This topic is locked from further discussion.
Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.dlindenb2000
Pleasre refer to the 200 links above your reply. Thank you.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Tolwan"]Here: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/385Here: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1862490
Here: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061213174708.htm
Here: http://www.medicirc.org/summary.html
and Here: http://men.webmd.com/guide/circumcision-decision-weighing-risks-benefitsLet me know if you want more.
rimnet00
Just in case you change your mind, heres one more link: link
I don't see why you wouldn't want to be. Whats wrong with being bigger??ferrari2001
I don't see how it makes you bigger, you're talking about being circumsized right?
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"]I don't see why you wouldn't want to be. Whats wrong with being bigger??MindFreeze
I don't see how it makes you bigger, you're talking about being circumsized right?
lol yeah.
[QUOTE="dlindenb2000"]Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.Tolwan
Pleasre refer to the 200 links above your reply. Thank you.
For every study saying one thing, there are those that say the opposite, and therefor nothing is proven. All those link say, is that if your a dirty slut, who never cleans and sleeps with everyone. Then you should get snipped. Fact still stands, that it's not recommend by the governments, nor covered by most health plans. Removing part of your body because you too stupid to care for it, and it might get infected is just idiotic. Go cut off your lips as well then, and your nose and fingers. Remove your lungs and heart. The body is created like this for a reason. It's worked for millenia, and messing with it doesn't do anything,[QUOTE="Tolwan"][QUOTE="dlindenb2000"]Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.dlindenb2000
Pleasre refer to the 200 links above your reply. Thank you.
For every study saying one thing, there are those that say the opposite, and therefor nothing is proven. All those link say, is that if your a dirty slut, who never cleans and sleeps with everyone. Then you should get snipped. Fact still stands, that it's not recommend by the governments, nor covered by most health plans. Removing part of your body because you too stupid to care for it, and it might get infected is just idiotic. Go cut off your lips as well then, and your nose and fingers. Remove your lungs and heart. The body is created like this for a reason. It's worked for millenia, and messing with it doesn't do anything,Actually, i suggest you read the link. They are all extensive studies and research done by doctors and professors. Furthermore, the US government does push it. It is standard procedure in the united states for male children to be circumcised, and it is covered by the most basic of health plans.
In the 1989-1999 decade, multiple studies confirmed the beneficial effect of newborn circumcision in preventing infant UTIs and transmission of HIV.first link
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 November 1second link
Further, women sexual partners of uncircumcised men with HPV infection are at significantly greater risk of developing cervical cancerfourth link
The warm, tight, moist undersurface of the infant foreskin provides an ideal home for the harmful fecal bacteria that cause kidney infectionsfourth link
In Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region (KP), a large health maintenance organization (HMO), recently published studies found that uncircumcised males are about 22 times more likely to get invasive penile cancer and 10 times more likely to get infant kidney infections as are circumcised males (Schoen, Pediatrics 2000).fourth link
Using data from the same study Chlamydia infections, common in young adults and teen-agers and an important cause of infertility, was found to be 3 times as likely if the man was uncircumcised.fourth link
During World War II, particularly during the North African desert campaign, the combination of sand and lack of hygienic conditions proved disastrous to uncircumcised menfourth link
My unscientific justifications for circumcisionfifth link
Just in case you change your mind, heres one more link: linkrimnet00
[QUOTE="familycircusfan"]ya but the guy who did it messed up its all weirdFUBAR24
god you sig scaredme for a second
lol
[quote="first link"]In the 1989-1999 decade, multiple studies confirmed the beneficial effect of newborn circumcision in preventing infant UTIs and transmission of HIV.foxhound_fox
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 November 1second link
Further, women sexual partners of uncircumcised men with HPV infection are at significantly greater risk of developing cervical cancerfourth link
The warm, tight, moist undersurface of the infant foreskin provides an ideal home for the harmful fecal bacteria that cause kidney infectionsfourth link
In Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region (KP), a large health maintenance organization (HMO), recently published studies found that uncircumcised males are about 22 times more likely to get invasive penile cancer and 10 times more likely to get infant kidney infections as are circumcised males (Schoen, Pediatrics 2000).fourth link
Using data from the same study Chlamydia infections, common in young adults and teen-agers and an important cause of infertility, was found to be 3 times as likely if the man was uncircumcised.fourth link
During World War II, particularly during the North African desert campaign, the combination of sand and lack of hygienic conditions proved disastrous to uncircumcised menfourth link
My unscientific justifications for circumcisionfifth link
One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.
