Capital Punishment/Death Penalty

  • 181 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

I am making this thread because i need to gather statisics for reaserch on the number of people who support and oppose diffent views on this subject. I have posted this on another site and have yet to get conclusive results. But on to the question do you oppose/support the death penalty and why and for what crimes. I myself and a Christian (even though God cannot be falsified by scietific means i still believe there is one and i believe it is the Abramic God) BUT i do not support the death penalty because Jesus said "if any man smite thee on thy right cheek turneth him also the other ,and if thine enemy sue the at the court and taketh your cloak give him also your tunic ,and if thine enemy compel thee to go a mile go with him twain". A conundrum with many fundementalist Christians is that in Genesis it says to kill any man that kills another man, and yet they oppose the same Old Testemant teaching that says divorce is acceptable. Thats why i hate being marked as a Christian because most of them only follow the rules that they want to (Paul and the Old Testament namely).

Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#2 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

I strongly support the death penalty, especially for those guilty of murder or rape.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#3 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

Because?

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Capital punishment, as it should be, should only be for people that commit murder. Nothing else.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
I support using life as an end as a punishment for using life as an end. That means for anyone guilty of murder, they should be killed. My only problem is that the courts could have an erroneous verdict and it would be much better to sentence fifty murders to life in prison than one innocent man to death. Otherwise else, I have no moral problem with capital punishment.
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

Alright side note: you have to state why your believe your beliefs

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

I support using life as an end as a punishment for using life as an end. That means for anyone guilty of murder, they should be killed. My only problem is that the courts could have an erroneous verdict and it would be much better to sentence fifty murders to life in prison than one innocent man to death. Otherwise else, I have no moral problem with capital punishment.Genetic_Code

model example

Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts
I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23343 Posts
I can't say I'm morally opposed to it, but I'm against it's implementation for reasons of cost and the judicial system's inherent innacuracy.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.Dr_Snood
Death Penalty for rape? Sounds like cruel and unusual punishment don't you think?
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.Dr_Snood

So... to you the cost of a mans life is not worth the price of his sustinance

Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts
[QUOTE="Dr_Snood"]I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.DroidPhysX
Death Penalty for rape? Sounds like cruel and unusual punishment don't you think?

For rape? Yes I can see that. For murder? I in no way see it as cruel and unusual punishment.
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Dr_Snood"]I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.Dr_Snood
Death Penalty for rape? Sounds like cruel and unusual punishment don't you think?

For rape? Yes I can see that. For murder? I in no way see it as cruel and unusual punishment.

So murder and rape to you warrant the same punishment? Taking everything away from someone is murder. possibly taking their viginity and possibly their peace of mind is rape.

Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts

[QUOTE="Dr_Snood"]I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.sonichunter99

So... to you the cost of a mans life is not worth the price of his sustinance

If the man/woman murdered someone for his own personal gain then no I do not.
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#16 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="Dr_Snood"]I support the death penalty. I do not understand why people are sentenced to life in prison for crimes such as murder and rape. Keeping someone in prison for life costs the government more money then it is worth. Our prisons are too packed as it is and for some crimes I feel the only true punishment is death. If you purposely go and murder someone for whatever reason I feel that you should pay the same price your victim did.Dr_Snood

So... to you the cost of a mans life is not worth the price of his sustinance

If the man/woman murdered someone for his own personal gain then no I do not.

So... murdering someone makes one a second class human? and therefore unfit to live ?

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
In support. For those who murder, either by direct hand or by manipulation, outside of self defense. Also for repeat pedophiles. Because this is our world, our times, and our lives. If the entire world suddenly went to the same mentality of those who murder, then what do you think would happen? Heaven and Hell, proverbially, are supposed to have rules as to who gets to be there no? Why not earth?
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I am completely against the death penalty in places where a competent prison system is in effect and a justice system that works objectively to prove guilt. It is an ethically bankrupt practice because no human being has the right to determine whether another lives or dies, regardless of any crime they committed. It is merely state-sanctioned revenge that does nothing but bring the illusion of "closure" to the victim's family and propagates the illusion of "deterrent" despite the statistics proving otherwise. It also is costlier than life-long imprisonment and does nothing to benefit the prisoner. I am a staunch proponent of all, or most violent crime being linked to mental illness, which according to the current laws would make those criminals unfit to stand trial. I do not propose that they are not responsible for their choices, but that they weren't necessarily in complete control of themselves, or had a predisposition to these actions/thoughts with no way of knowing they were wrong. I do believe that punishment is not the answer... because most prisons these days are just training facilities for better criminals. Rehabilitation and the re-introduction to society as a positive and productive member should play a leading role in our justice system world-wide. Nothing can reverse a crime, so I don't know why people want the justice system to reflect that desire in how it treats the convicted.
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

In support. For those who murder, either by direct hand or by manipulation, outside of self defense. Also for repeat pedophiles. Because this is our world, our times, and our lives. If the entire world suddenly went to the same mentality of those who murder, then what do you think would happen? Heaven and Hell, proverbially, are supposed to have rules as to who gets to be there no? Why not earth? CreasianDevaili

Why pedophiles? why not necrophiles? or rapists?

