I seem to remember Fox News and countless right-wing bloggers and pundits (and subsequently, of course, the Republican constituency) praising Bush just a few years ago when the economy was supposedly going well. Then when they could no longer hide the fact that things were actually going horribly, they quickly blamed it all on the decisions of the most recent democratic admistration, that of Bill Clinton.
Now, I'm not sure which better qualifies as flat-tout Orwellian...retroactively blaming a sudden disaster on an administration that ended eight years ago when things have supposedly been getting better under the new adminstration ever since, or blaming the sudden disaster on a new president who wasn't inducted or even elected until well after the fact.
I should note that I know next to nothing about even the most basic economic principles, so I myself am not going to blame anyone for our poor economic state, if only because I'm not qualified to do so. I always have and always will devote much greater attention to social issues and civil liberties, so when I see Obama spending the first few days in office reversing such collosal travesties as Guantanamo Bay, extraordinary rendition and torture, I can pretty much already declare him NOT a failure.
And finally, whether Bush is directly responsible for any of his administration's countless crimes is irrelevant; financial, political and moral support are enough, and for that matter, I hold just as much of an aversion (to put it lightly) towards the ordinary citizens who likewise support these atrocities as I do the figureheads they continually place in power.
Log in to comment