American Atheists sue over ground zero cross.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

This cross was found in the wreckage of the world trade center. It has now been moved to the 911 memorial museum.

If it means something to some people then why sue over it. I just don't see how it's harming anyone. I would hope to hear from some athiests on this and I'm sure I will:)

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
Stupid things like this are why people hate atheists.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
....as an atheist, not only is this a completely unnecessary complaint...but I hate groups such as 'American Atheist', they are no better than any racial/religious/gender/political/etc. group who have nothing better to do than to 'join together' to complain about **** just for the sake of complaining.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Not an atheist but I'm sure to any Christian I would be considered in the same tier. Same stance I had on the Islam center thing: I don't care if it stays. I disagree with attempts to remove it but if it was never intended to be there in the first place I wouldn't demand it be there. To Christians who will get all uppity about the Atheists doing this: Now you know the feeling.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
Good, it's offensive to have people force religion on others. Just because there's a lot of Christians, doesn't mean they get to throw Crosses on everything, it's rude and disrespectful to other religions.
Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

Good, it's offensive to have people force religion on others. Just because there's a lot of Christians, doesn't mean they get to throw Crosses on everything, it's rude and disrespectful to other religions.Nibroc420
The cross was found there the way it is in the picture.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]Good, it's offensive to have people force religion on others. Just because there's a lot of Christians, doesn't mean they get to throw Crosses on everything, it's rude and disrespectful to other religions.junglist101

The cross was found there the way it is in the picture.

Sure it was. :roll:
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts
Stupid things like this are why people hate atheists.scorch-62
x2, doesn't hurt anything to leave it be. the atheists need to stop being such sissies :o
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

What do you mean it was just found there like that? Was it actually a part of the building that just broke off like that, and just happened to look like that?

How can anyone even sue over this, how does it effect them exactly? What a stupid thing to sue over.

Why do some atheists feel like they need to completely censor or rid of everything that has to do with religion, just let people believe in what they want to. We do have the right.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]Good, it's offensive to have people force religion on others. Just because there's a lot of Christians, doesn't mean they get to throw Crosses on everything, it's rude and disrespectful to other religions.Nibroc420

The cross was found there the way it is in the picture.

Sure it was. :roll:

It wasn't standing the way it is but it was found in one piece there.

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
Sure it was. :roll:Nibroc420
It was, though it would be more accurate to call it a T-joint. The entire World Trade Center was made of these steel joints. 9/11 responders found an in-tact joint among the wreckage and it was dubbed the World Trade Center/Ground Zero cross.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

tenaka2
See. Yet another case of Christian's thinking they're above everyone else. It's disrespectful to those who died at 9/11, the ones who were not christian shouldn't be remembered by a Christian icon, nor should their families have to deal with such rude behavior from the religious communities.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

American Atheists president Dave Silverman. "They want a monopoly and we don't want that to happen."

It wasn't even a monopoly until you said anything. Wow...

Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts
Stupid. I'm an Atheist, but that doesn't mean I don't believe the cross is a powerful symbol to many people. Don't forget Atheism isn't a religion, it's not like we all have the same beliefs. To me, this Atheist group sound like a bunch of morons.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

American Atheists president Dave Silverman. "They want a monopoly and we don't want that to happen."

It wasn't even a monopoly until you said anything. Wow...

gotdangit
Yes it was... The memorial will contain a religious icon from only ONE religion, giving memory to the Christians who died, but leaving everyone else to be forgotten.
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Stunts like this, and banning school Christmas celebrations are why people are not found of atheists

The separation of church and state is important, but you don't have to be an @$$ about everything.

How about showing Christians the respect you say they are not giving you. You know setting an example.

^My comments are aimed towards vocal atheist like the ones in the article. Not atheists as a whole.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

tenaka2
...it is a museum, it is going in not solely based on the religious aspect of it but also its history at the site since it was discovered, why would we put other random memorials in a MUSEUM if they hold no significance other than to promote certain religions?...sort of goes against the exact sort of thing this group is complaining about.
Avatar image for limpbizkit818
limpbizkit818

15044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 limpbizkit818
Member since 2004 • 15044 Posts

The atheist group said that they have contacted the 9/11 Memorial and Museum requesting to display their own atheistic memorial next to the steel-shaped cross, possibly in the form of an atom or an American flag, to represent the "500 non-religious Americans" who were "among the victims of the 9/11 attack."

They want to put an atom into the memorial :lol:An atom. I love when real news stories are indistinguishable from The Onion.

Avatar image for XilePrincess
XilePrincess

13130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 XilePrincess
Member since 2008 • 13130 Posts
Stupid things like this are why people hate atheists.scorch-62
I agree. Seriously, that's sad. Like, Westboro funeral protesting sad.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

Nibroc420

See. Yet another case of Christian's thinking they're above everyone else. It's disrespectful to those who died at 9/11, the ones who were not christian shouldn't be remembered by a Christian icon, nor should their families have to deal with such rude behavior from the religious communities.

How is a cross disrespectful to those who died. The way I see it, it's more like Christians respecting and giving prayer to those who died.

If I said a prayer for you, would you find that offensive? That's how I see it, just because They leave something for someone doesn't mean they're forcing religion on anyone.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

SaintLeonidas
...it is a museum, it is going in not solely based on the religious aspect of it but also its history at the site since it was discovered, why would we put other random memorials in a MUSEUM if they hold no significance other than to promote certain religions?...sort of goes against the exact sort of thing this group is complaining about.

They're making something that doesn't need to be religious, into a religious thing. They're forcing everyone to respect a Cross, but leaving every other religion in the dark. They're essentially saying "Christianity > Your religion", by including this trash in their memorial.
Avatar image for SirWander
SirWander

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 SirWander
Member since 2009 • 5176 Posts

(stuff he quoted)tenaka2

I'm glad someone else decided to read the actual article.

That "cross" is nothing but blatant propaganda.

I personally don't care.

Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts
[QUOTE="junglist101"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]Good, it's offensive to have people force religion on others. Just because there's a lot of Christians, doesn't mean they get to throw Crosses on everything, it's rude and disrespectful to other religions.Nibroc420

The cross was found there the way it is in the picture.

Sure it was. :roll:

It was a big building, and the structure would have consisted of thousands of steel bars crossing each other at right angles, so it's not hard at all to believe a cross shape like the one in the picture was found in the rubble.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

Nibroc420
...it is a museum, it is going in not solely based on the religious aspect of it but also its history at the site since it was discovered, why would we put other random memorials in a MUSEUM if they hold no significance other than to promote certain religions?...sort of goes against the exact sort of thing this group is complaining about.

They're making something that doesn't need to be religious, into a religious thing. They're forcing everyone to respect a Cross, but leaving every other religion in the dark. They're essentially saying "Christianity > Your religion", by including this trash in their memorial.

...no actually. They aren't forcing anyone to respect anything. It had just been a major part of ground zero and so since it is a part of ground zero history they are including it in the museum. Has nothing to do with trying to promote one religion over another in anyway other than those who wish to view it that way just to have something to complain about.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

gotdangit

See. Yet another case of Christian's thinking they're above everyone else. It's disrespectful to those who died at 9/11, the ones who were not christian shouldn't be remembered by a Christian icon, nor should their families have to deal with such rude behavior from the religious communities.

How is a cross disrespectful to those who died. The way I see it, it's more like Christians respecting and giving prayer to those who died.

If I said a prayer for you, would you find that offensive? That's how I see it, just because They leave something for someone doesn't mean they're forcing religion on anyone.

I would find it offensive if my family was Jewish, or Muslim, and when going to a memorial for my family who died in 9/11, I'm forced to look at a religious symbol that is not my own, and does not represent my family. They're not allowing any other religious icons within the memorial, which is a clear bias towards christians. It's like if they drew a mural, depicting everyone who died, but making everyone white. It doesn't represent everyone, and is disrespectful to those who died, but dont get remembered or included.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

From article:

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case."

"It's an all or nothing deal. They can remove the cross, or they can let everybody else in. Either way is legal and we would drop the case," Silverman said.

Nibroc420

...it is a museum, it is going in not solely based on the religious aspect of it but also its history at the site since it was discovered, why would we put other random memorials in a MUSEUM if they hold no significance other than to promote certain religions?...sort of goes against the exact sort of thing this group is complaining about.

They're making something that doesn't need to be religious, into a religious thing. They're forcing everyone to respect a Cross, but leaving every other religion in the dark. They're essentially saying "Christianity > Your religion", by including this trash in their memorial.

Atheism isn't a religion, and maybe if there was an "atom" or "american flag" looking icon in the rubble or thing that reminded others of another religion it could have been added. The only reason the cross was there was because it was from the actual building. It's a museum of 9/11, not "Museum of random stuff that represents religions because we don't want Christianity to be the only one"

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
They're not allowing any other religious icons within the memorialNibroc420
Please, back this claim up.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"] ...it is a museum, it is going in not solely based on the religious aspect of it but also its history at the site since it was discovered, why would we put other random memorials in a MUSEUM if they hold no significance other than to promote certain religions?...sort of goes against the exact sort of thing this group is complaining about. gotdangit

They're making something that doesn't need to be religious, into a religious thing. They're forcing everyone to respect a Cross, but leaving every other religion in the dark. They're essentially saying "Christianity > Your religion", by including this trash in their memorial.

Atheism isn't a religion, and maybe if there was an "atom" or "american flag" looking icon in the rubble or thing that reminded others of another religion it could have been added. The only reason the cross was there was because it was from the actual building. It's a museum of 9/11, not "Museum of random stuff that represents religions because we don't want Christianity to be the only one"

It's a museum to help remember those who died. Meaning you've got to respect those who died. It's disrespectful to include some of the people's religions, but not everyone's religion. They're favoring Christianity, which is wrong. Lets go to the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Museum, and remove all photos depicting females, because it's to remember what happened, not the people right? :roll:
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] They're making something that doesn't need to be religious, into a religious thing. They're forcing everyone to respect a Cross, but leaving every other religion in the dark. They're essentially saying "Christianity > Your religion", by including this trash in their memorial.Nibroc420

Atheism isn't a religion, and maybe if there was an "atom" or "american flag" looking icon in the rubble or thing that reminded others of another religion it could have been added. The only reason the cross was there was because it was from the actual building. It's a museum of 9/11, not "Museum of random stuff that represents religions because we don't want Christianity to be the only one"

It's a museum to help remember those who died. Meaning you've got to respect those who died. It's disrespectful to include some of the people's religions, but not everyone's religion. They're favoring Christianity, which is wrong. Lets go to the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Museum, and remove all photos depicting females, because it's to remember what happened, not the people right? :roll:

So you're saying the only way to remember people who died is by showing an icon of their religion? Yep, that's certainly the only way to remember someone, by what religion they were, not by who they actually were... or by name.

Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]How is a cross disrespectful to those who died. The way I see it, it's more like Christians respecting and giving prayer to those who died.

If I said a prayer for you, would you find that offensive? That's how I see it, just because They leave something for someone doesn't mean they're forcing religion on anyone.

gotdangit

I would find it offensive if my family was Jewish, or Muslim, and when going to a memorial for my family who died in 9/11, I'm forced to look at a religious symbol that is not my own, and does not represent my family. They're not allowing any other religious icons within the memorial, which is a clear bias towards christians. It's like if they drew a mural, depicting everyone who died, but making everyone white. It doesn't represent everyone, and is disrespectful to those who died, but dont get remembered or included.

