American Atheists sue over ground zero cross.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Explain exactly how it is "representing christians" only.

gotdangit

That part is pretty obvious. Want me to explain what daytime is as well? Not happening. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious, if you're unable to understand, try reading the article.

Maybe you can't explain it because it isn't representing Christians only.

It was found in the rubble of the crashed building. They are using it in their museum. Someone already said they are accepting other icons from religions of things that had to do with the crash. Just because their is a Christian cross... (which it isn't, it's just happens to look like one) doesn't mean it represents only Christians and even more, it doesn't mean it ignores all other religions.

Again, if you want to understand, try actually reading the article. If you dont want to understand, you dont have to, but dont argue against something you've yet to understand.
Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] It's disrespectful to represent the religion of a few victims, but not all of them. Christians are not any more special than anyone else, they do not get special privileges. Nor should they get to be represented while everyone else is left in the dark.

Nibroc420

Explain exactly how it is "representing christians" only.

That part is pretty obvious. Want me to explain what daytime is as well? Not happening. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious, if you're unable to understand, try reading the article.

Your argument kind of hits a wall if you don't wish to explain things. If you have read my above posts, then I don't understand how they represent christians only. They also represent Judaism, star of david and the prayer shawl. I think this is the third time I've said this, other individuals could donate things from the victim's as well. The American Atheists wanted to put up a flag or an atom, I mean an atom? Are you saying the atheists are left out in the dark as you put it? I could understand donating a flag, sure, ok; but an atom? Is that an officially recognized symbol for atheism? I'm simply asking because I don't know. So far we have Christianity and Judaism crossed off the checklist, family members could donate items to check off Buddhism, Hinduism, or Muslism, hey or even Paganism too.

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] That part is pretty obvious. Want me to explain what daytime is as well? Not happening. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious, if you're unable to understand, try reading the article.Nibroc420

Maybe you can't explain it because it isn't representing Christians only.

It was found in the rubble of the crashed building. They are using it in their museum. Someone already said they are accepting other icons from religions of things that had to do with the crash. Just because their is a Christian cross... (which it isn't, it's just happens to look like one) doesn't mean it represents only Christians and even more, it doesn't mean it ignores all other religions.

Again, if you want to understand, try actually reading the article. If you dont want to understand, you dont have to, but dont argue against something you've yet to understand.

Yup so the people who are christian view it as a symbol, and the atheists view it as a piece of garbage. That still doesn't explain how the cross is representing only Christians. So go ahead and explain that, because it doesn't in the article. Just because the article says "The museum should remember everybody who died or suffered, not just the Christians," she said. "America is a melting pot." doesn't mean the cross is only making people remember the christians and no one else.


Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Explain exactly how it is "representing christians" only.

StrifeDelivery

That part is pretty obvious. Want me to explain what daytime is as well? Not happening. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious, if you're unable to understand, try reading the article.

Your argument kind of hits a wall if you don't wish to explain things. If you have read my above posts, then I don't understand how they represent christians only. They also represent Judaism, star of david and the prayer shawl. I think this is the third time I've said this, other individuals could donate things from the victim's as well. The American Atheists wanted to put up a flag or an atom, I mean an atom? Are you saying the atheists are left out in the dark as you put it? I could understand donating a flag, sure, ok; but an atom? Is that an officially recognized symbol for atheism? I'm simply asking because I don't know. So far we have Christianity and Judaism crossed off the checklist, family members could donate items to check off Buddhism, Hinduism, or Muslism, hey or even Paganism too.

Yea, and they are only accepting items that are linked to 9/11, the Atheists just want to throw in stuff just so they can be remembered. I don't see how anyone can look at an Atom and think... "Those poor atheists victims of 9/11." That's apperently what people are thinking when they look at the Cross according to him. "The poor Christian victims of 9/11, there must have been no other victims..."

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]Your argument kind of hits a wall if you don't wish to explain things.Nibroc420
I have explained things. People are simply covering their ears/eyes and going "no,no,no,no,no" It reaches a point where if they're simply choosing to not understand a simple to understand concept, that I'm going to simply facepalm, laugh, and ignore them.

In reality you've not really explained anything. You've merely stonewalled around people's explanations, and avoided their side by repeating "you don't understand". A person can't understand if you don't say anything, but ok. You keep referring to this mystical and mysterious "simple to understand concept" but never state what it is. Simply put, you are avoiding the discussion at hand. This is fine and all, but don't go on to say that we're simply covering our ears :?

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]Your argument kind of hits a wall if you don't wish to explain things.Nibroc420
I have explained things. People are simply covering their ears/eyes and going "no,no,no,no,no" It reaches a point where if they're simply choosing to not understand a simple to understand concept, that I'm going to simply facepalm, laugh, and ignore them.

Honestly you haven't really explained anything or given any quotes from the article, the only thing you've given us are your analogies that are so extreme that they don't have anything to do with the item at hand.

Yea but go ahead, expect people to believe your argument when you won't even explain it. Seems to me like you're the one covering your eyes and ears, because you won't even acknowledge the fact they they're letting other religious icons into the museums, as long as they are linked to 9/11. So go ahead, ignore this one also.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]Your argument kind of hits a wall if you don't wish to explain things.StrifeDelivery

I have explained things. People are simply covering their ears/eyes and going "no,no,no,no,no" It reaches a point where if they're simply choosing to not understand a simple to understand concept, that I'm going to simply facepalm, laugh, and ignore them.

In reality you've not really explained anything. You've merely stonewalled around people's explanations, and avoided their side by repeating "you don't understand". A person can't understand if you don't say anything, but ok. You keep referring to this mystical and mysterious "simple to understand concept" but never state what it is. Simply put, you are avoiding the discussion at hand. This is fine and all, but don't go on to say that we're simply covering our ears :?

Those who choose to ignore the truth, will never know the truth.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I have explained things. People are simply covering their ears/eyes and going "no,no,no,no,no" It reaches a point where if they're simply choosing to not understand a simple to understand concept, that I'm going to simply facepalm, laugh, and ignore them.Nibroc420

In reality you've not really explained anything. You've merely stonewalled around people's explanations, and avoided their side by repeating "you don't understand". A person can't understand if you don't say anything, but ok. You keep referring to this mystical and mysterious "simple to understand concept" but never state what it is. Simply put, you are avoiding the discussion at hand. This is fine and all, but don't go on to say that we're simply covering our ears :?

Those who choose to ignore the truth, will never know the truth.

Thank you for explaining why you won't acknowledge our posts or even explain anything.

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I have explained things. People are simply covering their ears/eyes and going "no,no,no,no,no" It reaches a point where if they're simply choosing to not understand a simple to understand concept, that I'm going to simply facepalm, laugh, and ignore them.Nibroc420

In reality you've not really explained anything. You've merely stonewalled around people's explanations, and avoided their side by repeating "you don't understand". A person can't understand if you don't say anything, but ok. You keep referring to this mystical and mysterious "simple to understand concept" but never state what it is. Simply put, you are avoiding the discussion at hand. This is fine and all, but don't go on to say that we're simply covering our ears :?

Those who choose to ignore the truth, will never know the truth.

I'm running in circles here. Give me a truth to go off of. How can I ignore a truth if I don't know what it is. Maybe I can try 20 questions. Is it because the atheists are mad that the atom wasn't accepted into the museum? Is the atom the officially recognized symbol of atheism? Who is being left out in the dark, the atheists?

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

In reality you've not really explained anything. You've merely stonewalled around people's explanations, and avoided their side by repeating "you don't understand". A person can't understand if you don't say anything, but ok. You keep referring to this mystical and mysterious "simple to understand concept" but never state what it is. Simply put, you are avoiding the discussion at hand. This is fine and all, but don't go on to say that we're simply covering our ears :?

gotdangit

Those who choose to ignore the truth, will never know the truth.

Thank you for explaining why you won't acknowledge our posts or even explain anything.

I've explained things. You've simply ignored me, if you wanted to know the truth, you would've found it already. Clearly you've got some other motives which prevent you from even wanting to understand, so there's no reason to explain it. Simple logic, empathy, and education prevail. But only if you want to use them.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Those who choose to ignore the truth, will never know the truth.Nibroc420

Thank you for explaining why you won't acknowledge our posts or even explain anything.

I've explained things. You've simply ignored me, if you wanted to know the truth, you would've found it already. Clearly you've got some other motives which prevent you from even wanting to understand, so there's no reason to explain it. Simple logic, empathy, and education prevail. But only if you want to use them.

On the contrary, I've been trying to understand your wacky thoughts, but you never explain, and now when I actually ask you to explain, you won't. Now tell me who's being ignorant.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Thank you for explaining why you won't acknowledge our posts or even explain anything.

gotdangit

I've explained things. You've simply ignored me, if you wanted to know the truth, you would've found it already. Clearly you've got some other motives which prevent you from even wanting to understand, so there's no reason to explain it. Simple logic, empathy, and education prevail. But only if you want to use them.

On the contrary, I've been trying to understand your wacky thoughts, but you never explain, and now when I actually ask you to explain, you won't. Now tell me who's being ignorant.

