :D

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

Why go through all that work around just to play used or borrowed games? I'd rather just stick with a PS3 or get a PS4. And even then, Sony is leaving that decision up to the devs. I don't see how a AAA multiplat game will have coded bullshit for one console and not the other. Sony made off like the knight in shining armor now, but time will tell.

HipHopBeats


What work? I buy it. Anyone on my list can play it. Anywhere in the USA.

The only work is you driving to your friends house or rental store to borrow, lend or rent a game. I'm done with that mess. No more rental store chasing! They never have the game I want in stock!

Avatar image for HipHopBeats
HipHopBeats

2850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#154 HipHopBeats
Member since 2011 • 2850 Posts

[QUOTE="HipHopBeats"]

Why go through all that work around just to play used or borrowed games? I'd rather just stick with a PS3 or get a PS4. And even then, Sony is leaving that decision up to the devs. I don't see how a AAA multiplat game will have coded bullshit for one console and not the other. Sony made off like the knight in shining armor now, but time will tell.

alexwatchtower


What work? I buy it. Anyone on my list can play it. Anywhere in the USA.

The only work is you driving to your friends house or rental store to borrow, lend or rent a game. I'm done with that mess. No more rental store chasing! They never have the game I want in stock!

Lol, I never rent because I'm too lazy to go through the trouble of waiting for and returning it. Ebay never fails. Simply wait a few weeks after release and get it for less. Plus 'lets play' vids are the next best thing to downloading the demo if you don't mind spiolers.

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="alexwatchtower"]

[QUOTE="HipHopBeats"]

Why go through all that work around just to play used or borrowed games? I'd rather just stick with a PS3 or get a PS4. And even then, Sony is leaving that decision up to the devs. I don't see how a AAA multiplat game will have coded bullshit for one console and not the other. Sony made off like the knight in shining armor now, but time will tell.

HipHopBeats


What work? I buy it. Anyone on my list can play it. Anywhere in the USA.

The only work is you driving to your friends house or rental store to borrow, lend or rent a game. I'm done with that mess. No more rental store chasing! They never have the game I want in stock!

Lol, I never rent because I'm too lazy to go through the trouble of waiting for and returning it. Ebay never fails. Simply wait a few weeks after release and get it for less. Plus 'lets play' vids are the next best thing to downloading the demo if you don't mind spiolers.

Ok have fun with that!

I'm lazier. I'll just put it in my share library and I'm done. And check out anyone else's share library that's sharing with me and start playing right away.

Avatar image for marinko123
marinko123

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 marinko123
Member since 2008 • 417 Posts

That's great if it's true, but publishers and sony weren't exactly happy back when you could share ps3 games with up to 5 people so they cut it to 2. Now I know with the way it was designed everybody could play the games at the same time and that's not possible with this system, but still it bumped up the limit to 10 people, it's easier to do now and they're even advertising it as a feature. I don't see publishers agreeing with this, I can only guess they will be able to limit their games from being shared.

Avatar image for Shame-usBlackley
Shame-usBlackley

18266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#157 Shame-usBlackley
Member since 2002 • 18266 Posts

What happened to the announced stipulation that you couldn't play a game for more than an hour if it wasn't being played on your original console?

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

What happened to the announced stipulation that you couldn't play a game for more than an hour if it wasn't being played on your original console?

Shame-usBlackley

You could, you just needed to check in. That's what the online check in is for. So someone can share your game library, one at a time. So it doesn't get abused and 10 friends log on, grab your game, log off for 24 hours and beat it, therby all simultaneously playing 1 copy. That's for preventing that.

They only allow you and 1 other person to simultaneously play your game. That's what the check-ins are for.

Avatar image for Shame-usBlackley
Shame-usBlackley

18266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#159 Shame-usBlackley
Member since 2002 • 18266 Posts

[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]

What happened to the announced stipulation that you couldn't play a game for more than an hour if it wasn't being played on your original console?

alexwatchtower

You could, you just needed to check in. That's what the online check in is for. So someone can share your game library, one at a time. So it doesn't get abused and 10 friends log on, grab your game, log off for 24 hours and beat it, therby all simultaneously playing 1 copy. That's for preventing that.

They only allow you and 1 other person to simultaneously play your game. That's what the check-ins are for.

So shared copies have to check in every hour?

Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#160 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

[QUOTE="alexwatchtower"]

[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]

What happened to the announced stipulation that you couldn't play a game for more than an hour if it wasn't being played on your original console?

Shame-usBlackley

You could, you just needed to check in. That's what the online check in is for. So someone can share your game library, one at a time. So it doesn't get abused and 10 friends log on, grab your game, log off for 24 hours and beat it, therby all simultaneously playing 1 copy. That's for preventing that.

They only allow you and 1 other person to simultaneously play your game. That's what the check-ins are for.

So shared copies have to check in every hour?

No, we know little to nothing about the shared copies. The 1 hour check was if you log in to a different console with your profile. 

Avatar image for ThaneKrios28
ThaneKrios28

1551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 ThaneKrios28
Member since 2013 • 1551 Posts

Why do I think of snake oil salesmen when I hear that you can share you games with 10 others?

wiouds
honestly i was thinking of the ms employee passing his wife around to 10 others............
Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]

[QUOTE="alexwatchtower"]

You could, you just needed to check in. That's what the online check in is for. So someone can share your game library, one at a time. So it doesn't get abused and 10 friends log on, grab your game, log off for 24 hours and beat it, therby all simultaneously playing 1 copy. That's for preventing that.

They only allow you and 1 other person to simultaneously play your game. That's what the check-ins are for.

S0lidSnake

So shared copies have to check in every hour?

No, we know little to nothing about the shared copies. The 1 hour check was if you log in to a different console with your profile. 

Well that's kind of what this is from your friend's point of view who is sharing your library.  They can have access to it even when you are not online.

The person who has the original copy only needs to do it every 24 hours.

Avatar image for wiouds
wiouds

6233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 wiouds
Member since 2004 • 6233 Posts

What is known about this share with 10 family members?

I find it hard that they would just allow you to pick ten people to share you rental libary with.

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

What is known about this share with 10 family members?

I find it hard that they would just allow you to pick ten people to share you rental libary with.

wiouds

Do you find it hard to believe publishers allow GameFly to "share" and charge for renting games out to everyone?

This is no different. Except they can still make money off of you. They can't when you go to GameFly. They can't encourage you to buy it. They can't offer you cool updates that will incentivize you to buy things. This is better in every way for them.

EDIT: And us.

Avatar image for wiouds
wiouds

6233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 wiouds
Member since 2004 • 6233 Posts

[QUOTE="wiouds"]

What is known about this share with 10 family members?

I find it hard that they would just allow you to pick ten people to share you rental libary with.

alexwatchtower

Do you find it hard to believe publishers allow GameFly to "share" and charge for renting games out to everyone?

This is no different. Except they can still make money off of you. They can't when you go to GameFly. They can't encourage you to buy it. They can't offer you cool updates that will incentivize you to buy things. This is better in every way for them.

It is very different from GameFly since GameFly is monthly fee system.

Avatar image for ThaneKrios28
ThaneKrios28

1551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 ThaneKrios28
Member since 2013 • 1551 Posts

[QUOTE="alexwatchtower"]

[QUOTE="wiouds"]

What is known about this share with 10 family members?

I find it hard that they would just allow you to pick ten people to share you rental libary with.

wiouds

Do you find it hard to believe publishers allow GameFly to "share" and charge for renting games out to everyone?

This is no different. Except they can still make money off of you. They can't when you go to GameFly. They can't encourage you to buy it. They can't offer you cool updates that will incentivize you to buy things. This is better in every way for them.

