This topic is locked from further discussion.
I don't see the problem.
Oh your precious Obama is getting some heat? Oh noes, impeach them all! :roll:
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="jointed"] No it's not. Obama is the figurehead of this new bill and he's also black....considering the fact that black people were and still is in some places compared to monkeys, this cartoon is very inappropriate. There's really nothing to discuss here, it's offensive.jointedHave you ever heard of the saying, its so easy a monkey can do it ? Yes, how this that relevant here?They are trying to say that anyone can write the Stimulus Bill.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"]I think it would of been made if McCain was the president and pushing this bill. People are going to call almost every political cartoon that is about Obama racist because he is half African American.RenegadePatriotNot all cartoons portray a dead Chimp that mentions a stimulus bill that has been directly influenced by the President.True but Im sure another offensive cartoon will be produced and it will be called racist.Possibly. And I'm sure you'll be back saying that only people who perceive racism are racist (regardless of the content?).
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="Tazzmission187"]im white and offended by this cartoon. what really grinds my gears is the world has changed from the civil rights days to today and racism is still around. my girlfriend is african american and its a shame that biggots still speak racial remarks. what is the purpose of hatred torwards african americans? i just dont understand how skin color can make a person hate others. the truth behind this cartoon is for the last 8 years bush screwed up the country and we have a african american president who is having people unite not just here in the usa but around the world. no one will ever admit that in the hearts of racist groups they dont want a guy like obama to succseed and thats a travisty in my eyes. republicans and democrats may disagree but the truth is obama is symbolisim and shows all races are equal and whats wrong with that?Tazzmission187News flash this is not a racist cartoon so just relax and enjoy it. bs if i remember correctly didnt mccain pee himself when ludachris dissed him on record? patriot i take it your a republican and thats fine but you godda admit if i drew a cartoon of palin or bush being put to death you would make a case out of it. lets face it the republicans are on life support and the way for them to breath is to attack obamas presidency. kinda odd how the ny post is republican ownedI would laugh at a cartoon about Bush or Palin, I take political cartoons very lightly.
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"]Have you ever heard of the saying, its so easy a monkey can do it ?RenegadePatriotYes, how this that relevant here?They are trying to say that anyone can write the Stimulus Bill. You guys are jumping from being technical to abstract...consistency please.
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="jointed"] Yes, how this that relevant here?jointedThey are trying to say that anyone can write the Stimulus Bill. You guys are jumping from being technical to abstract...consistency please.I am trying just to show that this was not a racist cartoon.
Look Jan man I am saying that people that think that this is racist needs to learn not to see everything as being about race.RenegadePatriotWell, it wasn't until the question was asked that I saw it from another perspective. Even without racial questions, though, the cartoon is offensive. It's either racial, or saying that US elected officials don't have any more brains than that necessary to sling poo.
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"]Look Jan man I am saying that people that think that this is racist needs to learn not to see everything as being about race.JandurinWell, it wasn't until the question was asked that I saw it from another perspective. Even without racial questions, though, the cartoon is offensive. It's either racial, or saying that US elected officials don't have any more brains than that necessary to sling poo.I find that it is more offensive by saying that we elected officials that don't have any more brains than that necessary to sling poo.
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] When it comes to interpretations, no one is "right" and no one is "wrong". It is not absurd to interpret the chimp as Obama, considering he strongly advocated for a stimulus bill and that he had significant input.-Sun_Tzu-It is, considering the monkey represents the people who WROTE THE DAMN BILL, not Obama lol. Good grief Charley Brown...what's wrong with some of you? No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.
Well said.
Basically this debate has become:
Why is this such an issue? From what i understood the author just saw an opportunity to make a pun, and used it. Can't see anyone getting offended by this, other than Obama himself.joao_22990And yet, ironically, just under half the people responding to the poll found it racist. There are probably others who agree that it COULD be construed as being racist but don't personally feel it is racist. I think there are three main schools of thought that I see forming in this thread. School Number 1: It's obviously racist and anyone who can't see that needs their head examined. School Number 2: It's obviously not racist and anyone who thinks it is needs their head examined. School Number 3: It either is or isn't racist (depending on who is answering) but I can see where the other side is coming from. Put me in School Number 3. I think it is racist, but I can see where different people can disagree. There are other possible interpretations and folks with different backgrounds or who are or are not familiar with the history behind monkey imagery with regards to black people may interpret the cartoon differently. If you're in School Number 1 or School Number 2, you may want to consider taking a couple of minutes and strongly trying to see where the other viewpoint is coming from.
If you're in School Number 1 or School Number 2, you may want to consider taking a couple of minutes and strongly trying to see where the other viewpoint is coming from.nocoolnamejimIt is my opinion that my opinion is stronger than your opinion or any "facts" you may come up with :x
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]If you're in School Number 1 or School Number 2, you may want to consider taking a couple of minutes and strongly trying to see where the other viewpoint is coming from.JandurinIt is my opinion that my opinion is stronger than your opinion or any "facts" you may come up with :x I humbly bow before the awesome power of your opinion!
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] How am I close minded? Did I ever try to discredit your interpretation? Did I ever say that your interpretation was incorrect? I don't think I ever did. -Sun_Tzu-You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant. I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.
No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.-Sun_Tzu-
Anything else?
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.dnuggs40I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man. "No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?
Clearly, you are not understanding his statement.
Dear god... have any of you saying that it is racist even looked at the cartoon and tried to interpret it besides saying "omgz monky being shot RACSIM"? The cartoon wouldn't make any sense at all if it was racist.
The guys killed a monkey, and they said that the Democrats have to get another monkey to write the bill now. So how would it make sense if it was racist? Obama and Congress got the bill passed so if it was trying to compare Obama to a monkey the monkey would be tremendously powerful and alive. :|
..
And only someone who was immediately looking for overt racism would catch it. If I hadn't been looking for it, I wouldn't have noticed anything at all. It is saying that those who wrote the bill have the intellect of a monkey! Is that so hard to find?
No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.-Sun_Tzu-I could be wrong with my interpretation here dnuggs, but I read that as him saying it is closed minded and ignorant not to accept that there ARE possible other interpretations, not him saying that you're closed minded and ignorant if you don't agree with his personal interpretation.
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.nocoolnamejimI could be wrong with my interpretation here dnuggs, but I read that as him saying it is closed minded and ignorant not to accept that there ARE possible other interpretations, not him saying that you're closed minded and ignorant if you don't agree with his personal interpretation. Not when the cartoon clearly states who the monkey is. Anybody claiming the monkey represents Obama (much more liking it to some racial slur) is definitely wrong on that "interpretation". There is no ifs or butts about it. What the monkey represents is crystal clear. In order to attach it to something else you have to ignore what the cartoon actually says.
Hey guys... ...may I please ask to bring the discussion back to the topic at hand and have it less about personally going after each other? I'd hate to have to lock this thread because it descended into a bit of a flame war.nocoolnamejimSome MOD decency on showcase right there folks! :)
On-Topic: After reading all these posts and initially voting the comic is racist, I have now concluded I initially did not correctly interpret the comic. Considering the direct implications of the comic, that they were shooting the "writer" of the stimulus bill, that directly proves that the intended target was obviously not Obama as he did not wirte the stimulus bill. I really think that its hard to disprove that logical train of interpretation.
Are monkeys a term/image potentially used derogatorily against African Americans? Yes.
Are monkeys a term/image potentiall used derogatorily against the lesser intelligent? Yes.
Can a term/image have more than one meaning? Yes.
Did Obama write the stimulus bill? No.
Was the monkey in the comic symbolizing the author of the stimulus bill? Yes.
Therefore we can logically conclude that the intention of the comic's artist was to imply that the author of the stimulus bill is a monkey, and that is not Obama.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment