Debt deal done, all eyes on the House

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

Everyone seems to have got what they wanted, ceiling increased, light budget cuts, but no new taxes. Too bad the cuts won't mean anything over the course of a decade.

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21702 Posts
About damn time. It shouldn't have taken this long for them to finally reach an agreement if the congress wasn't run by apes...
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
Everyone wanted no new taxes? :?
Avatar image for EntropyWins
EntropyWins

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 EntropyWins
Member since 2010 • 1209 Posts

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

EntropyWins
Basically it means there's a plan from both spectrums of the leadership. It means nothing until a vote is taken though, since the leaders can't actually put stuff into law. I hate all these projections and such that they make regarding "the next 10 years" considering that many of them probably won't be in Congress in a few at this rate.
Avatar image for EntropyWins
EntropyWins

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 EntropyWins
Member since 2010 • 1209 Posts
[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

MAILER_DAEMON
Basically it means there's a plan from both spectrums of the leadership. It means nothing until a vote is taken though, since the leaders can't actually put stuff into law. I hate all these projections and such that they make regarding "the next 10 years" considering that many of them probably won't be in Congress in a few at this rate.

lol, yeah it's all a joke. Especially when they are counting things like spending less money in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is money we weren't going to spend anyway, towards these supposed cuts.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"][QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

EntropyWins
Basically it means there's a plan from both spectrums of the leadership. It means nothing until a vote is taken though, since the leaders can't actually put stuff into law. I hate all these projections and such that they make regarding "the next 10 years" considering that many of them probably won't be in Congress in a few at this rate.

lol, yeah it's all a joke. Especially when they are counting things like spending less money in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is money we weren't going to spend anyway, towards these supposed cuts.

People are sick of the lack of transparency in Washington. I'm sick of this crap coming from both parties, personally...
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#9 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
This was welcome news to investors around the world - all stock exchanges in Asia, Australia, and Europe went up. The Dollar gained in value, and gold went down. Looks like there's going to be a rally on Wall Street today.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
So now we have a hollow "deal" in place that accomplishes nothing relevant while giving these stupid politicians license to go back to business as usual, bickering over new nonsensical ways to waste our tax dollars. Great.
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
Everyone wanted no new taxes? :?DroidPhysX
Just 72% of the American population. Nothing too noticeable.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]The republicans to have got what they wantedgameguy6700
Fixed that for ya.

This guy gets it! The Republicans wanted cuts, the Dems wanted taxes. The Republicans got cuts, the Dems didn't get taxes, and now Republicans are crying because they didn't get ALL the cuts they wanted, how is this a comprimise? The Republican agenda is basically cut spending and cut taxes, it seems like they got all of that in this deal, what is there to complain about?

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]The republicans to have got what they wantedtheone86

Fixed that for ya.

This guy gets it! The Republicans wanted cuts, the Dems wanted taxes. The Republicans got cuts, the Dems didn't get taxes, and now Republicans are crying because they didn't get ALL the cuts they wanted, how is this a comprimise? The Republican agenda is basically cut spending and cut taxes, it seems like they got all of that in this deal, what is there to complain about?

Well, first off, we didn't cut spending at all. What we did is make cuts to proposed new spending. The deficit and the debt will still increase as a result of this agreement.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"] Fixed that for ya.savebattery

This guy gets it! The Republicans wanted cuts, the Dems wanted taxes. The Republicans got cuts, the Dems didn't get taxes, and now Republicans are crying because they didn't get ALL the cuts they wanted, how is this a comprimise? The Republican agenda is basically cut spending and cut taxes, it seems like they got all of that in this deal, what is there to complain about?

Well, first off, we didn't cut spending at all. What we did is make cuts to proposed new spending. The deficit and the debt will still increase as a result of this agreement.

Cutting spending and cutting proposed new spending, seems like a matter of semantics to me. Of course you're not going to cut into CURRENT spending because that's already been approved as part of the last budget that was passed. The issue is that going into the future Republicans got everything on their agenda, and Democrats basically had to make all the sacrifices. As far as deficit increasing, that's a matter of how savings are used. If you draw down future spending that means less money going to increase the deficit, so it is still a means of deficit reduction.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

EntropyWins

The Senate vote is a shoo-in, but the House, not so much. There are some concerns that the Tea Party faction just might be enough to scuttle the deal, but I cannot imagine that even they could be so foolish. The Republicans got most of what they wanted, for them to push on at this point would be political suicide while making Bohener look like a bigger ass than he already is.

I don't think this is going to be a problem, the House Democrats will go along with the WH to seal the deal to just get rid of the issue. Their numbers will drown out the Tea Party faction's resistance.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

small immaterial back loaded cuts that will NEVER MAKE IT TO FRUITION? check. debt ceiling increased? check.

the only good thing here is that taxes were not raised, we are still spending like politions with other peoples money and still set to run out of money by the election in a year. cheer for the crap your leaders shovel you.

Avatar image for BrianB0422
BrianB0422

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#17 BrianB0422
Member since 2009 • 1636 Posts
Uh? Tax increases were part of the deal, just not in the way that many would expect. There has to be many cuts made by November or else an automatic 4 trillion in cuts will happen. You can bet your bottom dollar that the Democrats will make tax increases part of those negotiations.
Avatar image for BrianB0422
BrianB0422

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 BrianB0422
Member since 2009 • 1636 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]Everyone wanted no new taxes? :?scorch-62
Just 72% of the American population. Nothing too noticeable.

Lol what?? 68% of people polled favored a mixed deal with tax increases and spending cuts.
Avatar image for Stavrogin_
Stavrogin_

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Stavrogin_
Member since 2011 • 804 Posts
Anyone else upset that there won't be tax increases for the rich? I don't even live there and i'm still upset that the rich got away yet again.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
Anyone else upset that there won't be tax increases for the rich? I don't even live there and i'm still upset that the rich got away yet again. Stavrogin_
What do you mean the rich "got away" again? They already pay the highest percentage of taxes...
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Bush tax cuts set to expire 2013. Once those expire, the debt may be tackled. Can't have 2 wars and not expect to pay for it.

Avatar image for Stavrogin_
Stavrogin_

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Stavrogin_
Member since 2011 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="Stavrogin_"]Anyone else upset that there won't be tax increases for the rich? I don't even live there and i'm still upset that the rich got away yet again. BMD004
What do you mean the rich "got away" again? They already pay the highest percentage of taxes...

I'm sorry i'm not very familiar with US politics, but i thought i read somewhere that the taxes on the rich are at an all-time low.
Avatar image for BrianB0422
BrianB0422

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#23 BrianB0422
Member since 2009 • 1636 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="Stavrogin_"]Anyone else upset that there won't be tax increases for the rich? I don't even live there and i'm still upset that the rich got away yet again. Stavrogin_
What do you mean the rich "got away" again? They already pay the highest percentage of taxes...

I'm sorry i'm not very familiar with US politics, but i thought i read somewhere that the taxes on the rich are at an all-time low.

I am very upset. The trickle down theory is the biggest fallacy in the history of American politics. The wealth gap is widening by the minute and everyday middle class Americans are suffering for it. People are blinded by the "American Dream" which has been dead since the late 70's, therefore they continue to not want to tax the rich because, "one day I'll be the rich guy!". CEO's in the US make $500 to every $1 an employee makes, and the top 1% of wealth earners control over 80% of the wealth in the entire country. Logic would point to where the problem lies, but logic escapes many.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

The fact that America has maintained a AAA credit rating during all this, while the likes of Moody's rampages across the world; downgrading everyone. Shows how illegitimate the system is right now.

America has been abusing their position as the world reserve currency for decades, there should be consequences. Why do they get off scott free, while EU countries are being asset stripped, despite doing everything that was asked of them? America has shown far less will to do anything about their debt than other countries.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38943 Posts
bfd... we're going to have the same debacle all over again in the fall when the commission's recommendations are voted on. and again some time in 2012 when the new limit is reached. seems like they bought themselves some more time. nothing more.
Avatar image for BrianB0422
BrianB0422

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#26 BrianB0422
Member since 2009 • 1636 Posts
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

The fact that America has maintained a AAA credit rating during all this, while the likes of Moody's rampages across the world; downgrading everyone. Shows how illegitimate the system is right now.

America has been abusing their position as the world reserve currency for decades, there should be consequences. Why do they get off scott free, while EU countries are being asset stripped, despite doing everything that was asked of them? America has shown far less will to do anything about their debt than other countries.

Why do they get off scott free? Because our economy is the largest. I'm sure once China takes the cake that the preferential treatment will cease.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Why do they get off scott free? Because our economy is the largest. I'm sure once China takes the cake that the preferential treatment will cease.BrianB0422

America's economy hasn't been healthy for a long time. They kept putting off recessions by cutting interest rates, which just increased the indebtedness of the country.

The only reason the US has been able to get away with this for so long; is because they are the world reserve currency. They were chosen as the world reserve currency, because they were the worlds strongest and most stable economy. But not any more. If any other country, even healthy economic power houses like China and Germany, were to pull what the US did; they would suffer severe consequences. But there is always demand for dollars, artificially, because they are needed for world trade.

That is going to change, and the US is going to feel the impact of their abuse.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

china alarmists are as funny as global warming alarmists..... or really any alarmist who sees the world as an unintelligible mess

Avatar image for BrianB0422
BrianB0422

1636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#29 BrianB0422
Member since 2009 • 1636 Posts

[QUOTE="BrianB0422"]Why do they get off scott free? Because our economy is the largest. I'm sure once China takes the cake that the preferential treatment will cease.AnnoyedDragon

America's economy hasn't been healthy for a long time. They kept putting off recessions by cutting interest rates, which just increased the indebtedness of the country.

The only reason the US has been able to get away with this for so long; is because they are the world reserve currency. They were chosen as the world reserve currency, because they were the worlds strongest and most stable economy. But not any more. If any other country, even healthy economic power houses like China and Germany, were to pull what the US did; they would suffer severe consequences. But there is always demand for dollars, artificially, because they are needed for world trade.

That is going to change, and the US is going to feel the impact of their abuse.

/sigh... Size of Economies (GDP): 1. EU - 16.4m 2. US - 14.1m 3. Japan - 5.08m 4. China - 4.9m The US is the largest single-nation economy and will stay that way for a good while. I agree with your statements, but you're a bit over the top I feel.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="BrianB0422"]Why do they get off scott free? Because our economy is the largest. I'm sure once China takes the cake that the preferential treatment will cease.BrianB0422

America's economy hasn't been healthy for a long time. They kept putting off recessions by cutting interest rates, which just increased the indebtedness of the country.

The only reason the US has been able to get away with this for so long; is because they are the world reserve currency. They were chosen as the world reserve currency, because they were the worlds strongest and most stable economy. But not any more. If any other country, even healthy economic power houses like China and Germany, were to pull what the US did; they would suffer severe consequences. But there is always demand for dollars, artificially, because they are needed for world trade.

That is going to change, and the US is going to feel the impact of their abuse.

/sigh... Size of Economies (GDP): 1. EU - 16.4m23 countries2. US - 14.1mone country3. Japan - 5.08mone country 4. China - 4.9mone country The US is the largest single-nation economy and will stay that way for a good while. I agree with your statements, but you're a bit over the top I feel.

Avatar image for stanleycup98
stanleycup98

6144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#31 stanleycup98
Member since 2006 • 6144 Posts

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]The republicans to have got what they wantedtheone86

Fixed that for ya.

This guy gets it! The Republicans wanted cuts, the Dems wanted taxes. The Republicans got cuts, the Dems didn't get taxes, and now Republicans are crying because they didn't get ALL the cuts they wanted, how is this a comprimise? The Republican agenda is basically cut spending and cut taxes, it seems like they got all of that in this deal, what is there to complain about?

No, they didn't get cuts. What would happen with this deal is that a committee would be established to figure out a way to lower the deficit by the target number by tax cuts and spending cuts (particularly reforms to welfare programs and defense spending). There are no guaranteed spending cuts, and it is not guaranteed that taxes will not be raised. Whether taxes are raised or not and whether significant cuts are made or not depends on what the committee decides. My guess is that they will negotiate to raise taxes while cutting spending for defense and some welfare.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"] Fixed that for ya.stanleycup98

This guy gets it! The Republicans wanted cuts, the Dems wanted taxes. The Republicans got cuts, the Dems didn't get taxes, and now Republicans are crying because they didn't get ALL the cuts they wanted, how is this a comprimise? The Republican agenda is basically cut spending and cut taxes, it seems like they got all of that in this deal, what is there to complain about?

