British comedy can be really good a lot of times, but you cant top the American comedy of Seinfeld! Kramer, Eliane, George and Jerry made history with their adventures about nothing.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Comedy is somewhat subjective. The Office is a great example of this. I give much respect to the British version of The Office for starting something that was funny and original in it's own right, but I've seen both American and British versions and as a US native, I can safely say I find the humor in the American Office much more interesting and funny.
So does that mean that the American version of the Office is funnier? No it doesn't. It simply means that I catch the American subtleties of the show whereas I don't see the funny parts of the British version being all that great. There are many versions of The Office that are being broadcast all over the world at this point. Each one is carefully scripted to be as funny as possible towards their target audience. I simply recognize that the American version makes me laugh and I enjoy it. I don't have the time or the geographical know-how to recognize cultural shifts for humor.
British comedy has it's moments. Monty Python tends to transcend it's own cultural limitations to create laughs wherever it travels, but this isn't imitated by most other British comedies.
Comedy is somewhat subjective. The Office is a great example of this. I give much respect to the British version of The Office for starting something that was funny and original in it's own right, but I've seen both American and British versions and as a US native, I can safely say I find the humor in the American Office much more interesting and funny.
So does that mean that the American version of the Office is funnier? No it doesn't. It simply means that I catch the American subtleties of the show whereas I don't see the funny parts of the British version being all that great. There are many versions of The Office that are being broadcast all over the world at this point. Each one is carefully scripted to be as funny as possible towards their target audience. I simply recognize that the American version makes me laugh and I enjoy it. I don't have the time or the geographical know-how to recognize cultural shifts for humor.
British comedy has it's moments. Monty Python tends to transcend it's own cultural limitations to create laughs wherever it travels, but this isn't imitated by most other British comedies.
starfox15
psst. i live in scranton. 8)
[QUOTE="Foolio1"]
[QUOTE="Gnomefan"]
Lol new season is ftw
Gnomefan
I need to watch it but I don't have cable :(
http://tv.blinkx.com/show/the-it-crowd/vw4tmSd1SS4K96jJgoogle gave me that site... cant vouch for it though
Im pretty sure you can watch full episodes on youtube, they put adverts in the middle though.
I never understood why people like that show. Never found it funny honestlyBritish comedy can be really good a lot of times, but you cant top the American comedy of Seinfeld! Kramer, Eliane, George and Jerry made history with their adventures about nothing.
Raiden004
[QUOTE="Da_lil_PimP"]
Search up the British version of That 70's show and still tell me your statement is true.
Cokelore
This is off-topic but "That 70's show" is a technically lame show.
Anyone who actually finds that show comical needs to amp their taste in sitcoms...
I disagree. The first few seasons we're excellent. It did not go well after Eric left.Just because you don't enjoy it doesn't mean someone who does has a bad taste in shows as you make it seem
Personally as was stated above I hate Seinfeld but alot of people say its the best comedy ever. I don't say they have bad taste in shows because they like it, I just say I never got into it and go on my way
[QUOTE="Cokelore"]
[QUOTE="Da_lil_PimP"]
Search up the British version of That 70's show and still tell me your statement is true.
testfactor888
This is off-topic but "That 70's show" is a technically lame show.
Anyone who actually finds that show comical needs to amp their taste in sitcoms...
I disagree. The first few seasons we're excellent. It did not go well after Eric left.Just because you don't enjoy it doesn't mean someone who does has a bad taste in shows as you make it seem
Personally as was stated above I hate Seinfeld but alot of people say its the best comedy ever. I don't say they have bad taste in shows because they like it, I just say I never got into it and go on my way
Agreed. Eric was awesome. Let's try not to derail the thread though. But actually, search up the British version of the show. It's horrible.[QUOTE="Cokelore"]
[QUOTE="Da_lil_PimP"]
Search up the British version of That 70's show and still tell me your statement is true.
testfactor888
This is off-topic but "That 70's show" is a technically lame show.
Anyone who actually finds that show comical needs to amp their taste in sitcoms...
I disagree. The first few seasons we're excellent. It did not go well after Eric left.Just because you don't enjoy it doesn't mean someone who does has a bad taste in shows as you make it seem
Personally as was stated above I hate Seinfeld but alot of people say its the best comedy ever. I don't say they have bad taste in shows because they like it, I just say I never got into it and go on my way
Hmm...
"That 70s Show" had stories that were intriging enough, but the jokes were very poorly written and did not execute as well as the writers probably assumed based on it's retro environment and the characters that were created. The key term was "technically" here...would you say "The Room" was well written? Maybe "That 70s show" was not that bad, but do you get the gist of "technically"?
Another sitcom that suffers from that similar effect but through the opposite end of the spectrum is "Friends". "Friends" does look like something that is legitimately good on paper, but when executed they just seem like they are trying way too hard.
This is just my opinion of course.
Well my british comedy tastes are like this...
Stand up- Michael Mcintrye, Lee Evans and Jimmy Carr. I think they're all really funny. I don't know about previous generation's stand up. Havern't seen them.
TV Series, Inbetweeners, Misfits, DAD'S ARMY (comic gold), The Office (so much better than the american one in my opinion, the american one is so slapstick its boring)
, Blackadder, Mr. Bean, Fawlty Towers, The Green Wing, and Peep Show.
Films, Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, Monty Python, Pink Panther, In Bruges, Lock Stock and Two smoking barrels (a comedy in my opinion),The Madness of King George III, Death at a Funeral, Ali G In Da House, Run Fat Boy Run
Not a bad list in my opinion. Inbetweeners, The Office, Shaun of the Dead, and Lee Evans are my favourites.
Lies! I can't hear what your saying lalalala. :PBritish comedy used to be world class, back in the golden age of the flying circus and Basil. Now it's all the same really, that's really been a commonly agreed upon notion for the past 15-20 years. :)
BiancaDK
That's the problem with some of the British programs, you won't get it unless you have seen what it is based on. Look around you is mocking the Open University which was shown early in the mornings a few years ago, it's basically a parody verison of it. Some good British comedies are: Black Books, Spaced, Father Ted, Red Dwarf, Blackadder, Porridge, The Office, Green Wing, The Inbetweeners, IT Crowd, Drop the Dead Donkey, The Office, Monkey Dust, The Fast Show, The Thick of It, The Young Ones, Brass Eye etc Channel 4 probably produces and shows the most of the British Comedies on tv now. Also British Documentaries > all other documentaries.British humour is really stale imo. For instance I'm watching this stupid show named "look around you" right now and I'm just wondering wtf is this.
Espada12
I don't think it's necessary to draw comparison. There is little reason to tell somebody my form of entertainment is superior to their preferred form of entertainment. All that matters is if somebody is satisfied with the way things are in their own lives.PrimateJoe
You could apply that to anything and everything would be boring.
No need to win the olympics, it's the taking part that counts! As long as you're satisfied with your ability.
Competitiveness is a core primitive instinct. We all need that element of social darwinism to make the world go round. We do it for music, why not for comedy. Music is entertainment also.
certainly the office is better than the US version, but the two types of comedy are completely different, I'm sure americans find different stuff to be funny.
wink wink nudge nudge say no'more say no'more know what I mean know what I mean
Also British Documentaries > all other documentaries.heselThat I can agree on. Although, saying that presupposes that I have seen ALL other documentaries, which I have not; it's hard to beat BBC's documentaries, though.
[QUOTE="PrimateJoe"]I don't think it's necessary to draw comparison. There is little reason to tell somebody my form of entertainment is superior to their preferred form of entertainment. All that matters is if somebody is satisfied with the way things are in their own lives.IAMTHEJOKER88
You could apply that to anything and everything would be boring.
No need to win the olympics, it's the taking part that counts! As long as you're satisfied with your ability.
Competitiveness is a core primitive instinct. We all need that element of social darwinism to make the world go round. We do it for music, why not for comedy. Music is entertainment also.
Your interpretations is not accurate. I never suggested the removal of competition from athletics or others aspects of skill.Um, I was actually going to say that the only instance where I feel that this is true is in television: I much prefer American sitcoms to British sitcoms (though I struggle to think of any American show cleverer than Fawlty Towers and Monty Python's Flying Circus). I haven't had much of a foray into the medium of American stand-up, but from what I've seen it's absolutely clear that British stand-up comedians are far funnier than American ones. Absolutely and demonstrably.
[QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"]I don't think it's necessary to draw comparison. There is little reason to tell somebody my form of entertainment is superior to their preferred form of entertainment. All that matters is if somebody is satisfied with the way things are in their own lives.PrimateJoe
You could apply that to anything and everything would be boring.
No need to win the olympics, it's the taking part that counts! As long as you're satisfied with your ability.
Competitiveness is a core primitive instinct. We all need that element of social darwinism to make the world go round. We do it for music, why not for comedy. Music is entertainment also.
Your interpretations is not accurate. I never suggested the removal of competition from athletics or others aspects of skill.Well no s*** sherlock but your idea was that competition is essentially pointless in the entertainment medium. I asked why. To each their own maybe, but why not draw comparisons.
Your interpretations is not accurate. I never suggested the removal of competition from athletics or others aspects of skill.[QUOTE="PrimateJoe"][QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"]
You could apply that to anything and everything would be boring.
No need to win the olympics, it's the taking part that counts! As long as you're satisfied with your ability.
Competitiveness is a core primitive instinct. We all need that element of social darwinism to make the world go round. We do it for music, why not for comedy. Music is entertainment also.
IAMTHEJOKER88
Well no s*** sherlock but your idea was that competition is essentially pointless in the entertainment medium. I asked why. To each their own maybe, but why not draw comparisons.
because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.I haven't had much of a foray into the medium of American stand-up, but from what I've seen it's absolutely clear that British stand-up comedians are far funnier than American ones. Absolutely and demonstrably.super_mario_128I've had the dubious pleasure of dwelling on televised american stand-up comedy, and I can attest to indisputable truth of your claim. American stand-up is, except for a select few names, absolute garbage. What's worse, is that when it is devoid of humour that appeals to the intellect, it's suddenly wholesome good ol' blue-collar humour, and pride it taken upon that. which is In so many words; intentionally stupid for stupid people, ye-haw! >_>
[QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] Your interpretations is not accurate. I never suggested the removal of competition from athletics or others aspects of skill.PrimateJoe
Well no s*** sherlock but your idea was that competition is essentially pointless in the entertainment medium. I asked why. To each their own maybe, but why not draw comparisons.
because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
[QUOTE="PrimateJoe"][QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"]....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion. because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing. *stares at you indifferently*Well no s*** sherlock but your idea was that competition is essentially pointless in the entertainment medium. I asked why. To each their own maybe, but why not draw comparisons.
Overlord93
because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.[QUOTE="PrimateJoe"][QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"]
Well no s*** sherlock but your idea was that competition is essentially pointless in the entertainment medium. I asked why. To each their own maybe, but why not draw comparisons.
Overlord93
....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different.[QUOTE="Overlord93"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.PrimateJoe
....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different. thread is about arguing which comedy people prefer. So your relevent post is...?[QUOTE="Overlord93"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.PrimateJoe
....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different. why can't everyone just get along... hahaha.[QUOTE="Overlord93"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.PrimateJoe
....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different.Jeez man chill. The thread was made to debate the differences. That was the whole point and that is basically why these forums are here. For people to discuss whatever they want. Why are you against discussion when that is what these forums we're made for in the first place
It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different.[QUOTE="PrimateJoe"][QUOTE="Overlord93"]
....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
testfactor888
Jeez man chill. The thread was made to debate the differences. That was the whole point and that is basically why these forums are here. For people to discuss whatever they want. Why are you against discussion when that is what these forums we're made for in the first place
do you know what this symbol means ">" The topic title doesn't say: What are the differences between British Comedy and American Comedy. my point is clear: THERE is no justifiable reason to determine that one form of comedy is greater than another form as long as people are entertained and enjoy what they participate in. why continue to pester me about it?[QUOTE="testfactor888"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different.PrimateJoe
Jeez man chill. The thread was made to debate the differences. That was the whole point and that is basically why these forums are here. For people to discuss whatever they want. Why are you against discussion when that is what these forums we're made for in the first place
do you know what this symbol means ">" The topic title doesn't say: What are the differences between British Comedy and American Comedy. my point is clear: THERE is no justifiable reason to determine that one form of comedy is greater than another form as long as people are entertained and enjoy what they participate in. why continue to pester me about it? '>' was used to point out TCs opinion over the matter and begin debate. This isn't the modern literature forums, we abreviate[QUOTE="testfactor888"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different.PrimateJoe
Jeez man chill. The thread was made to debate the differences. That was the whole point and that is basically why these forums are here. For people to discuss whatever they want. Why are you against discussion when that is what these forums we're made for in the first place
do you know what this symbol means ">" The topic title doesn't say: What are the differences between British Comedy and American Comedy. my point is clear: THERE is no justifiable reason to determine that one form of comedy is greater than another form as long as people are entertained and enjoy what they participate in. why continue to pester me about it?The TC gave a reason, he declared that British Comedy > American Comedy, his 'determination' sparks the debate of whether or not his statement is true. You really need to relax a little.
[QUOTE="testfactor888"][QUOTE="PrimateJoe"] It's not about the medal. It's about comparison to see how you compare against other people. what you enjoy more or less than somebody else is irrelevant unless you're looking to establish specific social connections that favor your circumstances. It's unlikely to side with somebody who doesn't agree with you because they wouldn't reinforce your perception of the world. why can't everyone get along and appreciate others for their differences? Because they're too busy coming up with reasons why they are different.PrimateJoe
Jeez man chill. The thread was made to debate the differences. That was the whole point and that is basically why these forums are here. For people to discuss whatever they want. Why are you against discussion when that is what these forums we're made for in the first place
do you know what this symbol means ">" The topic title doesn't say: What are the differences between British Comedy and American Comedy. my point is clear: THERE is no justifiable reason to determine that one form of comedy is greater than another form as long as people are entertained and enjoy what they participate in. why continue to pester me about it? These forums are for discussion. > means the TC was saying British Comedy is better than American Comedy. The thread was open for debate. I don't understand why you are so hostile to debate when as I said already that is what these forums are here for. If you don't enjoy it than why post?because there is no basis to establish value. if a man runs faster than another man this is observable. If a man reasons better than another man reasons this is entirely subjective, and has little significance in the basis of reality. IF somebody enjoys a particular form of entertainment over another, why argue about it? What is there to gain? Nothing.[QUOTE="PrimateJoe"][QUOTE="IAMTHEJOKER88"]
Well no s*** sherlock but your idea was that competition is essentially pointless in the entertainment medium. I asked why. To each their own maybe, but why not draw comparisons.
Overlord93
....and what is there to gain from running faster. A MEDAL. forums are for discussion.
And what is there to gain? Nothing. In fact, you lose time when you waste time on forums...
Unless someone can win "System Wars-like" discussion with infallible perspectives and viewpoints it can't be done. There is no point in sharing *your* "opinions". No one is convinced.
You're doing it WRONG. WRONG.
So what is there to gain from these forums swamped with opinions everywhere with no objectivity as far as your monitor can see? It is laughter. You increase the activity of your brain cells as you laugh on these forums.
Here we gained back all the brain cells we lost while wasting our time posting on System Wars. With our newfound brain cells we can develop infallible perspectives and viewpoints to go back to System Wars one day and claim victory over it's opinion-filled masses. As it stands (or lack thereof) no one has capacity to win System Wars yet. :(
So you see it's not that simple...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment