Do you believe in evolution, OT?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

My whole family thinks I'm nuts because I believe in the single cell -> complex life method of evolution. As far as I'm concerned, it's a scientific certianty that's evidenced by the fossil record and DNA analysis.

But then again, my whole family is so conservative that they bleed red...err..fvck....I mean...they bleed Sean Hannity Serum. There's no getting through to them...as far as they are concerned, anyone who proposes evidence of evolution is attacking their faith-based beliefs and values.

How do you stand on this matter, OT? What say you?

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
long term evolution hasn't really been proven yet. even then, it's still just a theory. we don't know if it's fact or not.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts
Yes, I do. There is overwhelming evidence in support of it.
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts
imo, if you don't believe in it, you either haven't studied it or you're completely blind and ignorant. there's simply too much evidence supporting it, and nothing that disproves it.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

long term evolution hasn't really been proven yet. even then, it's still just a theory. we don't know if it's fact or not.ZumaJones07

You obvously have no idea what a scientific theory is.

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observationand experiment.Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation

br0kenrabbit
long term evolution has never been observed
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
I'm a biologist, plus I'm not a retard...so 'yes'.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
There's no belief, there's simply understanding. The process of natural selection is beautiful in its elegance and simplicity, and once you understand it, it's easy to believe that all life started as simpler than even a single cell. The process of natural selection even helps in the understanding of abiogenesis.
Avatar image for Captain52
Captain52

448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Captain52
Member since 2008 • 448 Posts
Yes, I believe in Evolution, and I think its something you shouldn't have to believe in as its a fact its real and exists anyway, there should be enough evidence to prove that its a fact.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation

ZumaJones07

i don't think long term evolution has been observed

It's called the fossil record/DNA analysis. It's fact. Period.

If you've studied it at all this wouldn't even be a question.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
Yes, I do. There is overwhelming evidence in support of it.jimkabrhel
Avatar image for Skarwolf
Skarwolf

2718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#12 Skarwolf
Member since 2006 • 2718 Posts

One thing I'm curious about and national geographic this month touches on it, but there are no definitive answers.

Why all mammals have 4 digits & a thumb ? All of them do, although there is variation they all have 4 fingers & a thumb. Scientists don't know why.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
DNA analysis and fossils exist in the present not the past. evolution has not been observed. it's been studied, but not observed. therefore it is not certain if it's true.
Avatar image for deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d

7914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
Member since 2005 • 7914 Posts
If we came from a common organism howcome i can't reproduce with monkeys if i evolved from them. if evolution was real i should be able to reproduce with a fish
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

One thing I'm curious about and national geographic this month touches on it, but there are no definitive answers.

Why all mammals have 5 digits & a thumb ? All of them do, although there is variation they all have 5 fingers & a thumb. Scientists don't know why.

Skarwolf
Common ancestor? :roll:
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#16 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

DNA analysis and fossils exist in the present not the past. evolution has not been observed. it's been studied, but not observed. therefore it is not certain if it's true. which it probably isn't.ZumaJones07

You're so wrong, and that's just ONE example among many.

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
I do not. I accept evolution as the most accurate explanation of the objective, verifiable and demonstrable MOUNTAIN of evidence we have collected regarding the state of species of living things adapting to their changing environment. To say one "believes in" a scientific theory is to sell short the (probably) billions of man-hours put into it's elucidation and understanding. One believes in the existence/non-existence of God or other unverifiable or unexplainable concept. They do not (not) believe in a factual occurence.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

DNA analysis and fossils exist in the present not the past. evolution has not been observed. it's been studied, but not observed. therefore it is not certain if it's true. which it probably isn't.ZumaJones07
Fruit flies. It's been observed in fruit flies. It's also obvious when you realize the issues with so called "superbugs", the bacteria that are immune to antibiodics.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
Nope In the bible, God created the heavens and the earth, and all the animals and man(as we currently are today). He said it himself. Who are you to question the word of a supernatural, all powerful God?
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

If we came from a common organism howcome i can't reproduce with monkeys if i evolved from them. if evolution was real i should be able to reproduce with a fishplaymynutz

For the same reason speciation (an offspring not being able to reproduce with like-members of its parents but is able to reproduce with like-members of its siblings) have been observed in the lab.

Avatar image for cybrcatter
cybrcatter

16210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 cybrcatter
Member since 2003 • 16210 Posts

If we came from a common organism howcome i can't reproduce with monkeys if i evolved from them. if evolution was real i should be able to reproduce with a fishplaymynutz
Have you ever tried?

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]DNA analysis and fossils exist in the present not the past. evolution has not been observed. it's been studied, but not observed. therefore it is not certain if it's true. which it probably isn't.br0kenrabbit

You're so wrong, and that's just ONE example among many.

that's not long term. i said long term evolution has not been observed, like fish to humans, thus the theory is still uncertain.
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]Nope In the bible, God created the heavens and the earth, and all the animals and man(as we currently are today). He said it himself. Who are you to question the word of a supernatural, all powerful God?

Go troll elsewhere
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#24 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
If we came from a common organism howcome i can't reproduce with monkeys if i evolved from them. if evolution was real i should be able to reproduce with a fishplaymynutz
You couldn't be that stupid
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#25 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

Nope In the bible, God created the heavens and the earth, and all the animals and man(as we currently are today). He said it himself. Who are you to question the word of a supernatural, all powerful God?Nibroc420

I believe in Zeus. How dare you question the mighty God of Olympus? Who do you think you are to do so?

(See, I can play that game, too.)

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
[...] like fish to humans [...] ZumaJones07
._. Ah, what the hell... The fossil record shows this. Just over millions of separate generations. Evolution does not, and has never, claimed that a fish will one day give birth to a human. This is not how biology works. And I hope you are joking, because this level of stupidity would be clinical.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#27 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]DNA analysis and fossils exist in the present not the past. evolution has not been observed. it's been studied, but not observed. therefore it is not certain if it's true. which it probably isn't.ZumaJones07

You're so wrong, and that's just ONE example among many.

that's not long term. i said long term evolution has not been observed, like fish to humans, thus the theory is still uncertain.

44,000 generations is pretty long-term. Get your termonology right.

And yes, we have observed 'long-term' evolution via the fossil record and via vestigial DNA. You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] [...] like fish to humans [...] Zeviander
._. Ah, what the hell... The fossil record shows this. Just over millions of separate generations. Evolution does not, and has never, claimed that a fish will one day give birth to a human. This is not how biology works. And I hope you are joking, because this level of stupidity would be clinical.

Here we go again, Science changing it's tune. >It's this >Actually no, that's wrong it's this. >Hold up guys, that was wrong too, i think it's this new thing. There's no agreed consensus in the "scientific community", as to what form of evolution is correct, they're all theories. (aka, guesses). Meanwhile God is watching us all, hoping that one day his sheep will move as one flock.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

Check the poll. So far, the only dissenters in this thread are trolls or devil's advocates.

Edit: And, past this post, what I said no longer applies.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I've never met anyone in real life who didn't. Anyone who does not after being introduced to the workings of it is a complete moron, and I don't throw around that title around easily.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="playmynutz"]If we came from a common organism howcome i can't reproduce with monkeys if i evolved from them. if evolution was real i should be able to reproduce with a fishcybrcatter

Have you ever tried?

5771_4e5f.jpeg

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#32 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

There's no agreed consensus in the "scientific community", as to what form of evolution is correct, they're all theories. (aka, guesses). Meanwhile God is watching us all, hoping that one day his sheep will move as one flock.Nibroc420

I gave the definition of scientific theory above. They're not 'just gueses'.

You should have learned what a scientific theory is in Junior High, what happened?

Avatar image for cybrcatter
cybrcatter

16210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 cybrcatter
Member since 2003 • 16210 Posts

[QUOTE="cybrcatter"]

[QUOTE="playmynutz"]If we came from a common organism howcome i can't reproduce with monkeys if i evolved from them. if evolution was real i should be able to reproduce with a fishwis3boi

Have you ever tried?

Pleasure_05a743_262857.jpg

ivPoN.jpg


I'll assume that's a pic from Motherless.

Avatar image for Dystopian-X
Dystopian-X

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Dystopian-X
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts



I'll assume that's a pic from Motherless.

cybrcatter

It's wis3boi.

Probably just some stupid old meme.

Avatar image for CRS98
CRS98

9036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#35 CRS98
Member since 2004 • 9036 Posts
Tell them they're insane and see how they feel.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="cybrcatter"]

I'll assume that's a pic from Motherless.

Dystopian-X

It's wis3boi.

Probably just some stupid old meme.

ummm....no

Avatar image for LZ71
LZ71

10524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 LZ71
Member since 2008 • 10524 Posts
No, just like I don't "believe" in cells either.
Avatar image for mindstorm
mindstorm

15255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 mindstorm
Member since 2003 • 15255 Posts
Sure I do accept the idea that species can adapt and evolve in their environment over many generations, yes. However, I have not yet been fully convinced that all living things on this earth descended from a sole single-celled organism. I hold to a form of Old Earth Creationism.
Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

YES because its actually been proven..and we can see hints of it in our daily lives.

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts
[QUOTE="mindstorm"]Sure I do accept the idea that species can adapt and evolve in their environment over many generations, yes. However, I have not yet been fully convinced that all living things on this earth descended from a sole single-celled organism. I hold to a form of Old Earth Creationism.

If you accept the idea of evolution, then there must be a starting point, what do you think that is?
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#41 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

Sure I do accept the idea that species can adapt and evolve in their environment over many generations, yes. However, I have not yet been fully convinced that all living things on this earth descended from a sole single-celled organism. I hold to a form of Old Earth Creationism.mindstorm

Then explain devolving complexity the further down the strata you go. Complex life-->less complex life--->sea life--->single-celled life.