No, they didn't get cuts. What would happen with this deal is that a committee would be established to figure out a way to lower the deficit by the target number by tax cuts and spending cuts (particularly reforms to welfare programs and defense spending). There are no guaranteed spending cuts, and it is not guaranteed that taxes will not be raised. Whether taxes are raised or not and whether significant cuts are made or not depends on what the committee decides. My guess is that they will negotiate to raise taxes while cutting spending for defense and some welfare.

Exactly, all this has done is defer to a committee of so-called experts with forced cuts in place if they can't agree to anything.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

/sigh... Size of Economies (GDP): 1. EU - 16.4m 2. US - 14.1m 3. Japan - 5.08m 4. China - 4.9m The US is the largest single-nation economy and will stay that way for a good while. I agree with your statements, but you're a bit over the top I feel.BrianB0422

Those figures aren't important. China has a tiny debt to GDP and a strong export economy, the US is a pale shadow of it's former industrial self and is suffering from massive indebtedness. The US's biggest export is dollars, they pay for things by abusing their world reserve status; and creating even more debt. How are these economies comparable? Those figures don't paint the whole picture.

What's the point in a higher GDP if they go into a international panic every few months, because they cannot pay to run the country using that GDP? Other countries are going to get sick of this and dump dollars, using some other currency for international trade. Then the US is in real trouble.

They focus so much on their own internal affairs, they are not considering that the rest of the world is tired of the USA's antics. What's the point in raising the debt ceiling, if countries and banks decide they don't want to loan them any more money? Yes there are countries that are worse off, but they are using severe austerity measures and cuts, or worse case; default. The US just keeps piling on more debt, and yet somehow continues to maintain their AAA credit rating.

They cannot cut interest rates below 0%, every time they pull this debt ceiling nonsense; other countries lose confidence in the US. It's going to come to an end at some point.

Avatar image for maheo30
maheo30

5102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 maheo30
Member since 2006 • 5102 Posts
Hopefully the House gets some sanity and votes this thing down.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#35 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

Bush tax cuts set to expire 2013. Once those expire, the debt may be tackled. Can't have 2 wars and not expect to pay for it.

sonicare
Yes, it's really a good thing that the next deadline for renewing them in Dec. 31, 2012, after the election. Then hopefully the Dems can just let them die.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#36 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Hopefully the House gets some sanity and votes this thing down. maheo30
Yes you're right, it'd be such a great thing if the US defaults on its debt because we don't pass a decent albeit less-than-desirable bill.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Hopefully the House gets some sanity and votes this thing down. maheo30
That is very possible. There's not enough republican votes alone to pass this bill so a large number of democrats are going to be needed if it is going to have a chance; however a lot of democrats probably won't vote for this either so it's going to be a close call in all likely hood.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#38 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
[QUOTE="maheo30"]Hopefully the House gets some sanity and votes this thing down. -Sun_Tzu-
That is very possible. There's not enough republican votes alone to pass this bill so a large number of democrats are going to be needed if it is going to have a chance; however a lot of democrats probably won't vote for this either so it's going to be a close call in all likely hood.

I imagine that the bill will pass with something in the range of 220 votes. The reason of course being that nobody (with any sense at least) wants the US to default. Boehner and Pelosi will round up just enough votes to pass it, and will let the other members of their caucus vote against it. I hope I'm not wrong on this, at least. :P
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="maheo30"]Hopefully the House gets some sanity and votes this thing down. chessmaster1989
Yes you're right, it'd be such a great thing if the US defaults on its debt because we don't pass a decent albeit less-than-desirable bill.

we got hard times ahead either way, facing them now when a lot of my work comes from over seas does not seem all that scary, as these problems tend to get worse the further down the road they are kicked, this might not be such a bad time for the government to be forced to their collection. then again i hate politics and am purely speaking from my situation and economic view.

Avatar image for Tetrarch9
Tetrarch9

2581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Tetrarch9
Member since 2010 • 2581 Posts

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

QuistisTrepe_

The Senate vote is a shoo-in, but the House, not so much. There are some concerns that the Tea Party faction just might be enough to scuttle the deal, but I cannot imagine that even they could be so foolish. The Republicans got most of what they wanted, for them to push on at this point would be political suicide while making Bohener look like a bigger ass than he already is.

I don't think this is going to be a problem, the House Democrats will go along with the WH to seal the deal to just get rid of the issue. Their numbers will drown out the Tea Party faction's resistance.

Bachmann has already flown back into Washington to vote against it. God I hate her.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

Tetrarch9

The Senate vote is a shoo-in, but the House, not so much. There are some concerns that the Tea Party faction just might be enough to scuttle the deal, but I cannot imagine that even they could be so foolish. The Republicans got most of what they wanted, for them to push on at this point would be political suicide while making Bohener look like a bigger ass than he already is.

I don't think this is going to be a problem, the House Democrats will go along with the WH to seal the deal to just get rid of the issue. Their numbers will drown out the Tea Party faction's resistance.

Bachmann has already flown back into Washington to vote against it. God I hate her.

Imagine if she blocks it (Wouldit bepossible?).:lol:

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="maheo30"]Hopefully the House gets some sanity and votes this thing down. chessmaster1989
That is very possible. There's not enough republican votes alone to pass this bill so a large number of democrats are going to be needed if it is going to have a chance; however a lot of democrats probably won't vote for this either so it's going to be a close call in all likely hood.

I imagine that the bill will pass with something in the range of 220 votes. The reason of course being that nobody (with any sense at least) wants the US to default. Boehner and Pelosi will round up just enough votes to pass it, and will let the other members of their caucus vote against it. I hope I'm not wrong on this, at least. :P

You are right that no rational person wants the US to default, but avoiding default is not contingent on this specific bill's passage.

It is contingent on the debt ceiling being raised (or the exploitation of some legal loophole). Even if this bill doesn't pass through congress (and if this bill can't pass then no deficit reduction bill can pass), there's still plenty of time to raise the debt ceiling before midnight (and even after that the treasury will most likely be able to pay all of our bills for the next few days - the bipartisan policy center has projected that the treasury is going to completely run out of money sometime between August 2nd and August 10th, so there is still some wiggle room for a debt ceiling raise after that, but going into August 2nd without a debt ceiling raise is still very risky). All congress has to do is pass a one sentence bill that says that they are raising the debt ceiling by 2 trillions dollars.

Every congressional leader agrees that the debt ceiling has to be raised. So if this bill gets struck down, the next question is simply when is the vote on a clean debt ceiling raise. And if that can't pass (which I think is very unlikely), then the administration considers its legal options (trillion dollar coins, 14th amendment, ect)

There's no reason why this specific bill has to pass. I don't really see why it should pass in the first place - no one seems to like it all that much.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Hasn't even passed the Senate yet.
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

There's no reason why this specific bill has to pass. I don't really see why it should pass in the first place - no one seems to like it all that much.

-Sun_Tzu-

There's really not much more that can be done at this point.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

[QUOTE="EntropyWins"]

So is this official as in it has already passed, or was there just an informal agreement by each respective leader?

Tetrarch9

The Senate vote is a shoo-in, but the House, not so much. There are some concerns that the Tea Party faction just might be enough to scuttle the deal, but I cannot imagine that even they could be so foolish. The Republicans got most of what they wanted, for them to push on at this point would be political suicide while making Bohener look like a bigger ass than he already is.

I don't think this is going to be a problem, the House Democrats will go along with the WH to seal the deal to just get rid of the issue. Their numbers will drown out the Tea Party faction's resistance.

Bachmann has already flown back into Washington to vote against it. God I hate her.

As the chair of the Tea Party caucus and the matriarch of smaller government she probably wanted to make sure that none of her ethanol subsidies got cut.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

Joe Biden heeding Obama's call for civility: Tea Party "acted like terrorists."

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

Joe Biden heeding Obama's call for civility: Tea Party "acted like terrorists."

QuistisTrepe_
If it takes hostages like a terrorist and quacks like a terrorist...
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

Joe Biden heeding Obama's call for civility: Tea Party "acted like terrorists."

QuistisTrepe_
Calling people 'terrorists' isn't a great way to start a 'civil' discussion.
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Joe Biden heeding Obama's call for civility: Tea Party "acted like terrorists."

xaos

If it takes hostages like a terrorist and quacks like a terrorist...

What if they use crosshairs as points on a map?

Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
Why is congress so against creating a higher tax rate for those with more money?