I believe its perfectly ok, homosexuals are no different from the rest of us. Not allowing them to get married is a form of discrimination IMO seeing as how everyone is supposed to equal and all.
Homosuexuality is not considered a mental disorder so I'm for same-sex marriage. So long as they're not harming anyone, why should they be unallowed to pursue their own happiness?
i came in here hoping to see a war with people writing entire arguments on how the gays will one day ruin america and whatnot and lawl at the battle.. but everybody agreeing? on the SAME answer? well i never..
I support it. To be against it is to be against freedom. Women and blacks overcame their oppression, it is just a matter of time before gays overcome theirs.
Marriage is outdated anyway, so I don't really see the point outside of for legal benefits. Denying them legal benefits would be a bit of a dick move, but I can't say I really care about the issue as a whole.
I think same sex marriages increase the potentional for adoption, so that's a good thing. Of course, there's always the artifical route, but adoption is always an option. Other than that, I don't think too much about it,
Marriage is outdated anyway, so I don't really see the point outside of for legal benefits. Denying them legal benefits would be a bit of a dick move, but I can't say I really care about the issue as a whole.
Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?
Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?
peter1191
You're comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest, and pedophilia. That is idiotic.
Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?
PannicAtack
You're comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest, and pedophilia. That is idiotic. I found it rather accurate actually. Depending on the animal though it could hurt someone. Maybe.
Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?
Ca_shadow
You're comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest, and pedophilia. That is idiotic. I found it rather accurate actually. Depending on the animal though it could hurt someone. Maybe. Yes, words of wisdom, from the person who likes dehumanizing gays.
Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?
PannicAtack
You're comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest, and pedophilia. That is idiotic.
Lol how so? The only reason it is acceptable is the simple fact that society has lived with it, so our horror towards such behavior has diminished to acceptance. Really, there is no difference. All of it is unnatural. Most ppl use religious arguements to substantiate their views. Ok, I agree. But what about evolutionary agruements? Is it possible that humans would be sexually attracted to their own gender? Doesn't this inhibit reproduction? Isn't this a "flaw" of human nature, if it is innate (aka born w/homosexuality) rather than developed? Just some things to contemplate as society slips into ever increasing acceptance of insanity.
There's a large difference between voicing an opinion and being blatantly offensive.
Sorry if you find my opinion offensive. I feel rather strongly on this. I've been forced to be aware that these things exist afterall. Of course your opinion is offensive, you called a very large group of people animals.
Sorry if you find my opinion offensive. I feel rather strongly on this. I've been forced to be aware that these things exist afterall.Ca_shadow
I too feel very strongly about this. And being called a "freaking animal" because of something far beyond my choice is clearly in violation of the terms of service. Which I'm sure you have yet to actually read.
Lol how so? The only reason it is acceptable is the simple fact that society has lived with it, so our horror towards such behavior has diminished to acceptance. Really, there is no difference. All of it is unnatural. Most ppl use religious arguements to substantiate their views. Ok, I agree. But what about evolutionary agruements? Is it possible that humans would be sexually attracted to their own gender? Doesn't this inhibit reproduction? Isn't this a "flaw" of human nature, if it is innate (aka born w/homosexuality) rather than developed? Just some things to contemplate as society slips into ever increasing acceptance of insanity.
peter1191
If that's the case, aren't heterosexual couples who are unable to birth a child just as unnatural. And last I checked, they were allowed to marry one another.
01. Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.
02. Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
03. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.
04. Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.
05. Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Britany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.
06. Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.
07. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.
08. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.
09. Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.
10. Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.
Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no.
ghoklebutter
you don't see it because you chose to be blind. open your eyes to truth.
Devil's advocate: Humans are not animals in the psychological sense.
yes we are. Every species has psychological differences. Ours just happen to be more different than most. That does not make us a different kingdom. Example. We are more psycologically similar to apes than apes are to bees. Are apes also not animals? or is it bees?
Log in to comment