:roll: I've explained it several times. You either ignore me, or twist my words and ignore the thoughts and feelings of the victims. I've said "They're not representing every religion equally" and you say "Who cares" Clearly you dont care, so i see no need to explain myself 100x over.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I've explained things. You've simply ignored me, if you wanted to know the truth, you would've found it already. Clearly you've got some other motives which prevent you from even wanting to understand, so there's no reason to explain it. Simple logic, empathy, and education prevail. But only if you want to use them.Nibroc420

On the contrary, I've been trying to understand your wacky thoughts, but you never explain, and now when I actually ask you to explain, you won't. Now tell me who's being ignorant.

:roll: I've explained it several times. You either ignore me, or twist my words and ignore the thoughts and feelings of the victims. I've said "They're not representing every religion equally" and you say "Who cares" Clearly you dont care, so i see no need to explain myself 100x over.

I don't say who cares, I explain that it's not representing a religion, but more like a blessing to everyone. Then you say that because someone is blessing you and isn't that same religion, it's disrespectful. You're the one ignoring all of my questions and remarks.

Once again, because I know you ignored it like 5 times already. They are representing more then one religion, they are accepting peoples religious icons that actually have something to do with the 9/11 buildings and victims.

You tell me I'm ignoring your posts, but I keep trying to get you to talk about this, and someone else also tried, and you've ignored it every single time. Another thing, you say you've explained it several times. Yet here we are, you're sitting here arguing that I'm ignoring you, all this time you had to explain to me once more, (apperarently) but you won't.

Avatar image for LustForSoul
LustForSoul

6404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 LustForSoul
Member since 2011 • 6404 Posts
I'm sure muslims died there too, and many other religious people. Putting a cross there is inconsiderate if you ask me. If muslims would plant a moon and star over there it would lead to fights and hate.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]On the contrary, I've been trying to understand your wacky thoughts, but you never explain, and now when I actually ask you to explain, you won't. Now tell me who's being ignorant.

gotdangit

:roll: I've explained it several times. You either ignore me, or twist my words and ignore the thoughts and feelings of the victims. I've said "They're not representing every religion equally" and you say "Who cares" Clearly you dont care, so i see no need to explain myself 100x over.

I don't say who cares, I explain that it's not representing a religion, but more like a blessing to everyone. Then you say that because someone is blessing you and isn't that same religion, it's disrespectful. You're the one ignoring all of my questions and remarks.

Once again, because I know you ignored it like 5 times already. They are representing more then one religion, they are accepting peoples religious icons that actually have something to do with the 9/11 buildings and victims.

You tell me I'm ignoring your posts, but I keep trying to get you to talk about this, and someone else also tried, and you've ignored it every single time. Another thing, you say you've explained it several times. Yet here we are, you're sitting here arguing that I'm ignoring you, all this time you had to explain to me once more, (apperarently) but you won't.

I explain it, and you go "nonononoono" I go "well yes, because ______" you go "nonononono" It reaches a certain point where it's obvious you're not interested in understanding.
Avatar image for shoot-first
shoot-first

9788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#67 shoot-first
Member since 2004 • 9788 Posts

Stupid things like this are why people hate atheists.scorch-62

I don't need a reason to hate them. 8)

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I've explained things. You've simply ignored me, if you wanted to know the truth, you would've found it already. Clearly you've got some other motives which prevent you from even wanting to understand, so there's no reason to explain it. Simple logic, empathy, and education prevail. But only if you want to use them.Nibroc420

On the contrary, I've been trying to understand your wacky thoughts, but you never explain, and now when I actually ask you to explain, you won't. Now tell me who's being ignorant.

:roll: I've explained it several times. You either ignore me, or twist my words and ignore the thoughts and feelings of the victims. I've said "They're not representing every religion equally" and you say "Who cares" Clearly you dont care, so i see no need to explain myself 100x over.

Well you've explained that you said that you explained it several times. They aren't representing every religion equally? Ok, who is left out? Is Atheism a religion now? Judaism and Christianity are both being represented because of what was found at ground zero or donated by family members. A family member could donate a Quran if the victim was Muslim; it merely has to pertain to 9/11. Once again, who isn't being represented? The only individual's that I could see not being represented are those who haven't stepped forward and gave something to the museum (like the family who donated the Jewish prayer shawl did) or those whom you are trying to classify as a religion (Atheism) or by donating something that isn't representative of all atheists or an officially recognized symbol (an atom?).

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] :roll: I've explained it several times. You either ignore me, or twist my words and ignore the thoughts and feelings of the victims. I've said "They're not representing every religion equally" and you say "Who cares" Clearly you dont care, so i see no need to explain myself 100x over.Nibroc420

I don't say who cares, I explain that it's not representing a religion, but more like a blessing to everyone. Then you say that because someone is blessing you and isn't that same religion, it's disrespectful. You're the one ignoring all of my questions and remarks.

Once again, because I know you ignored it like 5 times already. They are representing more then one religion, they are accepting peoples religious icons that actually have something to do with the 9/11 buildings and victims.

You tell me I'm ignoring your posts, but I keep trying to get you to talk about this, and someone else also tried, and you've ignored it every single time. Another thing, you say you've explained it several times. Yet here we are, you're sitting here arguing that I'm ignoring you, all this time you had to explain to me once more, (apperarently) but you won't.

I explain it, and you go "nonononoono" I go "well yes, because ______" you go "nonononono" It reaches a certain point where it's obvious you're not interested in understanding.

Are you being ironic? I'm the one who is explaining, and you're the one who is who is ignoring to respond to anything I say. Like I said earlier, you only respond to provoke people.

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

I'm sure muslims died there too, and many other religious people. Putting a cross there is inconsiderate if you ask me. If muslims would plant a moon and star over there it would lead to fights and hate.LustForSoul

But, ok, anyone is free to donate though as long as it pertains to 9/11. One family donated a victim's prayer shawl; he was Jewish. This isn't a Christian museum or memorial, it's for 9/11 and everything and everyone who was affected by it.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]I don't say who cares, I explain that it's not representing a religion, but more like a blessing to everyone. Then you say that because someone is blessing you and isn't that same religion, it's disrespectful. You're the one ignoring all of my questions and remarks.

Once again, because I know you ignored it like 5 times already. They are representing more then one religion, they are accepting peoples religious icons that actually have something to do with the 9/11 buildings and victims.

You tell me I'm ignoring your posts, but I keep trying to get you to talk about this, and someone else also tried, and you've ignored it every single time. Another thing, you say you've explained it several times. Yet here we are, you're sitting here arguing that I'm ignoring you, all this time you had to explain to me once more, (apperarently) but you won't.

gotdangit

I explain it, and you go "nonononoono" I go "well yes, because ______" you go "nonononono" It reaches a certain point where it's obvious you're not interested in understanding.

Are you being ironic? I'm the one who is explaining, and you're the one who is who is ignoring to respond to anything I say. Like I said earlier, you only respond to provoke people.

I respond because i hope people will hear the other side. victims of 9/11 aren't being represented, while the christian victims are. While we're at it, should we only mourn the white victims?
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I explain it, and you go "nonononoono" I go "well yes, because ______" you go "nonononono" It reaches a certain point where it's obvious you're not interested in understanding.Nibroc420

Are you being ironic? I'm the one who is explaining, and you're the one who is who is ignoring to respond to anything I say. Like I said earlier, you only respond to provoke people.

I respond because i hope people will hear the other side. victims of 9/11 aren't being represented, while the christian victims are. While we're at it, should we only mourn the white victims?

You see, according to your logic, if I found a structure that looked like person, and they put it in the museum, you'd say that isn't fair because it's gray and it doesn't represent white people or black people or any other people. Victims of 9/11 are being represented. So I'm saying this one more time hoping that you'll actually respond.

[spoiler] THEY ARE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO TURN IN RELIGIOUS ARTIFACTS AS LONG AS THEY PERTAIN TO THE CRASH SITE!! Other religions are being represented... Derp.:o [/spoiler]

NIBROC, Read and respond ^^

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] I explain it, and you go "nonononoono" I go "well yes, because ______" you go "nonononono" It reaches a certain point where it's obvious you're not interested in understanding.Nibroc420

Are you being ironic? I'm the one who is explaining, and you're the one who is who is ignoring to respond to anything I say. Like I said earlier, you only respond to provoke people.

I respond because i hope people will hear the other side. victims of 9/11 aren't being represented, while the christian victims are. While we're at it, should we only mourn the white victims?

But, other victims are being represented though. Do we simply ignore the fact that the Jewish victims are being recognized? Families simply have to donate something. Simple as that. Family members donated prayer shawl, Judaism recognized, Jewish victims recognized. How do you recognize the athetistic victims? With what though, an atom, which a very few members of the community would understand. I mean if atheism had a symbol that was easily recognized and understood to mean atheism, than ok.

Avatar image for Baconbits2004
Baconbits2004

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 Baconbits2004
Member since 2009 • 12602 Posts
I think some of these people are making this out to be way bigger than it has to be.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Are you being ironic? I'm the one who is explaining, and you're the one who is who is ignoring to respond to anything I say. Like I said earlier, you only respond to provoke people.

StrifeDelivery

I respond because i hope people will hear the other side. victims of 9/11 aren't being represented, while the christian victims are. While we're at it, should we only mourn the white victims?

But, other victims are being represented though. Do we simply ignore the fact that the Jewish victims are being recognized? Families simply have to donate something. Simple as that. Family members donated prayer shawl, Judaism recognized, Jewish victims recognized. How do you recognize the athetistic victims? With what though, an atom, which a very few members of the community would understand. I mean if atheism had a symbol that was easily recognized and understood to mean atheism, than ok.

Look, we've already tried to get him to respond to this subject, but he ignores it. I'm pretty sure he's just trying to see how long he can get us to keep arguing with him. So unless he actually responds to what we've said. I'm done, and he's just trolling.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

NIBROC, Read and respond ^^

gotdangit

O hai gais, lets all ignore logic, and not even read the article. or we could simply read it :

"We have not heard of any other religious groups at all that have been allowed to put something up."

Next time there's a thread with an article in the OP, perhaps you should take a moment to read it, possibly twice?

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

NIBROC, Read and respond ^^

gotdangit

O hai gais, lets all ignore logic, and not even read the article. or we could simply read it :

"We have not heard of any other religious groups at all that have been allowed to put something up."

Next time there's a thread with an article in the OP, perhaps you should take a moment to read it, possibly twice?

Why don't you read the article. Taken from the first page at the very bottom.

The 9/11 Memorial foundation told ABCNews.com that other religious artifacts will be included in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. A Star of David cut from WTC steel and a Bible fused to a piece of steel that was found during recovery efforts will both be on display in the same historical exhibition as the cross.

A Jewish prayer shawl, donated by a victim's family member, will be part of the museum's memorial exhibition.

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case." Clearly the memorial isn't allowing equality when it comes to representing the victims.
Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

NIBROC, Read and respond ^^

gotdangit

O hai gais, lets all ignore logic, and not even read the article. or we could simply read it :

"We have not heard of any other religious groups at all that have been allowed to put something up."

Next time there's a thread with an article in the OP, perhaps you should take a moment to read it, possibly twice?

Why don't you read the article. Taken from the first page at the very bottom.

The 9/11 Memorial foundation told ABCNews.com that other religious artifacts will be included in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. A Star of David cut from WTC steel and a Bible fused to a piece of steel that was found during recovery efforts will both be on display in the same historical exhibition as the cross.

A Jewish prayer shawl, donated by a victim's family member, will be part of the museum's memorial exhibition.

Oh hai guys, lets pretend we read the article when we actually didn't.... Oh and yea, I called it, once again you happened to ignore this. Are you blind?

Dang, you beat me to it gotdangit. So a Star of David was cut from the WTC steel. That will be on display. THe cross is WTC steel. Thus another religious group was allowed to place something up, in this instance, Jewish members were allowed to place something in the museum/memorial

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] O hai gais, lets all ignore logic, and not even read the article. or we could simply read it :

"We have not heard of any other religious groups at all that have been allowed to put something up."

Next time there's a thread with an article in the OP, perhaps you should take a moment to read it, possibly twice?

Nibroc420

Why don't you read the article. Taken from the first page at the very bottom.

The 9/11 Memorial foundation told ABCNews.com that other religious artifacts will be included in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. A Star of David cut from WTC steel and a Bible fused to a piece of steel that was found during recovery efforts will both be on display in the same historical exhibition as the cross.

A Jewish prayer shawl, donated by a victim's family member, will be part of the museum's memorial exhibition.

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case." Clearly the memorial isn't allowing equality when it comes to representing the victims.

Because American Atheist wants to bring in religious icons that have nothing to do with 9/11. Maybe if you read the article, you'd know they are only allowing artifacts that pertain to 9/11, and that's fair, because... what do you know?! It's a Musuem for 9/11!

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] O hai gais, lets all ignore logic, and not even read the article. or we could simply read it :

"We have not heard of any other religious groups at all that have been allowed to put something up."

Next time there's a thread with an article in the OP, perhaps you should take a moment to read it, possibly twice?

Nibroc420

Why don't you read the article. Taken from the first page at the very bottom.

The 9/11 Memorial foundation told ABCNews.com that other religious artifacts will be included in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. A Star of David cut from WTC steel and a Bible fused to a piece of steel that was found during recovery efforts will both be on display in the same historical exhibition as the cross.

A Jewish prayer shawl, donated by a victim's family member, will be part of the museum's memorial exhibition.

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case." Clearly the memorial isn't allowing equality when it comes to representing the victims.

Equal size and promience? I mean, come on. They found the cross, whereas they went and cut the Star of David out. That cross is what, 17 feet or something? Would it have been better if it was a 2 foot cross? I mean so far we got one Bible and one cross and over here we got one Star of David and one prayer shawl.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Why don't you read the article. Taken from the first page at the very bottom.

The 9/11 Memorial foundation told ABCNews.com that other religious artifacts will be included in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. A Star of David cut from WTC steel and a Bible fused to a piece of steel that was found during recovery efforts will both be on display in the same historical exhibition as the cross.

A Jewish prayer shawl, donated by a victim's family member, will be part of the museum's memorial exhibition.

gotdangit

Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case." Clearly the memorial isn't allowing equality when it comes to representing the victims.

Because American Atheist wants to bring in religious icons that have nothing to do with 9/11. Maybe if you read the article, you'd know they are only allowing artifacts that pertain to 9/11, and that's fair, because... what do you know?! It's a Musuem for 9/11!

It's discrimination against other religions.
Avatar image for ej902
EJ902

14338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 EJ902
Member since 2005 • 14338 Posts
What an utterly frivolous and tasteless waste of the courts' time
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Silverman said that if the 9/11 Memorial foundation allows all other religious memorials of equal size and prominence to be displayed in the museum, the group would "happily, happily, drop the case." Clearly the memorial isn't allowing equality when it comes to representing the victims.Nibroc420

Because American Atheist wants to bring in religious icons that have nothing to do with 9/11. Maybe if you read the article, you'd know they are only allowing artifacts that pertain to 9/11, and that's fair, because... what do you know?! It's a Musuem for 9/11!

It's discrimination against other religions.

No it's not, we already said that if it has something to do with the Twin Towers/WTC it would be allowed in the museum. The Atheists just want to take a random flag or atom that has nothing to do with 9/11 and put it in a museum that is there for people to remember 9/11, does that make sense? No.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]Because American Atheist wants to bring in religious icons that have nothing to do with 9/11. Maybe if you read the article, you'd know they are only allowing artifacts that pertain to 9/11, and that's fair, because... what do you know?! It's a Musuem for 9/11!

gotdangit

It's discrimination against other religions.

No it's not, we already tha if it has something to do with the Twin Towers/WTC it would be allowed in the museum. The Atheists just want to take a random flag or atom that has nothing to do with 9/11 and put it in a museum that is there for people to remember 9/11, does that make sense? No.

They want it there to represent the people who're not religious, currently they're not being represented in the memorial. Again, you've clearly shown you couldn't care less about them, my question is why? Why do people who're religious have more of a right than those who are not? Do my beliefs not matter because they dont involve a God? It's discrimination, and you dont care. Fair enough, however it doesn't make it okay.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] It's discrimination against other religions.Nibroc420

No it's not, we already tha if it has something to do with the Twin Towers/WTC it would be allowed in the museum. The Atheists just want to take a random flag or atom that has nothing to do with 9/11 and put it in a museum that is there for people to remember 9/11, does that make sense? No.

They want it there to represent the people who're not religious, currently they're not being represented in the memorial. Again, you've clearly shown you couldn't care less about them, my question is why? Why do people who're religious have more of a right than those who are not? Do my beliefs not matter because they dont involve a God? It's discrimination, and you dont care. Fair enough, however it doesn't make it okay.

It would be allowed if it was a flag found in the rubble of the crash site. Stop ignoring the fact that it's a musuem for 9/11. We've already proven to you that as long as it pertains to 9/11 it would be allowed. If Atheists really wanted something to be there, they should find something from the crash the represents Atheists.

I'm not even Christian and I'm arguing for them because the Atheists are taking this way to far. Like I said, if they want to be respresented, all they need is an icon from 9/11, isn't that simple enough?

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] It's discrimination against other religions.Nibroc420

No it's not, we already tha if it has something to do with the Twin Towers/WTC it would be allowed in the museum. The Atheists just want to take a random flag or atom that has nothing to do with 9/11 and put it in a museum that is there for people to remember 9/11, does that make sense? No.

They want it there to represent the people who're not religious, currently they're not being represented in the memorial. Again, you've clearly shown you couldn't care less about them, my question is why? Why do people who're religious have more of a right than those who are not? Do my beliefs not matter because they dont involve a God? It's discrimination, and you dont care. Fair enough, however it doesn't make it okay.

