Are You Circumsised? (poll)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dlindenb2000
dlindenb2000

4750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -11

User Lists: 0

#151 dlindenb2000
Member since 2005 • 4750 Posts
Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.
Avatar image for Siofen
Siofen

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Siofen
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts
No, and thank god. I love my foreskin, it makes my wang all snug and warm, it's like my wang has it's own little tipi, or a china man hat... :D
Avatar image for Tolwan
Tolwan

2575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#153 Tolwan
Member since 2003 • 2575 Posts

Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.dlindenb2000

Pleasre refer to the 200 links above your reply. Thank you.

Avatar image for Tolwan
Tolwan

2575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#154 Tolwan
Member since 2003 • 2575 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Tolwan"]Here: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/385

Here: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1862490
Here: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061213174708.htm
Here: http://www.medicirc.org/summary.html
and Here: http://men.webmd.com/guide/circumcision-decision-weighing-risks-benefits

Let me know if you want more.

rimnet00


Finally, some evidence that refutes my argument is brought up... you don't know how happy this makes me.

It is going tot take me a while to go through these.

Just in case you change your mind, heres one more link: link

I see what you did there.

Avatar image for darksword1123
darksword1123

30121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 darksword1123
Member since 2004 • 30121 Posts
Yes I am.
Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#156 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
No

Religious reasons
Avatar image for Psychosisrain
Psychosisrain

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Psychosisrain
Member since 2006 • 931 Posts
No and thank god, you don't need to be circumcised it just isnt needed. oh oh but less STDS and and the CLEANER LOLOLOL.
Avatar image for kingdre
kingdre

9456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 kingdre
Member since 2005 • 9456 Posts
Yes. :D
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#159 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
I don't see why you wouldn't want to be. Whats wrong with being bigger??
Avatar image for MindFreeze
MindFreeze

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 MindFreeze
Member since 2007 • 2814 Posts

I don't see why you wouldn't want to be. Whats wrong with being bigger??ferrari2001

I don't see how it makes you bigger, you're talking about being circumsized right?

Avatar image for Psychosisrain
Psychosisrain

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 Psychosisrain
Member since 2006 • 931 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"]I don't see why you wouldn't want to be. Whats wrong with being bigger??MindFreeze

I don't see how it makes you bigger, you're talking about being circumsized right?

lol yeah.

Avatar image for familycircusfan
familycircusfan

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 familycircusfan
Member since 2008 • 272 Posts
ya but the guy who did it messed up its all weird
Avatar image for dlindenb2000
dlindenb2000

4750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -11

User Lists: 0

#163 dlindenb2000
Member since 2005 • 4750 Posts

[QUOTE="dlindenb2000"]Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.Tolwan

Pleasre refer to the 200 links above your reply. Thank you.

For every study saying one thing, there are those that say the opposite, and therefor nothing is proven. All those link say, is that if your a dirty slut, who never cleans and sleeps with everyone. Then you should get snipped. Fact still stands, that it's not recommend by the governments, nor covered by most health plans. Removing part of your body because you too stupid to care for it, and it might get infected is just idiotic. Go cut off your lips as well then, and your nose and fingers. Remove your lungs and heart. The body is created like this for a reason. It's worked for millenia, and messing with it doesn't do anything,
Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#164 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

ya but the guy who did it messed up its all weirdfamilycircusfan

god you sig scaredme for a second

Avatar image for Tolwan
Tolwan

2575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#165 Tolwan
Member since 2003 • 2575 Posts
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]

[QUOTE="dlindenb2000"]Not sure why anyone would do it anymore, pretty much every Health Organization recommends against it. There are no proven benifts. Sure there can be problems with it, but if we cut off every part of our bodies that were prone to infection and cancer, we whouldn't have much left to call a body.dlindenb2000

Pleasre refer to the 200 links above your reply. Thank you.

For every study saying one thing, there are those that say the opposite, and therefor nothing is proven. All those link say, is that if your a dirty slut, who never cleans and sleeps with everyone. Then you should get snipped. Fact still stands, that it's not recommend by the governments, nor covered by most health plans. Removing part of your body because you too stupid to care for it, and it might get infected is just idiotic. Go cut off your lips as well then, and your nose and fingers. Remove your lungs and heart. The body is created like this for a reason. It's worked for millenia, and messing with it doesn't do anything,

Actually, i suggest you read the link. They are all extensive studies and research done by doctors and professors. Furthermore, the US government does push it. It is standard procedure in the united states for male children to be circumcised, and it is covered by the most basic of health plans.

Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts
Yes, and happy that I am.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#167 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

In the 1989-1999 decade, multiple studies confirmed the beneficial effect of newborn circumcision in preventing infant UTIs and transmission of HIV.first link

Firstly, the transmission of HIV has nothing to do with circumcision. It has everything to do with condom use or avoiding sexual contact with someone who has HIV.

My response to the first link: There is significant evidence to support the reduction in the risk to these diseases... yes, but proper hygiene can still prevent them all and safe sex practices are far better at preventing STD's than circumcision since regardless of whether or not you are circumcised, if you or your partner has a STD, the chances of you/them getting it through unsafe sex are the same. I am still having trouble accepting the fact that removing something that was put there by nature, through evolution and adaptation, is more beneficial than just leaving it and keeping it clean.



Can Med Assoc J. 1981 November 1second link

I'm having trouble taking a nearly three decade old journal seriously.



"Circumcision is now a proven, effective prevention strategy to reduce HIV infections in men," said Robert Bailey, professor of epidemiology in the UIC School of Public Healththird link

I hate to say it... but what about safe sex? Doesn't safe sex prevent HIV transmission? I know these people are "doctors" but what happened proper safe sex practices in prevention of HIV transmission?

Opponents of circumcision have speculated that circumcised men may feel they are not at risk of contracting HIV and may be more likely to engage in risky behavior.third link

Glad to know that they can read my mind... :|

My response to the third link: They have evidence to support their claim that it "prevents HIV" but they don't say whether or not condoms were used by ALL the men involved ALL the time or whether or not the men actually used the condoms at all. I am still having trouble seeing proper benefits that cannot be solved by proper hygiene and safe sex.


Further, women sexual partners of uncircumcised men with HPV infection are at significantly greater risk of developing cervical cancerfourth link

I would sure hope they are at greater risk... their partners HAVE the virus... :|

The warm, tight, moist undersurface of the infant foreskin provides an ideal home for the harmful fecal bacteria that cause kidney infectionsfourth link

Again, hygiene.

In Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region (KP), a large health maintenance organization (HMO), recently published studies found that uncircumcised males are about 22 times more likely to get invasive penile cancer and 10 times more likely to get infant kidney infections as are circumcised males (Schoen, Pediatrics 2000).fourth link

I'm still on hygiene with this one.

Using data from the same study Chlamydia infections, common in young adults and teen-agers and an important cause of infertility, was found to be 3 times as likely if the man was uncircumcised.fourth link

A STD? Again with the STD?

During World War II, particularly during the North African desert campaign, the combination of sand and lack of hygienic conditions proved disastrous to uncircumcised menfourth link

OH SNAP!

Response to fourth link: Again, I am still having trouble seeing how circumcision can be better than proper hygiene and safe sex...



My unscientific justifications for circumcisionfifth link

I like this link... a lot... :|

Response to fifth link: STD's... STD's... STD's... when have safe sex practices become a thing of the past? Did I miss the memo?



In conclusion

I'm still against circumcision... especially that of neonatal circumcision. It should be the choice of the individual of whom it is done to. There is not enough damning evidence to prove that circumcision is superior to simple hygiene and safe sex.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#168 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Just in case you change your mind, heres one more link: linkrimnet00

Cute joke... but you missed the fact that I am circumcised.
Avatar image for familycircusfan
familycircusfan

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 familycircusfan
Member since 2008 • 272 Posts

[QUOTE="familycircusfan"]ya but the guy who did it messed up its all weirdFUBAR24

god you sig scaredme for a second

lol

Avatar image for Tolwan
Tolwan

2575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#170 Tolwan
Member since 2003 • 2575 Posts

[quote="first link"]In the 1989-1999 decade, multiple studies confirmed the beneficial effect of newborn circumcision in preventing infant UTIs and transmission of HIV.foxhound_fox


Firstly, the transmission of HIV has nothing to do with circumcision. It has everything to do with condom use or avoiding sexual contact with someone who has HIV.

My response to the first link: There is significant evidence to support the reduction in the risk to these diseases... yes, but proper hygiene can still prevent them all and safe sex practices are far better at preventing STD's than circumcision since regardless of whether or not you are circumcised, if you or your partner has a STD, the chances of you/them getting it through unsafe sex are the same. I am still having trouble accepting the fact that removing something that was put there by nature, through evolution and adaptation, is more beneficial than just leaving it and keeping it clean.



Can Med Assoc J. 1981 November 1second link

I'm having trouble taking a nearly three decade old journal seriously.



"Circumcision is now a proven, effective prevention strategy to reduce HIV infections in men," said Robert Bailey, professor of epidemiology in the UIC School of Public Healththird link

I hate to say it... but what about safe sex? Doesn't safe sex prevent HIV transmission? I know these people are "doctors" but what happened proper safe sex practices in prevention of HIV transmission?

Opponents of circumcision have speculated that circumcised men may feel they are not at risk of contracting HIV and may be more likely to engage in risky behavior.third link

Glad to know that they can read my mind... :|

My response to the third link: They have evidence to support their claim that it "prevents HIV" but they don't say whether or not condoms were used by ALL the men involved ALL the time or whether or not the men actually used the condoms at all. I am still having trouble seeing proper benefits that cannot be solved by proper hygiene and safe sex.


Further, women sexual partners of uncircumcised men with HPV infection are at significantly greater risk of developing cervical cancerfourth link

I would sure hope they are at greater risk... their partners HAVE the virus... :|

The warm, tight, moist undersurface of the infant foreskin provides an ideal home for the harmful fecal bacteria that cause kidney infectionsfourth link

Again, hygiene.

In Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region (KP), a large health maintenance organization (HMO), recently published studies found that uncircumcised males are about 22 times more likely to get invasive penile cancer and 10 times more likely to get infant kidney infections as are circumcised males (Schoen, Pediatrics 2000).fourth link

I'm still on hygiene with this one.

Using data from the same study Chlamydia infections, common in young adults and teen-agers and an important cause of infertility, was found to be 3 times as likely if the man was uncircumcised.fourth link

A STD? Again with the STD?

During World War II, particularly during the North African desert campaign, the combination of sand and lack of hygienic conditions proved disastrous to uncircumcised menfourth link

OH SNAP!

Response to fourth link: Again, I am still having trouble seeing how circumcision can be better than proper hygiene and safe sex...



My unscientific justifications for circumcisionfifth link

I like this link... a lot... :|

Response to fifth link: STD's... STD's... STD's... when have safe sex practices become a thing of the past? Did I miss the memo?



In conclusion

I'm still against circumcision... especially that of neonatal circumcision. It should be the choice of the individual of whom it is done to. There is not enough damning evidence to prove that circumcision is superior to simple hygiene and safe sex.

One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.

There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.

Avatar image for Psychosisrain
Psychosisrain

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 Psychosisrain
Member since 2006 • 931 Posts

[QUOTE="rimnet00"]Just in case you change your mind, heres one more link: linkfoxhound_fox

Cute joke... but you missed the fact that I am circumcised.

How did you get circumcised? birth?

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#172 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

[quote="first link"]In the 1989-1999 decade, multiple studies confirmed the beneficial effect of newborn circumcision in preventing infant UTIs and transmission of HIV.foxhound_fox


Firstly, the transmission of HIV has nothing to do with circumcision. It has everything to do with condom use or avoiding sexual contact with someone who has HIV.

My response to the first link: There is significant evidence to support the reduction in the risk to these diseases... yes, but proper hygiene can still prevent them all and safe sex practices are far better at preventing STD's than circumcision since regardless of whether or not you are circumcised, if you or your partner has a STD, the chances of you/them getting it through unsafe sex are the same. I am still having trouble accepting the fact that removing something that was put there by nature, through evolution and adaptation, is more beneficial than just leaving it and keeping it clean.



Can Med Assoc J. 1981 November 1second link

I'm having trouble taking a nearly three decade old journal seriously.



"Circumcision is now a proven, effective prevention strategy to reduce HIV infections in men," said Robert Bailey, professor of epidemiology in the UIC School of Public Healththird link

I hate to say it... but what about safe sex? Doesn't safe sex prevent HIV transmission? I know these people are "doctors" but what happened proper safe sex practices in prevention of HIV transmission?

Opponents of circumcision have speculated that circumcised men may feel they are not at risk of contracting HIV and may be more likely to engage in risky behavior.third link

Glad to know that they can read my mind... :|

My response to the third link: They have evidence to support their claim that it "prevents HIV" but they don't say whether or not condoms were used by ALL the men involved ALL the time or whether or not the men actually used the condoms at all. I am still having trouble seeing proper benefits that cannot be solved by proper hygiene and safe sex.


Further, women sexual partners of uncircumcised men with HPV infection are at significantly greater risk of developing cervical cancerfourth link

I would sure hope they are at greater risk... their partners HAVE the virus... :|

The warm, tight, moist undersurface of the infant foreskin provides an ideal home for the harmful fecal bacteria that cause kidney infectionsfourth link

Again, hygiene.

In Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region (KP), a large health maintenance organization (HMO), recently published studies found that uncircumcised males are about 22 times more likely to get invasive penile cancer and 10 times more likely to get infant kidney infections as are circumcised males (Schoen, Pediatrics 2000).fourth link

I'm still on hygiene with this one.

Using data from the same study Chlamydia infections, common in young adults and teen-agers and an important cause of infertility, was found to be 3 times as likely if the man was uncircumcised.fourth link

A STD? Again with the STD?

During World War II, particularly during the North African desert campaign, the combination of sand and lack of hygienic conditions proved disastrous to uncircumcised menfourth link

OH SNAP!

Response to fourth link: Again, I am still having trouble seeing how circumcision can be better than proper hygiene and safe sex...



My unscientific justifications for circumcisionfifth link

I like this link... a lot... :|

Response to fifth link: STD's... STD's... STD's... when have safe sex practices become a thing of the past? Did I miss the memo?



In conclusion

I'm still against circumcision... especially that of neonatal circumcision. It should be the choice of the individual of whom it is done to. There is not enough damning evidence to prove that circumcision is superior to simple hygiene and safe sex.

didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent

Avatar image for remmbermytitans
remmbermytitans

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#173 remmbermytitans
Member since 2005 • 7214 Posts

No.

Religious reasons
Toriko42

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

Avatar image for Psychosisrain
Psychosisrain

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Psychosisrain
Member since 2006 • 931 Posts

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.

Religious reasons
remmbermytitans

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

wtf are you talking about, does being circumcised get you bigger or smaller????

Avatar image for darksword1123
darksword1123

30121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 darksword1123
Member since 2004 • 30121 Posts

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.

Religious reasons
remmbermytitans

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

If you were catholic then you would be circumcised....:|
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
No, and it almost cost me my penis a few years later. Not kidding
Avatar image for remmbermytitans
remmbermytitans

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#178 remmbermytitans
Member since 2005 • 7214 Posts
[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.

Religious reasons
darksword1123

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

If you were catholic then you would be circumcised....:|



No... Because religious people think that messing with "down there", is totally bad. You know the whole, no sex until marriage. But then again, that's a different topic.
Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#179 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts
Indeed I am.
Avatar image for the_leet_kid
the_leet_kid

9951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 the_leet_kid
Member since 2005 • 9951 Posts
[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.

Religious reasons
Psychosisrain

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

wtf are you talking about, does being circumcised get you bigger or smaller????

Neither...

Avatar image for Psychosisrain
Psychosisrain

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Psychosisrain
Member since 2006 • 931 Posts

No, and it almost cost me my penis a few years later. Not kidding DivergeUnify

Pics

Avatar image for killer_is_me
killer_is_me

1939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 killer_is_me
Member since 2007 • 1939 Posts
Actually I don't know.:P
Avatar image for remmbermytitans
remmbermytitans

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#183 remmbermytitans
Member since 2005 • 7214 Posts
[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.

Religious reasons
Psychosisrain

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

wtf are you talking about, does being circumcised get you bigger or smaller????

Not what I asked at all, talking about infections and stuff, is it worse to be "small" or "large" down there, and be uncircumsised. Or does it not even matter.

Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#185 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
Nope, all natural over here.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#186 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.

There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.

Tolwan

I think you are misunderstanding... if proper hygiene techniques are taught to children then they won't have to worry about being circumcised. "Irresponsibility" is an incredibly shallow and flawed reasoning to purport circumcision as a "solution" to improper hygiene.

And soldiers are soldiers... they have a lot more to worry about than urinary tract infections... you know, death and all.

Someone with an STD should not be having sex with another person. Period. That is the only reason why STD's are still around.

"no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom" I hope someone her can refute this because that is hilarious.

From the links you posted I still cannot support circumcision over proper hygiene and safe sex (or no sex). The evidence just cannot support it enough to make it "mandatory" that we remove what nature put there. One poster said it best already... "Americans seem to have a mutilation fetish."

didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent FUBAR24

You said it yourself, the absolute way to prevent yourself from getting an STD is being abstinent. That and having sex with a responsible partner who cleans themselves and has themselves tested for STD's.

Let's also not mention that circumcision has nothing to do with crabs, gential warts/herpes or other related STD's... :|

How did you get circumcised? birth?Psychosisrain

Yep. Until I saw the episode of P&T I was a proponent of it as well. The benefits don't outweigh the simple solutions...
Avatar image for remmbermytitans
remmbermytitans

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#187 remmbermytitans
Member since 2005 • 7214 Posts

My boyfriend isn't circumsised and to be honest, my first reaction was like wtf? But there's really nothing wrong with it (though it does seem like it'd be annoying for the men.) Calypto

Nice to get it from a girl's perspective. Sent you a friend request also.

Avatar image for Psychosisrain
Psychosisrain

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Psychosisrain
Member since 2006 • 931 Posts
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.

There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.

foxhound_fox


I think you are misunderstanding... if proper hygiene techniques are taught to children then they won't have to worry about being circumcised. "Irresponsibility" is an incredibly shallow and flawed reasoning to purport circumcision as a "solution" to improper hygiene.

And soldiers are soldiers... they have a lot more to worry about than urinary tract infections... you know, death and all.

Someone with an STD should not be having sex with another person. Period. That is the only reason why STD's are still around.

"no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom" I hope someone her can refute this because that is hilarious.

From the links you posted I still cannot support circumcision over proper hygiene and safe sex (or no sex). The evidence just cannot support it enough to make it "mandatory" that we remove what nature put there. One poster said it best already... "Americans seem to have a mutilation fetish."

didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent FUBAR24

You said it yourself, the absolute way to prevent yourself from getting an STD is being abstinent. That and having sex with a responsible partner who cleans themselves and has themselves tested for STD's.

Let's also not mention that circumcision has nothing to do with crabs, gential warts/herpes or other related STD's... :|

How did you get circumcised? birth?Psychosisrain

Yep. Until I saw the episode of P&T I was a proponent of it as well. The benefits don't outweigh the simple solutions...

This man speaks the truth.

Avatar image for Tolwan
Tolwan

2575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#189 Tolwan
Member since 2003 • 2575 Posts
[QUOTE="Tolwan"]One of the major things you are failing to realize is that great hygeine is not possible for everyone. Kids are often irresponsible and good hygeine is..out of the question for soldiers in combat. Futhermore, STD's are an issue. There people who have relationships with people with STD,s and no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom. So the two together lower your chances significantly more than just 1 or the other.

There are plenty more links you can find on google or Ebsco host. Almost all medical professionals encourage Circumcision, it seems to be more just sensationalists or conspiracy theorists that think it's a bad thing. Some people just dont like the thought of removing parts of your body.

foxhound_fox


I think you are misunderstanding... if proper hygiene techniques are taught to children then they won't have to worry about being circumcised. "Irresponsibility" is an incredibly shallow and flawed reasoning to purport circumcision as a "solution" to improper hygiene.

And soldiers are soldiers... they have a lot more to worry about than urinary tract infections... you know, death and all.

Someone with an STD should not be having sex with another person. Period. That is the only reason why STD's are still around.

"no foreskin works in conjuction with a condom" I hope someone her can refute this because that is hilarious.

From the links you posted I still cannot support circumcision over proper hygiene and safe sex (or no sex). The evidence just cannot support it enough to make it "mandatory" that we remove what nature put there. One poster said it best already... "Americans seem to have a mutilation fetish."

didnt you pay attention in sex ed. you can still get some types of STDs even if you are wearing a condom because only your skin needs to touch like. genital warts. safe sex isnt as safe as you think. the only absolutle way to garuntee that you wont get an STD is if you are abstinent FUBAR24

You said it yourself, the absolute way to prevent yourself from getting an STD is being abstinent. That and having sex with a responsible partner who cleans themselves and has themselves tested for STD's.

Let's also not mention that circumcision has nothing to do with crabs, gential warts/herpes or other related STD's... :|

How did you get circumcised? birth?Psychosisrain

Yep. Until I saw the episode of P&T I was a proponent of it as well. The benefits don't outweigh the simple solutions...

They can't retort it because what i said is a direct quote from several sources i have *already* posted on the effects of circumcision in relation to reducing risk of contracting STD. You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position. The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.

I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?

Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#191 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
Yes, I'm circumsised. It would be interesting though if I was all natural.
Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#192 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
[QUOTE="darksword1123"][QUOTE="remmbermytitans"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]No.

Religious reasons
remmbermytitans

Well, I'm assuming thats why I'm not.. Stupid catholic parents. Though is it worse to be "small" or "large" and uncircumsised?

If you were catholic then you would be circumcised....:|



No... Because religious people think that messing with "down there", is totally bad. You know the whole, no sex until marriage. But then again, that's a different topic.

No, different religion here

In my religion we believe the body is beautiful and shouldn't be touched. Children shouldn't be hurt either.
Avatar image for gameeer1
gameeer1

16425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 gameeer1
Member since 2006 • 16425 Posts
No, I am not.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#194 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position.Tolwan

Actually, my position is that neonatal circumcision is illegal. The baby does not choose to have its foreskin removed and should be allowed to make that decision later in life. My arguments against circumcision so far have been to refute the claims both you and your links make that circumcision "prevents" things that simple hygiene and safe sex can prevent on their own.

The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.Tolwan

You must shower everyday? Well, I hope you shower everyday because proper whole body hygiene practiced every day is essential to being the cleanest person you can be and not offending others with your odour. Pulling your foreskin back and cleaning yourself takes perhaps an extra few seconds... I fail to see how that is a "hassle."

I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?Tolwan

So why not? Because the child doesn't choose to have his foreskin removed? Because there is nothing beyond simple hygiene and safe sex that prevents these infections and STD's? I am open minded, I support the freedom for an individual to choose what they want done to their body and not have something forced upon them when they cannot even lift their own heads.

Neonatal circumcision is still not a government enforced obligation... I wonder why that is? Perhaps it is because it has still yet to be accepted by the general medical community?

I am done with this for tonight... Max Payne is calling to me.
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#195 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
Mhm.
Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#196 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts

[QUOTE="TanKLoveR"]No and i dont see how it could help :?, except maybe to be on saje's good side :lol:.Sajedene

I only mind it with the guys I'm sleeping with. So you and me are ok. :)

So you won't sleep with a guy who isn't circumsised? Is it for aesthetic reasons or other reasons?
Avatar image for elblanquito_81
elblanquito_81

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 elblanquito_81
Member since 2007 • 4356 Posts


They can't retort it because what i said is a direct quote from several sources i have *already* posted on the effects of circumcision in relation to reducing risk of contracting STD. You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position. The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.

I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?

Tolwan

You know, you could go back and forth all you want but the fact of the matter is that being circumcsised is not going to just give a person immunity to STD's or infections. They happen with or without a foreskin. There really is nothing beneficial about it. Want real actual proof instead of reading the results of some studies? Go have unprotected sex with someone who has an STD and come back here and tell us whether or not you caught something. Fact of the matter is this: uncircumcised or not the only way to decrease you chances of getting infected is by wearing a condom.

BTW have you even seen the numbers of men who get penile cancer each year? It's such a rare occurence it shouldn't even play a part in this discussion. One other thing: proper hygiene is not a hassle, it takes less than a minute to clean and even if you forget one day an infection isn't going to spring up overnight.

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#198 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

[QUOTE="Tolwan"]You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position.foxhound_fox

Actually, my position is that neonatal circumcision is illegal. The baby does not choose to have its foreskin removed and should be allowed to make that decision later in life. My arguments against circumcision so far have been to refute the claims both you and your links make that circumcision "prevents" things that simple hygiene and safe sex can prevent on their own.

The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.Tolwan

You must shower everyday? Well, I hope you shower everyday because proper whole body hygiene practiced every day is essential to being the cleanest person you can be and not offending others with your odour. Pulling your foreskin back and cleaning yourself takes perhaps an extra few seconds... I fail to see how that is a "hassle."

I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?Tolwan

So why not? Because the child doesn't choose to have his foreskin removed? Because there is nothing beyond simple hygiene and safe sex that prevents these infections and STD's? I am open minded, I support the freedom for an individual to choose what they want done to their body and not have something forced upon them when they cannot even lift their own heads.

Neonatal circumcision is still not a government enforced obligation... I wonder why that is? Perhaps it is because it has still yet to be accepted by the general medical community?

I am done with this for tonight... Max Payne is calling to me.

of course its easy for you to say that but think about it from a childs perspective. what five year old wants to take a bath. let alone clean his special parts

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#199 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

[QUOTE="Tolwan"]You obivously dont want to debate this on a scientific stance, you just want everyone to have foreskin fun, that's your position.foxhound_fox

Actually, my position is that neonatal circumcision is illegal. The baby does not choose to have its foreskin removed and should be allowed to make that decision later in life. My arguments against circumcision so far have been to refute the claims both you and your links make that circumcision "prevents" things that simple hygiene and safe sex can prevent on their own.

The fact of the matter is, most parents have their children circumcized to remove the hassle of proper hygiene, which is not as easy as you purport with concerns to foreskin. You must clean *very* thoroughly if you want to make sure you never get an infection, otherwise even if you do shower every day you maintain a risk of eventually getting an infenction or even cancer.Tolwan

You must shower everyday? Well, I hope you shower everyday because proper whole body hygiene practiced every day is essential to being the cleanest person you can be and not offending others with your odour. Pulling your foreskin back and cleaning yourself takes perhaps an extra few seconds... I fail to see how that is a "hassle."

I could give you 100 more links, peer reviewed articles (Which are arguably among the most reliable in science), and even mail you a medical text, but i dont think you'll change your mind, because i dont think you're open minded on the subject, which is strange. I think most of us here are, because it's such an *INSIGNIFICANT* issue. Really, the safest and best bet for children is circumcision, so why not?Tolwan

So why not? Because the child doesn't choose to have his foreskin removed? Because there is nothing beyond simple hygiene and safe sex that prevents these infections and STD's? I am open minded, I support the freedom for an individual to choose what they want done to their body and not have something forced upon them when they cannot even lift their own heads.

Neonatal circumcision is still not a government enforced obligation... I wonder why that is? Perhaps it is because it has still yet to be accepted by the general medical community?

I am done with this for tonight... Max Payne is calling to me.

of course its easy for you to say that but think about it from a childs perspective. what five year old wants to take a bath. let alone clean his special parts

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

pics or it didnt happen