Controversial Ny Post Cartoon

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="effthat"]Why do people take Al Sharpton seriously anymore? To me the cartoonist is comparing the Legislative body to a raging chimpanzee. They were the ones that wrote it after all. In many ways you can also dig a bit deeper and find that the raging primate acted similiarly to it's "owner" in the way that congress has been treating Obama. A lack of bipartisan cooperation has forced Obama to focus on public support of this bill instead of working on getting his staff in order which is at least somewhat due to the unethical financial situations that these politicians have found themselves in (the most recent being a connection between PRL(?), a lobbyist company, whose employees have made substantial donations and whose clients have found themselves recieving an unusually high amount of earmarks. In short, Al Sharpton has been attacked by this cartoonist in the past and has a grudge. The cartoon itself is only seen as racist when you are racist yourself and are looking for these sorts of things. This really amounts to PR bump for Al, the Cartoonist, and the paper. All of which could use it right now.

Well said.
Avatar image for Dark-Sithious
Dark-Sithious

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Dark-Sithious
Member since 2008 • 3914 Posts

I don't see the problem.

Oh your precious Obama is getting some heat? Oh noes, impeach them all! :roll:

Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="jointed"] No it's not. Obama is the figurehead of this new bill and he's also black....considering the fact that black people were and still is in some places compared to monkeys, this cartoon is very inappropriate. There's really nothing to discuss here, it's offensive.jointed
Have you ever heard of the saying, its so easy a monkey can do it ?

Yes, how this that relevant here?

They are trying to say that anyone can write the Stimulus Bill.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"]I think it would of been made if McCain was the president and pushing this bill. People are going to call almost every political cartoon that is about Obama racist because he is half African American.RenegadePatriot
Not all cartoons portray a dead Chimp that mentions a stimulus bill that has been directly influenced by the President.

True but Im sure another offensive cartoon will be produced and it will be called racist.

Possibly. And I'm sure you'll be back saying that only people who perceive racism are racist (regardless of the content?).
Avatar image for freshgman
freshgman

12241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#155 freshgman
Member since 2005 • 12241 Posts
yeah it was. wasnt overt racism but its there.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] I am just trying to show you how YOU are incorrect on it's meaning and what it represents.

When it comes to interpretations, no one is "right" and no one is "wrong". It is not absurd to interpret the chimp as Obama, considering he strongly advocated for a stimulus bill and that he had significant input.

It is, considering the monkey represents the people who WROTE THE DAMN BILL, not Obama lol. Good grief Charley Brown...what's wrong with some of you?

No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.
Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="Tazzmission187"]im white and offended by this cartoon. what really grinds my gears is the world has changed from the civil rights days to today and racism is still around. my girlfriend is african american and its a shame that biggots still speak racial remarks. what is the purpose of hatred torwards african americans? i just dont understand how skin color can make a person hate others. the truth behind this cartoon is for the last 8 years bush screwed up the country and we have a african american president who is having people unite not just here in the usa but around the world. no one will ever admit that in the hearts of racist groups they dont want a guy like obama to succseed and thats a travisty in my eyes. republicans and democrats may disagree but the truth is obama is symbolisim and shows all races are equal and whats wrong with that?Tazzmission187
News flash this is not a racist cartoon so just relax and enjoy it.

bs if i remember correctly didnt mccain pee himself when ludachris dissed him on record? patriot i take it your a republican and thats fine but you godda admit if i drew a cartoon of palin or bush being put to death you would make a case out of it. lets face it the republicans are on life support and the way for them to breath is to attack obamas presidency. kinda odd how the ny post is republican owned

I would laugh at a cartoon about Bush or Palin, I take political cartoons very lightly.
Avatar image for Aquat1cF1sh
Aquat1cF1sh

11096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#158 Aquat1cF1sh
Member since 2006 • 11096 Posts
It's not racist. >_> It's just showing that the artist thinks our president is a dumb monkey. This happened with Bush a lot. It has NOTHING to do with race. Seriously people, get off the racism mobile.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"]Have you ever heard of the saying, its so easy a monkey can do it ?RenegadePatriot
Yes, how this that relevant here?

They are trying to say that anyone can write the Stimulus Bill.

You guys are jumping from being technical to abstract...consistency please.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Oh your precious Obama is getting some heat? Oh noes, impeach them all! :roll:

Dark-Sithious
Yes, because I am advocating for everyone who criticizes Obama to be fired and detained due to insulting my lord and savior :roll:
Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] Not all cartoons portray a dead Chimp that mentions a stimulus bill that has been directly influenced by the President.

True but Im sure another offensive cartoon will be produced and it will be called racist.

Possibly. And I'm sure you'll be back saying that only people who perceive racism are racist (regardless of the content?).

Look Jan man I am saying that people that think that this is racist needs to learn not to see everything as being about race.
Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="jointed"] Yes, how this that relevant here?jointed
They are trying to say that anyone can write the Stimulus Bill.

You guys are jumping from being technical to abstract...consistency please.

I am trying just to show that this was not a racist cartoon.
Avatar image for Tazzmission187
Tazzmission187

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Tazzmission187
Member since 2008 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] Not all cartoons portray a dead Chimp that mentions a stimulus bill that has been directly influenced by the President.

True but Im sure another offensive cartoon will be produced and it will be called racist.

Possibly. And I'm sure you'll be back saying that only people who perceive racism are racist.

how much of a coincidence that this cartoon came out the day after president. obama sighned the bill? face the truth and thats a smart intelligent african american cant have a succsessfull presidency do to his race. if colin powel was president this wouldnt happen because 1. he's republican and 2nd. hes really well respected. just because obama is the new abe lincoln/jfk its ok to say hes a chimp? kinda funny how the president got alot of work done within 30 days wich bush didnt do a damn thing
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Look Jan man I am saying that people that think that this is racist needs to learn not to see everything as being about race.RenegadePatriot
Well, it wasn't until the question was asked that I saw it from another perspective. Even without racial questions, though, the cartoon is offensive. It's either racial, or saying that US elected officials don't have any more brains than that necessary to sling poo.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] When it comes to interpretations, no one is "right" and no one is "wrong". It is not absurd to interpret the chimp as Obama, considering he strongly advocated for a stimulus bill and that he had significant input.

It is, considering the monkey represents the people who WROTE THE DAMN BILL, not Obama lol. Good grief Charley Brown...what's wrong with some of you?

No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.

What reasons? Incorrectly attaching the imagery of the monkey to the president himself? Like already shown without a shadow of doubt, the monkey represents congress (they wrote it, not obama, and the cartoon CLEARLY says the moneky represents the people who WROTE the bill). The fact you can't come to terms with that shows your closed mindedness, not mine. It's plain as day. But continue on thinking whatever you like, it certainly doesn't effect me only your intellect.
Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
[QUOTE="RenegadePatriot"]Look Jan man I am saying that people that think that this is racist needs to learn not to see everything as being about race.Jandurin
Well, it wasn't until the question was asked that I saw it from another perspective. Even without racial questions, though, the cartoon is offensive. It's either racial, or saying that US elected officials don't have any more brains than that necessary to sling poo.

I find that it is more offensive by saying that we elected officials that don't have any more brains than that necessary to sling poo.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] It is, considering the monkey represents the people who WROTE THE DAMN BILL, not Obama lol. Good grief Charley Brown...what's wrong with some of you?

No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.

What reasons? Incorrectly attaching the imagery of the monkey to the president himself? Like already shown without a shadow of doubt, the monkey represents congress (they wrote it, not obama, and the cartoon CLEARLY says the moneky represents the people who WROTE the bill). The fact you can't come to terms with that shows your closed mindedness, not mine. It's plain as day. But continue on thinking whatever you like, it certainly doesn't effect me only your intellect.

How am I close minded? Did I ever try to discredit your interpretation? Did I ever say that your interpretation was incorrect? I don't think I ever did.
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#169 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] When it comes to interpretations, no one is "right" and no one is "wrong". It is not absurd to interpret the chimp as Obama, considering he strongly advocated for a stimulus bill and that he had significant input.-Sun_Tzu-
It is, considering the monkey represents the people who WROTE THE DAMN BILL, not Obama lol. Good grief Charley Brown...what's wrong with some of you?

No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.

Well said.

Basically this debate has become:

  • Person1: I can see that as being racist because black people have been compared to monkeys for a long time.
  • Person2: OMG....that makesyou racist!
Avatar image for Tazzmission187
Tazzmission187

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Tazzmission187
Member since 2008 • 804 Posts
renegadde obama has been in office for over one month and these ignorant republicans are slamming him. bush ran this country for 8 years and failed then got critisized. im saying obama is being judged racialy because he hasnt been president for a year. and what i mean is hes early in his presidency. hes respected because hes telling everyone if the bill dosent work than judge me for that and the truth is the bill is gona work in about a year or 2 the most. so why attack a man whos doing what he can to fix the toxic mess bush started? im not a nacy pelosi fan but i wouldnt condone a cartoon showing death and a remark for her. i dont wish death on anyone unless they truely deserve it by commiting a crime. obama never comited such a act
Avatar image for joao_22990
joao_22990

2230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#171 joao_22990
Member since 2007 • 2230 Posts
Why is this such an issue? From what i understood the author just saw an opportunity to make a pun, and used it. Can't see anyone getting offended by this, other than Obama himself.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#172 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Why is this such an issue? From what i understood the author just saw an opportunity to make a pun, and used it. Can't see anyone getting offended by this, other than Obama himself.joao_22990
And yet, ironically, just under half the people responding to the poll found it racist. There are probably others who agree that it COULD be construed as being racist but don't personally feel it is racist. I think there are three main schools of thought that I see forming in this thread. School Number 1: It's obviously racist and anyone who can't see that needs their head examined. School Number 2: It's obviously not racist and anyone who thinks it is needs their head examined. School Number 3: It either is or isn't racist (depending on who is answering) but I can see where the other side is coming from. Put me in School Number 3. I think it is racist, but I can see where different people can disagree. There are other possible interpretations and folks with different backgrounds or who are or are not familiar with the history behind monkey imagery with regards to black people may interpret the cartoon differently. If you're in School Number 1 or School Number 2, you may want to consider taking a couple of minutes and strongly trying to see where the other viewpoint is coming from.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
If you're in School Number 1 or School Number 2, you may want to consider taking a couple of minutes and strongly trying to see where the other viewpoint is coming from.nocoolnamejim
It is my opinion that my opinion is stronger than your opinion or any "facts" you may come up with :x
Avatar image for Eman5805
Eman5805

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 Eman5805
Member since 2004 • 4494 Posts
Basically saying a monkey made up the stimulus package. Yeah, there's racial connotations there, especially seeing as our prez is black and all...
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
What's offensive about it? It's likening politicians to monkeys. How is it racist? How is it offensive? It's pretty much true.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
Could very well be racist, but that depends on what the monkey is supposed to mean. If it's supposed to represent black people, it's racist. However, if it's only supposed to mean incompetence, then it isn't. However, the fact that the people are shooting the monkey also raises an eyebrow.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.

What reasons? Incorrectly attaching the imagery of the monkey to the president himself? Like already shown without a shadow of doubt, the monkey represents congress (they wrote it, not obama, and the cartoon CLEARLY says the moneky represents the people who WROTE the bill). The fact you can't come to terms with that shows your closed mindedness, not mine. It's plain as day. But continue on thinking whatever you like, it certainly doesn't effect me only your intellect.

How am I close minded? Did I ever try to discredit your interpretation? Did I ever say that your interpretation was incorrect? I don't think I ever did.

You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] What reasons? Incorrectly attaching the imagery of the monkey to the president himself? Like already shown without a shadow of doubt, the monkey represents congress (they wrote it, not obama, and the cartoon CLEARLY says the moneky represents the people who WROTE the bill). The fact you can't come to terms with that shows your closed mindedness, not mine. It's plain as day. But continue on thinking whatever you like, it certainly doesn't effect me only your intellect.

How am I close minded? Did I ever try to discredit your interpretation? Did I ever say that your interpretation was incorrect? I don't think I ever did.

You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.

I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#179 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]If you're in School Number 1 or School Number 2, you may want to consider taking a couple of minutes and strongly trying to see where the other viewpoint is coming from.Jandurin
It is my opinion that my opinion is stronger than your opinion or any "facts" you may come up with :x

I humbly bow before the awesome power of your opinion!
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts

[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] How am I close minded? Did I ever try to discredit your interpretation? Did I ever say that your interpretation was incorrect? I don't think I ever did. -Sun_Tzu-
You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.

I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.

No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.-Sun_Tzu-

Anything else?

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.

I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.

"No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

So you've accepted that you don't even have the ability to acknowledge the legitimacy of interpretations of others. Well, that's the first step, I suppose.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.

I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.

"No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

And I stand by that statement. Where do I say that you are ignorant for not accepting my interpretation?
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#183 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] You called me closed minded for not accepting your incorrect interpretation. You also called me ignorant. The problem is, it's not just some difference of opinion regarding an unclear aspect of the cartoon...what the monkey represents is blatantly obvious. Calling people closed minded because they don't accept your incorrect interpretation is silly. If you want to call an elephant a fish, feel free. But the people who point out an elephant is actually an animal are certainly not closed minded, nor are they ignorant.dnuggs40
I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.

"No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

Clearly, you are not understanding his statement.

Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#184 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts

Dear god... have any of you saying that it is racist even looked at the cartoon and tried to interpret it besides saying "omgz monky being shot RACSIM"? The cartoon wouldn't make any sense at all if it was racist.

The guys killed a monkey, and they said that the Democrats have to get another monkey to write the bill now. So how would it make sense if it was racist? Obama and Congress got the bill passed so if it was trying to compare Obama to a monkey the monkey would be tremendously powerful and alive. :|

..

And only someone who was immediately looking for overt racism would catch it. If I hadn't been looking for it, I wouldn't have noticed anything at all. It is saying that those who wrote the bill have the intellect of a monkey! Is that so hard to find?

Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.

"No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

So you've accepted that you don't even acknowledge the legitimacy of interpretations of others. Well, that's the first step, I suppose.

Not when it's blatantly wrong. You can't call an apple an orange and except people to accept it, and the people who point out the obvious difference aren't ignorant. Sorry folks, the cartoon CLEARLY shows what the monkey represents. CLEARLY.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#186 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.-Sun_Tzu-
I could be wrong with my interpretation here dnuggs, but I read that as him saying it is closed minded and ignorant not to accept that there ARE possible other interpretations, not him saying that you're closed minded and ignorant if you don't agree with his personal interpretation.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] I called you ignorant for not accepting my interpretation? Really? Can you show me where I said that? Because if you can't show me where I said that, then you sir, have just constructed a magnificent straw man.

"No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

And I stand by that statement. Where do I say that you are ignorant for not accepting my interpretation?

[size=20]To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance[/size] Or were you talking about someone else?
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] "No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

And I stand by that statement. Where do I say that you are ignorant for not accepting my interpretation?

[size=20]To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance[/size] Or were you talking about someone else?

I fail to see how acknowledgment constitutes as acceptance.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#189 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Hey guys... ...may I please ask to bring the discussion back to the topic at hand and have it less about personally going after each other? I'd hate to have to lock this thread because it descended into a bit of a flame war.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly.nocoolnamejim
I could be wrong with my interpretation here dnuggs, but I read that as him saying it is closed minded and ignorant not to accept that there ARE possible other interpretations, not him saying that you're closed minded and ignorant if you don't agree with his personal interpretation.

Not when the cartoon clearly states who the monkey is. Anybody claiming the monkey represents Obama (much more liking it to some racial slur) is definitely wrong on that "interpretation". There is no ifs or butts about it. What the monkey represents is crystal clear. In order to attach it to something else you have to ignore what the cartoon actually says.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] "No it is not absurd, for reasons I have already mentioned. To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance, quite frankly." Anything else?

So you've accepted that you don't even acknowledge the legitimacy of interpretations of others. Well, that's the first step, I suppose.

Not when it's blatantly wrong. You can't call an apple an orange and except people to accept it, and the people who point out the obvious difference aren't ignorant. Sorry folks, the cartoon CLEARLY shows what the monkey represents. CLEARLY.

The problem with your analogy is that an apple is not a literary device, while the chimp is.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] And I stand by that statement. Where do I say that you are ignorant for not accepting my interpretation?

[size=20]To not even be able to acknowledge the legitimacy of the interpretations of those who differ from you shows a tremendous amount of close mindedness and ignorance[/size] Or were you talking about someone else?

I fail to see how acknowledgment constitutes as acceptance.

Maybe Merriam can help... http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acknowledging "4: to recognize as genuine or valid " In order to acknowledge your "interpretation", I would have to accept it's validity. It's obviously not valid, so I won't accept nor acknowledge your racists interpretation.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] So you've accepted that you don't even acknowledge the legitimacy of interpretations of others. Well, that's the first step, I suppose.

Not when it's blatantly wrong. You can't call an apple an orange and except people to accept it, and the people who point out the obvious difference aren't ignorant. Sorry folks, the cartoon CLEARLY shows what the monkey represents. CLEARLY.

The problem with your analogy is that an apple is not a literary device, while the chimp is.

And the chimp was given a persona in the cartoon, which is the writers of the bill, which not Obama it's congress. Are you done yet, or can you finally grasp the obvious (obvious is an understatement...the persona was literally given in the cartoon) persona of the monkey yet?
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] Not when it's blatantly wrong. You can't call an apple an orange and except people to accept it, and the people who point out the obvious difference aren't ignorant. Sorry folks, the cartoon CLEARLY shows what the monkey represents. CLEARLY.

The problem with your analogy is that an apple is not a literary device, while the chimp is.

And the chimp was given a persona in the cartoon, which is the writers of the bill, which not Obama it's congress. Are you done yet, or can you finally grasp the obvious (obvious is an understatement...the persona was literally given in the cartoon) persona of the monkey yet?

The persona of the chimp is extremely vague. It could very well be congress, but you are overlooking the fact that Obama has put a tremendous amount of input into the stimulus bill; so much that one could go so far to say that he helped write said bill.
Avatar image for dnuggs40
dnuggs40

10484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 dnuggs40
Member since 2003 • 10484 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] The problem with your analogy is that an apple is not a literary device, while the chimp is.

And the chimp was given a persona in the cartoon, which is the writers of the bill, which not Obama it's congress. Are you done yet, or can you finally grasp the obvious (obvious is an understatement...the persona was literally given in the cartoon) persona of the monkey yet?

The persona of the chimp is extremely vague. It could very well be congress, but you are overlooking the fact that Obama has put a tremendous amount of input into the stimulus bill; so much that one could go so far to say that he helped write said bill.

Did Obama write the bill? Yes or no
Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#196 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts

Hey guys... ...may I please ask to bring the discussion back to the topic at hand and have it less about personally going after each other? I'd hate to have to lock this thread because it descended into a bit of a flame war.nocoolnamejim
Some MOD decency on showcase right there folks! :)

On-Topic: After reading all these posts and initially voting the comic is racist, I have now concluded I initially did not correctly interpret the comic. Considering the direct implications of the comic, that they were shooting the "writer" of the stimulus bill, that directly proves that the intended target was obviously not Obama as he did not wirte the stimulus bill. I really think that its hard to disprove that logical train of interpretation.

Are monkeys a term/image potentially used derogatorily against African Americans? Yes.

Are monkeys a term/image potentiall used derogatorily against the lesser intelligent? Yes.

Can a term/image have more than one meaning? Yes.

Did Obama write the stimulus bill? No.

Was the monkey in the comic symbolizing the author of the stimulus bill? Yes.

Therefore we can logically conclude that the intention of the comic's artist was to imply that the author of the stimulus bill is a monkey, and that is not Obama.

Avatar image for Dark-Sithious
Dark-Sithious

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 Dark-Sithious
Member since 2008 • 3914 Posts
Lol, how people can get angry because of this is beyond me. Even if the cartoon was racist,(which it isn't) I would say this has gotten out of hand (not talking about the thread)
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#198 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Probably not meant to be racist, but incredibly stupid at the very least.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="dnuggs40"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="dnuggs40"] And the chimp was given a persona in the cartoon, which is the writers of the bill, which not Obama it's congress. Are you done yet, or can you finally grasp the obvious (obvious is an understatement...the persona was literally given in the cartoon) persona of the monkey yet?

The persona of the chimp is extremely vague. It could very well be congress, but you are overlooking the fact that Obama has put a tremendous amount of input into the stimulus bill; so much that one could go so far to say that he helped write said bill.

Did Obama write the bill? Yes or no

It was Obama who proposed for the creation of such a bill, it was Obama who campaigned for the bill, and it was Obama who advocated for his ideas to be included in the bill. No, Obama didn't actually sit down and write the bill word for word, but he was a major contributor when it came to the ideas introduced in the legislation, and because of that, he did help write it. If it wasn't for Obama, the stimulus bill as we know it wouldn't have been created. The stimulus bill is Obama's bill, and the way I am interpreting the cartoon is that because the chimp (Obama) is now dead, someone else is going to have to emerge and create the next stimulus bill, in the same fashion that Obama created the current bill.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#200 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
maybe the artist and the NY post didnt mean for the image to have racial connotations, but they should have used their brain. With the history of black people being compared to animals (monkeys especially) in American history, they should have known the sort of response it would provoke. It does come off as a bit racist, and even if their intentions werent racist, they should have known better.