Arab Spring in the absence of the Iraq War?

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]

You're very predictable yourself.

PWSteal_Ldpinch

ah PWSteal_LdPinch the guy who lives to post only negative Muslim stories from around the world. and only posts attacking, slandering, and blasting muslims in every conceivable way. i don't deny bad and evil things happen in the Muslim world at the hands of Muslims. you calling me predictable is rather humorous to say the least.

You're the one attacking people for being predictable. Anyway, I'd be more ashamed of following a lascivious child rapist than being a predictable poster on a gaming forum.

You should also be ashamed of your cultural reflection. Your actions and views defeat themselves entirely.
Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] that makes more sense. and yes, Ishmael (which is actually Hebrew for "God has heard me" , ie God has answered our prayer) was not an Israelite, he was Itzchak's step brother, the difference was in the mother, Ishmael's mother was an Egyptian servant called Haggar , wheres Itzchak was Sarah's son.

Yes, a Semite, no?

Ishmael? yes, through Abraham, wheter the Egyptians were semites is something else (the bible says they weren't, but genetics says they most likely were)

I've always thought they were called Hamitic. I don't know how it's like with you guys, but we take on the ancestry of the father, if a man of a tribe marries a woman of another tribe, their son takes the tribe of the father, so in our view, Ishmael is pretty much Semitic. If we'll speak genetics, then Ishmael was a half-Semitic half-Hamitic, but nobody here gives a damn about genes.
Avatar image for jetpower3
jetpower3

11631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 jetpower3
Member since 2005 • 11631 Posts

That's a major assumption and a "what if".

Wasdie

It is, but in the wake of the fallout of this whole series of wars, you have to wonder.

If nothing else, it makes for good conversation and learning :).

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Saddam would have acted like Ghadaffi, he did it before to the Kurds so this would be nothing new.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#105 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"] Yes, a Semite, no?

Ishmael? yes, through Abraham, wheter the Egyptians were semites is something else (the bible says they weren't, but genetics says they most likely were)

I've always thought they were called Hamitic. I don't know how it's like with you guys, but we take on the ancestry of the father, if a man of a tribe marries a woman of another tribe, their son takes the tribe of the father, so in our view, Ishmael is pretty much Semitic. If we'll speak genetics, then Ishmael was a half-Semitic half-Hamitic, but nobody here gives a damn about genes.

yes, in the bible, the Egyptians were the children of Ham, son of Noah, although historically Egypt was home to a whole bunch of people. in the Jewish world it sort of works that way, a person's religion is chosen according to the mother , but the child has to belong to the group of the father, in the context of Ashkenazi/Sephardic/Mizrachi. ie, if we look at my family, despite the fact that my grandmother on my mother's side is a Sephardic Jew , because my father is an Ashkenazi Jew , on paper, I am also an Ashkenazi Jew (although honestly, few people in Israel who are under 40 actually care that much about that) though traditionally, Jews also chose the religion by the father too , but in the diaspora it was changed due to circumstances.
Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]

[QUOTE="SaudiFury"] ah PWSteal_LdPinch the guy who lives to post only negative Muslim stories from around the world. and only posts attacking, slandering, and blasting muslims in every conceivable way. i don't deny bad and evil things happen in the Muslim world at the hands of Muslims. you calling me predictable is rather humorous to say the least. Victorious_Fize

You're the one attacking people for being predictable. Anyway, I'd be more ashamed of following a lascivious child rapist than being a predictable poster on a gaming forum.

You should also be ashamed of your cultural reflection. Your actions and views defeat themselves entirely.

Cultural criticism from someone who lives in Saudi Arabia should be taken as a token of pride.

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"] You're the one attacking people for being predictable. Anyway, I'd be more ashamed of following a lascivious child rapist than being a predictable poster on a gaming forum.

PWSteal_Ldpinch

You should also be ashamed of your cultural reflection. Your actions and views defeat themselves entirely.

Cultural criticism from someone who lives in Saudi Arabia should be taken as a token of pride.

Negating views based on origins are a fine example of your sick, racially and ideologically prejudiced views.
Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] Ishmael? yes, through Abraham, wheter the Egyptians were semites is something else (the bible says they weren't, but genetics says they most likely were)

I've always thought they were called Hamitic. I don't know how it's like with you guys, but we take on the ancestry of the father, if a man of a tribe marries a woman of another tribe, their son takes the tribe of the father, so in our view, Ishmael is pretty much Semitic. If we'll speak genetics, then Ishmael was a half-Semitic half-Hamitic, but nobody here gives a damn about genes.

yes, in the bible, the Egyptians were the children of Ham, son of Noah, although historically Egypt was home to a whole bunch of people. in the Jewish world it sort of works that way, a person's religion is chosen according to the mother , but the child has to belong to the group of the father, in the context of Ashkenazi/Sephardic/Mizrachi. ie, if we look at my family, despite the fact that my grandmother on my mother's side is a Sephardic Jew , because my father is an Ashkenazi Jew , on paper, I am also an Ashkenazi Jew (although honestly, few people in Israel who are under 40 actually care that much about that) though traditionally, Jews also chose the religion by the father too , but in the diaspora it was changed due to circumstances.

It's very much the same way here as well. I cannot fathom racial hate, hating governments, that much I get, but Semites hating each other is something I can never quite stomach. Although I suppose the answer is obvious already: ignorance.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#109 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"] I've always thought they were called Hamitic. I don't know how it's like with you guys, but we take on the ancestry of the father, if a man of a tribe marries a woman of another tribe, their son takes the tribe of the father, so in our view, Ishmael is pretty much Semitic. If we'll speak genetics, then Ishmael was a half-Semitic half-Hamitic, but nobody here gives a damn about genes.

yes, in the bible, the Egyptians were the children of Ham, son of Noah, although historically Egypt was home to a whole bunch of people. in the Jewish world it sort of works that way, a person's religion is chosen according to the mother , but the child has to belong to the group of the father, in the context of Ashkenazi/Sephardic/Mizrachi. ie, if we look at my family, despite the fact that my grandmother on my mother's side is a Sephardic Jew , because my father is an Ashkenazi Jew , on paper, I am also an Ashkenazi Jew (although honestly, few people in Israel who are under 40 actually care that much about that) though traditionally, Jews also chose the religion by the father too , but in the diaspora it was changed due to circumstances.

It's very much the same way here as well. I cannot fathom racial hate, hating governments, that much I get, but Semites hating each other is something I can never quite stomach. Although I suppose the answer is obvious already: ignorance.

well , Jews are some of the most divided people in the world (and this was true even in ancient times, Golda Meir complained that rulling Israel was like being a prime minister, to 3 million prime ministers) and Arabs are quite capable of fighting each other, so its always been like that sadly.
Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] yes, in the bible, the Egyptians were the children of Ham, son of Noah, although historically Egypt was home to a whole bunch of people. in the Jewish world it sort of works that way, a person's religion is chosen according to the mother , but the child has to belong to the group of the father, in the context of Ashkenazi/Sephardic/Mizrachi. ie, if we look at my family, despite the fact that my grandmother on my mother's side is a Sephardic Jew , because my father is an Ashkenazi Jew , on paper, I am also an Ashkenazi Jew (although honestly, few people in Israel who are under 40 actually care that much about that) though traditionally, Jews also chose the religion by the father too , but in the diaspora it was changed due to circumstances.Darkman2007
It's very much the same way here as well. I cannot fathom racial hate, hating governments, that much I get, but Semites hating each other is something I can never quite stomach. Although I suppose the answer is obvious already: ignorance.

well , Jews are some of the most divided people in the world (and this was true even in ancient times, Golda Meir complained that rulling Israel was like being a prime minister, to 3 million prime ministers) and Arabs are quite capable of fighting each other, so its always been like that sadly.

These were ancient times, but I guess so. :(

We'll work it out eventually, I'm sure.

Avatar image for outworld222
outworld222

4673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#111 outworld222
Member since 2004 • 4673 Posts
Saddam would have acted like Ghadaffi, he did it before to the Kurds so this would be nothing new.markop2003
Saddam and Ghadafi are two very different people. I guess each had his own certain situation, and I'm guessing the exact opposite is true. Saddam would have acted differently than Ghadafi, and vice versa.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#112 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"] It's very much the same way here as well. I cannot fathom racial hate, hating governments, that much I get, but Semites hating each other is something I can never quite stomach. Although I suppose the answer is obvious already: ignorance.Victorious_Fize
well , Jews are some of the most divided people in the world (and this was true even in ancient times, Golda Meir complained that rulling Israel was like being a prime minister, to 3 million prime ministers) and Arabs are quite capable of fighting each other, so its always been like that sadly.

