About the CT shooting, does anyone else find it most disturbing that...

Answer this:

You accused me of "hearing voices" because I said "several people" were laughing at you, while you claimed there were only two. If I can find more than two people openly criticizing you, will you admit this statement above was incorrect, and quit the argument? I am making a bet with you. The bet is that I can find more than two people in this thread laughing at you. The wager is that the loser will admit he f*cked up and quit the argument. Do you accept, or would you like to alter the wager?

I

Answer this:

Describe your experience in ground combat, specifically in working with US forces.

I

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]A decision making process can be lousy like that one was.

Palantas

Okay, so you admit there was a decision-making process. Ergo, the fire was not indiscriminate. You misspoke.

And we already established that the military lied on their report.

kuraimen

Prove it.

So you keep calling me a liar but trust a lying source so yeah you're not one to talk about lying...kuraimen

So which is it? Did you lie about seeing the video, or are you lying about what you saw?

I don't trust it because they lied on it. This isn't exactly rocket science buddy. maybe you should get some sleep because it seems you're faltering.kuraimen

Oh my God, stupid f*ck can you not read? Prove it.

I don't have an agenda. And I'm not dishonest with myself.LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]I don't trust it because they lied on it. This isn't exactly rocket science buddy. maybe you should get some sleep because it seems you're faltering.Palantas

Oh my God, stupid f*ck can you not read? Prove it.

If a decision making process to act is not carefully done then it is indiscriminate. Should I lecture you on your own language now?kuraimen

Well you wouldnt' want to be arguing semantics, would you c^nt? "Indiscriminate" indicates random or unselective behavior. This does not in any way describe the pilot's actions. They:

1. Identified a point of interest based on certain criteria.
2. Observed it.
3. Continued observing it for some time.
4. Made a decision to fire.

That is the opposite of random or unselective behavior. That is deliberate behavior. See, this is arguing semantics, not the 100 other times you've accused me of it, when we were actually arguing about reasoning or evidence.

The report says one thing about the children sent to a hospital but the video shows otherwise.kuraimen

No it doesn't.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't have an agenda. And I'm not dishonest with myself.kuraimen

[Indiscriminate doesn't mean what you think it means....LJS9502_basic

This little sh!t's English has improved since he's been here, but he doesn't have a handle on the big words yet I don't think.

[QUOTE="El_Zo1212o"][QUOTE="Socialist696"]these drone killings are no more better than the gunmans killings because Death is death, no matter what the justificiation.Socialist696

You going to respond to this:

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]I imagine in many of those they also murder civilians...I

Right, because as long as you imagine something, it must be true! It's fun to pretend... :|

The vast majority of them are routine patrols with no interesting activity. You are mistaken.

Answer this:

Describe your experience in ground combat, specifically in working with US forces.

I

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't have an agenda. And I'm not dishonest with myself.LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][Indiscriminate doesn't mean what you think it means....Palantas

This little sh!t's English has improved since he's been here, but he doesn't have a handle on the big words yet I don't think.

Kuraimen......you have about five different posts that I've asked for proof.....any chance you will oblige me? Or is shouting your opinion and ad hominem and straw man the only thing you have?LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Kuraimen......you have about five different posts that I've asked for proof.....any chance you will oblige me? Or is shouting your opinion and ad hominem and straw man the only thing you have?kuraimen

"Indiscriminate" indicates random or unselective behavior.Palantas

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Kuraimen......you have about five different posts that I've asked for proof.....any chance you will oblige me? Or is shouting your opinion and ad hominem and straw man the only thing you have?LJS9502_basic

Kid?LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Kid?kuraimen

Lol didn't you mention at the start of this thread that you left GS because insults were allowed now? Well I see you're very confortable insulting now. More of your inherent contradictions and you ask e why I think you're dishonest lol

kuraimen

Describe my decision-making process in my mind that I used to retire from OT for a while.

[QUOTE="Palantas"]"Indiscriminate" indicates random or unselective behavior.kuraimen

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Palantas"]"Indiscriminate" indicates random or unselective behavior.LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Am I? Then I must say proudly since it means I hit a nerve with the less intelligent.....LJS9502_basic

So when you win the process is great but when you lose eveyone is butthurt? lol and you claim you're not biased. Yours is a bad case of cognitive dissonance kid.

You're clearly pro US and pro military. That's your agenda, don't be such a hypocrite kid.kuraimen

Lol, he's not. When I first came here, we had an argument about the Iraq war. He's not necessarily pro-US. You're just so vehemently anti-US that anyone who likes anything about the US is pro-US to you.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]You're clearly pro US and pro military. That's your agenda, don't be such a hypocrite kid.Palantas

Lol, he's not. When I first came here, we had an argument about the Iraq war. He's not necessarily pro-US. You're just so vehemently anti-US that anyone who likes anything about the US is pro-US to you.

Well I've never seen him slam the US. Sure you will defend your pal though. I have made pro US comments too so I guess that makes me unbiased? You guys really need a crash course in logic...kuraimen

That's almost all I see you posting about, is b!tching about the US. I hardly ever see you posting in any of the friendly topics on here.

I need to go. Maybe you can use the time to get some sleep Palantas. Maybe you can then do better :)kuraimen

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Well I've never seen him slam the US. Sure you will defend your pal though. I have made pro US comments too so I guess that makes me unbiased? You guys really need a crash course in logic...Palantas

That's almost all I see you posting about, is b!tching about the US. I hardly ever see you posting in any of the friendly topics on here.

Weren't weapons found? According to the Geneva Convention if a civilian is armed....there are no longer a civilian. LJS9502_basic

kuraimen decided that there were no weapons. In spite of...

1. The pilots saying there were weapons, specific weapon.
2. The gun cameras showing weapons.
3. Weapons being photographed by ground units.

In spite of all that, he decided that there were no weapons. His rationale: The US lies.

Using his rationale, I have determined that the US lied in making the gunship camera footage, and none of this ever happened. All of those people were actually killed in unrelated incidents.

EDIT:

His evidence that the US lied is that the report said the kids were turned over to the police, while the camera shows something different. I was just watching the footage, and I have no idea what he's talking about.

Answer this:

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]On your character and the kind of person you are. Not a very honest one I must say.I

Oh, I'm not honest. Show me the quote block where I'm being dishonest.

Answer this:

You accused me of "hearing voices" because I said "several people" were laughing at you, while you claimed there were only two. If I can find more than two people openly criticizing you, will you admit this statement above was incorrect, and quit the argument? I am making a bet with you. The bet is that I can find more than two people in this thread laughing at you. The wager is that the loser will admit he f*cked up and quit the argument. Do you accept, or would you like to alter the wager?

I

Answer this:

Describe your experience in ground combat, specifically in working with US forces.

I

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Kuraimen......you have about five different posts that I've asked for proof.....any chance you will oblige me? Or is shouting your opinion and ad hominem and straw man the only thing you have?LJS9502_basic

Am I supposed to care that it happened?LJS9502_basic

Well you were the one who brought the OTCars to the convo so that means you at least care more than me. You even have your own meme lol. Hows that cognitive dissonance going?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Am I supposed to care that it happened?kuraimen

Well you were the one who brought the OTCars to the convo so that means you at least care more than me. You even have your own meme lol. Hows that cognitive dissonance going?

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Well I've never seen him slam the US. Sure you will defend your pal though. I have made pro US comments too so I guess that makes me unbiased? You guys really need a crash course in logic...Palantas

That's almost all I see you posting about, is b!tching about the US. I hardly ever see you posting in any of the friendly topics on here.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Am I supposed to care that it happened?LJS9502_basic

Well you were the one who brought the OTCars to the convo so that means you at least care more than me. You even have your own meme lol. Hows that cognitive dissonance going?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Well you were the one who brought the OTCars to the convo so that means you at least care more than me. You even have your own meme lol. Hows that cognitive dissonance going?

kuraimen

I should start my OTcar campaign soondave123321

[QUOTE="dave123321"]I should start my OTcar campaign soonLJS9502_basic

Maybe you're not there then...kuraimen

Maybe I am. How many other threads have you posted in since we started this discussion?

Answer this:

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]On your character and the kind of person you are. Not a very honest one I must say.I

Oh, I'm not honest. Show me the quote block where I'm being dishonest.

Answer this:

You accused me of "hearing voices" because I said "several people" were laughing at you, while you claimed there were only two. If I can find more than two people openly criticizing you, will you admit this statement above was incorrect, and quit the argument? I am making a bet with you. The bet is that I can find more than two people in this thread laughing at you. The wager is that the loser will admit he f*cked up and quit the argument. Do you accept, or would you like to alter the wager?

I

Answer this:

Describe your experience in ground combat, specifically in working with US forces.

I