democrat, republican, communist, or liberal

  • 122 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mesocoo89
mesocoo89

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mesocoo89
Member since 2007 • 28 Posts
me= republican, what about you?
Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
Democommurepubliberal.
Avatar image for dissonantblack
dissonantblack

34009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 dissonantblack
Member since 2005 • 34009 Posts
i'm conservative and %100 anti communist.
Avatar image for joetira
joetira

2879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 joetira
Member since 2005 • 2879 Posts
i don't just follows the beliefs of one party, i'm mostly republican on big issues.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
More or less fascist.
i'm conservative and %100 anti communist. dissonantblack
Same.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

I'm a whig.  Ohhhh yeah. 8)

 

Avatar image for Childish_Spot
Childish_Spot

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Childish_Spot
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

libertarian. so im part of the right wing.

 

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you) 

Avatar image for GreatDecay
GreatDecay

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GreatDecay
Member since 2006 • 624 Posts

libertarian. so im part of the right wing.

 

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you)

Childish_Spot

right wing = patriot act = no freedoms. 

Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts

libertarian. so im part of the right wing.

 

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you)

Childish_Spot

You've got it wrong.

Yes, left is Communism and SOME socialism, but National Socialism falls under right wing ideals. I'm not bashing either, Communism is equally as bad. Libertarian is also in the center, I believe it's social liberalism and economic conservatism.

 

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

I don't know or care, but somewhere there is an optimal tax rate. Now it's clearly not 0% and it's clearly not 100%.  So what is it?  That is a good question.

I'd also like to say that "free markets" are a myth. 

Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts

libertarian. so im part of the right wing.

 

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you)

Childish_Spot

Wow, so you don't understand political ideology at all do you?

Nazism is a far right wing ideology in which rights are severly restricted, communism and socialism are left wing ideology that support mixed or non capitalistic economys, and the left supports greater social freedoms.

Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts

I don't know or care, but somewhere there is an optimal tax rate. Now it's clearly not 0% and it's clearly not 100%. So what is it? That is a good question.

I'd also like to say that "free markets" are a myth.

SpaceMoose
Free market for some things isn't a myth.
Avatar image for lugiemojeed
lugiemojeed

8785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 lugiemojeed
Member since 2004 • 8785 Posts
I'm a socialist hehehe nah, i really dont know what party i support
Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
[QUOTE="Childish_Spot"]

libertarian. so im part of the right wing.

 

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you)

yoshi-lnex

Wow, so you don't understand political ideology at all do you?

Nazism is a far right wing ideology in which rights are severly restricted, communism and socialism are left wing ideology that support mixed or non capitalistic economys, and the left supports greater social freedoms.

Yep. Pretty much.
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
I support socialist economic policys and liberal social policys, it provides the greatest freedom and benifit for people at both ends.
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#16 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
commie, of course.
Avatar image for DJ-PRIME90
DJ-PRIME90

11292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#17 DJ-PRIME90
Member since 2004 • 11292 Posts
liberal.
Avatar image for Flow4U
Flow4U

1529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Flow4U
Member since 2007 • 1529 Posts
Communism is great :), *Ding Dong* government at my door again :(
Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts
I'm a liberal Democrat.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Independent. 
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#21 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
"Follower of the true path. Elevated beyond categorizing oneself and others to make things simp--".....sorry, sorry.I had one of those moments. I don't have a political affiliation, but I don't mind change if it benefits the positive.
Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
Communism is great :), *Ding Dong* government at my door again :(Flow4U
It's just me selling Commie cookies. :)
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I support socialist economic policys and liberal social policys, it provides the greatest freedom and benifit for people at both ends.yoshi-lnex

I've seen few examples of socialist countries where their economies allow people freedom.  Maybe some of the scandinavian countries, but they really aren't socialist.

Avatar image for the_leet_kid
the_leet_kid

9951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 the_leet_kid
Member since 2005 • 9951 Posts

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you) 

Childish_Spot

Was that a serious comment?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Antidisestablishmentarianist.
Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts
[QUOTE="Childish_Spot"]

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you)

the_leet_kid

Was that a serious comment?

