[QUOTE="muffincakes87"]Are you British?"Native"
Did I offend anyone?
Jandurin
Nope.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
No it doesn't. There are many factors here that we don't have. Perhaps his school is having racial problems. In that case the school would have a zero tolerance policy toward racist statements....and while from his post it seems to be overreacting...it doesn't change the fact that if perceived racist comments are grounds for punishment then both should have been punished.....otherwise neither should have been. Which is my point. :roll: Which brings to my point as well. How would "native" be racist? I think I had the last laugh in this thread.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] But it does matter:| If all other views point to the TC's than It would of been a waste of breath.bazookajoe19
He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
But for something as silly, as the word native?[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="muffincakes87"]Are you British?"Native"
Did I offend anyone?
muffincakes87
Nope.
Well, I still wouldn't be offended even if you were. So there.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] Really? Show me some proof, that I made my opinions sound like facts.Vilot_HeroAnytime you decide what is or is not offensive you are stating opinion....and you state it that it is definitive and not opinion.Like the word native? And just FYI native isn't an offensive word. Your opinions sounded more like facts, than of mine.I made no statement in regard to whether the word is offensive or not. You did. Thus you have stated YOUR OPINION AS FACT.:lol:But native still isn't an offensive word:| Hence why I made it sound like a fact.
are you being serious!? you are so hypocritical.
[QUOTE="muffincakes87"][QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="muffincakes87"]Are you British?"Native"
Did I offend anyone?
Jandurin
Nope.
Well, I still wouldn't be offended even if you were. So there.Horray!
[QUOTE="bazookajoe19"]No it doesn't. There are many factors here that we don't have. Perhaps his school is having racial problems. In that case the school would have a zero tolerance policy toward racist statements....and while from his post it seems to be overreacting...it doesn't change the fact that if perceived racist comments are grounds for punishment then both should have been punished.....otherwise neither should have been. Which is my point. :roll: Which brings to my point as well. How would "native" be racist? I think I had the last laugh in this thread.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] But it does matter:| If all other views point to the TC's than It would of been a waste of breath.Vilot_Hero
He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
But for something as silly, as the word native?That is completely irrelevant.
[QUOTE="andyboiii"]I set it up :P No, I can't take responsibility. Vilot_Hero set this up all by themselves :| The obstinacy is unparalleled.You set up my post that he keeps repeating? I don't think so.../thread
LJ: 1
Vilolet Hero: 0
Jandurin
Get a lawyer and sue the school!!
It should work, because they are saying you can't say something that you are allowed to say.
You set up my post that he keeps repeating? I don't think so...LJS9502_basicThe problem isn't that the person doesn't understand your post, it's that they think you're saying native is offensive. *I think* You can't have expected that anyone would respond to your post in that way.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You set up my post that he keeps repeating? I don't think so...JandurinThe problem isn't that the person doesn't understand your post, it's that they think you're saying native is offensive. *I think* You can't have expected that anyone would respond to your post in that way.He picks my posts out to argue with in most threads I've encountered him in....for whatever reason.:?
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="bazookajoe19"]No it doesn't. There are many factors here that we don't have. Perhaps his school is having racial problems. In that case the school would have a zero tolerance policy toward racist statements....and while from his post it seems to be overreacting...it doesn't change the fact that if perceived racist comments are grounds for punishment then both should have been punished.....otherwise neither should have been. Which is my point. :roll: Which brings to my point as well. How would "native" be racist? I think I had the last laugh in this thread.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] But it does matter:| If all other views point to the TC's than It would of been a waste of breath.bazookajoe19
He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
But for something as silly, as the word native?That is completely irrelevant.
Please elaborate on why It is irrelevant to the matter at hand.He picks my posts out to argue with in most threads I've encountered him in....for whatever reason.:?LJS9502_basicWhat, another one? You sure are popular. :lol:
What, another one? You sure are popular. :lol:JandurinI think I've encountered him under a different user name......:o
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You set up my post that he keeps repeating? I don't think so...LJS9502_basicThe problem isn't that the person doesn't understand your post, it's that they think you're saying native is offensive. *I think* You can't have expected that anyone would respond to your post in that way.He picks my posts out to argue with in most threads I've encountered him in....for whatever reason.:?I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.
I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.Vilot_HeroI haven't posted anything incorrect. You just don't agree with it. Big difference. The weather here is seasonal....but I like the cooler temperature.
[QUOTE="bazookajoe19"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="bazookajoe19"]But for something as silly, as the word native?He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
Vilot_Hero
That is completely irrelevant.
Please elaborate on why It is irrelevant to the matter at hand.He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.Vilot_HeroSo you're doing a service for Gamespot and LJ?
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.LJS9502_basicI haven't posted anything incorrect. You just don't agree with it. Big difference. The weather here is seasonal....but I like the cooler temperature.You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.JandurinSo you're doing a service for Gamespot and LJ?If he is posting incorrect things, than I will correct him with the right information.
You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.Vilot_Hero:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.Vilot_HeroI haven't posted anything incorrect. You just don't agree with it. Big difference. The weather here is seasonal....but I like the cooler temperature.You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.
I was there for that little scuffle. You were wrong and you're still wrong. You were lying to yourself the entire time to maybe make yourself think you didn't lose a debate, and a pathetic attempt to make others think that you were right.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.Vilot_HeroSo you're doing a service for Gamespot and LJ?If he is posting incorrect things, than I will correct him with the right information. It would be then, not than. And correct would be more correct than right.
:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.LJS9502_basic
The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.Vilot_Hero:lol: And I thought I was stubborn....
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.JandurinSo you're doing a service for Gamespot and LJ?If he is posting incorrect things, than I will correct him with the right information. It would be then, not than. And correct would be more correct than right.Iv been here trying to change LJ's opinion since eight this morning:| Simple mistakes aren't going to kill anyone.
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.LJS9502_basic:lol: And I thought I was stubborn....I assure you that any historian would tell you, that Conquest's are not wars.
Simple mistakes aren't going to kill anyone.Vilot_HeroNeither is someone being wrong on the internet (in your opinion) going to kill you. :|
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.Vilot_Hero
I would assume that a country would go to war if another country was attempting to conquer it. Conquest is war. The battles weren't counted. ;)
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.Vilot_Hero:lol: And I thought I was stubborn....I assure you that any historian would tell you, that Conquest's are not wars.I don't want to continue that argument here....suffice to say you were owned by at least ten different users in that thread.
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="bazookajoe19"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="bazookajoe19"]But for something as silly, as the word native?He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
bazookajoe19
That is completely irrelevant.
Please elaborate on why It is irrelevant to the matter at hand.He's not arguing whether the word "native" is racist or not. He is just saying that if one of them is punished, both of them should be punished. What don't you understand about that?
Let's get back on topic. Vilot still doesn't understand what the arguement was even about.
Wrong you are allowed to say native, the teacher is wrong, it better than saying Indian. Plus you said it to your friend, the teacher should ask your friend if it is offensive to him.So i live in Canada and supposedly up here your not allowed to say the word "native" if your white. Anyways heres the story. I was sitting math class and my friend Trevor comes up to me and calls me white as a butter and i tell him hes brown like a native. Next thing i know the teacher comes up to me tells me to leave class and wait in the hallway for the principle to come and talk to me.
He brings me up to the office and he says I'm not allowed to say the word "Native" but "First nations" and tells me he could suspend me or even expel me for saying Trevor is a native.
Then i asked him this question
"IF i was native would i be up here right now?"
and he says "Probably not" So according to him natives are allowed to say native but us white people are not.So he gave me garbage duty instead and i had to walk around the school being laughed at.
IS the principle right or am i wrong? Just wanted to know what you guys think.
XileLord
Native means
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.LikeHaterade
I would assume that a country would go to war if another country was attempting to conquer it. Conquest is war. The battles weren't counted. ;)
Conquest is taking one area and holding It:| War is conquering the whole country.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.LJS9502_basic:lol: And I thought I was stubborn....I assure you that any historian would tell you, that Conquest's are not wars.I don't want to continue that argument here....suffice to say you were owned by at least ten different users in that thread.Far from that. I provided solid points(Some points were above solid). And I counted 94 wars from France. Anyone can try and disprove that.
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.Vilot_Hero
I would assume that a country would go to war if another country was attempting to conquer it. Conquest is war. The battles weren't counted. ;)
Conquest is taking one area and holding It:| War is conquering the whole country.You know, the word conquest is derived from the word conquer.;)
War can be galvanized by anything. Conquest is war in means of one entity attempting to conquer another.
The definition of "Conquest" is the act of conquering.
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.LikeHaterade
I would assume that a country would go to war if another country was attempting to conquer it. Conquest is war. The battles weren't counted. ;)
Conquest is taking one area and holding It:| War is conquering the whole country.You know, the word conquest is derived from the word conquer.;)
It has some relation, but It is still not the same.
War can be galvanized by anything. Conquest is war in means of one entity attempting to conquer another.
Conquest is like Annexing, but war on the other hand is destroying another entity.
The definition of "Conquest" is the act of conquering.
Conquering doesn't mean the entire country.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"]I pick out your post's because I don't agree with them, and sometimes you can post incorrect things without knowing it. It is possible to change peoples opinions, weather they be good or bad.Vilot_HeroSo you're doing a service for Gamespot and LJ?If he is posting incorrect things, than I will correct him with the right information.
Your philanthropy knows no bounds.
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.Vilot_Hero
I would assume that a country would go to war if another country was attempting to conquer it. Conquest is war. The battles weren't counted. ;)
Conquest is taking one area and holding It:| War is conquering the whole country.You know, the word conquest is derived from the word conquer.;)
It has some relation, but It is still not the same.
War can be galvanized by anything. Conquest is war in means of one entity attempting to conquer another.
Conquest is like Annexing, but war on the other hand is destroying another entity.
The definition of "Conquest" is the act of conquering.
Conquering doesn't mean the entire country.
FYI, if you are conquering something, it does mean the entire entity.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conquest
[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]:lol: The facts in that thread were against you. You pick and choose what you consider proof and discard what contradicts your opinion. :lol:The facts were against you dude:| Conquest's don't count as wars, and battles don't either.[QUOTE="Vilot_Hero"] You said France has had more wars than America...Guess what? That's incorrect. And one small spelling mistake. We all make them once in a while, especially in arguments that is significant to OT.LikeHaterade
I would assume that a country would go to war if another country was attempting to conquer it. Conquest is war. The battles weren't counted. ;)
Conquest is taking one area and holding It:| War is conquering the whole country.You know, the word conquest is derived from the word conquer.;)
It has some relation, but It is still not the same.
War can be galvanized by anything. Conquest is war in means of one entity attempting to conquer another.
Conquest is like Annexing, but war on the other hand is destroying another entity.
The definition of "Conquest" is the act of conquering.
Conquering doesn't mean the entire country.
FYI, if you are conquering something, it does mean the entire entity.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conquest
That definition is wrong. Online dictionaries aren't too reliable.I've been trying to contact the Hague War Crimes Tribunal but they just keep telling me to stop calling.duxup
Another rule or is this a crime. :P
Native i dont see how yuo can get punish for racism there. I would contact the schools supernintendo as ralaph would say on th simpoins :P
Far from that. I provided solid points(Some points were above solid). And I counted 94 wars from France. Anyone can try and disprove that.Vilot_HeroActually you provided only opinion...none of which was solid as you cherry pick what you consider as factual. And online dictionaries are as reliable as other dictionaries. They are published on the web instead of book form. The words aren't changed in meaning because they are on the web.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment