This topic is locked from further discussion.
clicketyclick
I apologize for the 'who cares.' It was an intentional response to the way you seemed to be treating my arguments.
I hope we're done now. I like debating, but I don't like it when it starts to turn into actual arguing. It puts me on edge.
lol, I didn't take offense at anything you said. You don't have to apologise. Whatever and all of what you're reading into what I wrote is wrong. [QUOTE="psychobrew"] Sure, but I think after every point (in this thread, anayway), there's an invisible asterick that says "For Me." Some people find this type of game borring, and if the player is board it's not scarry. Other people love this type of game, and that's fine, but when EA says they're bringing Dead Space to the Wii people expected Dead Space in all its glory, not another dumbed down spin off (rail games are dumbed down *to me*). I don't think people's expectations were unrealistic in what they were expecting based off the anouncement. I place the blame on EA for not making it clear that the game wasn't really Dead Space, not the people who thought it was and are now dissapointed. Well, if it is then their opinion, then I would say their opinion is uninformed. There is no way anyone - regardless of whether it's just their opinion - can make out the case that ALL on rails games are boring, not scary, or low quality. Sure it can be their opinion, but opinions can be wrong. It's just not possible that the genre determines and is the cause of the quality, interestingness, and scariness of the game. I think the first of those (quality) should be obvious. As to the other two, certain camera angles enhance the horror, but to tell you the truth, even though I had full control of my movement in RE4, it still wasn't that scary (though it was definitely interesting and very good.) Some people don't even think Dead Space was scary! They think it followed the Doom 3 monsters-popping-out-of-closet model that was boring and predictable. Genre doesn't determine and cause scariness. Sure, there are downsides to on-rails shooters that CAN (not necessarily will) lead to the game not being scary if these drawbacks aren't worked around. But there are drawbacks to all kinds of genres. Third person takes you out of the action, puts and intermediary in between you and the game in the form of your avatar, thus distancing you from the environment, pulling you out of the experience. Things aren't necessarily as scary when they're happening to Billy-Joe rather than you. But third person also has advantages too for horror games. No genre causes a game to be bad. If someone has an opinion otherwise, it is an irrational, unjustified opinion that makes no sense. That's just how it is and if that seems harsh to you, explain how a genre determines whether a game is good.I apologize for the 'who cares.' It was an intentional response to the way you seemed to be treating my arguments.
I hope we're done now. I like debating, but I don't like it when it starts to turn into actual arguing. It puts me on edge.
presto7640
On rails? Forget it EA. Bad way to change a series genre. I'll play House of the Dead: Overkill by Sega or Capcom's Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles, (where Capcom did change the genre, but gave us a heads up).nintendoboy16Why not both? (This game doesn't come out until fall).
...sigh I was hoping for something like RE4.
:| Wow EA, this is pure and utter crap. I actually trusted that you would produce a dead space like experience resi evil 4 style and you come to me with this crap? This game can be AAA and I still wouldn't even consider it. You've now hit the bottom of my, "games from devs I might buy if I have nothing else" to "Not buying any of your wii games". You say you are taking the wii serious and then you approach me with a rail shooter, wow EA wow.ActicEdge
How is a rail shooter any less "serious" than a third person shooter? I was not aware of this gaming genre heirarchy. I can understand why people might be dissapointed if they were really hoping for a third person shooter, but people are way overreacting. Really we know very little about this game and people are jumping to all kinds of conclusions. There's nothing so far that indicates this is a quick cash-in or any less effort is being put into this title. Everyone is just assuming this is a House of the Dead clone or something (not that that would be bad, either), but we don't know that. For all we know this could be a Killer7 style game, which was one of the best and most "hardcore" games of last generation.
I'm looking forward to this game because the very talented studio behind the original game is doing this as well, I like rail shooters (more than most third person shooters, save for Resident Evil 4), and the trailer looks really cool. When Dead Space Wii was originally announced I just expected a downgraded port, which I would have had very little interest in. This was a pleasant surprise.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]:| Wow EA, this is pure and utter crap. I actually trusted that you would produce a dead space like experience resi evil 4 style and you come to me with this crap? This game can be AAA and I still wouldn't even consider it. You've now hit the bottom of my, "games from devs I might buy if I have nothing else" to "Not buying any of your wii games". You say you are taking the wii serious and then you approach me with a rail shooter, wow EA wow._BlueDuck_
How is a rail shooter any less "serious" than a third person shooter? I was not aware of this gaming genre heirarchy. I can understand why people might be dissapointed if they were really hoping for a third person shooter, but people are way overreacting. Really we know very little about this game and people are jumping to all kinds of conclusions. There's nothing so far that indicates this is a quick cash-in or any less effort is being put into this title. Everyone is just assuming this is a House of the Dead clone or something (not that that would be bad, either), but we don't know that. For all we know this could be a Killer7 style game, which was one of the best and most "hardcore" games of last generation.