It is very different from GameFly since GameFly is monthly fee system.

the publisher dosent make any profit from it....... and honestly do places like ea activision and capcom need more money?
Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

What he said. Gamefly's fee has nothing to do with the publishers. They only pay for the initial rental copies. So this is actually better for publishers. You and your friends are always there, not at some offsite, ready to buy more of that publisher's stuff when you get an impulse to do so.

Besides, Xbox Live Gold has a montly fee too.

Avatar image for wiouds
wiouds

6233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 wiouds
Member since 2004 • 6233 Posts

What he said. Gamefly's fee has nothing to do with the publishers. They only pay for the initial rental copies. So this is actually better for publishers. You and your friends are always there, not at some offsite, ready to buy more of that publisher's stuff when you get an impulse to do so.

Besides, Xbox Live Gold has a montly fee too.

alexwatchtower

Risking the lost of sales is a good thing for publishers?

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="alexwatchtower"]

What he said. Gamefly's fee has nothing to do with the publishers. They only pay for the initial rental copies. So this is actually better for publishers. You and your friends are always there, not at some offsite, ready to buy more of that publisher's stuff when you get an impulse to do so.

Besides, Xbox Live Gold has a montly fee too.

wiouds

Risking the lost of sales is a good thing for publishers?

They're only risking this being worse than GameFly and used games which it won't be since they will limit to each copy being shared with a maximum of 10 people. Not unlimited used games sales. Not unlimited rentals. Get it?

And again, from what I understand publishers still have a right to opt out and I expect some additional restrictions. Some games might not be available for the sharing plan. That's up to each publisher. And there may be additional restrictions similar to rental stores, like not being able to share games day 1 on release date. Not all of it has been fully clarified.

Look into Sony's UltraViolet service. It's the same thing and it appears to be a lucrative model for movies which have less re-play value than most games do. The upside is that gamers will also encourage each other to keep their game libraries fresh and new. So buy more games. So other gamers will want to share with them.

Avatar image for marinko123
marinko123

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 marinko123
Member since 2008 • 417 Posts

So this is actually better for publishers. You and your friends are always there, not at some offsite, ready to buy more of that publisher's stuff when you get an impulse to do so.

alexwatchtower

What good does it do if they want to buy more of the publisher's stuff if the publisher will be losing out on up to 9 copies for every game they sell? Unless there will be microtransactions and tons of DLC, passes etc. for every game, I don't see this flying.

EDIT: Nevermind, I didn't see the post above in which you clarified it a bit better.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#171 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
this is crazy and it will run out of control. Sites will be setup to organize share networks between people (in case you don't have 9 friends with xbone) and people will be sharing games like crazy. THey might even have a calendar system so people arrange when and where players get to play certain. It's effectively free rental system with the only caveat being you are limited in play time. I'm naturally skeptical, so something for free with a minor drawback gives off warning lights to me. Therefore I think that at launch it won't be availabe, be avaliable on only a few games or have other restrictions in place.
Avatar image for 123pazu
123pazu

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 123pazu
Member since 2012 • 56 Posts

Remember game sharing on the PS3 used to be 5 people, and after all the publishers' bickering, Sony changed it to 2...   Now imagine if this XBOX sharing with 10 friends/family is true.....:twisted:

Avatar image for Meta-Gnostic
Meta-Gnostic

977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 Meta-Gnostic
Member since 2007 • 977 Posts

This is only good for single player games. What's the point of sharing a game with a friend when you want to play together, only one person can play it online. It will be worse than used games, how many games get resold 9 times? The avg used game get's sold 1-3 times.

Remember game sharing on the PS3 used to be 5 people, and after all the publishers' bickering, Sony changed it to 2...   Now imagine if this XBOX sharing with 10 friends/family is true.....:twisted:

123pazu


But on PS3 when you gameshared you could all play the game online or single player at the same time.

Avatar image for TheMierArmy
TheMierArmy

5699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 TheMierArmy
Member since 2003 • 5699 Posts

Sounds like a great feature but I'm guessing most publishers are going to opt out of this ...for big releases at least.