There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.
[QUOTE="rimnet00"]Just in case you change your mind, heres one more link: linkfoxhound_fox
How did you get circumcised? birth?
[quote="first link"]In the 1989-1999 decade, multiple studies confirmed the beneficial effect of newborn circumcision in preventing infant UTIs and transmission of HIV.foxhound_fox
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 November 1second link
Further, women sexual partners of uncircumcised men with HPV infection are at significantly greater risk of developing cervical cancerfourth link
The warm, tight, moist undersurface of the infant foreskin provides an ideal home for the harmful fecal bacteria that cause kidney infectionsfourth link
In Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region (KP), a large health maintenance organization (HMO), recently published studies found that uncircumcised males are about 22 times more likely to get invasive penile cancer and 10 times more likely to get infant kidney infections as are circumcised males (Schoen, Pediatrics 2000).fourth link
Using data from the same study Chlamydia infections, common in young adults and teen-agers and an important cause of infertility, was found to be 3 times as likely if the man was uncircumcised.fourth link
During World War II, particularly during the North African desert campaign, the combination of sand and lack of hygienic conditions proved disastrous to uncircumcised menfourth link
My unscientific justifications for circumcisionfifth link
didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent
No.
Religious reasons
Toriko42
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.
Religious reasons
remmbermytitans
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
wtf are you talking about, does being circumcised get you bigger or smaller????
[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.
Religious reasons
remmbermytitans
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
If you were catholic then you would be circumcised....:|[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"][QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.
Religious reasons
darksword1123
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
If you were catholic then you would be circumcised....:|[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"][QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.
Religious reasons
Psychosisrain
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
wtf are you talking about, does being circumcised get you bigger or smaller????
Neither...
[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"][QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.
Religious reasons
Psychosisrain
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
wtf are you talking about, does being circumcised get you bigger or smaller????
Not what I asked at all, talking about infections and stuff, is it worse to be "small" or "large" down there, and be uncircumsised. Or does it not even matter.
One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.
Tolwan
didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent FUBAR24
How did you get circumcised? birth?Psychosisrain
My boyfriend isn't circumsised and to be honest, my first reaction was like wtf? But there's really nothing wrong with it (though it does seem like it'd be annoying for the men.) Calypto
Nice to get it from a girl's perspective. Sent you a friend request also.
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.
foxhound_fox
didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent FUBAR24
How did you get circumcised? birth?Psychosisrain
This man speaks the truth.
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.
foxhound_fox
didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent FUBAR24
How did you get circumcised? birth?Psychosisrain
They can't retort it because what i said is a direct quote from several sources i have *already* posted on the effects of circumcision in relation to reducing risk of contracting STD. You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position. The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.
I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?
[QUOTE="darksword1123"][QUOTE="remmbermytitans"][QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.
Religious reasons
remmbermytitans
Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?
If you were catholic then you would be circumcised....:|You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position.Tolwan
The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.Tolwan
I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?Tolwan
[QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]No and i dont see how it could help :?, except maybe to be on saje's good side :lol:.Sajedene
I only mind it with the guys I'm sleeping with. So you and me are ok. :)
So you won't sleep with a guy who isn't circumsised? Is it for aesthetic reasons or other reasons?You know, you could go back and forth all you want but the fact of the matter is that being circumcsised is not going to just give a person immunity to STD's or infections. They happen with or without a foreskin. There really is nothing beneficial about it. Want real actual proof instead of reading the results of some studies? Go have unprotected sex with someone who has an STD and come back here and tell us whether or not you caught something. Fact of the matter is this: uncircumcised or not the only way to decrease you chances of getting infected is by wearing a condom.
They can't retort it because what i said is a direct quote from several sources i have *already* posted on the effects of circumcision in relation to reducing risk of contracting STD. You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position. The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.
I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?
Tolwan
BTW have you even seen the numbers of men who get penile cancer each year? It's such a rare occurence it shouldn't even play a part in this discussion. One other thing: proper hygiene is not a hassle, it takes less than a minute to clean and even if you forget one day an infection isn't going to spring up overnight.
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position.foxhound_fox
The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.Tolwan
I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?Tolwan
of course its easy for you to say that but think about it from a childs perspective. what five year old wants to take a bath. let alone clean his special parts
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position.foxhound_fox
The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.Tolwan
I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?Tolwan
of course its easy for you to say that but think about it from a childs perspective. what five year old wants to take a bath. let alone clean his special parts
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment