Nintendo going to start charging for online play

  • 144 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for darkmark91
darkmark91

3047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 darkmark91
Member since 2006 • 3047 Posts
Brawl better be free!!!
Avatar image for Wet_Sand
Wet_Sand

1504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 Wet_Sand
Member since 2007 • 1504 Posts
I'll stick with Live...
Avatar image for blingchu55
blingchu55

3098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 blingchu55
Member since 2007 • 3098 Posts

I'll stick with Live...Wet_Sand

we dont know what it is yet. You could be like some guy in 1996 who said I'll stick with mario 64 when they announcd 3-D Zelda Project

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts
Hey, I know what this means. WII WILL SOON BE GETTING A PHANTASY STAR ONLINE GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YAY!!!!!!!!!! Sucks that you have to pay for online play but hey, whatever.
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#105 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts

[QUOTE="Wet_Sand"]I'll stick with Live...blingchu55

we dont know what it is yet. You could be like some guy in 1996 who said I'll stick with mario 64 when they announcd 3-D Zelda Project

besides that not everyone just wants to play shooters

Avatar image for Tokyo90
Tokyo90

2024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Tokyo90
Member since 2007 • 2024 Posts

was bound to happen. now its only a matter of time until sony starts charging.lethal18

they better not

Avatar image for Wii60Joe
Wii60Joe

370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Wii60Joe
Member since 2008 • 370 Posts

Link.

During a Game Developers Conference session called "Planning the Wii Menu" today, Nintendo's Takashi Aoyama announced a new Pay to Play program. This will be a new version of the Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection (NWFC). Aoyama explained that NWFC will remain a free service, but forthcoming experiences will require users to pay a fee to enjoy. These services will fall under the new NWFC: Pay to Play program. Games that utilize the new service will feature a logo similar to the one used for NWFC but is orange and reads Pay to Play at the bottom.

The online is still free. You just pay if you want extra content. You people are tripping for nothing.

m_machine024

lol i know ppl dont worry about it

Avatar image for WiiMan21
WiiMan21

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#108 WiiMan21
Member since 2007 • 8191 Posts
If it means Dl content, voice chat, and something like an xbox live profile kinda thing, then I'm all in!, As long as its under the monthly payment for Wow.....
Avatar image for deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38

16051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
Member since 2004 • 16051 Posts

augh....

I hope I do not like a lot of this titles :lol:

Of those included at least I guess we could expect more/nicer features for online gaming :)

People wake up!!! there will never be a voice chat and full stop! stop day draming hello stop day dreaming! its not gonna hapend geez! people will argue curse, kids will scream and cry and parents will bann and sell the wii's so there will never be a voice chat.nezardm

go to nintendo.com there is a feature already to control "open chat" in parental control... how would it work???... do not know. Maybe it would avoid kids entering adults games.. maybe you would just chat with friend on your list (which for kids wshould be control by their parents, if parents actually care, there is parental control for that) Does this implied we can expect chat voice soon??? NO. But do not say that the reason is "bc it would affect kids" N already have a way to avoid pr try to avoid this. Why then we do not have it yet?? Ask N :D

Avatar image for TwilightSoilder
TwilightSoilder

1831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 TwilightSoilder
Member since 2007 • 1831 Posts
WHAT!?!?!? Now they're charging us for online!? Well, they better make some BIG changes with the online or I'm through with nintendo. :evil:
Avatar image for deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38

16051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#112 deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
Member since 2004 • 16051 Posts
PPL!!!! stop getting so pissed already... they ARE NOT going to charge for online, just some especifics games.. and the odds are that MK (N title) woud be free....
Avatar image for blingchu55
blingchu55

3098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 blingchu55
Member since 2007 • 3098 Posts

im going to bed now,and this had better be clearere when i wake up :evil:

you have 3 hours!

Avatar image for Cowmanik
Cowmanik

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Cowmanik
Member since 2007 • 506 Posts

While I agree with you comment, Jordan, but I believe this might not end up being the case. I have a bit of a funny feeling that big name game companys like EA and Activision will surely abuse this new feature. I can almost-guarantee that they will.icarus212001

That's a legitimate concern. I'm not worrying about it too much yet, I'll wait until I get all of the details.

Avatar image for deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38

16051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#115 deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
Member since 2004 • 16051 Posts

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]Did anyone actually read the announcement?JordanElek

I'm convinced that at least 90% of the people who saw the article read no further than the title of it. It's extremely frustrating, considering the article was seven sentences long. Too many people are getting angry without even knowing what they're angry about.

To those were are angry and do know what you're angry about, I applaud you. Complain to your heart's desire. But everyone else, who thinks that Nintendo has announced a blanket charge for internet use on the Wii, take thirty seconds and read the article. Then we can debate.

Thank you... I thougt I was the only one frustated with this...

Do members even read the stuff bf going all berserk?? I mean at least read the whole post of the TC. Even there you can READ pay and play for SOME games.... especifics games....

and like someone already pointed out... now that I think about it I do not even have to worry is pry gonna be for MMO games.... so I may no need to pay this for any game :D:D (me happy :P )

EDIT: I read some others post on this last page... and thx god there are a couple that understood what I (we) did.. So OK.... online still free... nothing to be like "headless chicken" running around yet.

Avatar image for zaku101
zaku101

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#118 zaku101
Member since 2005 • 4641 Posts

One word "GREED".

Nintendo, from day 1 was making a profit on Wii sales. They have money to burn. they can afford to provide a free service. Guys, just because you don't like friend codes and the crappy online that is currently provided doesn't mean you have to pay for it. Nintendo can easily send an update an fix this for free. They are trying to charge now because they think they could do that and you will accept it.Judging from the posts, you guys are willing to bend over, so they are right.

pjoasil

The only thing I dislike about Nintendos greed is that they charged $250 for the Wii. I mean come on, the specs on the Wii are very similar to the GC. The Wii has a better CPU yes but the graphic cards are almost the same making the CPU useless. This can be seen in most games that look visually the same as most GC games or worse. The new Mario kart game looks no different then the 5 year old DD. It also laks AA which makes the new graphic card and cpu appear useless on the Wii. I mean come on the N64 had AA on 90% of it's games why don't we see it on a system how many years ahead of it?

The price of making a

Wii:$150 Retail $250 The DVD reader is what cost the most on it.

360: $330 Retail 399.00

Ps3: $840 Retail $599.00

Avatar image for ninjavelmor
ninjavelmor

1053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 ninjavelmor
Member since 2004 • 1053 Posts
^ to the poster above. if you didn't realize it before, nintendo is a company, out to make money. i don;t see why you are complaining about a $250 price, if its to much, then don't buy it, no one is forcing you to. with the xbox360, you have to spend $100 for the wireless adapater, again, you don;t have to buy it if you don't want to.

with the pay to play thing, i think more then half the people on this topic didn't even read the article. they never said, online gaming was now going to be fee based, they said certain things would be fee based. xbox live does it. why can't other compaines do.
Avatar image for skanjos
skanjos

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 skanjos
Member since 2006 • 647 Posts
[QUOTE="JordanElek"]

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]Did anyone actually read the announcement?chang_1910

I'm convinced that at least 90% of the people who saw the article read no further than the title of it. It's extremely frustrating, considering the article was seven sentences long. Too many people are getting angry without even knowing what they're angry about.

To those were are angry and do know what you're angry about, I applaud you. Complain to your heart's desire. But everyone else, who thinks that Nintendo has announced a blanket charge for internet use on the Wii, take thirty seconds and read the article. Then we can debate.

Thank you... I thougt I was the only one frustated with this...

Do members even read the stuff bf going all berserk?? I mean at least read the whole post of the TC. Even there you can READ pay and play for SOME games.... especifics games....

and like someone already pointed out... now that I think about it I do not even have to worry is pry gonna be for MMO games.... so I may no need to pay this for any game :D:D (me happy :P )

EDIT: I read some others post on this last page... and thx god there are a couple that understood what I (we) did.. So OK.... online still free... nothing to be like "headless chicken" running around yet.

it seems you dont get it why many of wii owners are frustrated.i bought the console with free online games,i dont play shooters(if i did i would buy a 360),so the games that i want to play online are ssbb,mario kart and mmorgs(i am a mmorg fan and waiting for animal crossing mmo,pokemon mmo,maplestory and other)now plz tell me that nintendo didnt screw me.......with this announcment they basicaly say that the mmos on the wii will have a monthly fee......that screws mmo fans...

so in the end dont say that people didnt read the article and stuff.THIS IS TRULY IS A HIT UNDER THE BELT FOR MANY OF WII OWNERS and i am mad.

Avatar image for Satanshelper
Satanshelper

2812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Satanshelper
Member since 2006 • 2812 Posts
Hmm, if I have to start paying for my Wii's online I don't think I'll even bother with it, god Nintendo really can annoy me sometimes...
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#122 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
[QUOTE="pjoasil"]

One word "GREED".