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

I am completely against the death penalty in places where a competent prison system is in effect and a justice system that works objectively to prove guilt. It is an ethically bankrupt practice because no human being has the right to determine whether another lives or dies, regardless of any crime they committed. It is merely state-sanctioned revenge that does nothing but bring the illusion of "closure" to the victim's family and propagates the illusion of "deterrent" despite the statistics proving otherwise. It also is costlier than life-long imprisonment and does nothing to benefit the prisoner. I am a staunch proponent of all, or most violent crime being linked to mental illness, which according to the current laws would make those criminals unfit to stand trial. I do not propose that they are not responsible for their choices, but that they weren't necessarily in complete control of themselves, or had a predisposition to these actions/thoughts with no way of knowing they were wrong. I do believe that punishment is not the answer... because most prisons these days are just training facilities for better criminals. Rehabilitation and the re-introduction to society as a positive and productive member should play a leading role in our justice system world-wide. Nothing can reverse a crime, so I don't know why people want the justice system to reflect that desire in how it treats the convicted.foxhound_fox

i agrree with this man. he seems to have things straight...for the most part. no doubt there are mentally ill murderers but i disagree that the majority are mentally ill. if i said i was controlled by alcohol when i murdered someone i would be laughed at but if i was a schizophenic (incorrect spelling) i would get off with manslaughter at worst. mental illness is not always an excuse.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7055 Posts

Anti for two reasons.

1. The system is often wrong. You can't bring back a dead man and mistakenly executing a single innocent person is a price society should never accept.

2. IMO, life in prison is far more punishment than execution. Execution is a high degree of anxiety for a relatively short period of time. Life in prison is decades of reflection with no way of escapingyour thoughts and/or circumstance.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]In support. For those who murder, either by direct hand or by manipulation, outside of self defense. Also for repeat pedophiles. Because this is our world, our times, and our lives. If the entire world suddenly went to the same mentality of those who murder, then what do you think would happen? Heaven and Hell, proverbially, are supposed to have rules as to who gets to be there no? Why not earth? sonichunter99

Why pedophiles? why not necrophiles? or rapists?

I said repeat pedophiles. Also, and just to be blunt, I do care more if a small child is raped compared to a grown woman or man. Not saying they deserve it if grown, just not the same severity in my mind. Something just disturbs me on the notion that those children would not understand what is happening while they are being raped and, it seems many times, killed by the sheer force and pressure of the act itself of a full grown person on a small child. Also on necrophiles I really am not disturbed. Do you think when someone digs up a grave and goes at it, that they are assaulting the soul or something?
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#23 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

It doesn't have a purpose.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]In support. For those who murder, either by direct hand or by manipulation, outside of self defense. Also for repeat pedophiles. Because this is our world, our times, and our lives. If the entire world suddenly went to the same mentality of those who murder, then what do you think would happen? Heaven and Hell, proverbially, are supposed to have rules as to who gets to be there no? Why not earth? CreasianDevaili

Why pedophiles? why not necrophiles? or rapists?

I said repeat pedophiles. Also, and just to be blunt, I do care more if a small child is raped compared to a grown woman or man. Not saying they deserve it if grown, just not the same severity in my mind. Something just disturbs me on the notion that those children would not understand what is happening while they are being raped and, it seems many times, killed by the sheer force and pressure of the act itself of a full grown person on a small child. Also on necrophiles I really am not disturbed. Do you think when someone digs up a grave and goes at it, that they are assaulting the soul or something?

just asking a question

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

It doesn't have a purpose.

Barbariser

Ok... care to elaborate on that a little Mr. Existentialist

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#26 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
It's breaching human rights, i.e. the right to live. I do not support it.
Avatar image for Sandulf29
Sandulf29

14330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Sandulf29
Member since 2010 • 14330 Posts

if crime is worthy of capital punishment like terrorism, countless murders, kidnapping, rape etc. such sick people should die and should have no remorse for it.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#28 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

if crime is worthy of capital punishment like terrorism, countless murders, kidnapping, rape etc. such sick people should die and should have no remorse for it.

Sandulf29

Again... killing ,never mind the amount, makes you a second class human? therefore unfit to live?

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

Why pedophiles? why not necrophiles? or rapists?

I said repeat pedophiles. Also, and just to be blunt, I do care more if a small child is raped compared to a grown woman or man. Not saying they deserve it if grown, just not the same severity in my mind. Something just disturbs me on the notion that those children would not understand what is happening while they are being raped and, it seems many times, killed by the sheer force and pressure of the act itself of a full grown person on a small child. Also on necrophiles I really am not disturbed. Do you think when someone digs up a grave and goes at it, that they are assaulting the soul or something?

just asking a question

Mind if I ask a question as well then? Is this research to prove what you think or to show an unbiased report?
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
i agrree with this man. he seems to have things straight...for the most part. no doubt there are mentally ill murderers but i disagree that the majority are mentally ill. if i said i was controlled by alcohol when i murdered someone i would be laughed at but if i was a schizophenic (incorrect spelling) i would get off with manslaughter at worst. mental illness is not always an excuse.sonichunter99
Ah, but they are the same. Imbibing alcohol is a conscious choice, and while one may not be in control when inebriated, they made the choice to become like that and are responsible. Just so, schizophrenics usually have to take medication to control their problems (which can be violent outbursts) and by choosing not to take that medication, they are responsible for that choice (not the same, but similar). My point is that instead of punishing someone for a bad choice, we need to teach them why it is wrong, help them get treatment for their problem (medication for the schizophrenic, rehab for the alcoholic, etc.) and give them skills they can use to gain reentry into society. If we don't do the latter, they have no means of rebuilding trust, and usually just relapse into the state they are used to. Even murderers should be able to redeem themselves, and if they can prove that they have reformed themselves, given a second chance. I have a personal moral issue with the idea of "locking them up and throwing away the key." Nobody is beyond redemption, even if their crimes are incredibly heinous and they show no remorse. The most violent of sociopaths/psychopaths are the ones that need the most help. Their mental illness is deeply rooted, and often caused by things they had no control over (abuse in childhood, in many cases, leads people to become abusers themselves for example).
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#31 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I said repeat pedophiles. Also, and just to be blunt, I do care more if a small child is raped compared to a grown woman or man. Not saying they deserve it if grown, just not the same severity in my mind. Something just disturbs me on the notion that those children would not understand what is happening while they are being raped and, it seems many times, killed by the sheer force and pressure of the act itself of a full grown person on a small child. Also on necrophiles I really am not disturbed. Do you think when someone digs up a grave and goes at it, that they are assaulting the soul or something?CreasianDevaili

just asking a question

Mind if I ask a question as well then? Is this research to prove what you think or to show an unbiased report?

Certainly Not! if the public bias is in favor of the death penalty thats what the reaserch will show. i myself am extremely biased... which is why i am reaserching to see what the majorities take on this issue is.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#32 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]i agrree with this man. he seems to have things straight...for the most part. no doubt there are mentally ill murderers but i disagree that the majority are mentally ill. if i said i was controlled by alcohol when i murdered someone i would be laughed at but if i was a schizophenic (incorrect spelling) i would get off with manslaughter at worst. mental illness is not always an excuse.foxhound_fox
Ah, but they are the same. Imbibing alcohol is a conscious choice, and while one may not be in control when inebriated, they made the choice to become like that and are responsible. Just so, schizophrenics usually have to take medication to control their problems (which can be violent outbursts) and by choosing not to take that medication, they are responsible for that choice (not the same, but similar). My point is that instead of punishing someone for a bad choice, we need to teach them why it is wrong, help them get treatment for their problem (medication for the schizophrenic, rehab for the alcoholic, etc.) and give them skills they can use to gain reentry into society. If we don't do the latter, they have no means of rebuilding trust, and usually just relapse into the state they are used to. Even murderers should be able to redeem themselves, and if they can prove that they have reformed themselves, given a second chance. I have a personal moral issue with the idea of "locking them up and throwing away the key." Nobody is beyond redemption, even if their crimes are incredibly heinous and they show no remorse. The most violent of sociopaths/psychopaths are the ones that need the most help. Their mental illness is deeply rooted, and often caused by things they had no control over (abuse in childhood, in many cases, leads people to become abusers themselves for example).

Now your starting to make sense to me. and your last paragraph seems very... Christian. even though my gut tells me otherwise

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]I said repeat pedophiles. Also, and just to be blunt, I do care more if a small child is raped compared to a grown woman or man. Not saying they deserve it if grown, just not the same severity in my mind. Something just disturbs me on the notion that those children would not understand what is happening while they are being raped and, it seems many times, killed by the sheer force and pressure of the act itself of a full grown person on a small child. Also on necrophiles I really am not disturbed. Do you think when someone digs up a grave and goes at it, that they are assaulting the soul or something?

If 12 seasons of Law & Order SVU gave taught me anything, it is that paedophiles are extremely ill. They are so deluded, they think that they are expressing "love" to the child and that this "love" is the same as that shared between two adults. Before getting into the series, I was very much "sickened" by paedophilia (and to a lesser extent hebephilia and ephebephilia). But SVU showed me just how it isn't a black and white issue, and how it is a mental illness; a misdirected sexual attraction to an age group that shouldn't be a cause for it. What some men do to children is definitely disturbing... but justice is blind to the victim and the perpetrator. It is supposed to assess the guilt of that who committed it, and what a just and fair debt that person owes society. Not be a means to "punish the sick" for their "heinous crimes."
Avatar image for jedixman
JediXMan

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#34 JediXMan
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

Sounds cruel and insensitive, but people convicted to life are a financial drain. I'm pro hard labor (and I don't mean community service by picking up trash at the side of the road. I mean hard labor)

Avatar image for Sandulf29
Sandulf29

14330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Sandulf29
Member since 2010 • 14330 Posts

[QUOTE="Sandulf29"]

if crime is worthy of capital punishment like terrorism, countless murders, kidnapping, rape etc. such sick people should die and should have no remorse for it.

sonichunter99

Again... killing ,never mind the amount, makes you a second class human? therefore unfit to live?

of course, if a person performs a heinous crime who shows no remorse for it, shows no sign of repentance in future why should you keep such person alive. society should be from sociopaths. but those who want to change their ways should be put in some kind of medical institution
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

Sounds cruel and insensitive, but people convicted to life are a financial drain. I'm pro hard labor (and I don't mean community service by picking up trash at the side of the road. I mean hard labor)

JediXMan7

IMO better than death.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#37 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="Sandulf29"]

if crime is worthy of capital punishment like terrorism, countless murders, kidnapping, rape etc. such sick people should die and should have no remorse for it.

Sandulf29

Again... killing ,never mind the amount, makes you a second class human? therefore unfit to live?

of course, if a person performs a heinous crime who shows no remorse for it, shows no sign of repentance in future why should you keep such person alive. society should be from sociopaths. but those who want to change their ways should be put in some kind of medical institution

Any man can be redeemed... at least thats what my religeon and my mind tells me

Avatar image for Sandulf29
Sandulf29

14330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Sandulf29
Member since 2010 • 14330 Posts

[QUOTE="Sandulf29"][QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

Again... killing ,never mind the amount, makes you a second class human? therefore unfit to live?

sonichunter99

of course, if a person performs a heinous crime who shows no remorse for it, shows no sign of repentance in future why should you keep such person alive. society should be from sociopaths. but those who want to change their ways should be put in some kind of medical institution

Any man can be redeemed... at least thats what my religeon and my mind tells me

thats all in theory. do you mean to say that people like Osama Bin Laden and Hitler could have been redeemed, there was no need to kill Osama

Avatar image for jedixman
JediXMan

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#39 JediXMan
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

[QUOTE="JediXMan7"]

Sounds cruel and insensitive, but people convicted to life are a financial drain. I'm pro hard labor (and I don't mean community service by picking up trash at the side of the road. I mean hard labor)

sonichunter99

IMO better than death.

Death is actually costly. Hard labor - where they actually earn money for society and pay for their own imprisonment - is actually a good solution, in my opinion.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Now your starting to make sense to me. and your last paragraph seems very... Christian. even though my gut tells me otherwisesonichunter99
Your gut would be right. However, I find labels unable to truly express who I am. The whole idea of absolute compassion is common in most religions though, which means under certain circumstances, the whole "acceptance of the resurrection of Christ" notwithstanding, I could be called a "Christian." But only as far as I could also be called a Buddhist, Muslim, Jew, Taoist, Sikh, Baha'i, Unitarian Universalist, etc.
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#41 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="Sandulf29"] of course, if a person performs a heinous crime who shows no remorse for it, shows no sign of repentance in future why should you keep such person alive. society should be from sociopaths. but those who want to change their ways should be put in some kind of medical institutionSandulf29

Any man can be redeemed... at least thats what my religeon and my mind tells me

thats all in theory. do you mean to say that people like Osama Bin Laden and Hitler could have been redeemed, there was no need to kill Osama

yes they could have if hitler didnt kill himself and if our government would have CAPTURED never killed him

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]Now your starting to make sense to me. and your last paragraph seems very... Christian. even though my gut tells me otherwisefoxhound_fox
Your gut would be right. However, I find labels unable to truly express who I am. The whole idea of absolute compassion is common in most religions though, which means under certain circumstances, the whole "acceptance of the resurrection of Christ" notwithstanding, I could be called a "Christian." But only as far as I could also be called a Buddhist, Muslim, Jew, Taoist, Sikh, Baha'i, Unitarian Universalist, etc.

true dat

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Death is actually costly. Hard labor - where they actually earn money for society and pay for their own imprisonment - is actually a good solution, in my opinion.JediXMan7
I would certainly agree. Why do we keep people locked up for more than half the day when they could be out doing something productive? It would not only lower the cost of imprisonment, but teach them skills that could actually be used if they return to society. And it would also help boost the economy, especially if they are producing consumables (though, nothing that can be contaminated or sabotaged).
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#44 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

It doesn't have a purpose.

sonichunter99

Ok... care to elaborate on that a little Mr. Existentialist

It's pretty obvious, isn't it? Killing a convinct simply doesn't achieve anything that you couldn't do using a different and less retributive solution.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

It doesn't have a purpose.

Barbariser

Ok... care to elaborate on that a little Mr. Existentialist

It's pretty obvious, isn't it? Killing a convinct simply doesn't achieve anything that you couldn't do using a different and less retributive solution.

Thank You

Avatar image for jedixman
JediXMan

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#46 JediXMan
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

[QUOTE="JediXMan7"]Death is actually costly. Hard labor - where they actually earn money for society and pay for their own imprisonment - is actually a good solution, in my opinion.foxhound_fox
I would certainly agree. Why do we keep people locked up for more than half the day when they could be out doing something productive? It would not only lower the cost of imprisonment, but teach them skills that could actually be used if they return to society. And it would also help boost the economy, especially if they are producing consumables (though, nothing that can be contaminated or sabotaged).

It would definitely help those who would be released. One reason people return to crime is because they know nothing else. Teach them skills and maybe, just maybe, some can turn around.

But for those that we know are not getting out ever again, put them to work and just return them to their cells at the end of the day. As you said, it would help the economy.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

I support it, why should i have to pay to leave a murder in prision.

Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#48 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

I support it, why should i have to pay to leave a murder in prision.

James161324

because of our stupid government

Avatar image for Sandulf29
Sandulf29

14330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Sandulf29
Member since 2010 • 14330 Posts

[QUOTE="Sandulf29"]

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

Any man can be redeemed... at least thats what my religeon and my mind tells me

sonichunter99

thats all in theory. do you mean to say that people like Osama Bin Laden and Hitler could have been redeemed, there was no need to kill Osama

yes they could have if hitler didnt kill himself and if our government would have CAPTURED never killed him

see i agree, everyone should be given a chance to redeem themselves, repent for their crimes. but there are people outside who are not capable of doing so. we call them sociopaths and psychopaths. for years acts of hitler and osama were seen with repugnance and they were aware of it, yet they decided not to change their ways. i dunno how they would have, if captured. also locking away such guys in a padded cell for life is just plain expensive. in religious terms i maybe on same level as them as i show no forgiveness, but in real world its just practicality
Avatar image for sonichunter99
sonichunter99

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#50 sonichunter99
Member since 2009 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="sonichunter99"]

[QUOTE="Sandulf29"] thats all in theory. do you mean to say that people like Osama Bin Laden and Hitler could have been redeemed, there was no need to kill Osama

Sandulf29

yes they could have if hitler didnt kill himself and if our government would have CAPTURED never killed him

see i agree, everyone should be given a chance to redeem themselves, repent for their crimes. but there are people outside who are not capable of doing so. we call them sociopaths and psychopaths. for years acts of hitler and osama were seen with repugnance and they were aware of it, yet they decided not to change their ways. i dunno how they would have, if captured. also locking away such guys in a padded cell for life is just plain expensive. in religious terms i maybe on same level as them as i show no forgiveness, but in real world its just practicality

so just because they are sociopathic or psychopatic means that they cant redeem themselves? all men are created eqaul their actoins have no bearing on their lifes value, even though we probably cannot come to a concesus on this issue