These were ancient times, but I guess so. :(

one day it might change, , though thats going to be an odd Middle East although you know its not just between Jews and Arabs (and Persians for that matter) , its also Arab against Arab

heck , the first time Arabs are mentioned (as far as I know) , in an outside source, its on an Assyrian stele where they are allied with the Israelites and others in fighting the Assyrians, so weirder things have happened.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts
[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"] You should also be ashamed of your cultural reflection. Your actions and views defeat themselves entirely.Victorious_Fize

Cultural criticism from someone who lives in Saudi Arabia should be taken as a token of pride.

Negating views based on origins are a fine example of your sick, racially and ideologically prejudiced views.

Ad hominem is a fine example of your inadequate and intellectually deficient debating skills.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

give it i [QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="GazaAli"]By the way, I think the Arab spring is mostly hogwash. Tyrants are changing but people aren't.TehFuneral
What?

Don't what me. From the beginning I only heard fancy words, but the sh!tty people are still sh!tty.

give it time....

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts
[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"] Cultural criticism from someone who lives in Saudi Arabia should be taken as a token of pride.PWSteal_Ldpinch
Negating views based on origins are a fine example of your sick, racially and ideologically prejudiced views.

Ad hominem is a fine example of your inadequate and intellectually deficient debating skills.

I think you should learn what an ad hominem is before you appeal to sophistry. I wasn't the one using a person's origin to laugh off his argument.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#117 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

I think Saddam would have reacted exactly like Ghadaffi. He wouldnt hesitate to use planes against his people. I cant really find a correlation between the Iraq War starting or not and the Arab Spring commencing. I cant say if it sped up the Spring or hurt it or had no effect at all. But: if the Iraq War never started, I'd say Saddam would have been overthrown by now.

BossPerson

Saddam probably would've been worse than Ghadaffi. I think with Ghadaffi a decent number of Libyan military personnel turned against Ghadaffi. Saddam kept a ridiculously tight control on the army, so I think the the army would've stuck by Saddam out of fear. Plus Saddam had the Republican Guard which was more loyal to him and better trained and equipped than the military.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#118 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

The more the Arab Spring progresses and the more we see just how much a blunder the invasion of Iraq was, I wonder what would have happened if it never took place. I am pretty curious actually as to whether Saddam would have been overthrown internally instead of completely by intervention. I also wonder how differently current events would have turned out without the war ever happening.

I must say, I believe the Arab Spring could have happened years earlier if the Iraq War never took place. The complete mess the country became and the cycle of violence it is still consumed in has seemed to served as sort of an example as to what would happen to Arab nations if their respective dictators/strongmen were overthrown. It gave their people a reason (real or not) to rally around them, and even today, we have seen people like Syrian President Assad largely using this card to maintain his key support (as well as Gaddafi and his supporters for awhile).

Yes, hindsight is 20/20 and this is all hypothetical and after the fact, but you have to wonder and reassess history constantly.

jetpower3

I don't think the Iraq War hindered the Arab Spring. In fact I think if the Arab Spring had tried to start up under a Saddam-ruled Iraq, he would've crushed it just like he did with the Shia rebellion in Southern Iraq in the early 1990s. And let's not forget what he did to the Kurds in the Halabja massacre, using helicopter gunships and chemical weapons on civilians. I doubt any internal force would have been able to overthrow Saddam. Since the end of the First Gulf War Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton tried to help Iraqis (mostly the military) overthrow Saddam for years but it didn't work. George W. Bush initially continued the approach of Papa Bush and Clinton, but 9/11 changed things and it wasn't until the U.S. led a multinational coalition to actually invade Iraq that we were able to overthrow Saddam.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#119 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="jetpower3"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] No because if the sanctions were lifted Saddam would've been able to reload militarily. BossPerson

Eight years or less of reloading militarily isn't going to cut it. Gaddafi had about the same amount of time, and that wasn't enough to save himself.

Ghadaffi was very weak militarily, he had no real support among his army staff and he had to hire mercenaries for much of the dirty work. In Iraq, i'd assume the army would be stronger

I heard that prior to the first Gulf War Saddam had the 4th largest army in the world. Also, Saddam had spies placed throughout the army, so his army would have been much more obedient to him than Ghadaffi's was.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#120 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

[QUOTE="jetpower3"]

Eight years or less of reloading militarily isn't going to cut it. Gaddafi had about the same amount of time, and that wasn't enough to save himself.

jetpower3

Gaddafi wouldn't have been overthrown without western intervention.

Maybe not, but Saddam was under a no-fly-zone of his very own. Any new uprising would be very difficult to respond to in the same way as Gaddafi initally did.

The no-fly-zones in Iraq were a little iffy. First off the southern no-fly-zone was not enforced as much as the northern one because the U.S. worried that if the Shia got independence they would become allies with Iran. Second, by the late 1990s and early 2000s, the U.S. and its allies were getting tired of the no-fly-zone and began to cut down on their no-fly-zone patrols because the Iraqis were shooting Surface to Air Missiles (SAMs) at patrolling jets.

Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

It annoys me how many people are/were against the Iraq war. And blame Bush for it.....all he did was go by what his Intelligence was telling him! Its not like he is a trained expert and was looking at satellite photographcs and **** the intillegence proved false....so what? People think that after 9/11 we were just supposed to sit around and not do anything is just insane. Diplomacy cant solve all of the worlds problems. Evil exists. Dimplomacy failed in trying to stop Hitler and it failed against Saddam.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

also lol @ monarchist & Arab-hating Arabs.Victorious_Fize

We Westerners have developed quite an aversion to monarchs with very good reason. Please forgive us for not loving them.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="SaudiFury"]

from what i gather from your post history and what i've seen.

there is not much to learn.

SaudiFury

So, you claim to know what I am about after reading a few random posts on Gamespot? Man. That is dishonest even for you.

I don't claim to know you, i've never met you, i claim to have a good idea as to how you will respond. If reading dozens of posts by you and seeing your beliefs written down and how you present yourself does not amount to some knowledge as to what you think and how you act. Then i don't know what counts then.

if say i were to start a thread about say.... abortion, By and large the active posters on this forum, i can already tell what and where most of them stand. After being on here for some 5 years, it begins to be predictable as to who will respond and how. it's not about being a smart @ss, or claiming to know people, it's about seeing a predictable response given again and again.

When victorious_fize writes that he is of a Yemeni tribal origin, what does this change for you? you already lol'd at him for living in Saudi Arabia. were all a bunch of sand people to some of you guys anyways.

sandpeople.jpg

Praline is a bro.

fin

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]also lol @ monarchist & Arab-hating Arabs.coolbeans90

We Westerners have developed quite an aversion to monarchs with very good reason. Please forgive us for not loving them.

I was referring to the Arabs here who oppose the revolutions. Nobody here likes monarchs either. We call them "mutabil" in Arabic, meaning "drummer". Because they'll drum (tabla) about how glorious their masters are day and night.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]also lol @ monarchist & Arab-hating Arabs.Victorious_Fize

We Westerners have developed quite an aversion to monarchs with very good reason. Please forgive us for not loving them.

I was referring to the Arabs here who oppose the revolutions. Nobody here likes monarchs either. We call them "mutabil" in Arabic, meaning "drummer". Because they'll drum (tabla) about how glorious their masters are day and night.

Gotcha.

Addendum: PW ain't a bro.

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

We Westerners have developed quite an aversion to monarchs with very good reason. Please forgive us for not loving them.

coolbeans90

I was referring to the Arabs here who oppose the revolutions. Nobody here likes monarchs either. We call them "mutabil" in Arabic, meaning "drummer". Because they'll drum (tabla) about how glorious their masters are day and night.

Gotcha.

Addendum: PW ain't a bro.

You're already a bro in my book.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"] I was referring to the Arabs here who oppose the revolutions. Nobody here likes monarchs either. We call them "mutabil" in Arabic, meaning "drummer". Because they'll drum (tabla) about how glorious their masters are day and night.Victorious_Fize

Gotcha.

Addendum: PW ain't a bro.

You're already a bro in my book.

