The Conduit Previewed: Graphic are everything they've been hyped to be

[QUOTE="snover2009"]

But those 3 games prove that it is a decent jump in visuals, it just happens that all other games don't take advantage of the graphical hardware.

Lto_thaG

Because third parties are in this delusion that Wii sucks.

Except for High Voltage of course, and Platinum Games

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

[QUOTE="kardine"]

And the Wii having two games distinguishable with the GC hardware limitations? Really

kardine

[QUOTE="kardine"]

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
Ya rly..Nothing apart from the big 3 really blow my mind.Good looking games,yes...but not a big step from the gamecube.

psychobrew

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

[QUOTE="kardine"]

And the Wii having two games distinguishable with the GC hardware limitations? Really

kardine

[QUOTE="kardine"]

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
Ya rly..Nothing apart from the big 3 really blow my mind.Good looking games,yes...but not a big step from the gamecube.

psychobrew

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

[QUOTE="kardine"] The Conduit, FF CC CB, Madworld....

Pices

[QUOTE="kardine"]

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
Ya rly..Nothing apart from the big 3 really blow my mind.Good looking games,yes...but not a big step from the gamecube.

Lto_thaG

"Silent Hill, Overlord: Dark Legend, Deadly Creatures, Monster Hunter 3, Cursed Mountain, Red Steel 2. This list could keep going." Are you going to incorrectly discount these as well? Released or not the game looks how it looks. FF: CC CB is one of the nicest looking games of the year regardless of console. Great mix of technical excellence with good art design. Madworld is still pushing the tech beyond last gen. Alll the games psychobrew mentioned are great examples. People still base Wii's visuals off of what devs failed to do rather, than what has been graphically amazing.

kardine

[QUOTE="kardine"]

"Silent Hill, Overlord: Dark Legend, Deadly Creatures, Monster Hunter 3, Cursed Mountain, Red Steel 2. This list could keep going." Are you going to incorrectly discount these as well? Released or not the game looks how it looks. FF: CC CB is one of the nicest looking games of the year regardless of console. Great mix of technical excellence with good art design. Madworld is still pushing the tech beyond last gen. Alll the games psychobrew mentioned are great examples. People still base Wii's visuals off of what devs failed to do rather, than what has been graphically amazing.

Lto_thaG

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

[QUOTE="kardine"]

"Silent Hill, Overlord: Dark Legend, Deadly Creatures, Monster Hunter 3, Cursed Mountain, Red Steel 2. This list could keep going." Are you going to incorrectly discount these as well? Released or not the game looks how it looks. FF: CC CB is one of the nicest looking games of the year regardless of console. Great mix of technical excellence with good art design. Madworld is still pushing the tech beyond last gen. Alll the games psychobrew mentioned are great examples. People still base Wii's visuals off of what devs failed to do rather, than what has been graphically amazing.

kardine

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"] I never said they looked bad.They are indeed goodlooking titles,but not a big step forward from the GC.

[QUOTE="legend26"]

as close as possible, not exactly like a ps3 360 game

VGobbsesser

It's still a pretty large gap between the capabilities of the system; "As close as possible" isn't saying much.

They did actually try. I believe they had come very close during development at one point, but they said theyhad to tone it back down because the framerate went all jittery, so the console couldnt handle it. My best guess would be they had tolower the resolution of the textures or something.Although I wouldnt quote me on that, I dont remeber where I read this exactly, all I remember was it was a proper interview.

Nevertheless, If you want 360 graphics, shouldnt you just play a 360 game? They said they would try and they did, but its not like people were expecting it to look like GeoW. If its any consolation, the game looks great in motion, by far the best graphics. The screens just dont do it justice, sadly.

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

[QUOTE="legend26"]

as close as possible, not exactly like a ps3 360 game

It's still a pretty large gap between the capabilities of the system; "As close as possible" isn't saying much.

They did actually try. I believe they had come very close during development at one point, but they said theyhad to tone it back down because the framerate went all jittery, so the console couldnt handle it. My best guess would be they had tolower the resolution of the textures or something.Although I wouldnt quote me on that, I dont remeber where I read this exactly, all I remember was it was a proper interview.

Nevertheless, If you want 360 graphics, shouldnt you just play a 360 game? They said they would try and they did, but its not like people were expecting it to look like GeoW. If its any consolation, the game looks great in motion, by far the best graphics. The screens just dont do it justice, sadly.