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

Sounds like a great feature but I'm guessing most publishers are going to opt out of this ...for big releases at least.

TheMierArmy

They never really opted out of Gamefly or Blockbuster though for big releases. Just for same day availability. Could be the same.

Avatar image for wiouds
wiouds

6233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 wiouds
Member since 2004 • 6233 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMierArmy"]

Sounds like a great feature but I'm guessing most publishers are going to opt out of this ...for big releases at least.

alexwatchtower

They never really opted out of Gamefly or Blockbuster though for big releases. Just for same day availability. Could be the same.

It is almost like GameFly and Block Buster can do to the store and pick up the games and then rent them out.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

I find this hard to believe. More BS from MS.

Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#178 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
I find it hard to believe that ANY publisher would want this for their game. It's essentially giving out 9 free copies of their game for every single copy sold. It makes. No. Sense. At. All.
Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

Gif would probably be too long for this one. :P

Tom Cruise explains Microsoft's deal.

Avatar image for marinko123
marinko123

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 marinko123
Member since 2008 • 417 Posts

Ignoring the fact that 9 lost sales is not good for devs much? And please don't go saying that they'll make a profit by shoving microtransactions and features of shared games behind a paywall, you've got demos for that.

Avatar image for alexwatchtower
alexwatchtower

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 alexwatchtower
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

Less Grossman takes on hardcore gamers and Sony on DRM.

Avatar image for JJ_Productions
JJ_Productions

1067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 JJ_Productions
Member since 2008 • 1067 Posts
Shouldn't this level of corporate shilling be against Gamespot's TOS? Seriously, how can we have discussions about games when we have these corporate advertisers running up and down this forum throwing arguments and counter arguments left and right. Mods you need to do something about this, the quality of the boards these last couple of days has been appalling. Get this ish together.
Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#183 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts
Shouldn't this level of corporate shilling be against Gamespot's TOS? Seriously, how can we have discussions about games when we have these corporate advertisers running up and down this forum throwing arguments and counter arguments left and right. Mods you need to do something about this, the quality of the boards these last couple of days has been appalling. Get this ish together.JJ_Productions
This clown is on a break right now, if you check his last thread. He's hard to keep up with at this point because of how all over the place he is, but if he is a paid shill, he's doing an abysmal job. I'm pretty sure he's managed to turn even more people off to Microsoft than Don Mattrick, and that's saying ALOT.
Avatar image for D3s7rUc71oN
D3s7rUc71oN

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 D3s7rUc71oN
Member since 2004 • 5180 Posts

[QUOTE="JJ_Productions"]Shouldn't this level of corporate shilling be against Gamespot's TOS? Seriously, how can we have discussions about games when we have these corporate advertisers running up and down this forum throwing arguments and counter arguments left and right. Mods you need to do something about this, the quality of the boards these last couple of days has been appalling. Get this ish together.Randolph
This clown is on a break right now, if you check his last thread. He's hard to keep up with at this point because of how all over the place he is, but if he is a paid shill, he's doing an abysmal job. I'm pretty sure he's managed to turn even more people off to Microsoft than Don Mattrick, and that's saying ALOT.

His posts are blantant MS advertisement, just looking at the first 2 pages of  PGD you ll see how many posts he has. Enough is enough . 

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#185 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts
Shouldn't this level of corporate shilling be against Gamespot's TOS? Seriously, how can we have discussions about games when we have these corporate advertisers running up and down this forum throwing arguments and counter arguments left and right. Mods you need to do something about this, the quality of the boards these last couple of days has been appalling. Get this ish together.JJ_Productions
I'm cracking down for sure. This is a game board, not an Xbox hardware board.
Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#186 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts
Wait, wasn't he suspended?
Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

This policy is baffling. So sharing a physical copy of a game is bad and should be prohibited but now we're going to allow you to digitally share one purchase with nine other people? Ok, Microsoft...