Lets hope not.
Avatar image for Nisstyre_56
Nisstyre_56

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Nisstyre_56
Member since 2006 • 2849 Posts
A Socialist
Avatar image for romocop33
romocop33

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 romocop33
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]I support socialist economic policys and liberal social policys, it provides the greatest freedom and benifit for people at both ends.sonicare

I've seen few examples of socialist countries where their economies allow people freedom. Maybe some of the scandinavian countries, but they really aren't socialist.

socialism might work if the US ever gave it a chance. president allende (elected by the people) of chile was a stanch socialist and he was improving the country without destroying the economy. too bad the CIA helped replace him with one of the most ruthless dictators the world has ever seen.

Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts
independant with right wing ideas.
Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts
hmm, which of these is not like the other
Avatar image for danteswrath2000
danteswrath2000

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 danteswrath2000
Member since 2005 • 428 Posts

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]I support socialist economic policys and liberal social policys, it provides the greatest freedom and benifit for people at both ends.sonicare

I've seen few examples of socialist countries where their economies allow people freedom.  Maybe some of the scandinavian countries, but they really aren't socialist.

Economic freedom is complicated. Socialism rests on the principle that competition shouldn't be abolished but played on an equal level (allowing more social mobility). Clearly you think that restrictions placed on people to achieve this results in less freedom, but I disagree. Free markets lead to a maldistribution of wealth.
Avatar image for oscar530
oscar530

4430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 oscar530
Member since 2005 • 4430 Posts
I don't care anything but communism is fine with me
Avatar image for PlayedThemAll
PlayedThemAll

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 PlayedThemAll
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts
I have no political affiliation. It serves no point... except for insecure school boys and school girls, who have no self esteem. Why do I say this? Because you feel insecure with your own ideas and so you form a orginization to represent them. Idiotic.
Avatar image for danteswrath2000
danteswrath2000

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 danteswrath2000
Member since 2005 • 428 Posts
I don't care anything but communism is fine with me oscar530
Fascism is fine with you, but communism isn't? 
Avatar image for 1ND1FF3R3NT
1ND1FF3R3NT

3162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 1ND1FF3R3NT
Member since 2006 • 3162 Posts

Socially speaking, I am mostly conservative...for example, I will never vote for a candidate who supports abortion or gay rights (that's right, I might not be voting in 2008 ). However I am against the death penalty, in principle.

Economically, I am also mostly conservative. The only issue I am liberal on is corporate control of the media.

Global warming, etc....I don't really care. I'll drive what I want, eat what I want, and break all the damn styrofoam I want.

Avatar image for The___OoofMich
The___OoofMich

1327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 The___OoofMich
Member since 2006 • 1327 Posts
im independent. i mix and match w/ different parties. i consider myself more republican, however i will probaly vote for barack obama
Avatar image for danteswrath2000
danteswrath2000

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 danteswrath2000
Member since 2005 • 428 Posts
Social conservatives are priggs. 
Avatar image for Jhonie_Fklits25
Jhonie_Fklits25

671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 Jhonie_Fklits25
Member since 2005 • 671 Posts
me= republican, what about you?mesocoo89

Me too.
Avatar image for callmewaffle
callmewaffle

905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 callmewaffle
Member since 2007 • 905 Posts

I'm a whig.  Ohhhh yeah. 8)

 

The_Ish

I'm the anti-masonry  party.  Fine, don't teach us the secret handshake.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="Childish_Spot"]

libertarian. so im part of the right wing.

 

right wing = freedoms

left = communism and socialism (related to nazism mind you)

Greatgone12

You've got it wrong.

Yes, left is Communism and SOME socialism, but National Socialism falls under right wing ideals. I'm not bashing either, Communism is equally as bad. Libertarian is also in the center, I believe it's social liberalism and economic conservatism.

 

Yeah, that's what Libertarianism is.  Socially liberal and economically conservative.  Which is what I am; but, unlike some, I'm not Anti-Communist.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
I'm nothing. I try to not be anyway.
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
Unless I'm running for something I don't see why I need a party.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"]

[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]I support socialist economic policys and liberal social policys, it provides the greatest freedom and benifit for people at both ends.danteswrath2000

I've seen few examples of socialist countries where their economies allow people freedom.  Maybe some of the scandinavian countries, but they really aren't socialist.

Economic freedom is complicated. Socialism rests on the principle that competition shouldn't be abolished but played on an equal level (allowing more social mobility). Clearly you think that restrictions placed on people to achieve this results in less freedom, but I disagree. Free markets lead to a maldistribution of wealth.

By definition, restrictions lead to less freedom.  Capitalism is an imperfect system, full of flaws.  There certainly needs to be some regulation to promote a more equal distribution of assets.  However, it's just better than the alternative.

 Also, for clarification, my reference to less freedom had less to do with legal restrictions and more to do with the economic situations of many/most socialistic countries.  The people of the USSR, China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, etc. haven't really benefitted from the "social revolution" that their countries governments were all founded on.  Many proponents of communism/socialsim state that this is because those countries never developed into the socialistic utopia.  But what they fail to realize is that's the underlying problem with sociaism -> it's purely idealistic and not readily attainable on any large scale.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

By definition, restrictions lead to less freedom.

sonicare
By definition, yes; practically, not always. In this case, restricting corporations prevents a minority (compay) from have an absorbitant amount of power over a majority, thereby depriving them of power (freedom).
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

I bet most of you guys who are anti-communists/socialists don't even know what it is......

I saw one write "anything but communism"......what an idiot

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I bet most of you guys who are anti-communists/socialists don't even know what it is......

I saw one write "anything but communism"......what an idiot

jointed

It's an unattainable ideal.  Every major country that has tried to adopt true communism, has only had it corrupted ala Stalinism or maoism.  I even have issues with the ideal communist or socialist state because I think that it takes to much away from the individual, but that's not even the main problem.

Certainly, on small scales it can work.  And some countries can implement forms of it, i.e. many european governments have many socialistic policies - but none of them are true socialistic states.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

It's an unattainable ideal. Every major country that has tried to adopt true communism, has only had it corrupted ala Stalinism or maoism. I even have issues with the ideal communist or socialist state because I think that it takes to much away from the individual, but that's not even the main problem.

Certainly, on small scales it can work. And some countries can implement forms of it, i.e. many european governments have many socialistic policies - but none of them are true socialistic states.

sonicare
Socialism is not communism; they're very different concepts. Communism is now impossible because we no longer live in an agricultural society. Communism, the original idea of it, doesn't stifle the individual at all, not my concept of it at least. I'm essentially talking about communes like the famous Kabutz in Israel, that kind of operation.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"]

It's an unattainable ideal. Every major country that has tried to adopt true communism, has only had it corrupted ala Stalinism or maoism. I even have issues with the ideal communist or socialist state because I think that it takes to much away from the individual, but that's not even the main problem.

Certainly, on small scales it can work. And some countries can implement forms of it, i.e. many european governments have many socialistic policies - but none of them are true socialistic states.

quiglythegreat

Socialism is not communism; they're very different concepts. Communism is now impossible because we no longer live in an agricultural society. Communism, the original idea of it, doesn't stifle the individual at all, not my concept of it at least. I'm essentially talking about communes like the famous Kabutz in Israel, that kind of operation.

They're not different concepts.  Communism is a form of socialism, a branch of it in sense.

Communism is based on a mutual ownership of property/capital - eliminating any sense of difference or advantage between people.  In a sense, emphasis on the group rather than the individual.  There are good and bad points to that, but I stand by our individual rights.

Avatar image for Guiltfeeder566
Guiltfeeder566

10068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Guiltfeeder566
Member since 2005 • 10068 Posts

Communist FTW

j/k

Democrate and liberal

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="sonicare"]

It's an unattainable ideal. Every major country that has tried to adopt true communism, has only had it corrupted ala Stalinism or maoism. I even have issues with the ideal communist or socialist state because I think that it takes to much away from the individual, but that's not even the main problem.

Certainly, on small scales it can work. And some countries can implement forms of it, i.e. many european governments have many socialistic policies - but none of them are true socialistic states.

sonicare

Socialism is not communism; they're very different concepts. Communism is now impossible because we no longer live in an agricultural society. Communism, the original idea of it, doesn't stifle the individual at all, not my concept of it at least. I'm essentially talking about communes like the famous Kabutz in Israel, that kind of operation.

They're not different concepts. Communism is a form of socialism, a branch of it in sense.

Communism is based on a mutual ownership of property/capital - eliminating any sense of difference or advantage between people. In a sense, emphasis on the group rather than the individual. There are good and bad points to that, but I stand by our individual rights.

Socialism is when the government heavily regulates the economy. Communism is when there is no government.