Do you believe same sex marriage is okay?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#201 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]If they want to, people should be able to vote on that issue, and if they get it wrong, it is their country that suffers. Truly, democracy will create governments of the people, by the people, and for the people. When such governments make mistakes, then it is the people, and noone else who are to blame. When you start cementing non-constitutional ideologies into a nation, you dilute democracy, and revert back to other forms of government.Teenaged

There never would be a voting about taxes. Simply because a government cannot allow the citizens to get the chance to vote on something that might put the whole economy in danger. As you see democracy does have boundaries.

I think you are using a very ideal definition of democracy that is not applied in any democratic country.

What non-constitutional ideologies are these?

I was somewhat mistaken there, as I think taxes is a constitutional aspects of most countries. My bad. But that does not change the point of what I was saying. And the concept that same-sex couples should be able to marry, is a non-constitutional ideology.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#202 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[Just because something is not stated specifically as a right in the constitution doesnt mean that depriving a specific group of people does not break some of their rights.

On the other hand I never made an argument from the constitution did I?

...................

LJS9502_basic

You are throwing out the word "rights". The Constitution is where they are defined here. And marriage for anyone is NOT a right. It's either a religious event or a societal event. Thus in the second case society can decide.....which is how democracy works.

Also, society decides about things when if those things change then they affect their lives or if they generally would hurt society as a whole. This issue doesnt affect their lives and it doesnt hurt society.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#203 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]If they want to, people should be able to vote on that issue, and if they get it wrong, it is their country that suffers. Truly, democracy will create governments of the people, by the people, and for the people. When such governments make mistakes, then it is the people, and noone else who are to blame. When you start cementing non-constitutional ideologies into a nation, you dilute democracy, and revert back to other forms of government.MetalGear_Ninty

There never would be a voting about taxes. Simply because a government cannot allow the citizens to get the chance to vote on something that might put the whole economy in danger. As you see democracy does have boundaries.

I think you are using a very ideal definition of democracy that is not applied in any democratic country.

What non-constitutional ideologies are these?

I was somewhat mistaken there, as I think taxes is a constitutional aspects of most countries. My bad. But that does not change the point of what I was saying. And the concept that same-sex couples should be able to marry, is a non-constitutional ideology.

Something being absent from the constitution doesnt necessarily mean its against the constitution.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#204 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You are throwing out the word "rights". The Constitution is where they are defined here. And marriage for anyone is NOT a right. It's either a religious event or a societal event. Thus in the second case society can decide.....which is how democracy works.

LJS9502_basic

In the post that you quoted I only mentioned the word "rights" in reference to what the black people fought for.

So, no, I didnt just throw out the word "rights".

Contradiction much? You just admitted to using it in the post I quoted.:|

No contradiction at all.

In my first response to you I agreed that marriage is not a constitutional right.

I added though that depriving someone of something which is not a constitutional right might be in indirect violation to other constitutional rights he/she has.

Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
People get married to goats too.
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#206 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[Just because something is not stated specifically as a right in the constitution doesnt mean that depriving a specific group of people does not break some of their rights.

On the other hand I never made an argument from the constitution did I?

...................

LJS9502_basic

You are throwing out the word "rights". The Constitution is where they are defined here. And marriage for anyone is NOT a right. It's either a religious event or a societal event. Thus in the second case society can decide.....which is how democracy works.

You're having a laugh, mate. Marriage is an absolute right, in that we are free to enter into it as we see fit. The wedding itself, sure, it's a religious/social event, but the entering of a permanent union between two loving (or non-loving, this is the 21st Century after all) is a right that is open to all. Well, except gays apparently. Seems even the 21st century is not enough of a catalyst to promote open mindedness.
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[Just because something is not stated specifically as a right in the constitution doesnt mean that depriving a specific group of people does not break some of their rights.

On the other hand I never made an argument from the constitution did I?

...................

