Alex Jones: How Government "Weather Weapon" Could Have Been Behind OK

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] The fact that you see this as a legitimate complaint rather than a joke says more about the quality of Infowars "journalism" than I think I ever could.Ace6301

It's hard to tell with you.  You will call something a joke when you didn't mean it to be one.  

Especially when you're reading it from my level.  :P

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]If 'How to organize and execute successful false flags' was a class, the United States government would get an F.mmwmwmmwmwmm

[QUOTE="Shottayouth13-"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

How so?  I speak my mind.  There are some things about greedy,powerful people that most people don't grasp, so they call me crazy when I talk about them.  There are other things that just don't add up for me as a possible/probable conspiracy.  This is one of them.

Thanks?  I guess? 

hartsickdiscipl

Alex didn't say that the government did it.  So yeah, I did agree with him.  Perhaps you should take a few baby steps in the direction of paying attention to detail.  

Did someone say the atom smasher is dangerous, OMG how stupid are people? I won't even comment on Alex Jones because he's a nutjob and doesn't deserve the effort. 

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Infowars should change its banner to something like: "Nothing bad would ever happen if the US government didn't exist" At this point it really would be more consistent for them to claim that the US was sending natural disasters back in time rather than admitting that bad things do in fact happen that are outside of our control. hartsickdiscipl

If you listened to The Alex Jones show on any sort of regular basis, you would know that he constantly states that there are real terrorists and truly natural disasters.  

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Shottayouth13-"] It's an improvement in that you didn't outright agree with Alex Jones. Baby steps.Shottayouth13-

Alex didn't say that the government did it.  So yeah, I did agree with him.  Perhaps you should take a few baby steps in the direction of paying attention to detail.  

You said that I didn't outright agree with Alex Jones.  I did.  

Jones warned nonetheless that the government "can create and steer groups of tornadoes."

jimkabrhel

lolwtf did I just read...

[QUOTE="Shottayouth13-"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Alex didn't say that the government did it.  So yeah, I did agree with him.  Perhaps you should take a few baby steps in the direction of paying attention to detail.  

hartsickdiscipl

You said that I didn't outright agree with Alex Jones.  I did.  

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Jones warned nonetheless that the government "can create and steer groups of tornadoes."

psn8214

lolwtf did I just read...

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Jones warned nonetheless that the government "can create and steer groups of tornadoes."

psn8214

lolwtf did I just read...

'Murica

I love HAARP, It's baiting so many nutjobs who fail to realize that it's an extremely transparent research project.

I love HAARP, It's baiting so many nutjobs who fail to realize that it's an extremely transparent research project.

rastotm

Why do people pay attention to this fool?

Why do people pay attention to this fool?

Wasdie

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Why do people pay attention to this fool?

MakeMeaSammitch

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Why do people pay attention to this fool?

Ace6301

People traded in one form of anti-intellectualism/non evidence based ideology, for another.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Why do people pay attention to this fool?

MakeMeaSammitch

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]My question is why are conspiracy nuts more common these days?

MakeMeaSammitch

People traded in one form of anti-intellectualism/non evidence based ideology, for another.

*sigh*Alex Jones...

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

PannicAtack

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

mattbbpl

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

mattbbpl

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

mattbbpl

Do you understand how a country with nuclear weapons could be beaten by a bunch of guerilla fighters in the jungle?  If so, you answered your own question.  

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

hartsickdiscipl

Do you understand how a country with nuclear weapons could be beaten by a bunch of guerilla fighters in the jungle?  If so, you answered your own question.  

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I understand this was a joke, but I've truly never understood how conspiracy people can simultaneously believe that the government has the technology to summon a 1.3 mile wide tornado and yet be held at bay by some personal firearms.Yusuke420

Do you understand how a country with nuclear weapons could be beaten by a bunch of guerilla fighters in the jungle?  If so, you answered your own question.  

Yes, quite right.  However, the ability to generate tornadoes in specific locations wouldn't guarantee victory over a nation of gun owners.  You're not going to hit them all.  It's a terrible argument that's full of holes.  

Bear in mind- I didn't say that I think that the government can specifically manufacture and effectively steer tornadoes at will.  Maybe Alex and I do disagree on that.  Maybe he knows something I don't.  Doesn't really matter right now.  I don't know of any evidence that this is what happened in Oklahoma.  

However, the ability to generate tornadoes in specific locations wouldn't guarantee victory over a nation of gun owners.  You're not going to hit them all.  It's a terrible argument that's full of holes.hartsickdiscipl

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]However, the ability to generate tornadoes in specific locations wouldn't guarantee victory over a nation of gun owners.  You're not going to hit them all.  It's a terrible argument that's full of holes.Ace6301

Being Alex Jones must be so exhausting. JML897

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]However, the ability to generate tornadoes in specific locations wouldn't guarantee victory over a nation of gun owners.  You're not going to hit them all.  It's a terrible argument that's full of holes.Ace6301

0/10

Who needs drones when you have tornadoes?

Who needs drones when you have tornadoes?

pianist

Who needs drones when you have tornadoes?

pianist

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

Obviously the government staged it as a pretext for gun control.

hartsickdiscipl

Do you understand how a country with nuclear weapons could be beaten by a bunch of guerilla fighters in the jungle?  If so, you answered your own question.  

[QUOTE="pianist"]

Who needs drones when you have tornadoes?

Shottayouth13-

[QUOTE="Shottayouth13-"][QUOTE="pianist"]

Who needs drones when you have tornadoes?

Yusuke420

It's too bad that the government is so evil, weather control could be extremely beneficial to the economy. If only it were in the hands of a private business.

It's too bad that the government is so evil, weather control could be extremely beneficial to the economy. If only it were in the hands of a private business.

rastotm

[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]

[QUOTE="Shottayouth13-"] America will soon start sending droves of tornadoes across the sea to fight their battles for them.MakeMeaSammitch

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Yusuke420"] That would be awesome!

Yusuke420

I do know that a waterspout would be a cooler weapon.

Or a volcano tornado.

The most suspect part of the tornado hitting Moore, OK has nothing to do with the storm itself.  It has to do with the mainstream media's immediate switch in coverage away from Obama, Clinton, and Holder committing criminal and treasonous acts so they can treat a tornado like it's Fukushima.  Yes, it's terrible!  People died and the damage is amazing.  But come on.. The Joplin, MO twister that killed over 160 people didn't have this much coverage.  

hartsickdiscipl

Don't forget that all this extreme weather helps push the climate change agenda. 

weather weapon? So in Alex Jones's world our government is now so badass it can create tornadoes, and control the weather in general?  Doesn't he also claim that the government is incompetent on a regular basis?

Serraph105

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

weather weapon? So in Alex Jones's world our government is now so badass it can create tornadoes, and control the weather in general?  Doesn't he also claim that the government is incompetent on a regular basis?

Rattlesnake_8

Yes, but to control the weather to the extent of using a tornado to destroy a billion dollars worth of property and kill dozens of people doesn't exist.

I'm sure some of you will find some interest in these vids. There's a lot more info out there that will help you in expanding your knowledge on the subject, in the least assist you in connecting the dots for yourself.

http://youtu.be/foLDKQ00XJc - HAARP Weapon- how to make Earthquakes (The History Channel)

http://youtu.be/xo-T_KvLNdQ - What is HAARP IS HAARP Dangerous

http://youtu.be/yZFNJplylns- CHEMTRAILS Exposed on Discovery Channel