They're not allowing other icons of religion because they didn't come from the actually building themselves. If you really think saying a prayer for someone in good nature is offensive, then you're just ignorant. Stop looking at things the wrong way instead of what they actually are.

On another note, stop being a troll, you just come into controversial topics and disagree with everyone to make people angry and argue with you.

Pretty sure you're going to get something in your inbox for calling someone else a troll. I did. I'd delete it if I were you.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Atheism isn't a religion, and maybe if there was an "atom" or "american flag" looking icon in the rubble or thing that reminded others of another religion it could have been added. The only reason the cross was there was because it was from the actual building. It's a museum of 9/11, not "Museum of random stuff that represents religions because we don't want Christianity to be the only one"

gotdangit

It's a museum to help remember those who died. Meaning you've got to respect those who died. It's disrespectful to include some of the people's religions, but not everyone's religion. They're favoring Christianity, which is wrong. Lets go to the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Museum, and remove all photos depicting females, because it's to remember what happened, not the people right? :roll:

So you're saying the only way to remember people who died is by showing an icon of their religion? Yep, that's certainly the only way to remember someone, by what religion they were, not by who they actually were... or by name.

No, i'm saying that if someone dies, you should respect them, and their beliefs. Only showing respect for Christians' beliefs is disrespectful to every non-christian there. You're essentially saying "Pfft, who cares if you're Muslim, you're being remembered by a christian icon now" That's not very respectful.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] It's a museum to help remember those who died. Meaning you've got to respect those who died. It's disrespectful to include some of the people's religions, but not everyone's religion. They're favoring Christianity, which is wrong. Lets go to the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Museum, and remove all photos depicting females, because it's to remember what happened, not the people right? :roll:Nibroc420

So you're saying the only way to remember people who died is by showing an icon of their religion? Yep, that's certainly the only way to remember someone, by what religion they were, not by who they actually were... or by name.

No, i'm saying that if someone dies, you should respect them, and their beliefs. Only showing respect for Christians' beliefs is disrespectful to every non-christian there. You're essentially saying "Pfft, who cares if you're Muslim, you're being remembered by a christian icon now" That's not very respectful.

No it's not, you're making up extreme analogies that don't actually pertain to the situation.

Ok there is a Christian symbol, that represents the Christians in one way, religion, and for everyone else, there are other icons that represent those people, just not in religion. Like I said, the cross doesn't represeent people, it's more like a blessing. You're acting as if the cross has all the names of people who were christian and not anyone else. The cross doesn't represent Christians only, and it's not representing everyone.

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts
[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I would find it offensive if my family was Jewish, or Muslim, and when going to a memorial for my family who died in 9/11, I'm forced to look at a religious symbol that is not my own, and does not represent my family. They're not allowing any other religious icons within the memorial, which is a clear bias towards christians. It's like if they drew a mural, depicting everyone who died, but making everyone white. It doesn't represent everyone, and is disrespectful to those who died, but dont get remembered or included.KeitekeTokage

They're not allowing other icons of religion because they didn't come from the actually building themselves. If you really think saying a prayer for someone in good nature is offensive, then you're just ignorant. Stop looking at things the wrong way instead of what they actually are.

On another note, stop being a troll, you just come into controversial topics and disagree with everyone to make people angry and argue with you.

Pretty sure you're going to get something in your inbox for calling someone else a troll. I did. I'd delete it if I were you.

I changed it, thanks for the warning, I'm not the only who thinks so, and if I did get in trouble, it'd probably be because he reported me.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]So you're saying the only way to remember people who died is by showing an icon of their religion? Yep, that's certainly the only way to remember someone, by what religion they were, not by who they actually were... or by name.

gotdangit

No, i'm saying that if someone dies, you should respect them, and their beliefs. Only showing respect for Christians' beliefs is disrespectful to every non-christian there. You're essentially saying "Pfft, who cares if you're Muslim, you're being remembered by a christian icon now" That's not very respectful.

No it's not, you're making up extreme analogies that don't actually pertain to the situation.

Ok there is a Christian symbol, that represents the Christians in one way, religion, and for everyone else, there are other icons that represent those people, just not in religion. Like I said, the cross doesn't represeent people, it's more like a blessing. You're acting as if the cross has all the names of people who were christian and not anyone else. The cross doesn't represent Christians only, and it's not representing everyone.

The Cross is there so Christians can have their beliefs respected. Yet no other icon is there. Leaving hundreds of other victims unrepresented. it's highly disrespectful, and the cross should either be removed, or other icons relating to the other victims should be allowed. But as is, only the victims who were christian are having their religions respected, while everyone else is essentially told to suck it up. Discrimination at it's finest.
Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

Quote from the article:

"The 9/11 Memorial foundation told ABCNews.com that other religious artifacts will be included in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. A Star of David cut from WTC steel and a Bible fused to a piece of steel that was found during recovery efforts will both be on display in the same historical exhibition as the cross.

A Jewish prayer shawl, donated by a victim's family member, will be part of the museum's memorial exhibition."

So other religions are being represented. But it's not even the point of them being religious to begin with. A Bible was fused to a piece of steel, they wouldn't just throw that away simply because it was a Bible. It's part of the history of the place. I'm not really understanding the uproar. A victim's family member was able to donate something, it doesn't mean another victim's family member couldn't donate something to. The American Atheists are making a big deal over nothing really.

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

Atheist extremists are just as bad as any other kind of extremist.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

The American Atheists are making a big deal over nothing really.

StrifeDelivery

Sounds similar to what was said when Terry Jones disrespected muslims everywhere by claiming they're all terrorists, and that their Quran teaches terrorism.
"Pfft, the Muslims dont matter, who cares, it's not a big deal"

Yeah, alright, it's not a big deal to you, because you're not insulted.

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
Atheist extremists are just as bad as any other kind of extremist.dommeus
I wouldn't say so. Atheist extremists will nag your ear off. Religious extremists tend to blow s*** up.
Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts

Atheist extremists are just as bad as any other kind of extremist.

dommeus

They're as bad as Islamist terrorists? Don't think so

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="dommeus"]

Atheist extremists are just as bad as any other kind of extremist.

imaps3fanboy

They're as bad as Islamist terrorists? Don't think so

Dont forget the Christian extremists who gun down innocent children.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

The American Atheists are making a big deal over nothing really.

Nibroc420

Sounds similar to what was said when Terry Jones disrespected muslims everywhere by claiming they're all terrorists, and that their Quran teaches terrorism.
"Pfft, the Muslims dont matter, who cares, it's not a big deal"

Yeah, alright, it's not a big deal to you, because you're not insulted.

How does disrespecting a religion sound similar to saying, "they're making a big deal over nothing?"

It isn't a big deal, no one should be insulted by it. It would be insulting if a religion had an icon there and it was removed... oh wait.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

The American Atheists are making a big deal over nothing really.

gotdangit

Sounds similar to what was said when Terry Jones disrespected muslims everywhere by claiming they're all terrorists, and that their Quran teaches terrorism.
"Pfft, the Muslims dont matter, who cares, it's not a big deal"

Yeah, alright, it's not a big deal to you, because you're not insulted.

How does disrespecting a religion sound similar to saying, "they're making a big deal over nothing?"

It isn't a big deal, no one should be insulted by it. It would be insulting if a religion had an icon there and it was removed... oh wait.

It's disrespectful to represent the religion of a few victims, but not all of them. Christians are not any more special than anyone else, they do not get special privileges. Nor should they get to be represented while everyone else is left in the dark.

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

The American Atheists are making a big deal over nothing really.