D3nnyCrane

You are throwing out the word "rights". The Constitution is where they are defined here. And marriage for anyone is NOT a right. It's either a religious event or a societal event. Thus in the second case society can decide.....which is how democracy works.

Seems even the 21st century is not enough of a catalyst to promote open mindedness.

Didn't I just say people can get married to goats too? D:
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#208 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[Just because something is not stated specifically as a right in the constitution doesnt mean that depriving a specific group of people does not break some of their rights.

On the other hand I never made an argument from the constitution did I?

...................

LJS9502_basic

You are throwing out the word "rights". The Constitution is where they are defined here. And marriage for anyone is NOT a right. It's either a religious event or a societal event. Thus in the second case society can decide.....which is how democracy works.

You might want to read the Constitution a bit more carefully then, especially the Ninth Amendment. Basically, you can't call something 'not a right' because it isn't listed in the Constitution.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#209 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]

There never would be a voting about taxes. Simply because a government cannot allow the citizens to get the chance to vote on something that might put the whole economy in danger. As you see democracy does have boundaries.

I think you are using a very ideal definition of democracy that is not applied in any democratic country.

What non-constitutional ideologies are these?

Teenaged

I was somewhat mistaken there, as I think taxes is a constitutional aspects of most countries. My bad. But that does not change the point of what I was saying. And the concept that same-sex couples should be able to marry, is a non-constitutional ideology.

Something being absent from the constitution doesnt necessarily mean its against the constitution.

Indeed. Witness the Ninth Amendment.
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#210 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts

[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You are throwing out the word "rights". The Constitution is where they are defined here. And marriage for anyone is NOT a right. It's either a religious event or a societal event. Thus in the second case society can decide.....which is how democracy works.

LOLTRAIN

Seems even the 21st century is not enough of a catalyst to promote open mindedness.

Didn't I just say people can get married to goats too? D:

I was a page boy at a wedding when I was 4 and thought I was marrying my cousin the flower girl. **** was SO cash.

Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="LOLTRAIN"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"] Seems even the 21st century is not enough of a catalyst to promote open mindedness.D3nnyCrane

Didn't I just say people can get married to goats too? D:

I was a page boy at a wedding when I was 4 and thought I was marrying my cousin the flower girl. **** was SO cash.

Hahaha you were this naughty back then too I see! :o I'd like to see your pervy 4 yo self. :P
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"]

[QUOTE="LOLTRAIN"] Didn't I just say people can get married to goats too? D:LOLTRAIN

I was a page boy at a wedding when I was 4 and thought I was marrying my cousin the flower girl. **** was SO cash.

Hahaha you were this naughty back then too I see! :o I'd like to see your pervy 4 yo self. :P

Oh LOLTRAIN, I feel as if I have made mad love to you in a past incarnation. Love me tender, my beautiful laughing train.
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#213 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts
No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.
Avatar image for Heretix_Aevum
Heretix_Aevum

4105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 Heretix_Aevum
Member since 2005 • 4105 Posts

There should be no problem with it, with anybody.

Avatar image for Heretix_Aevum
Heretix_Aevum

4105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 Heretix_Aevum
Member since 2005 • 4105 Posts

No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5


*Looks at sig*

Sigh...

*Facepalm*

Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#216 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5
Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#217 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5
Yeah this happens with any kind of rules. We are free to break them.

For instance GS users are not to abuse the reporting system. Some people do though. I guess that means we have free will. But you will agree with me that having free will doesnt mean that there are no consequences.. ;-)

Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5
No it's not "not okay". Kthnx.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#219 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.D3nnyCrane
Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

God said so? :?

Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#220 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.D3nnyCrane
Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.D3nnyCrane
Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

Yes yes yes, I'd also like to know.
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#222 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.LOLTRAIN
No it's not "not okay". Kthnx.

I did not use a double negative. My statement should be read just as I wrote it. Thx.
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5
Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

Are you sure they're valid?
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="LOLTRAIN"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5
No it's not "not okay". Kthnx.

I did not use a double negative. My statement should be read just as I wrote it. Thx.

You didn't use it but I did. Thx.
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#225 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Teenaged

Yeah this happens with any kind of rules. We are free to break them.

For instance GS users are not to abuse the reporting system. Some people do though. I guess that means we have free will. But you will agree with me that having free will doesnt mean that there are no consequences.. ;-)

Please don't make this personal..... When debating, it's better to remain detatched.
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#226 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5
Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

No, I listed 2 BS reasons, last accepted around 1974. So try again.
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#227 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts
[QUOTE="LOLTRAIN"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"] Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

Are you sure they're valid?

Yes. I am sure.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#228 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts

If they wanna get married, live happily for a few years, divorce and lose half there worldly pocession.. I say let them.

[spoiler] And lol to the guy in the first page (30 posts a page0 who compared it to the likes of Pedophillia, incest and human-animal relations. Stupidity is a funny thing. :lol: [/spoiler]

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#229 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]No. It's not "okay" at all. But it happens -- and we have free will to do whatever we want.Lansdowne5

Yeah this happens with any kind of rules. We are free to break them.

For instance GS users are not to abuse the reporting system. Some people do though. I guess that means we have free will. But you will agree with me that having free will doesnt mean that there are no consequences.. ;-)

Please don't make this personal..... When debating, it's better to remain detatched.

What? I am talking about free will.... =/

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#230 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

If they wanna get married, live happily for a few years, divorce and lose half there worldly pocession.. I say let them.

RiseAgainst12

Hm, if I were you I would rephrase my spoiler text a bit. I am afraid that mods will not like it... =/

Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#231 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="LOLTRAIN"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

Are you sure they're valid?

Yes. I am sure.

Well.. lets say they are, just for this threads sake.. do you have any other valid reasons?
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#232 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"] Ok, other than the usual "It's not natural" or "marriage is supposed to be between man and woman" BS that gets turfed at this point - how is gay marriage not OK?

You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

No, I listed 2 BS reasons, last accepted around 1974. So try again.

You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="LOLTRAIN"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

Are you sure they're valid?

Yes. I am sure.

OK! :) ^.^
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

No, I listed 2 BS reasons, last accepted around 1974. So try again.

You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.

What is it?
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#235 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".Lansdowne5
No, I listed 2 BS reasons, last accepted around 1974. So try again.

You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.

What is marriage?

Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#236 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"]

If they wanna get married, live happily for a few years, divorce and lose half there worldly pocession.. I say let them.

Teenaged

Hm, if I were you I would rephrase my spoiler text a bit. I am afraid that mods will not like it... =/

Hmm? I don't see anything wrong with it :s
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#237 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Yeah this happens with any kind of rules. We are free to break them.

For instance GS users are not to abuse the reporting system. Some people do though. I guess that means we have free will. But you will agree with me that having free will doesnt mean that there are no consequences.. ;-)

Teenaged

Please don't make this personal..... When debating, it's better to remain detatched.

What? I am talking about free will.... =/

And emphasizing your point by using an example which you know will annoy......
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#238 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] Please don't make this personal..... When debating, it's better to remain detatched. Lansdowne5

What? I am talking about free will.... =/

And emphasizing your point by using an example which you know will annoy......

Annoy whom? :?

Whats wrong with my example? =/

Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#239 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You just listed two perfectly valid reasons. Those which you consider "BS".

No, I listed 2 BS reasons, last accepted around 1974. So try again.

You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.

What is that? The entering of a committed relationship between two loving individuals? Lay this out there - you are saying that homosexuals are less capable and deserving of a relationship than heterosexuals. Put it out there or I can't take you seriously.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#240 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]What? I am talking about free will.... =/

Teenaged

And emphasizing your point by using an example which you know will annoy......

Annoy whom? :?

Whats wrong with my example? =/

I think he has reported you at some point during this thread :P
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#241 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"]

If they wanna get married, live happily for a few years, divorce and lose half there worldly pocession.. I say let them.

RiseAgainst12

Hm, if I were you I would rephrase my spoiler text a bit. I am afraid that mods will not like it... =/

Hmm? I don't see anything wrong with it :s

Well you called him stupid.

Oh well I dont disagree with your opinion but I am just saying. :P You know the mods. :P

Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
Also I'd like to add here that same sex marriages have been taking place since at least 300 AD.
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#243 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"] No, I listed 2 BS reasons, last accepted around 1974. So try again.Teenaged

You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.

What is marriage?

Marriage is a sacramental convenant between two members of the opposite sex which has been established by God. It's a lifelong commitment which in its very essence mirrors the relationship between Christ and his Church (the bride). The man should love his wife as Christ self-sacrifically loved the Church. Basically, it's the joining together of male and female into one body. To quote Jesus - "the two will become one flesh".
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#244 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.Lansdowne5

What is marriage?

Marriage is a sacramental convenant between two members of the opposite sex which has been established by God. It's a lifelong commitment which in its very essence mirrors the relationship between Christ and his Church (the bride). The man should love his wife as Christ self-sacrifically loved the Church. Basically, it's the joining together of male and female into one body. To quote Jesus - "the two will become one flesh".

That's Christian marriage of course. That statement fails to define all marriage, even all religious marriage.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#245 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Hm, if I were you I would rephrase my spoiler text a bit. I am afraid that mods will not like it... =/

Teenaged

Hmm? I don't see anything wrong with it :s

Well you called him stupid.

Oh well I dont disagree with your opinion but I am just saying. :P You know the mods. :P

Oh yea.. well i didn't blatantly call it to him :P Plus i am sure if they read into it they will agree :lol:
Avatar image for LOLTRAIN
LOLTRAIN

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 LOLTRAIN
Member since 2009 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.Lansdowne5

What is marriage?

Marriage is a sacramental convenant between two members of the opposite sex which has been established by God. It's a lifelong commitment which in its very essence mirrors the relationship between Christ and his Church (the bride). The man should love his wife as Christ self-sacrifically loved the Church. Basically, it's the joining together of male and female into one body. To quote Jesus - "the two will become one flesh".

That's the mystery of marriage. There are other kind of marriages too. EDIT: Danm_999 beat me to it D:
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#247 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]What? I am talking about free will.... =/

Teenaged

And emphasizing your point by using an example which you know will annoy......

Annoy whom? :?

Whats wrong with my example? =/

It's personal. As I said. O_o
Avatar image for Lansdowne5
Lansdowne5

6015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#248 Lansdowne5
Member since 2008 • 6015 Posts

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]What is marriage?

LOLTRAIN

Marriage is a sacramental convenant between two members of the opposite sex which has been established by God. It's a lifelong commitment which in its very essence mirrors the relationship between Christ and his Church (the bride). The man should love his wife as Christ self-sacrifically loved the Church. Basically, it's the joining together of male and female into one body. To quote Jesus - "the two will become one flesh".

That's the mystery of marriage. There are other kind of marriages too.

You did not define what type of marriage you were referring to in the OP......

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#249 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] You listed two "BS" reasons which you consider invalid but which are in reality still perfectly acceptable reasons to regard same-sex marriage as "not okay". The very nature of same-sex marriage contradicts what marriage is.Lansdowne5

What is marriage?

Marriage is a sacramental convenant between two members of the opposite sex which has been established by God. It's a lifelong commitment which in its very essence mirrors the relationship between Christ and his Church (the bride). The man should love his wife as Christ self-sacrifically loved the Church. Basically, it's the joining together of male and female into one body. To quote Jesus - "the two will become one flesh".

Like others said: thats the christian definition of marriage taken by a fundamentalist view at that!

I am talking about the notion of marriage in its more abstract sense.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#250 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"] And emphasizing your point by using an example which you know will annoy...... Lansdowne5

Annoy whom? :?

Whats wrong with my example? =/

It's personal. As I said. O_o

I dont see how... O_o

Why is it personal? Do you have some idea you would like to share with me? I would like to know...