One of the only reasons I want Rare to come back to Nintendo . . .

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts
I want a new online Conker game on the Wii!!!! That squirrel is Legendary.
Avatar image for dylanmcc
dylanmcc

2512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 dylanmcc
Member since 2008 • 2512 Posts
Lol yeah that was a good game
I want Rare to make games for Nintendo so we can get a Donkey Kong and Banjo game.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

Avatar image for TheColbert
TheColbert

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TheColbert
Member since 2008 • 3846 Posts

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

Jaysonguy
How is Rare in a better place? Compared to some of the games they have made recently, I would say with Nintendo they were making higher quality titles.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

TheColbert

How is Rare in a better place? Compared to some of the games they have made recently, I would say with Nintendo they were making higher quality titles.

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

Avatar image for Code_Geass_CC
Code_Geass_CC

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 Code_Geass_CC
Member since 2008 • 2703 Posts
There are a 1000 reasons why Rare was better with Nintendo. Rare made such great platformers, and they made the best Nintendo games aside from Nintendo itself.
Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts
[QUOTE="TheColbert"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

Jaysonguy

How is Rare in a better place? Compared to some of the games they have made recently, I would say with Nintendo they were making higher quality titles.

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

????? Super Mario Galaxy.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TheColbert"] How is Rare in a better place? Compared to some of the games they have made recently, I would say with Nintendo they were making higher quality titles.SER69

 

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

????? Super Mario Galaxy.

That's second

Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="TheColbert"] How is Rare in a better place? Compared to some of the games they have made recently, I would say with Nintendo they were making higher quality titles.SER69

 

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

????? Super Mario Galaxy.

Don't get him started again. Just read the recent pages in the off-topic discussion thread in this here forum.
Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts
[QUOTE="SER69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

 

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

clicketyclick
????? Super Mario Galaxy.

Don't get him started again. Just read the recent pages in the off-topic discussion thread in this here forum.

Oh I C , well I never played B&KN&B, but it seems to me from videos that it can hardly be considered a platformer. But I guess it's all opinion, so whatever.
Avatar image for doctores143
doctores143

3016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#11 doctores143
Member since 2007 • 3016 Posts
I kinda wish they would come back to Nintendo too but do you really think that there would be a better banjo game on the wii with the whole "car creatiion" concept? The physics likely wouldn't be as good and the art style wouldn't even be half as good.
Avatar image for ChildOfGaming7
ChildOfGaming7

1009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 ChildOfGaming7
Member since 2008 • 1009 Posts

You really have alot going for yourself Jason, but I shouldn't say that...

I would LOVE for Rare to work for Nintendo again. The only possiblity of that happening would be having Donkey Kong games 1st-party and the other games being published by Microsoft (since they're already doing that with DS).

Avatar image for doctores143
doctores143

3016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#13 doctores143
Member since 2007 • 3016 Posts
Since Nintendo can't make a new banjo can they not make a new game entitled donkey kong country... either?
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts
Well maybe...just maybe it might come despite Rare being with microsoft. For example Viva Pinata is a Rare game on the DS as well as the 360. That shows that their is still some sort of relationship between the 3 companies. Next to Nintendo Rare is my favorite company.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Well maybe...just maybe it might come despite Rare being with microsoft. For example Viva Pinata is a Rare game on the DS as well as the 360. That shows that their is still some sort of relationship between the 3 companies. Next to Nintendo Rare is my favorite company.painguy1

Not at all

That other company doesn't have a handheld so they don't mind taking even more money from Nintendo to make their own games for their own system.

Of course that didn't stop the new Banjo game from bringing up Diddy Kong but even for the older games they say they're for the XBOX so no.

YOu'll never see it

Avatar image for tacoeater831
tacoeater831

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 tacoeater831
Member since 2008 • 217 Posts
I just want to see rares n64 games hit the virtual console. such as conker, banjo and kazoie, goldeneye 007, and donkey kong 64. and I checked, the only person stopping nintendo from putting these games on vc is nintendo itself. for example. In 2007 microsoft planned to put goldeneye 007 on the xbox live arcade. While they were planning this, microsoft went to nintendo and asked them if they also want goldeneye on the the virtual console. Nintendp refused the offer. What the Hell?
Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30706 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

I would disagree given how bad there continuation of N64 titles have been, this new Banjo is the best of the lot, but its nothing like old ones. And when it comes to the best platformer Mario Galaxy has it beat by a massive margin.
Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts
[QUOTE="TheColbert"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

How is Rare in a better place? Compared to some of the games they have made recently, I would say with Nintendo they were making higher quality titles.

