This topic is locked from further discussion.
Omg.....I feel so sad. This is what happens if you let a male principal oversee school. They let stuff like this happen all the time. PrincesswookieI love your sexist attitude...:roll:
I say Screw Detentions, Suspensions, or Saturday schools! They do nothing. Take the bully ,make him stand up and take a stick and wack that kid up.
Agreed. Men should never hit women....ever.I would pin that worthless piece of **** to the ground and punch his face in until he swallowed every last one of his bloody teeth.
You don't hit defenseless women ever.
kerrman
even if that the case there is no excuse for hitting a girl.... in else he dad abuse his mom and thinks its ok... there is no way he was right.... you never hit a girl i don't care if your parents said anything or not.
rcafan
While I condemn the attack on the girl from the article, I must disagree with your assertion there is no excuse for hitting a girl.
If a girl hits me, then I will hit her back with all the force available to me. I've done it before and I stand by my actions.
In 4th grade, the girl next to me got the idea to hold a pencil under my butt as I sat in my chair, thereby stabbing me in the cheek. I turned around and punched her in the chest so hard that her desk flipped over upside down. I knocked her breath out so badly that she was taken to the hospital because the teacher thought that she was having a heart attack. The school tried to get me in trouble, but because I was merely defending myself my father threatened to sue the school, the teacher, the principle, and the girl's parents if I were to suffer a single negative consequence for the event.
It was the girl that ended up getting detention for using a pencil as an offensive weapon. This was before the era of "zero-tolerance".
That wasn't the only time that I've had to hit a girl in self defense, and if I need to do it again, then I will.
I defy anyone to show me a law that says that I have to let a girl hit me.
[QUOTE="rcafan"]
even if that the case there is no excuse for hitting a girl.... in else he dad abuse his mom and thinks its ok... there is no way he was right.... you never hit a girl i don't care if your parents said anything or not.
dkrustyklown
While I condemn the attack on the girl from the article, I must disagree with your assertion there is no excuse for hitting a girl.
If a girl hits me, then I will hit her back with all the force available to me. I've done it before and I stand by my actions.
In 4th grade, the girl next to me got the idea to hold a pencil under my butt as I sat in my chair, thereby stabbing me in the cheek. I turned around and punched her in the chest so hard that her desk flipped over upside down. I knocked her breath out so badly that she was taken to the hospital because the teacher thought that she was having a heart attack. The school tried to get me in trouble, but because I was merely defending myself my father threatened to sue the school, the teacher, the principle, and the girl's parents if I were to suffer a single negative consequence for the event.
It was the girl that ended up getting detention for using a pencil as an offensive weapon. This was before the era of "zero-tolerance".
That wasn't the only time that I've had to hit a girl in self defense, and if I need to do it again, then I will.
I defy anyone to show me a law that says that I have to let a girl hit me.
What? Nobody should ever hit women and anyone that supports it is an awful person.What? Nobody should ever hit women and anyone that supports it is an awful person. Princesswookie
What law says that?
[QUOTE="Princesswookie"] What? Nobody should ever hit women and anyone that supports it is an awful person. dkrustyklown
What law says that?
There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman.There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman. Princesswookie
WRONG!
I have an absolute right to defend myself against anyone that tries to cause physical injury to me, be they a man or a woman.
It is perfectly moral and just to hit a woman in self defense.
[QUOTE="Palantas"][QUOTE="clayron"]
Believe it or not, that's not some unwritten rule that people grow up knowing.
rcafan
I agree. Thanks to the women's movement, girls can learn how to fight and receive training in arms. I see reason not to hit girls, anymore than not to hit anyone.
you shouldn't be hitting anyone period. girl or boy.This sounds good.
[QUOTE="dkrustyklown"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"] What? Nobody should ever hit women and anyone that supports it is an awful person. Princesswookie
What law says that?
There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman.Should a woman ever hit a man?
