America currently scare the hell out of me (short version)

  • 123 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#101 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
[QUOTE="helium_flash"]

WTF are you talking about? How is it NOT secular? Politicians may make choices based on what they believe, but there is NO religion endorsed by the government AT ALL. Last time i checked, there was an Atheist senator from California, and also a just elected Muslim senator.

Stop trying to say the US isn't secular when there in nothing in the government that supports any religion at all. Religious politicians =/= Religious Government!

quiglythegreat

I disagree. I don't see what else possibly COULD make a government religious.

In that case, the only way for a government to NOT be secular is if all the representatives were Atheist. 

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

The Second Great Awakening happened BEFORE the Civil War! OVER 150 years ago! Also, the Second Great Awakening wasn't limited to the United States.

sca321
The Second Great awakening not being exclusive to the United States has nothing to do with anything. America has a legacy of religious fanatacism; so it is and so I said it. You questioned me, I provided examples of historical instances supporting this claim.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="helium_flash"]

WTF are you talking about? How is it NOT secular? Politicians may make choices based on what they believe, but there is NO religion endorsed by the government AT ALL. Last time i checked, there was an Atheist senator from California, and also a just elected Muslim senator.

Stop trying to say the US isn't secular when there in nothing in the government that supports any religion at all. Religious politicians =/= Religious Government!

sca321

I disagree. I don't see what else possibly COULD make a government religious.

A state religion.

A state religion does nothing to make the government religious (practically) unless the officials are religious.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
In that case, the only way for a government to NOT be secular is if all the representatives were Atheist. helium_flash
Or agnostic, or have a number of people who refuse to legislate according to their religious beliefs.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="sca321"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jointed"]

helium_flash

well, I'm saying that the US claims to be secular but most obviously is not.....

You just said that secularity means there are no laws respecting an establishment of religion. There are not such laws, so it is secular according to you.

no I did not....I said that the statement implies that the US was founded on secularity...

Secularity means that state and organized religion must have NOTHING to do with eachother.......this ISNT the case in today's USA...

there you have it...

WTF are you talking about? How is it NOT secular? Politicians may make choices based on what they believe, but there is NO religion endorsed by the government AT ALL. Last time i checked, there was an Atheist senator from California, and also a just elected Muslim senator.

Stop trying to say the US isn't secular when there in nothing in the government that supports any religion at all. Religious politicians =/= Religious Government!

Religious politicians making decisions based on religion = not secular.

Politicians using religion to win elections = not secular.

Secularity isnt only about how the government endorse religion upon its people. It's also about how religion is affecting the nation's sociological structure.

I say again, Secularity means that state and organized religion must have NOTHING to do with eachother.

Avatar image for sparklebarkle
sparklebarkle

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 sparklebarkle
Member since 2004 • 3613 Posts
Yes Yes..non religious people are allowed to do whatever they please, but when it's religious, that's a horrible thing.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
Yes Yes..non religious people are allowed to do whatever they please, but when it's religious, that's a horrible thing.sparklebarkle
I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.
Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#108 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
[QUOTE="sca321"]

The Second Great Awakening happened BEFORE the Civil War! OVER 150 years ago! Also, the Second Great Awakening wasn't limited to the United States.

quiglythegreat

The Second Great awakening not being exclusive to the United States has nothing to do with anything. America has a legacy of religious fanatacism; so it is and so I said it. You questioned me, I provided examples of historical instances supporting this claim.

First, the First Great Awakening happened before the US was independent. 

Second, those are horrible examples.  The US was only 30 or so years old when the Second Great Awakening occured.  You need to give maybe something.. more recent for there to be a history of religious fantacism.  You gave 3 examples, all of which happened A LONG TIME AGO.  The United States hasn't done anything recent for us to be called religious fanatics.

According to your logic, i could say that all white people are racist from the way they treated black people in their past.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="sca321"]

The Second Great Awakening happened BEFORE the Civil War! OVER 150 years ago! Also, the Second Great Awakening wasn't limited to the United States.

helium_flash

The Second Great awakening not being exclusive to the United States has nothing to do with anything. America has a legacy of religious fanatacism; so it is and so I said it. You questioned me, I provided examples of historical instances supporting this claim.

First, the First Great Awakening happened before the US was independent.

Second, those are horrible examples. The US was only 30 or so years old when the Second Great Awakening occured. You need to give maybe something.. more recent for there to be a history of religious fantacism. You gave 3 examples, all of which happened A LONG TIME AGO. The United States hasn't done anything recent for us to be called religious fanatics.

According to your logic, i could say that all white people are racist from the way they treated black people in their past.

I said America has a history of religious fanatacism. I've been backing that up because you challenged this claim. Apparently I went too far back for there to be a legacy...? Ok, how about 94% of Americans still believing in God, whatever that was, and less than half believing in evolution? I'd say that's fair evidence and the legacy continues.
Avatar image for sparklebarkle
sparklebarkle

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 sparklebarkle
Member since 2004 • 3613 Posts
I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.
quiglythegreat
Sadly it goes both ways.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"] I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.
sparklebarkle
Sadly it goes both ways.

OK...? People need to think about things independently and reach the conclusions themselves upon independent meditation. I'm intolerant of anything other than this. There's no point to have democracy without this. Religion stops this, as do political parties.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sparklebarkle"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"] I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.
quiglythegreat
Sadly it goes both ways.

OK...? People need to think about things independently and reach the conclusions themselves upon independent meditation. I'm intolerant of anything other than this. There's no point to have democracy without this. Religion stops this, as do political parties.

  Don't forget Lobbying and big business.

Avatar image for sparklebarkle
sparklebarkle

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 sparklebarkle
Member since 2004 • 3613 Posts
[QUOTE="sparklebarkle"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"] I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.
quiglythegreat
Sadly it goes both ways.

OK...? People need to think about things independently and reach the conclusions themselves upon independent meditation. I'm intolerant of anything other than this. There's no point to have democracy without this. Religion stops this, as do political parties.

People are always going to have a bias for their own views. What would you tell your five year old child if they asked, "How did the world start?" Would anyone truthfully tell them.."umm..well..look it up when you're older." It's obvious that pretty much any parent would teach their children what they were taught. People will also push their own views in other areas of life as well. It's something people need to accept.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="sparklebarkle"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"] I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.
sparklebarkle
Sadly it goes both ways.

OK...? People need to think about things independently and reach the conclusions themselves upon independent meditation. I'm intolerant of anything other than this. There's no point to have democracy without this. Religion stops this, as do political parties.

People are always going to have a bias for their own views. What would you tell your five year old child if they asked, "How did the world start?" Would anyone truthfully tell them.."umm..well..look it up when you're older." It's obvious that pretty much any parent would teach their children what they were taught. People will also push their own views in other areas of life as well. It's something people need to accept.

Well, it would make sense to teach the scientific view. Science is indeed based objective analysis, which is precisely what I'm proposing here. It's not impossible at all. It's not even difficult.
Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#115 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
[QUOTE="helium_flash"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="sca321"]

The Second Great Awakening happened BEFORE the Civil War! OVER 150 years ago! Also, the Second Great Awakening wasn't limited to the United States.

quiglythegreat

The Second Great awakening not being exclusive to the United States has nothing to do with anything. America has a legacy of religious fanatacism; so it is and so I said it. You questioned me, I provided examples of historical instances supporting this claim.

First, the First Great Awakening happened before the US was independent.

Second, those are horrible examples. The US was only 30 or so years old when the Second Great Awakening occured. You need to give maybe something.. more recent for there to be a history of religious fantacism. You gave 3 examples, all of which happened A LONG TIME AGO. The United States hasn't done anything recent for us to be called religious fanatics.

According to your logic, i could say that all white people are racist from the way they treated black people in their past.

I said America has a history of religious fanatacism. I've been backing that up because you challenged this claim. Apparently I went too far back for there to be a legacy...? Ok, how about 94% of Americans still believing in God, whatever that was, and less than half believing in evolution? I'd say that's fair evidence and the legacy continues.

You could contribute most of that due to the fact that we have millions of hispanic immigrants flooding into our country each year.

Also, according to wikipedia, in 2001, 14.5% of the people identified themselves as having no faith.  76.7% identified themselves as Christian.  That's less than your 94%.   Plus, you give no numbers as to how religious other countries are.  According to wiki again, England is 71% Christian and 22.3% faithless.  That's not much less than the US.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="helium_flash"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="sca321"]

The Second Great Awakening happened BEFORE the Civil War! OVER 150 years ago! Also, the Second Great Awakening wasn't limited to the United States.

helium_flash

The Second Great awakening not being exclusive to the United States has nothing to do with anything. America has a legacy of religious fanatacism; so it is and so I said it. You questioned me, I provided examples of historical instances supporting this claim.

First, the First Great Awakening happened before the US was independent.

Second, those are horrible examples. The US was only 30 or so years old when the Second Great Awakening occured. You need to give maybe something.. more recent for there to be a history of religious fantacism. You gave 3 examples, all of which happened A LONG TIME AGO. The United States hasn't done anything recent for us to be called religious fanatics.

According to your logic, i could say that all white people are racist from the way they treated black people in their past.

I said America has a history of religious fanatacism. I've been backing that up because you challenged this claim. Apparently I went too far back for there to be a legacy...? Ok, how about 94% of Americans still believing in God, whatever that was, and less than half believing in evolution? I'd say that's fair evidence and the legacy continues.

You could contribute most of that due to the fact that we have millions of hispanic immigrants flooding into our country each year.

Also, according to wikipedia, in 2001, 14.5% of the people identified themselves as having no faith.  76.7% identified themselves as Christian.  That's less than your 94%.   Plus, you give no numbers as to how religious other countries are.  According to wiki again, England is 71% Christian and 22.3% faithless.  That's not much less than the US.

These numbers are irrelevant.....I don't know about america, but in Europe , a small amount (0,01% ) of your tax money goes to the chruches and you yourself have to tell the government that you don't want to pay....Most people simply pay and don't want to bother with the paper work. The people who has done the survey you're talking about has simply counted the people who's paying that amount, and therefore it's COMPLETELY irrelevant.

Avatar image for sca321
sca321

1903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 sca321
Member since 2003 • 1903 Posts

These numbers are irrelevant.....I don't know about america, but in Europe , a small amount (0,01% ) of your tax money goes to the chruches and you yourself have to tell the government that you don't want to pay....Most people simply pay and don't want to bother with the paper work. The people who has done the survey you're talking about has simply counted the people who's paying that amount, and therefore it's COMPLETELY irrelevant.

jointed

So European tax money goes to churches, huh? Now who's not secular.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#118 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"]

These numbers are irrelevant.....I don't know about america, but in Europe , a small amount (0,01% ) of your tax money goes to the chruches and you yourself have to tell the government that you don't want to pay....Most people simply pay and don't want to bother with the paper work. The people who has done the survey you're talking about has simply counted the people who's paying that amount, and therefore it's COMPLETELY irrelevant.

sca321

So European tax money goes to churches, huh? Now who's not secular.

  Technically speaking Churchs in the US get funds too.. Indirectly..  For instance churchs don't pay taxs yet they get the services of the fire and police departments.

Avatar image for gamerchris810
gamerchris810

2372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 gamerchris810
Member since 2007 • 2372 Posts
why do so many americains go to church? most arnt even christian, they just feel they have to go to church...ill never understand u americains...good ol'Britainia
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

why do so many americains go to church? most arnt even christian, they just feel they have to go to church...ill never understand u americains...good ol'Britainiagamerchris810

This post is one big contradiction

Avatar image for sca321
sca321

1903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 sca321
Member since 2003 • 1903 Posts
[QUOTE="sca321"][QUOTE="jointed"]

These numbers are irrelevant.....I don't know about america, but in Europe , a small amount (0,01% ) of your tax money goes to the chruches and you yourself have to tell the government that you don't want to pay....Most people simply pay and don't want to bother with the paper work. The people who has done the survey you're talking about has simply counted the people who's paying that amount, and therefore it's COMPLETELY irrelevant.

sSubZerOo

So European tax money goes to churches, huh? Now who's not secular.

Technically speaking Churchs in the US get funds too.. Indirectly.. For instance churchs don't pay taxs yet they get the services of the fire and police departments.

Tax exempt status isn't that same as getting tax money. 

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

You could contribute most of that due to the fact that we have millions of hispanic immigrants flooding into our country each year.

Also, according to wikipedia, in 2001, 14.5% of the people identified themselves as having no faith. 76.7% identified themselves as Christian. That's less than your 94%. Plus, you give no numbers as to how religious other countries are. According to wiki again, England is 71% Christian and 22.3% faithless. That's not much less than the US.

helium_flash

91% of Americans classify themselves as having religious faith, according to Newsweek. The issue is that in America, it seems that a lot of people are hardcore about religion, specifically evangelicals, of whom apparently about 62% (the white ones) believe the Bible is God's literal word.

http://pewforum.org/publications/surveys/religion-politics-06.pdf 

Avatar image for mark4091
mark4091

3780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 mark4091
Member since 2007 • 3780 Posts

[QUOTE="sparklebarkle"]Yes Yes..non religious people are allowed to do whatever they please, but when it's religious, that's a horrible thing.quiglythegreat
I think people should want what will be best for everyone, not what they're told to want. I just want some goddamn rational thinking.

I agree