Nintendo, from day 1 was making a profit on Wii sales. They have money to burn. they can afford to provide a free service. Guys, just because you don't like friend codes and the crappy online that is currently provided doesn't mean you have to pay for it. Nintendo can easily send an update an fix this for free. They are trying to charge now because they think they could do that and you will accept it.Judging from the posts, you guys are willing to bend over, so they are right.

zaku101

The only thing I dislike about Nintendos greed is that they charged $250 for the Wii. I mean come on, the specs on the Wii are very similar to the GC. The Wii has a better CPU yes but the graphic cards are almost the same making the CPU useless. This can be seen in most games that look visually the same as most GC games or worse. The new Mario kart game looks no different then the 5 year old DD. It also laks AA which makes the new graphic card and cpu appear useless on the Wii. I mean come on the N64 had AA on 90% of it's games why don't we see it on a system how many years ahead of it?

The price of making a

Wii:$150 Retail $250 The DVD reader is what cost the most on it.

360: $330 Retail 399.00

Ps3: $840 Retail $599.00

supossedly double the GC and Xbox and you say its overpriced....also its selling out everywhere so obviously its not overpriced. It has a tone of features that are worth its price.

Avatar image for TheMinority16
TheMinority16

597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 TheMinority16
Member since 2007 • 597 Posts
I don't really mind paying for Wii Online, as long as it isn't too expensive. And I'm sure all of us are expecting a better online experience.
Avatar image for yowvapa2
yowvapa2

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 yowvapa2
Member since 2008 • 209 Posts
Zaku, stop bringing up console vs. console discussions on the Nintendo Wii forum. This is not System Wars.
Avatar image for CPrince1000
CPrince1000

744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 CPrince1000
Member since 2007 • 744 Posts
They probally won't make you pay for actually playing online, it will most likly be extra's, such as better Karts, Maps, & New Features etc. (downloadable content)
Avatar image for soccerslim79
soccerslim79

252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 soccerslim79
Member since 2005 • 252 Posts

there better be better elements such as voice chat, rankings, and maybe even acheivements

at the moment the only game id pay for online is brawl

Avatar image for CartoonProphet
CartoonProphet

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 CartoonProphet
Member since 2008 • 38 Posts

I'm not too concerned. It probably has to do with DLC and MMO's. The DLC I can't see happening for a while, or at least until the big N decides we can have more storage... somehow, or something. :P And MMO's take servers, servers cost money, money doesn't grow on trees so gamers pay for server costs through subscription fees. That is unless you want to play a Moderately Multiplayer Online game. I'm sure WoW would be fun with only 32 PC's running off some random guy's Wii as the server (< obvious sarcasm).

Even XBL had this with Final Fantasy 11 and Phantasy Star Online. Except there you pay, Internet connection, XBL subscription and the subscription to the game. And that's why I don't play mumorpuhgers; they're wallet abuse!

Just relax, there's no concrete news as to what this all means yet. Besides: jumping to conclusions doesn't burn any calories... it's a pointless exercise.

Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
I think this is great news. Hopefully with Pay and Play Nintendo will finaly implement things like Voice Chat and Freind Code sharing with strangers, online leader boards and ranks, ect. I just hope they don't make it excessively expensive.
Avatar image for epayps2
epayps2

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 epayps2
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjavelmor"]^ to the poster above. if you didn't realize it before, nintendo is a company, out to make money. i don;t see why you are complaining about a $250 price, if its to much, then don't buy it, no one is forcing you to. with the xbox360, you have to spend $100 for the wireless adapater, again, you don;t have to buy it if you don't want to.

with the pay to play thing, i think more then half the people on this topic didn't even read the article. they never said, online gaming was now going to be fee based, they said certain things would be fee based. xbox live does it. why can't other compaines do.
zaku101

I am just saying that's a lot for a system thats weaker then the 7 year old Xbox in horse power and no hard drive. $30 more you could just get a 360. Now Microsoft has done a great job in price. They have made the 360 almost the same price as the last gen ps2 with 10X the power of that system.

Where did you get that info?
Avatar image for XenoLair
XenoLair

4758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

#131 XenoLair
Member since 2006 • 4758 Posts
If its only that, than good.... cuz i up to now, NONE of the online games are good enough to pay for the online play. Maybe a MMORPG would be nice. ... but im still not paying to play... so what i pay my ISP ALOT of cash for a crap connection and now im gonna pay Microsoft for XBLive to get connection losses, no thank you Bill G. Ah, good old PC games where we could play online for free.. on good servers ^^
Avatar image for ninjavelmor
ninjavelmor

1053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132 ninjavelmor
Member since 2004 • 1053 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjavelmor"]^ to the poster above. if you didn't realize it before, nintendo is a company, out to make money. i don;t see why you are complaining about a $250 price, if its to much, then don't buy it, no one is forcing you to. with the xbox360, you have to spend $100 for the wireless adapater, again, you don;t have to buy it if you don't want to.

with the pay to play thing, i think more then half the people on this topic didn't even read the article. they never said, online gaming was now going to be fee based, they said certain things would be fee based. xbox live does it. why can't other compaines do.
zaku101

I am just saying that's a lot for a system thats weaker then the 7 year old Xbox in horse power and no hard drive. $30 more you could just get a 360. Now Microsoft has done a great job in price. They have made the 360 almost the same price as the last gen ps2 with 10X the power of that system.



yeah and the xb360 is also riddled with problems, about every xb360 owner has had to buy a second one
Avatar image for PeterPerson
PeterPerson

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#133 PeterPerson
Member since 2007 • 3627 Posts

hmm... cool.

online will probably be better now. hooray!

Avatar image for sman3579
sman3579

21174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#134 sman3579
Member since 2008 • 21174 Posts
As long as its not Mario Kart Wii, SSBB, Animal Crossing Wii, or any other wi-fi game I want im fine.
Avatar image for zaku101
zaku101

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#135 zaku101
Member since 2005 • 4641 Posts
[QUOTE="zaku101"]

[QUOTE="ninjavelmor"]^ to the poster above. if you didn't realize it before, nintendo is a company, out to make money. i don;t see why you are complaining about a $250 price, if its to much, then don't buy it, no one is forcing you to. with the xbox360, you have to spend $100 for the wireless adapater, again, you don;t have to buy it if you don't want to.

with the pay to play thing, i think more then half the people on this topic didn't even read the article. they never said, online gaming was now going to be fee based, they said certain things would be fee based. xbox live does it. why can't other compaines do.
ninjavelmor

I am just saying that's a lot for a system thats weaker then the 7 year old Xbox in horse power and no hard drive. $30 more you could just get a 360. Now Microsoft has done a great job in price. They have made the 360 almost the same price as the last gen ps2 with 10X the power of that system.



yeah and the xb360 is also riddled with problems, about every xb360 owner has had to buy a second one

Every owner is covered for 3 years free of charge.

Avatar image for zaku101
zaku101

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#136 zaku101
Member since 2005 • 4641 Posts
[QUOTE="zaku101"]

[QUOTE="ninjavelmor"]^ to the poster above. if you didn't realize it before, nintendo is a company, out to make money. i don;t see why you are complaining about a $250 price, if its to much, then don't buy it, no one is forcing you to. with the xbox360, you have to spend $100 for the wireless adapater, again, you don;t have to buy it if you don't want to.

with the pay to play thing, i think more then half the people on this topic didn't even read the article. they never said, online gaming was now going to be fee based, they said certain things would be fee based. xbox live does it. why can't other compaines do.
epayps2

I am just saying that's a lot for a system thats weaker then the 7 year old Xbox in horse power and no hard drive. $30 more you could just get a 360. Now Microsoft has done a great job in price. They have made the 360 almost the same price as the last gen ps2 with 10X the power of that system.

Where did you get that info?

Which part of it?

If your talking about the specs heres a link.

Link

More Deeper into it, Link

Your pretty much paying for a system weaker then the 7 year old Xbox that sold for $250 with a built in hard drive. That's why I find the price tag of $250 too much.

Avatar image for ninjavelmor
ninjavelmor

1053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#137 ninjavelmor
Member since 2004 • 1053 Posts
[QUOTE="ninjavelmor"][QUOTE="zaku101"]

[QUOTE="ninjavelmor"]^ to the poster above. if you didn't realize it before, nintendo is a company, out to make money. i don;t see why you are complaining about a $250 price, if its to much, then don't buy it, no one is forcing you to. with the xbox360, you have to spend $100 for the wireless adapater, again, you don;t have to buy it if you don't want to.

with the pay to play thing, i think more then half the people on this topic didn't even read the article. they never said, online gaming was now going to be fee based, they said certain things would be fee based. xbox live does it. why can't other compaines do.
zaku101

I am just saying that's a lot for a system thats weaker then the 7 year old Xbox in horse power and no hard drive. $30 more you could just get a 360. Now Microsoft has done a great job in price. They have made the 360 almost the same price as the last gen ps2 with 10X the power of that system.



yeah and the xb360 is also riddled with problems, about every xb360 owner has had to buy a second one

Every owner is covered for 3 years free of charge.



yeah, now they are, but it didn't used to be that way
Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts
Can you guys take your conversation of the 360 to PMs? Your tangent has nothing to do with this thread... Thanks.
Avatar image for fraz1776
fraz1776

2269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 fraz1776
Member since 2006 • 2269 Posts
I don't see this being a problem if they improve the service for the pay to play games, if they are still using the bare-bones online then I won't be online.
Avatar image for deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38

16051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#141 deactivated-62cbf5c22ef38
Member since 2004 • 16051 Posts
[QUOTE="chang_1910"][QUOTE="JordanElek"]

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]Did anyone actually read the announcement?skanjos

I'm convinced that at least 90% of the people who saw the article read no further than the title of it. It's extremely frustrating, considering the article was seven sentences long. Too many people are getting angry without even knowing what they're angry about.

To those were are angry and do know what you're angry about, I applaud you. Complain to your heart's desire. But everyone else, who thinks that Nintendo has announced a blanket charge for internet use on the Wii, take thirty seconds and read the article. Then we can debate.

Thank you... I thougt I was the only one frustated with this...

Do members even read the stuff bf going all berserk?? I mean at least read the whole post of the TC. Even there you can READ pay and play for SOME games.... especifics games....

and like someone already pointed out... now that I think about it I do not even have to worry is pry gonna be for MMO games.... so I may no need to pay this for any game :D:D (me happy :P )

EDIT: I read some others post on this last page... and thx god there are a couple that understood what I (we) did.. So OK.... online still free... nothing to be like "headless chicken" running around yet.

it seems you dont get it why many of wii owners are frustrated.i bought the console with free online games,i dont play shooters(if i did i would buy a 360),so the games that i want to play online are ssbb,mario kart and mmorgs(i am a mmorg fan and waiting for animal crossing mmo,pokemon mmo,maplestory and other)now plz tell me that nintendo didnt screw me.......with this announcment they basicaly say that the mmos on the wii will have a monthly fee......that screws mmo fans...

so in the end dont say that people didnt read the article and stuff.THIS IS TRULY IS A HIT UNDER THE BELT FOR MANY OF WII OWNERS and i am mad.

my appologies if I have offended you.. You have the right to be mad. My comment is for those that are mad bc ONLINE is NOT going to be FREE (which is not true, which means they did not read the article)

In you case you are mad bc the games that you like are those that may end up getting the Fee. You can get as mad as you want. Rant away my friend :) (and sorry dude... about you having to pay to play... )

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

Did anyone actually read the announcement?

BRAWL, MARIO KART WII, AND

ANY GAME WITH THE

BLUE WIFI LOGOARE

FREE TO PLAY ONLINE!!!

Pay and Play is for certain games, and will have a different logo, the general Wi-Fi service is still free. We do not know what games will use the service, nor how much it costs or what comes with it.

metroidfood

Perhaps a bump then. (again unlikely)

Avatar image for Cooleo1010
Cooleo1010

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Cooleo1010
Member since 2007 • 118 Posts

There will still be our normal bare Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection, so no need to be so outraged....
Also if you read it instead of the title you would have realized that you only pay for some features to play, like most people already said, like voice chat and no Friend Codes but that just speculation.
And I think you pay with Wii points, but I'm only guessing that part.

Avatar image for xgamer40
xgamer40

3913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#144 xgamer40
Member since 2006 • 3913 Posts
As long as they remove friend codes, add rankings, and add voice chat WITH random people, I'll be fine with it, I pay for xbox live no problem so I can easily cough up a few dollars for Nintendo online, just as long as they satisfy me with enough to keep me paying :)
Avatar image for dirtymurdy123
dirtymurdy123

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 dirtymurdy123
Member since 2007 • 169 Posts
i would much rather pay a monthly charge for all games than just certain ones....it seem like a hastle. if i rented a game i would have to subscribe for a month when i woyuld only have it for a week. i rather just pay one charge
Avatar image for Mike1978Smith
Mike1978Smith

2012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Mike1978Smith
Member since 2005 • 2012 Posts

This is awesome news! Now Ninty will have a venue for harcore online gamers.

I mean, think about it: Ninty wants gaming to be safe for kids, but there's alot of grumbling from many gamers who want more out of the online experience. The other consoles don't have problems with friends codes or lack of voice chat or lack of being able to communicate to a stranger. By introducing a pay to play program, they can step up on the online aspect and still keep kids safe. How does it keep kids safe? Because kids don't have credit cards.

It's just a way for Ninty to seperate the kids from the more hardcore online gamers and deliver the correct experience to each. A way for them to have their cake and eat it too, so to speak. I'm pumped.

Avatar image for crankypinoy
crankypinoy

170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#147 crankypinoy
Member since 2007 • 170 Posts
well this was going to happen sooner or later...hopefully they put the money to good use
Avatar image for santiagochile
santiagochile

1717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 santiagochile
Member since 2005 • 1717 Posts
[QUOTE="zaku101"][QUOTE="pjoasil"]

One word "GREED".

Nintendo, from day 1 was making a profit on Wii sales. They have money to burn. they can afford to provide a free service. Guys, just because you don't like friend codes and the crappy online that is currently provided doesn't mean you have to pay for it. Nintendo can easily send an update an fix this for free. They are trying to charge now because they think they could do that and you will accept it.Judging from the posts, you guys are willing to bend over, so they are right.

Cyber-

The only thing I dislike about Nintendos greed is that they charged $250 for the Wii. I mean come on, the specs on the Wii are very similar to the GC. The Wii has a better CPU yes but the graphic cards are almost the same making the CPU useless. This can be seen in most games that look visually the same as most GC games or worse. The new Mario kart game looks no different then the 5 year old DD. It also laks AA which makes the new graphic card and cpu appear useless on the Wii. I mean come on the N64 had AA on 90% of it's games why don't we see it on a system how many years ahead of it?

The price of making a

Wii:$150 Retail $250 The DVD reader is what cost the most on it.

360: $330 Retail 399.00

Ps3: $840 Retail $599.00

supossedly double the GC and Xbox and you say its overpriced....also its selling out everywhere so obviously its not overpriced. It has a tone of features that are worth its price.

He's right, from a technical standpoint the Wii is a ripoff. A huge amount of the price of the Wii is for profit. The Wii is just an overpowered Gamecube with a great controller. It has the same power as the old XBOX! Nintendo can afford to keep its price so high because their is demand for the Wii. But you are NOT getting what you pay for, and everyone knows that!

Avatar image for guard12
guard12

2018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#149 guard12
Member since 2004 • 2018 Posts

I dont think Nintendo is doing this to directly affect the community but rather attract third party developers and publishers to help out with online play on the Wii. As I believe was stated in the article.

I just hope this does not extend to the DS since I play more Wi-fi on that than the Wii.

Avatar image for scottie300z
scottie300z

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 scottie300z
Member since 2004 • 418 Posts
[QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="zaku101"][QUOTE="pjoasil"]

One word "GREED".

Nintendo, from day 1 was making a profit on Wii sales. They have money to burn. they can afford to provide a free service. Guys, just because you don't like friend codes and the crappy online that is currently provided doesn't mean you have to pay for it. Nintendo can easily send an update an fix this for free. They are trying to charge now because they think they could do that and you will accept it.Judging from the posts, you guys are willing to bend over, so they are right.

santiagochile

The only thing I dislike about Nintendos greed is that they charged $250 for the Wii. I mean come on, the specs on the Wii are very similar to the GC. The Wii has a better CPU yes but the graphic cards are almost the same making the CPU useless. This can be seen in most games that look visually the same as most GC games or worse. The new Mario kart game looks no different then the 5 year old DD. It also laks AA which makes the new graphic card and cpu appear useless on the Wii. I mean come on the N64 had AA on 90% of it's games why don't we see it on a system how many years ahead of it?

The price of making a

Wii:$150 Retail $250 The DVD reader is what cost the most on it.

360: $330 Retail 399.00

Ps3: $840 Retail $599.00

supossedly double the GC and Xbox and you say its overpriced....also its selling out everywhere so obviously its not overpriced. It has a tone of features that are worth its price.

He's right, from a technical standpoint the Wii is a ripoff. A huge amount of the price of the Wii is for profit. The Wii is just an overpowered Gamecube with a great controller. It has the same power as the old XBOX! Nintendo can afford to keep its price so high because their is demand for the Wii. But you are NOT getting what you pay for, and everyone knows that!

Most things for sale these days are marked up atleast by twice as much. That is how companies get successful, they make money. You didnt really expect to may only the cost of producing the wii did you?

And no the wii is more powerful than the old xbox which sold for $300 a few years ago.