[QUOTE="ThaneKrios28"][QUOTE="Yusuke420"]
Thane, you're an idiot. It's not an insult when I am stating a fact!Â
coolbeans90
to bad your mother didnt abort you when she was knocked up with you yea i got insults to now if you want to continue this fine but you will lose kid
This letter contains some tough news. It's not pleasant to hear, but it's very important, and it's part of telling the truth. What follows is the story of how Dr. Thane V Krios IV can be so rich in the rhetoric of democracy and yet so poor in its implementation. He accuses me of being impolite in my responses to his inhumane, pathological revenge fantasies. Let's see: Dr. Krios disgorges his disparaging and arrogant comments on a topic of which he is wholly ignorant, and he expects a polite reply? What is he, ethnocentrism-prone?
Dr. Krios truly believes that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the clueless hands of hate-filled simpletons. It is just such ultra-splenetic megalomania, delusional egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Dr. Krios to distract attention from more important issues. He uses the term "undemonstrativeness" with ostensible confidence that its meaning is universally understood. If you doubt this, just ask around.
Dr. Krios is like an evil genius except without the "genius" part. An obvious parallel from a slightly different context is that if we fail in our task of revealing the truth about his smears, then Dr. Krios will condemn innocent people to death. And what of it? If we do nothing, he will keep on exhibiting cruelty to animals. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. Dr. Krios knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgiveor at least overlookall of his arrogant excesses. My take on the matter is that I have grown tired of watching the repeated handshakes and toothy smiles in front of television cameras and subsequently learning that nothing has truly changed. As always, if Dr. Krios could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to doctor evidence and classification systems and make huffy generalizations to support warped, preconceived views. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Dr. Krios and his votaries, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that Dr. Krios and his henchmen are, by nature, debauched gumps. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but what we're involved in with Dr. Krios is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious personevery person with any shred of a sense of responsibilitymust concern himself with it.
I don't have a high opinion of illogical headcases. And that's where we are right now. I don't mean to throw fuel on an already considerable fire, but Dr. Krios proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never impale us on the pike of fogyism. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. Certainly, caustic, unprincipled sectarianism is not new. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree.
Something that I have heard repeated several times from various sourcesa sort of "tag line" for Dr. Kriosis, "We should go out and smear people of impeccable character and reputation. And when we're done with that, we'll all lionize the most out-of-touch hatemongers you'll ever see." This is not a direct quote, nor have I heard it from Dr. Krios's lips directly but several sources have paraphrased the content to me in near-enough ways that I feel fairly confident it actually was said. And to be honest, I have no trouble believing it.
Anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that anyone who says that Dr. Krios answers to no one can be branded as both vicious and contemptible. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: When I say that Dr. Krios must be suffering from some severe mental strabismus to think that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that materialism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. This is a common fallacy held by testy scaramouches. Dr. Krios is inherently intellectually challenged, callow, and mumpish. Oh, and he also has a disorderly mode of existence. We are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which cheeky hoddypeaks like Dr. Krios are totally absent. The other road leads into the darkness of nosism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? Let me give you a hint: You shouldn't let Dr. Krios intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Dr. Krios.
Difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to catalogue Dr. Krios's swindles and perversions. If you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem. We must work together to make a cause célèbre out of exposing Dr. Krios's tractates for what they really are. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to force Dr. Krios into early retirement. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because I never intend to offend anyone, Dr. Krios included. Alas, the following statement may upset a few people: The general public is finally starting to become aware of Dr. Krios's duplicity and complicity. Some people squirm a bit when they they read things like that, but such statements are the key to explaining why my goal is to hinder the power of abysmal misers like Dr. Krios. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I unequivocally do have to try.
As far as I can tell, Dr. Krios is a litigious, spleeny phlyarologist. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that I would love to be a fly on the wall near where Dr. Krios and his junta meet. I'd love to hear how those power-drunk liars and cheats come up with their predatory schemes for biologically or psychologically engineering possession-obsessed fast-talkers to make them even more disreputable than they already are. Then, I'd finally be able to back up my claim that the term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of Dr. Krios. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I feel that I want to thank Dr. Krios for his surmises. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how petulant Dr. Krios can be.
In this land which has befriended neurotic fiends, Dr. Krios has conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted, and corrupted, andhiding to this hour behind the braver screen of vulgar yutzesdares to contrive and scheme the death of every principle that has protected him. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, I can't possibly believe his claim that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because I have to wonder where Dr. Krios got the idea that it is my view that the world can be happy only when his lynch mob is given full rein. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is.
Dr. Krios apparently believes that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. You and I know better than that. You and I know that hucksterism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. This may be water under the bridge by now, but if it were up to him, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. It's often hard to decipher Dr. Krios's cankered comments. Obviously, he flees clarity whenever it involves unpleasant shouldering of responsibility, but I profess that in this case, Dr. Krios is trying to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. His mission? To pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a villainous coterie of mandarinism. The take-away message of this letter is that I will do my best to examine the warp and woof of Dr. Thane V Krios IV's opuscula. We should hold these words to our bosom, use them as a shield against Dr. Krios's inequities, and wield them unilaterally against those who would calumniate helpless flimflammers.
r u drunk?Â
Log in to comment