There is a difference between not caring and figuring out how to go about what you are wanting. The cross is from the wreckage, so is the Star of David and the bible found. The prayer shawl was donated by a family member. Even if we ignore the prayer shawl, all those items were found at ground zero. I mean an atheist could make a flag out of some of the WTC steel and place it in the museum. But basically it is sounding like they just want to place some random flag or some random atom sculpture that they made. I don't think a cross made out of popsicle sticks would be placed in this museum. Not because it's discriminatory agaisnt the religion itself, but it doesn't pertain to the point of the museum. If the American Atheists donated a flag or a fireman saving someone scultped from rivets or steel or something from the WTC and they got denied again, they I would agree with you Nibroc.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]No it's not, we already tha if it has something to do with the Twin Towers/WTC it would be allowed in the museum. The Atheists just want to take a random flag or atom that has nothing to do with 9/11 and put it in a museum that is there for people to remember 9/11, does that make sense? No.

gotdangit

They want it there to represent the people who're not religious, currently they're not being represented in the memorial. Again, you've clearly shown you couldn't care less about them, my question is why? Why do people who're religious have more of a right than those who are not? Do my beliefs not matter because they dont involve a God? It's discrimination, and you dont care. Fair enough, however it doesn't make it okay.

It would be allowed if it was a flag found in the rubble of the crash site. Stop ignoring the fact that it's a musuem for 9/11. We've already proven to you that as long as it pertains to 9/11 it would be allowed. If Atheists really wanted something to be there, they should find something from the crash the represents Atheists.

I'm not even Christian and I'm arguing for them because the Atheists are taking this way to far. Like I said, if they want to be respresented, all they need is an icon from 9/11, isn't that simple enough?

The Cross isn't an "icon from 9/11" The Star isn't an "Icon from 9/11" The donated Shawl isn't an "Icon from 9/11" They're all religious icons, and the star was fabricated from pieces of the tower, that doesn't mean it has anything to do with the tower... The memorial has already told the Atheist group that they're not allowed to submit anything, which is why this article even exists. Yet another way atheists have to suffer because religious people want special privileges.
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

It seems like American Atheists do everything they possibly can to troll religious Americans. I'm an atheist and I think this is pretty ridiculous just let the cross stay there.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

It seems like American Atheists do everything they possibly can to troll religious Americans. I'm an atheist and I think this is pretty ridiculous just let the cross stay there.

UnknownSniper65
They're fine with it staying, they're mad because the memorial wont let them donate anything to represent the 500+ athiests who died on 9/11. Religious victims get represented, but as soon as you're not religious, you dont matter anymore. Double standards like that need to stop.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] They want it there to represent the people who're not religious, currently they're not being represented in the memorial. Again, you've clearly shown you couldn't care less about them, my question is why? Why do people who're religious have more of a right than those who are not? Do my beliefs not matter because they dont involve a God? It's discrimination, and you dont care. Fair enough, however it doesn't make it okay.Nibroc420

It would be allowed if it was a flag found in the rubble of the crash site. Stop ignoring the fact that it's a musuem for 9/11. We've already proven to you that as long as it pertains to 9/11 it would be allowed. If Atheists really wanted something to be there, they should find something from the crash the represents Atheists.

I'm not even Christian and I'm arguing for them because the Atheists are taking this way to far. Like I said, if they want to be respresented, all they need is an icon from 9/11, isn't that simple enough?

The Cross isn't an "icon from 9/11" The Star isn't an "Icon from 9/11" The donated Shawl isn't an "Icon from 9/11" They're all religious icons, and the star was fabricated from pieces of the tower, that doesn't mean it has anything to do with the tower... The memorial has already told the Atheist group that they're not allowed to submit anything, which is why this article even exists. Yet another way atheists have to suffer because religious people want special privileges.

They all pertain to the WTC. The "flag or atom" that the Atheists want to contribute to the museum don't pertain to WTC. No where in the article did it say that anything that American Atheist tries to give is denied. They are only denying the things that have nothing to do with WTF. Also, those items are icons from 9/11, because that's what people view them as. To you it's just a piece of garbage, to them, it means something.

Taking a random "atom" that has nothing to do with 9/11, or the World Trade Centers doesn't mean anything to anyone. It would mean something if it were taken or found in the actual building or were given from a victim of 9/11.

Also you constantly respond to me, but never the strife guy?

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]It would be allowed if it was a flag found in the rubble of the crash site. Stop ignoring the fact that it's a musuem for 9/11. We've already proven to you that as long as it pertains to 9/11 it would be allowed. If Atheists really wanted something to be there, they should find something from the crash the represents Atheists.

I'm not even Christian and I'm arguing for them because the Atheists are taking this way to far. Like I said, if they want to be respresented, all they need is an icon from 9/11, isn't that simple enough?

gotdangit

The Cross isn't an "icon from 9/11" The Star isn't an "Icon from 9/11" The donated Shawl isn't an "Icon from 9/11" They're all religious icons, and the star was fabricated from pieces of the tower, that doesn't mean it has anything to do with the tower... The memorial has already told the Atheist group that they're not allowed to submit anything, which is why this article even exists. Yet another way atheists have to suffer because religious people want special privileges.