Also, explain vestigial DNA.

Again, only about half your DNA is even human.

Avatar image for almasdeathchild
almasdeathchild

8922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#42 almasdeathchild
Member since 2011 • 8922 Posts

yep

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

Evolution is technically a theory but i seen enough evidence to believe in it

Avatar image for mindstorm
mindstorm

15255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 mindstorm
Member since 2003 • 15255 Posts
[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Sure I do accept the idea that species can adapt and evolve in their environment over many generations, yes. However, I have not yet been fully convinced that all living things on this earth descended from a sole single-celled organism. I hold to a form of Old Earth Creationism.

If you accept the idea of evolution, then there must be a starting point, what do you think that is?

Jesus saying, "Hey universe, you can come out of non-existence now." Now, the details of how this happened if one were to actually observe it, I do not know. My view certainly allows for the possibility of a God-guided form of evolution but I just haven't bought into certain aspects of it.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

Evolution is technically a theory but i seen enough evidence to believe in it

Chris_Williams

Technically, you don't know what you're talking about. I've posted this in this thread already, it's sad that I have to post it again:

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observationand experiment.Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.

It's sad that I have to post it at all, that's Junior-High stuff right there.

Avatar image for Bane_09
Bane_09

3394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Bane_09
Member since 2010 • 3394 Posts

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

Evolution is technically a theory but i seen enough evidence to believe in it

br0kenrabbit

Technically, you don't know what you're talking about. I've posted this in this thread already, it's sad that I have to post it again:

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observationand experiment.Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.

It's sad that I have to post it at all, that's Junior-High stuff right there.

I hate explaining what the word theory means in science over and over. People can be so fvcking dumb

If you don't "believe" in evolution you are either really stupid or blinded by faith.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#47 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="mindstorm"]Sure I do accept the idea that species can adapt and evolve in their environment over many generations, yes. However, I have not yet been fully convinced that all living things on this earth descended from a sole single-celled organism. I hold to a form of Old Earth Creationism.mindstorm
If you accept the idea of evolution, then there must be a starting point, what do you think that is?

Jesus saying, "Hey universe, you can come out of non-existence now." Now, the details of how this happened if one were to actually observe it, I do not know. My view certainly allows for the possibility of a God-guided form of evolution but I just haven't bought into certain aspects of it.

I'll be the first to admit that there is room for theology in a 'first cause' (and I'll also admit that that doesn't necessarily make it so), but the physical, tangible evidence for single-cell life evolving into everything we see about us is pretty solid.

Basically, there's room for God before the Big Bang. He could have set things in motion, and if he did so, it's pretty clear that evolution is how he went about it.

Keep in mind that some theories such as String Theory have room for extra-spacial dimensions beyond our 3D+1 in which all of time in our spacial dimensions could be viewed as a singularity (meaning you can see time from beginning to end occurring in a single instance if you could move outside our 3D perception and into one of the other spacial dimensions) so perhaps this explains Gods foreknowledge. So it's not that he's actually guiding evolution currently or at any time in the post-big-bang past, but that he sat events in motion in the beginning so that they would occur 'just so'.

You gotta admit, God has a scientific mind. Right?

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

Evolution is technically a theory but i seen enough evidence to believe in it

br0kenrabbit

Technically, you don't know what you're talking about. I've posted this in this thread already, it's sad that I have to post it again:

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observationand experiment.Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.

It's sad that I have to post it at all, that's Junior-High stuff right there.

oh, i thought you weren't going to act like a jacka** for once, boy was i wrong. Evolution is both a fact and a theory, if it was just a fact you wouldn't be asking the question "DO YOU BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION", would you ask DO YOU BELIEVE IN OXYGEN? No, because its been proven and unless you have the only time machine in the world you can't prove that it isn't a theory but their is strong evidence to support Evolution its just scientists can't come out and declare it as fact and like i said i believe in Evolution

EDIT: i got confused, evolution is in fact a fact, you should be asking if people believe in Natural Selection which is a theory of evolution . my bad peeps, my bad jacka**

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#49 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
Who knows? Maybe it was aliens or God.
Avatar image for Bane_09
Bane_09

3394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Bane_09
Member since 2010 • 3394 Posts

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

Evolution is technically a theory but i seen enough evidence to believe in it

Chris_Williams

Technically, you don't know what you're talking about. I've posted this in this thread already, it's sad that I have to post it again:

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observationand experiment.Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.

It's sad that I have to post it at all, that's Junior-High stuff right there.

oh, i thought you weren't going to act like a jacka** for once, boy was i wrong. Evolution is both a fact and a theory, if it was just a fact you wouldn't be asking the question "DO YOU BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION", would you ask DO YOU BELIEVE IN OXYGEN? No, because its been proven and unless you have the only time machine in the world you can't prove that it isn't a theory but their is strong evidence to support Evolution its just scientists can't come out and declare it as fact and like i said i believe in Evolution

I would wager that most scientists consider it a fact.