Sweet

< 3

I LOOK FORWARD TO FUTURE CONVOS

will attempt to be civlized

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

Addendum: PW ain't a bro.coolbeans90
Yeah I was starting to think so too, beans. While were being candid with each other, your praise of Sun Tzu's debating skills reveals a lack of judgement.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

Sun Tzu is a f*cking terrible debater.

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Gotcha.

Addendum: PW ain't a bro.

coolbeans90

You're already a bro in my book.

Sweet

< 3

I LOOK FORWARD TO FUTURE CONVOS

will attempt to be civlized

Haha, it's ok, don't hold back unless it's blatantly hateful. I consider all the few genuine posters here to be bros, as I quite like them. It's a real rarity to find someone on OT with no ideological restraints or preservation. Granted, I don't upheld this view very much myself, but I've always had it in mind and I've been keeping special efforts lately to gradually implement it in full action internet wide (which is basically SingTFU about things I don't know).
Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

I am a f*cking terrible debater.

PWSteal_Ldpinch
FTFY.
Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]

I am a f*cking terrible debater.

Victorious_Fize

FTFY.

Well of course you'd say that. You are not an impartial observer of my debating skills.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]Addendum: PW ain't a bro.PWSteal_Ldpinch

Yeah I was starting to think so too, beans. While were being candid with each other, your praise of Sun Tzu's debating skills reveals a lack of judgement.

He is very good at debating - far better than I am, anyway. I say this as a hater of leftie scum. Granted, you argue hopeless causes well, though with an amount of vitriol I would call unwarranted.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"] You're already a bro in my book.

Victorious_Fize

Sweet

< 3

I LOOK FORWARD TO FUTURE CONVOS

will attempt to be civlized

Haha, it's ok, don't hold back unless it's blatantly hateful. I consider all the few genuine posters here to be bros, as I quite like them. It's a real rarity to find someone on OT with no ideological restraints or preservation. Granted, I don't upheld this view very much myself, but I've always had it in mind and I've been keeping special efforts lately to gradually implement it in full action internet wide (which is basically SingTFU about things I don't know).

On occasion, when upset with someone, it's not that I don't hold back, but I say the most awfully ridiculous sh!t possible towards someone possible. Some interpret this as hostile.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]Addendum: PW ain't a bro.coolbeans90

Yeah I was starting to think so too, beans. While were being candid with each other, your praise of Sun Tzu's debating skills reveals a lack of judgement.

He is very good at debating - far better than I am, anyway. I say this as a hater of leftie scum. Granted, you argue hopeless causes well, though with an amount of vitriol I would call unwarranted.

Sun Tzu might be a decent person and his views have improved recently but his debating skills are severely lacking. I haven't seen you debate at all but if he is far better than you as you say then you must be a terrible debater as well. Once, he was trying to argue that begining a sentence with the disclaimer "in my opinion" is redundant because any statement one makes is assumed to be the person's opinion.

And also, what are these "hopeless causes" that I argue? I have never argued that there is a solution to Islam, my arguments are only intended to discredit the notion that Islam is a peaceful religion.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
Considering Saddam had used chemical weapons against his own kurds in the past we just end up intervening.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"] Yeah I was starting to think so too, beans. While were being candid with each other, your praise of Sun Tzu's debating skills reveals a lack of judgement.

PWSteal_Ldpinch

He is very good at debating - far better than I am, anyway. I say this as a hater of leftie scum. Granted, you argue hopeless causes well, though with an amount of vitriol I would call unwarranted.

Sun Tzu might be a decent person and his views have improved recently but his debating skills are severely lacking. I haven't seen you debate at all but if he is far better than you as you say then you must be a terrible debater as well. Once, he was trying to argue that begining a sentence with the disclaimer "in my opinion" is redundant because any statement one makes is assumed to be the person's opinion.

And also, what are these "hopeless causes" that I argue? I have never argued that there is a solution to Islam, my arguments are only intended to discredit the notion that Islam is a peaceful religion.

Sun Tzu uses powerful, concise arguments, despite qualifiers.

No one among us us arguing Islam is a peaceful religion.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

Sun Tzu uses powerful, concise arguments.

coolbeans90

:lol:

No one among us us arguing Islam is a peaceful religion.

coolbeans90

So what is it that you think I'm arguing?

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Man there must be a draft ITT because I hear a lot of rustling
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Sun Tzu uses powerful, concise arguments.