I'm looking forward to this game because the very talented studio behind the original game is doing this as well, I like rail shooters (more than most third person shooters, save for Resident Evil 4), and the trailer looks really cool. When Dead Space Wii was originally announced I just expected a downgraded port, which I would have had very little interest in. This was a pleasant surprise.
No, I'm done making excuses for developers pulling this **** on wii owners where they would never pull it on the other consoles. I don't consider a rail shooter as EA taking the wii seriously, how can I? They tell us Dead Space is coming to the wii, I expected a 3rd person game, they give me this? Why should I accpet this, people keep making excuses for devs who do this and its ridiculous, Capcom, Konami with Castlevania Judgement I mean come on. Point to where I said the game would be crap because I'm interested to know. The fact of the matter is that I know that EA looked at the Wii and thought, "lets turn this into a more casual friendly easier affair because its a wii game". Good game or not, I'm not going to cut EA any slack, this is utter bull and I hope this game bombs. This is coming from someone who is constantly pissed when devs close and good games get crap sales but I'm done defending these type of actions. For shame EA.
[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]:| Wow EA, this is pure and utter crap. I actually trusted that you would produce a dead space like experience resi evil 4 style and you come to me with this crap? This game can be AAA and I still wouldn't even consider it. You've now hit the bottom of my, "games from devs I might buy if I have nothing else" to "Not buying any of your wii games". You say you are taking the wii serious and then you approach me with a rail shooter, wow EA wow.ActicEdge
How is a rail shooter any less "serious" than a third person shooter? I was not aware of this gaming genre heirarchy. I can understand why people might be dissapointed if they were really hoping for a third person shooter, but people are way overreacting. Really we know very little about this game and people are jumping to all kinds of conclusions. There's nothing so far that indicates this is a quick cash-in or any less effort is being put into this title. Everyone is just assuming this is a House of the Dead clone or something (not that that would be bad, either), but we don't know that. For all we know this could be a Killer7 style game, which was one of the best and most "hardcore" games of last generation.
I'm looking forward to this game because the very talented studio behind the original game is doing this as well, I like rail shooters (more than most third person shooters, save for Resident Evil 4), and the trailer looks really cool. When Dead Space Wii was originally announced I just expected a downgraded port, which I would have had very little interest in. This was a pleasant surprise.
No, I'm done making excuses for developers pulling this **** on wii owners where they would never pull it on the other consoles. I don't consider a rail shooter as EA taking the wii seriously, how can I? They tell us Dead Space is coming to the wii, I expected a 3rd person game, they give me this? Why should I accpet this, people keep making excuses for devs who do this and its ridiculous, Capcom, Konami with Castlevania Judgement I mean come on. Point to where I said the game would be crap because I'm interested to know. The fact of the matter is that I know that EA looked at the Wii and thought, "lets turn this into a more casual friendly easier affair because its a wii game". Good game or not, I'm not going to cut EA any slack, this is utter bull and I hope this game bombs. This is coming from someone who is constantly pissed when devs close and good games get crap sales but I'm done defending these type of actions. For shame EA.
This game is being made by the creators of the original Dead Space. EA could've put them to work on Dead Space 2 instead of this, I'd say that's serious support. If a game is good that really is all that matters. It sounds like you want depth which you don't expect from this game but we really don't know enough about it to make that conclusion. Just because it's a rail shooter doesn't mean it'll be a shallow experience. It may be more Killer 7 than House of the Dead.
Def not what I was anticipating the game would be like, but it's all good.
I'll check it out most likely
O RLY?
On rails hmm?
Well- if House of the dead: Overkill can still be considered good- so can Dead Space: Extraction.
My expectations are low- but we'll see what happens.
No, I'm done making excuses for developers pulling this **** on wii owners where they would never pull it on the other consoles. I don't consider a rail shooter as EA taking the wii seriously, how can I?ActicEdge
The Wii is the only viable console option for a rail shooter, so of course this wouldn't happen on another console. Maybe EA wanted to make a rail shooter to out-do all the other games in its genre, and they chose the Dead Space franchise because it suits the genre very well.
EA is taking the Wii seriously by playing to its strengths. The Wii has become known as the platform for the out-of-the-ordinary. If you want the ordinary, you need to buy another console. You can hate that idea all you want and curse developers for sticking to it, but that's the way it is.
And yes, onrails shooters are out of the ordinary. How many of them existed on a home console before the Wii, and how many of them exist on other current consoles?
Honestly I think that's in game footage. If you look at the pipes on the sides of the areas in the sewers they still have some hard edges. If it was prerendered they probably would've fixed that.
The Killer7 gameplay idea would actually work pretty nicely. Dead Space on the other systems is still an extremely linear game, doors are usually locked until you complete a certain objective and even then its usually just restrooms off to the sid. In fact the navigation system they used, a blue light showing the direction that the player needs to go, could easily be converted into the rails the game progresses on.
The only major change in the way the game is played would be with the open areas where they would have necromorphs attack from all sides and the player wouldn't have anywhere to hide. Of course with this game being set in the mining coloney they could confine it to corridors or other tight areas and have the enemies funnel in.
Anyway that was only a minute teaser trailer. Probably just wait for more, it'll be interesting to see what they do with it.
As soon as I read it was a rail shooter my heart DROPPED! I was so excited for this game and now I get ANOTHERrail shooter.
Also just to add in.
If this game doesn't sell as well as EA thought it wold they are just going to say there aren't any hardcore gamers for the Wii.
People need to relax.
1. We have like a minutes worth of a trailer.
2. Yes, its on-rails, however, what makes it any different from RE:UC or House of The Dead: Overkill
I understand people were expecting something a la RE4:Wii Edition. What I don't understand is how people can complain about this without even knowing much about the game. We literally know nothing but that its on-rails and EA's aim with it is to change the way the genre is made. Relax and stop complaining. Seriously, you guys are acting way too whiny and childish.
People need to relax.
1. We have like a minutes worth of a trailer.
2. Yes, its on-rails, however, what makes it any different from RE:UC or House of The Dead: Overkill
I understand people were expecting something a la RE4:Wii Edition. What I don't understand is how people can complain about this without even knowing much about the game. We literally know nothing but that its on-rails and EA's aim with it is to change the way the genre is made. Relax and stop complaining. Seriously, you guys are acting way too whiny and childish.
Haziqonfire
Man don't post stuff like this! First of all, we know that the changing of the genre is all bs, they can't do that, they are just trying to sell something here. I mean, how much can you improve a on rails shooter?! True about the short trailer, actually graphics look pretty decent for a Wii game, but just knowing that it is a on rails shooter to know that they are jsut trying to sell a Wii gimmick, point and shoot, like RE:UC. I mean, you cannot really say those are special games for the Wii, just a lame excuse to make use of the pointing thing. What is really splinerting is the fact that we expected good Wii controls for a game like this, but instead we get something COMPLETELY different from what we liked of the first game, all the exploring, etc, etc. I don't know, it's like killing the game imo, I mean, I have nthing against on rails shooters, but they are never worth a 50 dollar tag. They are short, repetitive and uninspired most of the time. Shoot the heck of whatever ypu see in the screen! That is on rails... and it sucks for Dead Space Wii... completely dissapoiting. Anyway, I guess people have their right to be cherishing over this news if they are fans of on rails shooter, it's just that most of us who heard this news were really excited about the game and it turned out to be all but what we expected. But it is true, whining and all is stupid, in won't change anything, but everyone can have their say in how they feel about this, so let them be for god's sake! Just as you can say this, they can say whatever they want.
they are jsut trying to sell a Wii gimmick, point and shoot, like RE:UC. I mean, you cannot really say those are special games for the Wii, just a lame excuse to make use of the pointing thing. dan543So now the IR pointer, the most useful and promising feature of the Wii remote, is just a gimmick? The pointer is the very reason that people were wanting this to be a third-person shooter, so that it could have controls similar to RE4.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]No, I'm done making excuses for developers pulling this **** on wii owners where they would never pull it on the other consoles. I don't consider a rail shooter as EA taking the wii seriously, how can I?JordanElek
The Wii is the only viable console option for a rail shooter, so of course this wouldn't happen on another console. Maybe EA wanted to make a rail shooter to out-do all the other games in its genre, and they chose the Dead Space franchise because it suits the genre very well.
EA is taking the Wii seriously by playing to its strengths. The Wii has become known as the platform for the out-of-the-ordinary. If you want the ordinary, you need to buy another console. You can hate that idea all you want and curse developers for sticking to it, but that's the way it is.
And yes, onrails shooters are out of the ordinary. How many of them existed on a home console before the Wii, and how many of them exist on other current consoles?
1) Any console can have on rail shooters, the only reason there aren't many of them is because they aren't popular plain and simple. OUT DO!?!?! are you kidding ROFL seriously this is a joke. Sorry Dead Space would be much better with third person Wii controls like RE:4. House of the Dead suits rails NOT Dead Space. 2) Seriously hahahahahaha. Ea's lineup for Wii is LAME! Ea's multi plat games on Wii are horribly gimped; Madden's online is glitchy, laggy and unplayable to put it simple, the 360 and PS3 get a Legendary 09 Edition for Madden while Wii gets a hokey All-Play feature that no one uses. Maybe third party devs should try ORDINARY+QUALITY for once on Wii, it works on PS3 and 360, it works for many first party Nintendo franchises. if they want to try something new thats fine, just make sure there wont be obvious backlash. 3) they're out of the ordinary now days because it isn't 1995. They don't exist on many consoles now days because it isn't a popular genre. Above all I as well as many Wii owners are sick and tired of the bait and switch junk third party devs are pulling on Wii. -Wii isn't getting RE:5, it's getting RE:UC, but it's on rails. -Wii will get a Castlevania game, but it's a fighter not action adventure. -Sorry Dead Space is the last stray for many wii owners.1) Any console can have on rail shootersumcommonThe PS3 has ONE light gun shooter and the 360 has none.
the only reason there aren't many of them is because they aren't popular plain and simple.umcommonYeah. It's got nothing to do with the fact that you need a huge and incredibly imprecise peripheral in order to play rail shooters on any other console, unlike the Wii, which comes with IR pointer capability out of the box, which is hundreds and hundreds of times more accurate and easier to program for than a light gun peripherals.
House of the Dead suits rails NOT Dead Space.umcommonHow do you know this if you haven't played the game or read a single review?
MaddenumcommonHere's a little secret: If you stop buying horrible games from awful franchises, you won't have to complain about them online.
3) they're out of the ordinary now days because it isn't 1995.umcommonThe only genre that has effectively dissapeared are text adventures, and even that can be debated. Genres don't just magically dissapear.
They don't exist on many consoles now days because it isn't a popular genre.umcommonIf you like popular games, go buy 10 copies of Wii Fit. It doesn't get any more popular than that, champ.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]No, I'm done making excuses for developers pulling this **** on wii owners where they would never pull it on the other consoles. I don't consider a rail shooter as EA taking the wii seriously, how can I?JordanElek
The Wii is the only viable console option for a rail shooter, so of course this wouldn't happen on another console. Maybe EA wanted to make a rail shooter to out-do all the other games in its genre, and they chose the Dead Space franchise because it suits the genre very well.
EA is taking the Wii seriously by playing to its strengths. The Wii has become known as the platform for the out-of-the-ordinary. If you want the ordinary, you need to buy another console. You can hate that idea all you want and curse developers for sticking to it, but that's the way it is.
And yes, onrails shooters are out of the ordinary. How many of them existed on a home console before the Wii, and how many of them exist on other current consoles?
I don't care how many rail shooters exist on other consoles -- I simply don't want any. The Wii has perfect controls for FPS and TPS and there are many people who want these games on the Wii because of this. PS3 and 360 controlers are plain rotten for shooters. Right now, we can have the controls but not the games or the games but not the controls. I guess there's always the PC. I don't agree that if Wii owners want ordinary games they should buy another console -- it would be different if MS or Sony (if it were less expensive) had motion controls. The bottom line is the Wii needs more games in general. I do hope the Wii version of Dead Space does well for those who are still excited about it, but I think EA is shooting themselves in the foot.Speaking of which how many people were mad about RE:UC being on rails: a lot. How did RE:UC sell in comparison to it's superior RE:4 counterpart... poor. IF RE:UC would of been made in the same fashion as RE:4 I bet it would of sold over 2 million. How mad people are doesn't say anything about the quality of the game, and neither does the number of sales (though sometimes that can be an indication).[QUOTE="umcommon"][QUOTE="loco145"]Come on. Re:UC require tons more skill than the original Dead Space did.JordanElek
Umbrella Chronicles is a high-quality game that also happens to be very fun. It's not like any other game in the RE series, but that isn't always a bad thing.
People are crying "cash in" and "lazy" and "casual game that requires no skill." This game could turn out to be a well-made, high-quality, fun game, and it sounds like a lot of people here will pass it up just because it isn't what they wanted it to be. If this didn't have the Dead Space name attached, would we be seeing the same reactions? I can understand disappointment, but the utter rage and language that demeans the game itself just screams overreaction.
Even if the game had a name other than Dead Space, it'd still be more or less a HotD 3.0 for the Wii. Sure the game could indeed turn out to be a fantastic experience and there could be factors that differentiate the two, but in the end it is another on-rails shooter and cliche on top of what we already have compared to what it could've been if they had taken a different route - which can be safely said as the latter is what the majority of us here expected to our own disappointment. What many Wii owners have been thirsting for is a wider variety and selection in titles with high production values and quality polish instead of more of the same, so while I'm not too disappointed myself as my choices for gaming isn't limited to the Wii, I can somewhat understand the "utter rage and over-reaction" coming from Wii exclusive owners who've become quick to brush it off as a "lazy cash-in" given the history of what the console itself has become quite notorious for up to this point.
Guys, im as disopointed as the next guy at the news that deadspace for the wii is a on rails shooter. see my post on page 2. but lets not all wright it off from the get go. these are the same guys who did the first deadspace iirc and that says alot. they have tallent for sure. sure its very posable that this is going to be a quick cash in, something relativly easy and quick to make just to milk the Wii owners who alot of are imho starving for a "core" or "mature" themed game. but its just about as posable that these guys are going to do a good job. i mean JUST becuase its a on rails FPS does not automaticly make it a instant fail. if they realy put some effort into it and do some cool things, set the right tone and dont just make it genaric moweing down of hords of necro's and actualy treat it like a story driven game it could be good. Take a wait and see attatude. And like i said im pretty sceptical my self. But dont make up your minds untill we know more. At least wait till some reviewers get a chance to play it and give us a proper hands on preview.
And ps to who ever made the statement about re4 and deadspace not selling well......i give you a face palm.
Thats what I was hoping for, the graphics in that trailer were great. I'm not sure about the on-rails thing but it could be decent.If that video has in game graphics then woooo that's some nice stuff going on there.
And this is exactly what I hoped it would be and what I pray the Wii gets more of, same universe different stories.
Phil
Nomad0404
Wow, you guys remind me of when Nintendo announce Metroid Prime going to be a First Person game instead of a side scroller and everyone was like "it's gonna fail" "I'm not gonna buy it" But it turned out to be one of the best game of all time, now I'm not saying that Dead Space Extraction will be one of the best game of all time, but you can't judge a game unless you have actually played it or have enough information on it. I admit that knowing that it is a rail shooter sort of let me down a little, but that doesn't mean that it's gonna be a terrible game or another boring rail shooter, Prime wasn't just "another First Person shooter" either, it's an adventure. There's plenty of time before the game releases, and you can all judge the game after EA reveals more info about, right now there's not much to say.King-gamerThat's different though. The game hadn't been on a console since SNES, gaming evolved into 3D during N64 so that was expected. Plus FPS (FPA) games are popular. Sorry but this would be like a dev taking a great 360 game like Halo, Gears, etc and making it on rails........ no one would buy it and they would get huge backlash, kinda like what EA is getting right now and rightfully so.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]No, I'm done making excuses for developers pulling this **** on wii owners where they would never pull it on the other consoles. I don't consider a rail shooter as EA taking the wii seriously, how can I?JordanElek
The Wii is the only viable console option for a rail shooter, so of course this wouldn't happen on another console. Maybe EA wanted to make a rail shooter to out-do all the other games in its genre, and they chose the Dead Space franchise because it suits the genre very well.
EA is taking the Wii seriously by playing to its strengths. The Wii has become known as the platform for the out-of-the-ordinary. If you want the ordinary, you need to buy another console. You can hate that idea all you want and curse developers for sticking to it, but that's the way it is.
And yes, onrails shooters are out of the ordinary. How many of them existed on a home console before the Wii, and how many of them exist on other current consoles?
Dude, I bought a wii for out of the ordinary ideas, I bought Z-dub for Goodness sakes, a rail shooter is not out of the ordinary, this is EA being lazy. Without turning this into a SW comment, crap like a spin off in another genre would not be pulled on the other consoles but is always pulled out on the wii and people always defend it. I won't question why but don't expect me to conform to your way of thinking.