[QUOTE="Princesswookie"] There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman. dkrustyklown
WRONG!
I have an absolute right to defend myself against anyone that tries to cause physical injury to me, be they a man or a woman.
It is perfectly moral and just to hit a woman in self defense.
It's true he has a legal right to self defense whether his attacker be male, female, animal, or even robotic.
[QUOTE="Princesswookie"] There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman. dkrustyklown
WRONG!
I have an absolute right to defend myself against anyone that tries to cause physical injury to me, be they a man or a woman.
It is perfectly moral and just to hit a woman in self defense.
No. You're wrong.There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman.[QUOTE="Princesswookie"][QUOTE="dkrustyklown"]
What law says that?
TacticalDesire
Should a woman ever hit a man?
If she has to, then she should.No. You're wrong. Princesswookie
So you don't think that people have a right to self defense, huh?
The LAW agrees with me, so that means that you are wrong, so deal with it.
Whatever happened to the Belt?
There's nothing better than a good old fashion belt whipping for punishment.
[QUOTE="Princesswookie"]No. You're wrong. dkrustyklown
So you don't think that people have a right to self defense, huh?
The LAW agrees with me, so that means that you are wrong, so deal with it.
No-one has the right to hit women and the law was created by sexist men. Thye should be take with a grain of salt.[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"] There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman. Princesswookie
Should a woman ever hit a man?
If she has to, then she should.But if a man has to hit a woman he shouldn't?
[QUOTE="dkrustyklown"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"]No. You're wrong. Princesswookie
So you don't think that people have a right to self defense, huh?
The LAW agrees with me, so that means that you are wrong, so deal with it.
No-one has the right to hit women and the law was created by sexist men. Thye should be take with a grain of salt.So, you're implying that all of our congressmen and women are sexist?
If she has to, then she should.[QUOTE="Princesswookie"][QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]
Should a woman ever hit a man?
TacticalDesire
But if a man has to hit a woman he shouldn't?
Right.No-one has the right to hit women and the law was created by sexist men. Thye should be take with a grain of salt.[QUOTE="Princesswookie"][QUOTE="dkrustyklown"]
So you don't think that people have a right to self defense, huh?
The LAW agrees with me, so that means that you are wrong, so deal with it.
TacticalDesire
So, you're implying that all of our congressmen and women are sexist?
Yes and that the women have no self-respect fro themselves in Congress.[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"] If she has to, then she should. Princesswookie
But if a man has to hit a woman he shouldn't?
Right.Your logic is flawed.
What? Nobody should ever hit women and anyone that supports it is an awful person. Princesswookie
What law says that?
There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women. And there should be a law prohibiting anyone from hitting a woman. Why should women be given a special protected status? Honestly if someone strikes first you have the right to hit back regardless of gender.[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"] No-one has the right to hit women and the law was created by sexist men. Thye should be take with a grain of salt. Princesswookie
So, you're implying that all of our congressmen and women are sexist?
Yes and that the women have no self-respect fro themselves in Congress.You have every right to defend yourself no matter who is hitting you. Judging by your profile pic you seem like a hardcore ******** so I could understand why this widely accepted concept seems foreign to you.
Why are you guys arguing with a level one poster who made her account today? For all you know, this is just another troll. She purposely isn't explaining the reasons for her point of view.
Why are you guys arguing with a level one poster who made her account today? For all you know, this is just another troll. She purposely isn't explaining the reasons for her point of view.
RogueShodown
This forum was missing a neo feminist..
You have every right to defend yourself no matter who is hitting you. Judging by your profile pic you seem like a hardcore (feminist)...
xXCombatWombat
I don't get why a feminist would be going around saying you shouldn't hit girls. That's a very traditional (and sexist) idea. In the old days, women were not trained to arms. We developed codes of honor about not attacking the helpless and so forth, which would include women. There's no reason for that anymore. Women can go to gyms, they can take martial arts, they can buy weapons, and they can join the military. I'd only expect an exceedingly conservative person say you shouldn't hit girls.
Well she must've done something to deserve that kind of beating Not that I'm aproving it but....one does not simply go around beating peopleDarthkaiser
Yes they do... There are people that can go off at the slightest thing, or do so because of bigotry.. Especially when it comes to bullying.
Why are you guys arguing with a level one poster who made her account today? For all you know, this is just another troll. She purposely isn't explaining the reasons for her point of view.
RogueShodown
I thought it was rather entertaining. Additionally, I was trying to see if she was serious or not. I wasn't sure if she was the equivilalent of a "fakeboy" on SW since her statements and views made little sense and were not substantially backed up, almost as if inviting criticism.
[QUOTE="Princesswookie"]
There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women.
Palantas
According to what?
Widely accepted morals held by most of society.[QUOTE="xXCombatWombat"]
You have every right to defend yourself no matter who is hitting you. Judging by your profile pic you seem like a hardcore (feminist)...
Palantas
I don't get why a feminist would be going around saying you shouldn't hit girls. That's a very traditional (and sexist) idea. In the old days, women were not trained to arms. We developed codes of honor about not attacking the helpless and so forth, which would include women. There's no reason for that anymore. Women can go to gyms, they can take martial arts, they can buy weapons, and they can join the military. I'd only expect an exceedingly conservative person say you shouldn't hit girls.
No. Not true.[QUOTE="RogueShodown"]
Why are you guys arguing with a level one poster who made her account today? For all you know, this is just another troll. She purposely isn't explaining the reasons for her point of view.
TacticalDesire
I thought it was rather entertaining. Additionally, I was trying to see if she was serious or not. I wasn't sure if she was the equivilalent of a "fakeboy" on SW since her statements and views made little sense and were not substantially backed up, almost as if inviting criticism.
I assue you I'm dead serious. What do you mean my views make little sense? They are true.[QUOTE="Palantas"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"]
There is no law, but it's morally right to not hit women.
Princesswookie
According to what?
Widely accepted morals held by most of society.Its morally wrong to hit ANYONE.. Inless in self defense, a issue thats genderless.
Widely accepted morals held by most of society.[QUOTE="Princesswookie"][QUOTE="Palantas"]
According to what?
sSubZerOo
Its morally wrong to hit ANYONE.. Inless in self defense, a issue thats genderless.
Nope. Most of society finds it wrong to hit women even if it's supposedly "self-defense"[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Princesswookie"] Widely accepted morals held by most of society. Princesswookie
Its morally wrong to hit ANYONE.. Inless in self defense, a issue thats genderless.
Nope. Most of society finds it wrong to hit women even if it's supposedly "self-defense" Doesn't matter legally a person is fully able to defend themselves... Gender should have nothing to do with it, merely physical size, threat and what not.. If a woman comes at a man with a blade, they are under law able to defend their lives even if it means slugging the woman..Widely accepted morals held by most of society.
Princesswookie
Which society? Obviously not modern Western society, as most First World countries allow women to serve in the military.
Also, when questioning your statement about morality, I said "what," not "whom." Based on your answer, can I assume that you believe morality is determined by the predominant view of a given society at a given time?
There are some people in this world that I simply don't understand. Like those who argue with princesswookie. (I'm pretty sure I understand exactly what her motives are)
sSubZerOoDoesn't matter legally a person is fully able to defend themselves... Gender should have nothing to do with it, merely physical size, threat and what not.. If a woman comes at a man with a blade, they are under law able to defend their lives even if it means slugging the woman.. And that's wrong.
[QUOTE="Princesswookie"]
Widely accepted morals held by most of society.
Palantas
Which society? Obviously not modern Western society, as most First World countries allow women to serve in the military.
Also, when questioning your statement about morality, I said "what," not "whom." Based on your answer, can I assume that you believe morality is determined by the predominant view of a given society at a given time?
Yes.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment