Christine O'Donnell fails at the Constitution.

I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.Sajo7

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

This has to be taken out of context. It doesn't even make sense. :P

topsemag55

There is a general misinterpretation of the Separation of Church and State...what the Amendement means is that the Federal Government cannot force any one religion upon the people.

Teachers are government employees.. If they are teaching a religion they are in fact enforcing a religion upon the people.. Hence why public schools and public organizations are secular in nature.

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.xaos

I can see it now.. O'Donnell becomes Palin's running mate for 2012.

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Sajo7"]I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.sSubZerOo

I can see it now.. O'Donnell becomes Palin's running mate for 2012.

I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.Sajo7

I for one was glad she won the nomination...there wasn't any real choice between Coons and Castle.:P:lol:

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.topsemag55

I for one was glad she won the nomination...there wasn't any real choice between Coons and Castle.:P:lol:

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="xaos"] If it helps, I think she'll continue saying silly things, but unless she takes them to a whole new level, you probably won't hear about them. She's set herself quite a bar.Sajo7

I can see it now.. O'Donnell becomes Palin's running mate for 2012.

I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.Sajo7

Wait... her opponent's name happens to be a racial slur? Hilarity is guaranteed regardless of the voting outcome! Hooray!

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]I'll be a little sad when she loses and no longer says silly things.fidosim

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

Typical they twisted it around to make it seem like she did not know

Rush Limbaugh set the record straight though for the media

comp_atkins

technically she is right that phrase does not appear anywhere in the constitution its an idea that merely refers to no official religion not anything concerning religion or God cant at all be taught in or mentioned in public areas.

the 1st amendment ensures no official religion can exist. but saids nothing that God cant exist in government or all references to God must be blotted out of the government.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miwSljJAzqg

I'm still waiting to see if she weighs the same as a duck!chessmaster1989

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miwSljJAzqg

Former_Slacker

DAAMN, that intelligent Design tidbit was painfully dumb.

I honestly think our media has found a new Palin with this chick.

since I'm making these right now I thought I could drop this off for O'Donnell to wear.

I think this pretty well clears it up...Her campaign issued a statement later saying O'Donnell "was not questioning the concept of separation of church and state as subsequently established by the courts. She simply made the point that the phrase appears nowhere in the Constitution."

If she was so sure that those exact words wern't in the Constitution why did she sit there with that moronic grin? If she'd have further clarified what she meant instead of asking it over and over again and making herself look unintelligent this wouldn't look so bad for her. It's bad enough she's already behind double digits and it's taking focus off of some of the Teabaggers who might actually win come election day.

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

This has to be taken out of context. It doesn't even make sense. :P

There is a general misinterpretation of the Separation of Church and State...what the Amendement means is that the Federal Government cannot force any one religion upon the people.

Teachers are government employees.. If they are teaching a religion they are in fact enforcing a religion upon the people.. Hence why public schools and public organizations are secular in nature.

Public schools teach evolution and that is the same thing as religion.Sineps_2

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"] Public schools teach evolution and that is the same thing as religion.Mousetaches

[QUOTE="Mousetaches"]

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"] Public schools teach evolution and that is the same thing as religion.Sineps_2

:lol: ANOTHER brainless Tea party candidate.

I cant wait for her to lose this election and then go on the "I'm a real american so buy my book" book tour next year and have her gain millions of $$ off of saps.

So because Darwin believed in God, evolution is a religion?Mousetaches

[QUOTE="Mousetaches"]So because Darwin believed in God, evolution is a religion?Sineps_2

[QUOTE="Mousetaches"]So because Darwin believed in God, evolution is a religion?Sineps_2

Not believing in evolution != creationist. Secondly all that poll shows is that the majority of Americans are vastly misinformed.

I have a conservative friend who says he will bet anyone $100 that they cannot find the words 'separation of church and state' in the constitution. In that regard, he is correct, the constitution never says those words. But it does say "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This means that congress will NOT make any laws about religion, and because it is congress that makes all the laws, then religion will always be kept separate from the government.Acemaster27

Would it be wrong to call her a dumb *****? I'd like to call her that.

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"][QUOTE="Mousetaches"]So because Darwin believed in God, evolution is a religion?Mousetaches

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"][QUOTE="Mousetaches"]So because Darwin believed in God, evolution is a religion?Former_Slacker

Not believing in evolution != creationist. Secondly all that poll shows is that the majority of Americans are vastly misinformed.

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]Typical they twisted it around to make it seem like she did not know Rush Limbaugh set the record straight though for the mediaSerraph105

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"][QUOTE="Mousetaches"] What does that have to do with evolution being a "religion?"Former_Slacker

Alright now you're just trolling.

Well, you can't argue with quality games like the Kirby series. I like how he just consume anything that gets in his way with little regard to what it was.Sineps_2

Me too!

*Crunch*

Deeelicious.

[QUOTE="Mousetaches"][QUOTE="Sineps_2"] Most people believe in Creationism. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtmlSineps_2

Yeah, it has. All evidence points in favor of it while there is zero (that's right, zero) evidence to support creationism.

Isn't it also true that she couldn't name the first five freedoms of the constitution, but Coons could?

[QUOTE="Sineps_2"]Well, you can't argue with quality games like the Kirby series. I like how he just consume anything that gets in his way with little regard to what it was.m0zart

Me too!

*Crunch*

Deeelicious.

Isn't it also true that she couldn't name the first five freedoms of the constitution, but Coons could?

flazzle

And even better, it is the other way around. Coons is an utter imbecile. Where as O'Donnell can school all of America (because they do not know the 1st Amendment), Coons can't even state the first 5 amendments.

FAIL.

[QUOTE="flazzle"]

Isn't it also true that she couldn't name the first five freedoms of the constitution, but Coons could?

fissionfusion

And even better, it is the other way around. Coons is an utter imbecile. Where as O'Donnell can school all of America (because they do not know the 1st Amendment), Coons can't even state the first 5 amendments.

FAIL.

Are you sure? I thought I heard the other way. Maybe someone has a link. I can't believe we have page after page of slamming ODonnel, but NO ONE here mentions that Coons can't even state the 5 freedoms?! I'm sure you have this wrong because I can't believe GS posters are this biased.