Nibroc420

Sounds similar to what was said when Terry Jones disrespected muslims everywhere by claiming they're all terrorists, and that their Quran teaches terrorism.
"Pfft, the Muslims dont matter, who cares, it's not a big deal"

Yeah, alright, it's not a big deal to you, because you're not insulted.

They are both extremes. I'm not agreeing with either individual here, Terry Jones or the American Atheists. If they found a half-burned Quran from one of the office workers, it would probably be included in the museum. Also, isn't there the tattered American flag that they found at ground zero? Would that be sufficient for the American Atheists? They wanted to have an atom or a flag on display at the museum. All the items present were either donated or found at ground zero. I don't know why people should go through a checklist procedure to see if an item qualifies to be included into the museum or not :?

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
i won't bother reading the rest of this thread.. but i will say that in america everyone has the right to complain
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

Sounds similar to what was said when Terry Jones disrespected muslims everywhere by claiming they're all terrorists, and that their Quran teaches terrorism.
"Pfft, the Muslims dont matter, who cares, it's not a big deal"

Yeah, alright, it's not a big deal to you, because you're not insulted.

Nibroc420

How does disrespecting a religion sound similar to saying, "they're making a big deal over nothing?"

It isn't a big deal, no one should be insulted by it. It would be insulting if a religion had an icon there and it was removed... oh wait.

It's disrespectful to represent the religion of a few victims, but not all of them. Christians are not any more special than anyone else, they do not get special privileges. Nor should they get to be represented while everyone else is left in the dark.

Explain exactly how it is "representing christians" only.

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

Sounds similar to what was said when Terry Jones disrespected muslims everywhere by claiming they're all terrorists, and that their Quran teaches terrorism.
"Pfft, the Muslims dont matter, who cares, it's not a big deal"

Yeah, alright, it's not a big deal to you, because you're not insulted.

Nibroc420

How does disrespecting a religion sound similar to saying, "they're making a big deal over nothing?"

It isn't a big deal, no one should be insulted by it. It would be insulting if a religion had an icon there and it was removed... oh wait.

It's disrespectful to represent the religion of a few victims, but not all of them. Christians are not any more special than anyone else, they do not get special privileges. Nor should they get to be represented while everyone else is left in the dark.

I'm confused. Who is left in the dark? Hinduism? Buddhism? Atheism? Once again, the items used in the museum were either found or donated. The Jewish prayer shawl was donated and is going to be on display. I don't understand who is getting more special treatment here than someone else. If an individual was Hindu and one of the family members wanted to donate a statue or something, I wouldn't see the problem. It doesn't sound like someone has done that yet though, but it doesn't mean that they couldn't

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]How does disrespecting a religion sound similar to saying, "they're making a big deal over nothing?"

It isn't a big deal, no one should be insulted by it. It would be insulting if a religion had an icon there and it was removed... oh wait.

gotdangit

It's disrespectful to represent the religion of a few victims, but not all of them. Christians are not any more special than anyone else, they do not get special privileges. Nor should they get to be represented while everyone else is left in the dark.

Explain exactly how it is "representing christians" only.

That part is pretty obvious. Want me to explain what daytime is as well? Not happening. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious, if you're unable to understand, try reading the article.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] It's disrespectful to represent the religion of a few victims, but not all of them. Christians are not any more special than anyone else, they do not get special privileges. Nor should they get to be represented while everyone else is left in the dark.

Nibroc420

Explain exactly how it is "representing christians" only.

That part is pretty obvious. Want me to explain what daytime is as well? Not happening. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious, if you're unable to understand, try reading the article.

Maybe you can't explain it because it isn't representing Christians only.

It was found in the rubble of the crashed building. They are using it in their museum. Someone already said they are accepting other icons from religions of things that had to do with the crash. Just because their is a Christian cross... (which it isn't, it's just happens to look like one) doesn't mean it represents only Christians and even more, it doesn't mean it ignores all other religions.