[QUOTE="theone86"]
[QUOTE="positivebalance"]
you're right, they are in a different position. that's why they shouldn't go so trashed at parties. it's entirely their fault if they decide to binge drink.
weezyfb
Oh, so men can binge drink and it's alright, but for women it's not OK, double standard much? What you're basically saying is tantamout to blaming any victim for any crime of being in a bad position. OK, so I walked through a bad part of town and got mugged, but if I can identify the person who did it they shouldn't be punished because I shouldn't have been walking there anyways. That logic is crap. I'm not saying women aren't more vunerable when they do drink, but to say it's their fault when something bad happens instead of the person who KNOWINGLY took advantadge of them is complete horse****.
you get smashed man or woman...you are still responsible...
as an adult you gotta be able to use common sense and forsee some things
What I'm saying is that when both parties are equally as drunk there's more risk for women due to the position they're in, and what he was saying was that women should drink less because of that. That's a double standard, that men should be able to party without fear of reprisal and not only can women not do that but they can't because of the actions that certain males will take due to their vunerable position.
Also, I realize that getting drunk is a risk, but that doesn't make them responsible for everything that happens while they're drunk. Yes, they run the risk that something could happen, but that doesn't absolve the scumbag who picked up a woman at a party, took her back to his room, and had sex with her when she was obviously drunk. Men still hold a good deal of responsibility here, if a woman's drunk you probably shouldn't be sleeping with her and if she says no you had damn well better stop. Like my analogy about getting mugged, if I walk through a bad neighborhood I know my chances of getting mugged might increase, but that doesn't make the mugger right.
Log in to comment