They all pertain to the WTC. The "flag or atom" that the Atheists want to contribute to the museum don't pertain to WTC. No where in the article did it say that anything that American Atheist tries to give is denied. They are only denying the things that have nothing to do with WTF. Also, those items are icons from 9/11, because that's what people view them as. To you it's just a piece of garbage, to them, it means something.

Taking a random "atom" that has nothing to do with 9/11, or the World Trade Centers doesn't mean anything to anyone. It would mean something if it were taken or found in the actual building or were given from a victim of 9/11.

Also you constantly respond to me, but never the strife guy?

Well at least I know you read my posts there gotdangit

Avatar image for deactivated-6016f2513d412
deactivated-6016f2513d412

20414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-6016f2513d412
Member since 2007 • 20414 Posts
I think that it's a pretty lame and unnecessary thing to complain about, but for everyone railing on atheists (yet again), I want to say that atheists are far from the only group who've pulled petty and ridiculous stunts like this, so quit acting persecuted. This situation and this group of atheists also does not adequately represent all atheists.
Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

Yes I do, I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks this is ridiculous. For some reason Nimbroc just decides to ignore random things that he knows he has no argument against and then calls us ignorant... It's double standars like this that we need to get rid of.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

They all pertain to the WTC.
The star wasn't made by the WTC bombings, it was welded together from pieces of the towers...

The "flag or atom" that the Atheists want to contribute to the museum don't pertain to WTC.
They're not allowed to donate anything, even if said "Atom" was made of WTC wreckage.

No where in the article did it say that anything that American Atheist tries to give is denied.
Actually it did, once again you should try to read it.

They are only denying the things that have nothing to do with WTF.
And the Jewish Shawl? it wasn't in the wreckage...

Also, those items are icons from 9/11, because that's what people view them as. To you it's just a piece of garbage, to them, it means something.
To athiests, the Atom and Flag mean something. Sure, to you it's garbage, but to them, it means something.

Taking a random "atom" that has nothing to do with 9/11, or the World Trade Centers doesn't mean anything to anyone.
A random shawl that has nothing to do with the WTC means nothing to anyone.

It would mean something if it were taken or found in the actual building or were given from a victim of 9/11.
How can a victim of 9/11 donate something? :?

gotdangit

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#97 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts

I can vaguely recall it being reported on the news here when they found that upright cross in the wreckage. I think it's a legitimate piece of the history/saga of the site and all that happened there and should therefore definitely be in the museum regardless of any obvious religious connotations.

Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

I think that it's a pretty lame and unnecessary thing to complain about, but for everyone railing on atheists (yet again), I want to say that atheists are far from the only group who've pulled petty and ridiculous stunts like this, so quit acting persecuted. This situation and this group of atheists also does not adequately represent all atheists. t3hrubikscube

No, I'm definitely not railing against atheists or have anything against them. And yes, you are right, this situation and group of atheists aren't representative of all atheists, same with all members of all religions.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

No, I'm definitely not railing against atheists or have anything against them.StrifeDelivery


Actually, that's precicely what you're doing by supporting the oppression of Athiest beliefs.

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]They all pertain to the WTC.
The star wasn't made by the WTC bombings, it was welded together from pieces of the towers...

It was carvved from the towers exactly, you admit it, it pertains to 9/11

The "flag or atom" that the Atheists want to contribute to the museum don't pertain to WTC.
They're not allowed to donate anything, even if said "Atom" was made of WTC wreckage.

If it actually said that, then leave me a quote. All I read was that they tried to donate items that having nothing to do with 9/11

No where in the article did it say that anything that American Atheist tries to give is denied.
Actually it did, once again you should try to read it.

Read above.

They are only denying the things that have nothing to do with WTF.
And the Jewish Shawl? it wasn't in the wreckage...

It was given by a victim of 9/11

Also, those items are icons from 9/11, because that's what people view them as. To you it's just a piece of garbage, to them, it means something.
To athiests, the Atom and Flag mean something. Sure, to you it's garbage, but to them, it means something.

How does it mean something? It has nothing to do with 9/11 at all. That's not representing anyone that suffered from the 9/11 attacks.

Taking a random "atom" that has nothing to do with 9/11, or the World Trade Centers doesn't mean anything to anyone.
A random shawl that has nothing to do with the WTC means nothing to anyone.

The woman was a relative of someone who died in the crash.

It would mean something if it were taken or found in the actual building or were given from a victim of 9/11.
How can a victim of 9/11 donate something? :?

Just because you didn't die during 9/11 doesn't mean you aren't a victim. If the terrorists that flew into the building killed my brother, I'm a victim of the 9/11 attacks, and I have suffered. Luckily that didn't happen.

Nibroc420