On rails isn't out of the ordinary, Zack and wiki is out of the ordinary. On rails is just something not done on consoles but since consoles aren't the only form of gaming, you have no point. Unless you know, I haven't played tons of arcade games on rails.
You can believe EA is taking the wii seriously if you want, I however know better than to consider an on rails version of an open world 3rd person shooter serious suppot. You'll need a better argument then out of the ordinary and Dead Space (a 3rd person horror game for god sakes) to make a point about this issue.
On rails isn't out of the ordinary, Zack and wiki is out of the ordinary. On rails is just something not done on consoles but since consoles aren't the only form of gaming, you have no point.ActicEdge
You could say the same for point and click adventures. The fact is that neither genre is established in the console market whatsoever, and it isn't crazy for EA to want to tap into the point-and-shoot genre on the Wii if they think they can take the top spot. It's actually a pretty smart move.
It's hard for me to argue about the what-ifs in Dead Space as a third-person shooter since I haven't played the original. There could be many reasons for them to think that it wouldn't translate well enough to be a big seller on the Wii. It could be that they're just waiting to bring the next multiplat third-person shooter installment of the franchise to all three consoles, rather than porting the first one to the Wii or making an entirely new one as a Wii-exclusive.
I've said it again and again over the past few days.... It's fine to be disappointed, but we have to look at the game that's actually being made. So far, for what it's trying to be, it looks like it has some potential. Just because this game is on rails doesn't mean that the Wii won't see a third-person installment in the future, if EA decides that the market is ready for it. People seem to be taking this game's direction as EA saying "Screw you Wii owners!" That doesn't make any sense. They're making a business decision. We'll have to wait and see if it was actually a good one or not.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]On rails isn't out of the ordinary, Zack and wiki is out of the ordinary. On rails is just something not done on consoles but since consoles aren't the only form of gaming, you have no point.JordanElek
You could say the same for point and click adventures. The fact is that neither genre is established in the console market whatsoever, and it isn't crazy for EA to want to tap into the point-and-shoot genre on the Wii if they think they can take the top spot. It's actually a pretty smart move.
It's hard for me to argue about the what-ifs in Dead Space as a third-person shooter since I haven't played the original. There could be many reasons for them to think that it wouldn't translate well enough to be a big seller on the Wii. It could be that they're just waiting to bring the next multiplat third-person shooter installment of the franchise to all three consoles, rather than porting the first one to the Wii or making an entirely new one as a Wii-exclusive.
I've said it again and again over the past few days.... It's fine to be disappointed, but we have to look at the game that's actually being made. So far, for what it's trying to be, it looks like it has some potential. Just because this game is on rails doesn't mean that the Wii won't see a third-person installment in the future, if EA decides that the market is ready for it. People seem to be taking this game's direction as EA saying "Screw you Wii owners!" That doesn't make any sense. They're making a business decision. We'll have to wait and see if it was actually a good one or not.
I'm not arguing that, this isn't a "hate EA because they made a rail shooter". I never once stated that. This is EA not being clear on there intentions? The game will probably be good, I don't care, that's not my point. EA made this game seem like it would be big, the game wii owners had been finally waiting for, and they lied. That is why people are disappointed. It doesn't matter what EA does after this, the damage has already been done. Or am I wrong?
This is EA not being clear on there intentions? The game will probably be good, I don't care, that's not my point. EA made this game seem like it would be big, the game wii owners had been finally waiting for, and they lied. That is why people are disappointed. It doesn't matter what EA does after this, the damage has already been done. Or am I wrong?ActicEdgeSee my post in Jaysonguy's thread. EA didn't make the game seem like that at all. All we got was a PR statement that said the Wii would get a Dead Space game of the "same quality and fear factor" as the original game. The hype was built by (possibly) editorialists and (definitely) gamers.
See my post in Jaysonguy's thread. EA didn't make the game seem like that at all. All we got was a PR statement that said the Wii would get a Dead Space game of the "same quality and fear factor" as the original game. The hype was built by (possibly) editorialists and (definitely) gamers.[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]This is EA not being clear on there intentions? The game will probably be good, I don't care, that's not my point. EA made this game seem like it would be big, the game wii owners had been finally waiting for, and they lied. That is why people are disappointed. It doesn't matter what EA does after this, the damage has already been done. Or am I wrong?JordanElek
There was a lot more to it than that but like my previous post said, forget it, I'm done talking about this.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment