11 Y.O. boy tazered as 'last resort!'

[QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"][QUOTE="cowboymonkey21"]Unless he's a sociopath or something.

But I find tasering the kid to be a little weak. It's not okay to beat on a girl but it's okay to tase a kid?:? I'm sure the cop could have broken up the fight by pulling the kid away from the girl.:?

cowboymonkey21

[QUOTE="cowboymonkey21"]

[QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"] Well, like I said earlier, could just be a lesson that the kid needed to learn. Maybe he bullied all the time? Who knows...THE_BRUTALIZER

[QUOTE="ownage_denied"]

[QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"] Thats very very true, in fact I wouldnt be surprised.....actually i would expect the average american mom to sue for a cop assaulting their child or something. Especially if the child is black and the cops white. There are so many screwed up ways to get away with that.....THE_BRUTALIZER

LOL at people pulling the race card while accusing others of potentially pulling it.

I don't think you're racist but you did bring up race in a situation that has absolutely nothing to do with it, which is pulling the race card.

On topic, I think tasering an 11 year old is a little bit over the line. I think physical restraint would be a much better option, as long as it's done properly.

[QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"][QUOTE="cowboymonkey21"]Really though. What kind of a$$hole tases a 11 year old kid? It's not right.:?

cowboymonkey21

[QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"][QUOTE="ownage_denied"]

LOL at people pulling the race card while accusing others of potentially pulling it.

ownage_denied

I don't think you're racist but you did bring up race in a situation that has absolutely nothing to do with it, which is pulling the race card.

On topic, I think tasering an 11 year old is a little bit over the line. I think physical restraint would be a much better option, as long as it's done properly.

What the hell is wrong with you guys? You want tazers in elementary schools? I would understand high school but ELE FREAKIN MENTARY school? Theyre just kids. We cant go around tazering kids.

What the hell is wrong with you guys? You want tazers in elementary schools? I would understand high school but ELE FREAKIN MENTARY school? Theyre just kids. We cant go around tazering kids.

Hungry_Jello

I have no problems with that...all though I would think a cop would be able to subdue an 11 year old without a taser >_>Darth-Caedus

This brings me back to my original post in this thread.

If you have kids you need to ****ing beat them from time to time! Don't be a damn weak-willed pansy that this country seems to kick out in spades now days. Children will never learn boundaries if left to learn for themselves. Spank your damn kids already!!!

[QUOTE="Tauruslink"]Cant that give him like a heart attack or something? :?THE_BRUTALIZER

Well, I guess in that situation it was necessary.

This brings me back to my original post in this thread.

If you have kids you need to ****ing beat them from time to time! Don't be a damn weak-willed pansy that this country seems to kick out in spades now days. Children will never learn boundaries if left to learn for themselves. Spank your damn kids already!!!

jer_1

LOL im looking at the sponsored links below.....taser guns 10 bucks lol.....

LOL im looking at the sponsored links below.....taser guns 10 bucks lol.....

THE_BRUTALIZER

There's the scumbag Google at work for you. Targeted ads for all! Woohoo, forget thinking for yourselves Google will now do it all for you!

Tazers are a very good thing in law enforcement......All police officers (at least here in CA) have to be tazed themselves before becoming officers, so they know how it feels. The child was the obvious aggressor in this situation and was dealt with in appropriate matter. I don't understand why this is even an issue really...... Mafiree

Because its a CHILD. There are a lot of things you can do before freaking tazering a kid. He was an ADULT. Chloroform would have been a better option. What if your kid was acting unruly and a teacher tazed him a couple times. Would you be alright with that?

Tasers can cause heart attacks... in perfectly healthy people. Unless the child is 6'4", the child could easily be subdued by other means. Tasers are very unsafe and should only be used when a gun is called for, but lethal force is not necessary.

[QUOTE="Mafiree"]Tazers are a very good thing in law enforcement......All police officers (at least here in CA) have to be tazed themselves before becoming officers, so they know how it feels. The child was the obvious aggressor in this situation and was dealt with in appropriate matter. I don't understand why this is even an issue really...... Hungry_Jello

Because its a CHILD. There are a lot of things you can do before freaking tazering a kid. He was an ADULT. Chloroform would have been a better option. What if your kid was acting unruly and a teacher tazed him a couple times. Would you be alright with that?

The kid's 11. Just grab the little ****. Last resort, put him in an arm lock.No need for tazing kids, imo.

This brings me back to my original post in this thread.

If you have kids you need to ****ing beat them from time to time! Don't be a damn weak-willed pansy that this country seems to kick out in spades now days. Children will never learn boundaries if left to learn for themselves. Spank your damn kids already!!!

jer_1

Threads like this one leave me shuddering at the thought of a jury composed of OT members.

It's depressing to see how quickly people can jump to conclusions about which party is the aggressor and which party is the victim, based purely on a naive assignment of stereotypical gender roles.

How do you know the girl didn't start the altercation, or at least intentionally provoke it? For all we know, she may have thoroughly deserved the beating that the boy was trying to administer.

:lol: jesus... quite sad IMO. So out of the entire school no one had the strengh to pull an 11-year old away?

Last resort? He's just 11 yrs old I seriously doubt that a police officer could not subdue an 11 year old.

...Why was the boy's reaction to go after the girl again after recovering from the first tazer? super_mario_128

There are some pretty big people at that age. I knew an 11 year old who was around 5-6 feet tall.

Beating on a girl aint cool.

My daughter would have been the one with the tazer;)

My daughter would have been the one with the tazer;)

corwinn01

You know those eleven-year-old children: major top-gun gangsters that'll snap any second and rip your head off with their bare hands. Always best to taser them, 'cuz God knows there haven't been any cops made yet strong enough to separate the fighting children rather than attack them with a very painful and potentially deadly weapon. Tasers are the only rational way to go here.

Beating on a girl aint cool.

zarshack

If the officer couldn't stop the 11 year old any other way, he can't just give him, he had to use the tazer.

I'd say they should be used, but only if an attempt at stopping them failed.

It is protocol NOT to physcially intervene with children or elderly, there is too much of a chance that the police officer will injur them. Being a police officer is the only job where you will be sued for following protocol to a tee, there is no winning for Police, I feel bad for them. People are just out to hate, it is truely sad.Im_single

They can't step in the middle of the kids and tell them to stop fighting, nudging them away from eachother? They have to use a taser--which is insanely painful on an adult, let alone a child, and people have died from the taser--on a harmless kid because "physical force is too risky"? I call BS. Grabbing the kid's arm and pushing him out of the way is better than shocking him with a weapon, and not even that is necessary to diffuse a situation between prepubescent children.

[QUOTE="Im_single"]It is protocol NOT to physcially intervene with children or elderly, there is too much of a chance that the police officer will injur them. Being a police officer is the only job where you will be sued for following protocol to a tee, there is no winning for Police, I feel bad for them. People are just out to hate, it is truely sad.Theokhoth

They can't step in the middle of the kids and tell them to stop fighting, nudging them away from eachother? They have to use a taser--which is insanely painful on an adult, let alone a child, and people have died from the taser--on a harmless kid because "physical force is too risky"? I call BS. Grabbing the kid's arm and pushing him out of the way is better than shocking him with a weapon, and not even that is necessary to diffuse a situation between prepubescent children.

The fact that the cop had to taser the boy twice should prove that the only amount of physical force that would have subdued the kid would have been enough to knock him unconscious. In the worst case scenario, the kid, having been knocked unconsious, could slip into a coma, recieve a life-threatening concussion, break any number of his limbs and bones, or recieve some other life-threatening injury because the cop didn't want to run the risk of fricasseeing the kid with a taser, and even then, according to the Wiki (so take it with a grain of salt), there have been 245 deaths from being tased between June 2001 and June 2007, a period of six years.

I have no problems with that...all though I would think a cop would be able to subdue an 11 year old without a taser >_>Darth-Caedus

Tasers are dangerous, any grown man could knock an 11 year old down pretty quick. The security guard must have been a real pansy.

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="Im_single"]It is protocol NOT to physcially intervene with children or elderly, there is too much of a chance that the police officer will injur them. Being a police officer is the only job where you will be sued for following protocol to a tee, there is no winning for Police, I feel bad for them. People are just out to hate, it is truely sad.tycoonmike

They can't step in the middle of the kids and tell them to stop fighting, nudging them away from eachother? They have to use a taser--which is insanely painful on an adult, let alone a child, and people have died from the taser--on a harmless kid because "physical force is too risky"? I call BS. Grabbing the kid's arm and pushing him out of the way is better than shocking him with a weapon, and not even that is necessary to diffuse a situation between prepubescent children.

The fact that the cop had to taser the boy twice should prove that the only amount of physical force that would have subdued the kid would have been enough to knock him unconscious. In the worst case scenario, the kid, having been knocked unconsious, could slip into a coma, recieve a life-threatening concussion, break any number of his limbs and bones, or recieve some other life-threatening injury because the cop didn't want to run the risk of fricasseeing the kid with a taser, and even then, according to the Wiki (so take it with a grain of salt), there have been 245 deaths from being tased between June 2001 and June 2007, a period of six years.

[QUOTE="THE_BRUTALIZER"][QUOTE="Tht1Guy7780"]

Its hard to be a cop these days. You cant even do your job because some teacher will make it a race issue. Who knows what kind of unwarented trouble the officer wouldve been in if he laid his hands on hime. People are so sue happy these days. Its sickening.

Tauruslink

I was suspended before I could clarify hahaha

i was refering to the Gates-cambridge plice incident. Sorry for not clarifying, seems like an argument stemed from this misunderstanding.

Now the million dollar question...what if it was a kid assaulting a snowman?