PWSteal_Ldpinch

:lol:

No one among us us arguing Islam is a peaceful religion.

coolbeans90

So what is it that you think I'm arguing?

Have you observed him debate?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to argue that, doctrinally, that Islam is inherently more violent than other Abrahamic religions -- whereas I'd chalk it up to cultural backwardness.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

Man there must be a draft ITT because I hear a lot of rustling -Sun_Tzu-

Hi Sun Tzu.

Did you or did you not argue that begining a sentence with the disclaimer "in my opinion" is redundant because any statement one makes is assumed to be the person's opinion?

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Man there must be a draft ITT because I hear a lot of rustling PWSteal_Ldpinch

Hi Sun Tzu.

Did you or did you not argue that begining a sentence with the disclaimer "in my opinion" is redundant because any statement one makes is assumed to be the person's opinion?

Sounds like something I would say. But I only ever say that if someone responds to a post of mine that only points out the fact that what I said was my opinion. It's an annoying habit a lot of people have.
Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

Have you observed him debate?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to argue that, doctrinally, that Islam is inherently more violent than other Abrahamic religions -- whereas I'd chalk it up to cultural backwardness.

coolbeans90


Oh so you're an equalizer. Well it won't take long for me to dismantle your argument. Do you think every religion is exactlyas violent as every other? Does every religion have the same exactnumber of violent passages?

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Have you observed him debate?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to argue that, doctrinally, that Islam is inherently more violent than other Abrahamic religions -- whereas I'd chalk it up to cultural backwardness.

PWSteal_Ldpinch


Oh so you're an equalizer. Well it won't take long for me to dismantle your argument. Do you think every religion is exactlyas violent as every other? Does every religion have the same exactnumber of violent passages?

I'm not an equalizer.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Have you observed him debate?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to argue that, doctrinally, that Islam is inherently more violent than other Abrahamic religions -- whereas I'd chalk it up to cultural backwardness.

coolbeans90


Oh so you're an equalizer. Well it won't take long for me to dismantle your argument. Do you think every religion is exactlyas violent as every other? Does every religion have the same exactnumber of violent passages?

I'm not an equalizer.

So what is your argument? Do even know what you're trying to argue? If you answer the question then I might be able to help you get some insight.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"]


Oh so you're an equalizer. Well it won't take long for me to dismantle your argument. Do you think every religion is exactlyas violent as every other? Does every religion have the same exactnumber of violent passages?

PWSteal_Ldpinch

I'm not an equalizer.

So what is your argument? Do even know what you're trying to argue? If you answer the question then I might be able to help you get some insight.

I know exactly what I am trying to argue, and you do, too (making my response rather pointless, but so be it): that the disparity of violence between regions of different Abrahamic regions has not to do with religious reason strictly related to doctrine so much as cultural differences.

Avatar image for PWSteal_Ldpinch
PWSteal_Ldpinch

1172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 PWSteal_Ldpinch
Member since 2011 • 1172 Posts

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

I'm not an equalizer.

coolbeans90

So what is your argument? Do even know what you're trying to argue? If you answer the question then I might be able to help you get some insight.

I know exactly what I am trying to argue, and you do, too (making my response rather pointless, but so be it): that the disparity of violence between regions of different Abrahamic regions has not to do with religious reason strictly related to doctrine so much as cultural differences.

So you don't think that the punishment for apostasy being death isn't enshrined in islamic doctrine?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#148 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Hey PWS, just curious, have you studied Islamic history?
Avatar image for gwenstacy961
gwenstacy961

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 gwenstacy961
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
Hillary says "show me the money!!!" to Syria and Iran! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRw8I8eyQ0M Very funny video!
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="PWSteal_Ldpinch"] So what is your argument? Do even know what you're trying to argue? If you answer the question then I might be able to help you get some insight.PWSteal_Ldpinch

I know exactly what I am trying to argue, and you do, too (making my response rather pointless, but so be it): that the disparity of violence between regions of different Abrahamic regions has not to do with religious reason strictly related to doctrine so much as cultural differences.

So you don't think that the punishment for apostasy being death isn't enshrined in islamic doctrine?

*yawns*

I do not recall saying the penalty wasn't that.

When you are done burning straw men, let me know.