That's why Nintendo got rid of them. Rare lost most of the talent that made them great during the NES-N64 eras. Only recently have they recovered and started making some good games.
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

[QUOTE="painguy1"]Well maybe...just maybe it might come despite Rare being with microsoft. For example Viva Pinata is a Rare game on the DS as well as the 360. That shows that their is still some sort of relationship between the 3 companies. Next to Nintendo Rare is my favorite company.Jaysonguy

Not at all

That other company doesn't have a handheld so they don't mind taking even more money from Nintendo to make their own games for their own system.

Of course that didn't stop the new Banjo game from bringing up Diddy Kong but even for the older games they say they're for the XBOX so no.

YOu'll never see it

its possible. stop being so negative. As long as they have relations its possible just on a very small scale.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]Well maybe...just maybe it might come despite Rare being with microsoft. For example Viva Pinata is a Rare game on the DS as well as the 360. That shows that their is still some sort of relationship between the 3 companies. Next to Nintendo Rare is my favorite company.painguy1

Not at all

That other company doesn't have a handheld so they don't mind taking even more money from Nintendo to make their own games for their own system.

Of course that didn't stop the new Banjo game from bringing up Diddy Kong but even for the older games they say they're for the XBOX so no.

YOu'll never see it

 

its possible. stop being so negative. As long as they have relations its possible just on a very small scale.

No I'm not being negative I'm being honest

Give me one good reason why that other company would let THEIR OWN STUDIO make games for their competitor that they're trying to catch?

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts
[QUOTE="painguy1"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Not at all

That other company doesn't have a handheld so they don't mind taking even more money from Nintendo to make their own games for their own system.

Of course that didn't stop the new Banjo game from bringing up Diddy Kong but even for the older games they say they're for the XBOX so no.

YOu'll never see it

Jaysonguy

its possible. stop being so negative. As long as they have relations its possible just on a very small scale.

No I'm not being negative I'm being honest

Give me one good reason why that other company would let THEIR OWN STUDIO make games for their competitor that they're trying to catch?

Well on a somewhat unrealistic level Nintendo has things to barter with like design plans etc. But money can convince almost anyone or any corporation.

Avatar image for SirSpudly
SirSpudly

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 SirSpudly
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

Give me one good reason why that other company would let THEIR OWN STUDIO make games for their competitor that they're trying to catch?

Jaysonguy

Because that studio does not have the backing to compete in the handheld market, therefore picking a pony for portable games would seem like a good idea.

In this case, the pony is Nintendo.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="painguy1"]

its possible. stop being so negative. As long as they have relations its possible just on a very small scale.

firefox59

No I'm not being negative I'm being honest

Give me one good reason why that other company would let THEIR OWN STUDIO make games for their competitor that they're trying to catch?

Well on a somewhat unrealistic level Nintendo has things to barter with like design plans etc. But money can convince almost anyone or any corporation.

Once again they made Viva Piniata for the DS. It doesnt matter whether or not they have a handheld, either way microsoft is contributing to an increase in Nintendos wealth/profit (why would a rival company do that);). Also rememmber Starfox Adventures for the GC? I believe that game was made by Rare after Nintendo sold them to microsoft so yeah. :)
Avatar image for black_ice23
black_ice23

1288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 black_ice23
Member since 2003 • 1288 Posts
[QUOTE="firefox59"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

 

No I'm not being negative I'm being honest

Give me one good reason why that other company would let THEIR OWN STUDIO make games for their competitor that they're trying to catch?

painguy1

Well on a somewhat unrealistic level Nintendo has things to barter with like design plans etc. But money can convince almost anyone or any corporation.

Once again they made Viva Piniata for the DS. It doesnt matter whether or not they have a handheld, either way microsoft is contributing to an increase in Nintendos wealth/profit (why would a rival company do that);). Also rememmber Starfox Adventures for the GC? I believe that game was made by Rare after Nintendo sold them to microsoft so yeah. :)

i think that has more to do with the fact the the game was already in progress before adn during the sale, and they just finished it up due to a contract or it was nearly done anyways that it could be released with little touch ups or with rares input but for me all i want rare for is Goldeneye 64 on VC nuff said
Avatar image for Jakendo
Jakendo

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Jakendo
Member since 2007 • 3841 Posts
[ Also rememmber Starfox Adventures for the GC? I believe that game was made by Rare after Nintendo sold them to microsoft so yeah. :)painguy1
I believe it wasnt.... And I really doubt that a Rare game can come to the Wii (unless its through the virtual console) The reason why Microsoft let Rare make Diddy Kong Racing DS and Viva Pinata is because Microsoft does not have a handheld console on the market. Microsoft knows that the DS games can sell a lot, so thats why the released those games for the DS. Microsoft knows that the Wii is a threat, and thats why they probably wont release games for it. The DS serves no threat to them.
Avatar image for tommy--F
tommy--F

502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 tommy--F
Member since 2008 • 502 Posts
[QUOTE="SER69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

 

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

Jaysonguy

????? Super Mario Galaxy.

That's second

Sorry I'm a bit lost here, what platformer is SMG second to this generation?
Avatar image for link027
link027

1110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 link027
Member since 2008 • 1110 Posts
Glodeneye
Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts
[QUOTE="painguy1"][QUOTE="firefox59"]

Well on a somewhat unrealistic level Nintendo has things to barter with like design plans etc. But money can convince almost anyone or any corporation.

black_ice23

Once again they made Viva Piniata for the DS. It doesnt matter whether or not they have a handheld, either way microsoft is contributing to an increase in Nintendos wealth/profit (why would a rival company do that);). Also rememmber Starfox Adventures for the GC? I believe that game was made by Rare after Nintendo sold them to microsoft so yeah. :)

i think that has more to do with the fact the the game was already in progress before adn during the sale, and they just finished it up due to a contract or it was nearly done anyways that it could be released with little touch ups or with rares input but for me all i want rare for is Goldeneye 64 on VC nuff said

Yeah I'm pretty sure SF Adventures was not made after Micrsoft acquired Rare.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts
Im sorry my mistake.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#30 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Im sorry my mistake.painguy1

For this painer you have instantly become one of my favorite people on this forum

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

[QUOTE="painguy1"]Im sorry my mistake.Jaysonguy

For this painer you have instantly become one of my favorite people on this forum

lol thanks

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#32 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42192 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

What? No! I'm sorry, but Rare still belongs to Ninty, and we were supposed to get DK racing on the Gamecube, but NO!!!! MS had to come in and show off their cash. Not trying to turn this into SW or anything, but Rare should never have left Nintendo for MS. That's why I refuse to play their XBOX games.
Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#33 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
Rare: excels in platformers and FPS titles for over a decade, working with both Nintendo and Microsoft. Rare is AMAZING.
Avatar image for boba707
boba707

1021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 boba707
Member since 2007 • 1021 Posts

i just want to see goldeneye on VC

      [] - brought to you by TripleTags.com

Avatar image for boba707
boba707

1021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 boba707
Member since 2007 • 1021 Posts

i just want to see goldeneye on VC

      [] - brought to you by TripleTags.com

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#36 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
[QUOTE="boba707"]

i just want to see goldeneye on VC

      [] - brought to you by TripleTags.com

Rare is the hands of Microsoft, Nintendo's biggest competitor. Won't happen my friend.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

nintendoboy16

What? No! I'm sorry, but Rare still belongs to Ninty, and we were supposed to get DK racing on the Gamecube, but NO!!!! MS had to come in and show off their cash. Not trying to turn this into SW or anything, but Rare should never have left Nintendo for MS. That's why I refuse to play their XBOX games.

You understand that Nintendo abandoned Rare right?

Avatar image for Gsig
Gsig

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 Gsig
Member since 2008 • 90 Posts
If rare came back to nintendo I would sell my xbox to buy their games.. Well probably not but the games they are making for Xbox are a little dissapointing. Nintendo can set em right again.
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts
Yeah Nintendo for some odd reason(some odd greedy reason) siad "$CREW U RARE WERE SELL YOUR @$$3$ to MICRONUTS". I just want to hope for the best and wish for that .10% chance that some agreement will come EVENTUALLY.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#40 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42192 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That ship sailed a long time ago

Rare is in a better place now

What? No! I'm sorry, but Rare still belongs to Ninty, and we were supposed to get DK racing on the Gamecube, but NO!!!! MS had to come in and show off their cash. Not trying to turn this into SW or anything, but Rare should never have left Nintendo for MS. That's why I refuse to play their XBOX games.

You understand that Nintendo abandoned Rare right?

All I knowis that MS bought Rare during the Making of Donkey Kong Racing. I haven't heard anything of this being Ninty's fault that Rare isn't here. http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/donkeykongracing/index.html?tag=result;title;0
Avatar image for bobcheeseball
bobcheeseball

9315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 bobcheeseball
Member since 2007 • 9315 Posts
Anyone else interested in a new donkey kong country??
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#42 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"] What? No! I'm sorry, but Rare still belongs to Ninty, and we were supposed to get DK racing on the Gamecube, but NO!!!! MS had to come in and show off their cash. Not trying to turn this into SW or anything, but Rare should never have left Nintendo for MS. That's why I refuse to play their XBOX games.nintendoboy16

 

You understand that Nintendo abandoned Rare right?

All I knowis that MS bought Rare during the Making of Donkey Kong Racing. I haven't heard anything of this being Ninty's fault that Rare isn't here. http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/donkeykongracing/index.html?tag=result;title;0

Here's the Reader's Digest version

Rare said "Hey it really sucks being an independent company, we'd love for you guys at Nintendo to buy us so we'd have more power and security in the gaming field"

Nintendo said "Nah, we already do most of what you do better"

Rare then said "Ok well then can you sell back to us our shares in the company so another company can buy us?

Nintendo said "Ok, sounds good for us. We keep our stuff we created, you guys keep everything you created"

Microsoft then purchased Rare and that brings us to now

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#43 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42192 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

 

You understand that Nintendo abandoned Rare right?

All I knowis that MS bought Rare during the Making of Donkey Kong Racing. I haven't heard anything of this being Ninty's fault that Rare isn't here. http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/donkeykongracing/index.html?tag=result;title;0

Here's the Reader's Digest version

Rare said "Hey it really sucks being an independent company, we'd love for you guys at Nintendo to buy us so we'd have more power and security in the gaming field"

Nintendo said "Nah, we already do most of what you do better"

Rare then said "Ok well then can you sell back to us our shares in the company so another company can buy us?

Nintendo said "Ok, sounds good for us. We keep our stuff we created, you guys keep everything you created"

Microsoft then purchased Rare and that brings us to now

Which Nintendo said that? NOA or Nintendo Japan? Because that sounds to me of what Reggie would say.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#44 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]All I knowis that MS bought Rare during the Making of Donkey Kong Racing. I haven't heard anything of this being Ninty's fault that Rare isn't here. http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/donkeykongracing/index.html?tag=result;title;0nintendoboy16

 

Here's the Reader's Digest version

Rare said "Hey it really sucks being an independent company, we'd love for you guys at Nintendo to buy us so we'd have more power and security in the gaming field"

Nintendo said "Nah, we already do most of what you do better"

Rare then said "Ok well then can you sell back to us our shares in the company so another company can buy us?

Nintendo said "Ok, sounds good for us. We keep our stuff we created, you guys keep everything you created"

Microsoft then purchased Rare and that brings us to now

Which Nintendo said that? NOA or Nintendo Japan? Because that sounds to me of what Reggie would say.

Nintendo said it

When dealings of this nature are done it's done by Nintendo, not just one branch of the company like NA or Japan.

Avatar image for Junior_AIN
Junior_AIN

4703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 132

User Lists: 1

#45 Junior_AIN
Member since 2007 • 4703 Posts
I miss Banjo-Kazooie without having to buy a non-Nintendo console, that's all.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#46 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42192 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

 

Here's the Reader's Digest version

Rare said "Hey it really sucks being an independent company, we'd love for you guys at Nintendo to buy us so we'd have more power and security in the gaming field"

Nintendo said "Nah, we already do most of what you do better"

Rare then said "Ok well then can you sell back to us our shares in the company so another company can buy us?

Nintendo said "Ok, sounds good for us. We keep our stuff we created, you guys keep everything you created"

Microsoft then purchased Rare and that brings us to now

Which Nintendo said that? NOA or Nintendo Japan? Because that sounds to me of what Reggie would say.

Nintendo said it

When dealings of this nature are done it's done by Nintendo, not just one branch of the company like NA or Japan.

That dosen't explain much, but I'm just going to end this with this: Rare is still making games for Ninty, but on the DS and they have to ask THQ for publishments because MS has to do console publishments. And what I want to see mostly is Perfect Dark on the DS.
Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]Which Nintendo said that? NOA or Nintendo Japan? Because that sounds to me of what Reggie would say.nintendoboy16

Nintendo said it

When dealings of this nature are done it's done by Nintendo, not just one branch of the company like NA or Japan.

That dosen't explain much, but I'm just going to end this with this: Rare is still making games for Ninty, but on the DS and they have to ask THQ for publishments because MS has to do console publishments. And what I want to see mostly is Perfect Dark on the DS.

Ok here is a less biased version of what jaysonguy posted availed by someone who currently works for RARE:
When Nintendo first invested in Rare they only purchased about 15% of the company, and probably only paid about $20,000 to do it. After that, whenever the Stampers wanted more money, they would sell another little chunk of the company to Nintendo at their (ever increasing) regular market value. Nintendo eventually ended up owning 49% of the company. When Rare's stock value hit about $500 million ($250 of which belonging to the Stampers), the Stampers thought Rare's stock had gone about as high as it could go, so they decided to take their winnings and cash out before the price went down. They didn't want to sell 2% of the company to Nintendo for some more chump change, lose control if the company (not even to Nintendo), and then watch their $250 million slip away for some reason they had no control over. So they offered to sell the company outright to Nintendo. Nintendo was not interested in paying approximately $250 million to keep Rare, and asked Rare to find other buyers. For reference, at about the same time, Yamauchi set up a fund called Fund Q using $200 million of his own money and loaned it to small developers to get them to publish Cube games. Even the loan of this kind of money was enough to even secure Square support on the GameCube. Also, control of Retro was bought out for a mere 1 million dollars, but it's unknown how much money Nintendo spent setting up the studio (Nintendo was footing the bills before and after the buyout). The Stampers received offers from at least Microsoft and Activision (yeah, the **** who recently canned Goldeneye XBLA because Iwata didn't like it), and went with Microsoft's offer to buy 100% of the company, including the IP's, for $375 million. The Stampers bought Nintendo's 49% and sorted out/bought all their IP's back from Nintendo for $100 million (on credit), and then sold the whole bundle to Microsoft, making $275 million for themselves. In a completely unrelated story, one month after selling their stake in the UK developer, Nintendo was fined approximately $100 million by the European Union for NES-era price fixing. The Stampers took paying jobs for Microsoft and ran Rare for four years before leaving to "pursue other opportunities", but AFAIK no new startup company has been announced.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#48 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42192 Posts
Ok here is a less biased version of what jaysonguy posted availed by someone who currently works for RARE:
When Nintendo first invested in Rare they only purchased about 15% of the company, and probably only paid about $20,000 to do it. After that, whenever the Stampers wanted more money, they would sell another little chunk of the company to Nintendo at their (ever increasing) regular market value. Nintendo eventually ended up owning 49% of the company. When Rare's stock value hit about $500 million ($250 of which belonging to the Stampers), the Stampers thought Rare's stock had gone about as high as it could go, so they decided to take their winnings and cash out before the price went down. They didn't want to sell 2% of the company to Nintendo for some more chump change, lose control if the company (not even to Nintendo), and then watch their $250 million slip away for some reason they had no control over. So they offered to sell the company outright to Nintendo. Nintendo was not interested in paying approximately $250 million to keep Rare, and asked Rare to find other buyers. For reference, at about the same time, Yamauchi set up a fund called Fund Q using $200 million of his own money and loaned it to small developers to get them to publish Cube games. Even the loan of this kind of money was enough to even secure Square support on the GameCube. Also, control of Retro was bought out for a mere 1 million dollars, but it's unknown how much money Nintendo spent setting up the studio (Nintendo was footing the bills before and after the buyout). The Stampers received offers from at least Microsoft and Activision (yeah, the **** who recently canned Goldeneye XBLA because Iwata didn't like it), and went with Microsoft's offer to buy 100% of the company, including the IP's, for $375 million. The Stampers bought Nintendo's 49% and sorted out/bought all their IP's back from Nintendo for $100 million (on credit), and then sold the whole bundle to Microsoft, making $275 million for themselves. In a completely unrelated story, one month after selling their stake in the UK developer, Nintendo was fined approximately $100 million by the European Union for NES-era price fixing. The Stampers took paying jobs for Microsoft and ran Rare for four years before leaving to "pursue other opportunities", but AFAIK no new startup company has been announced.
SER69
Ok, that explains it much better, but I still wonder why Rare is working with THQ for the DS games.
Avatar image for bobdood99
bobdood99

1862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 bobdood99
Member since 2007 • 1862 Posts
i want them back because they new how to make an awesome fps..... perfect dark, and golden eye 007 must i say anymore?
Avatar image for Yao-kun
Yao-kun

311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Yao-kun
Member since 2005 • 311 Posts
[QUOTE="SER69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

 

They have the best platformer this generation, that's something going their way.

Jaysonguy

????? Super Mario Galaxy.

That's second

 

Tee-hee Don't you love people that think their opinions are facts? I bet you're religious too!Â