do you respect US soldiers?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]

To be fair, the Japanese Imperial Army perpetrated numerous atrocities/genocides against the peoples they conquered. That still doesn't justify the bombings of Hiro/Naga though.

LJS9502_basic
Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....

Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180074 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]

To be fair, the Japanese Imperial Army perpetrated numerous atrocities/genocides against the peoples they conquered. That still doesn't justify the bombings of Hiro/Naga though.

kuraimen

Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....

Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...

An economic center is NOT a military center. Period. Don't care how your bias spins it...that's bull ****

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#203 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Better topic would be "Do you respect soldiers?" I'd be more interested to see what people think of soldiers from their own country and not a potential foreign nation.

Avatar image for Nayef_shroof
Nayef_shroof

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 Nayef_shroof
Member since 2011 • 709 Posts
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]

To be fair, the Japanese Imperial Army perpetrated numerous atrocities/genocides against the peoples they conquered. That still doesn't justify the bombings of Hiro/Naga though.

LJS9502_basic
Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....

...They were predominantly civilian areas with military infrastructure scattered throughout. Don't try to justify the slaughter of over 400,000 individuals. In fact, if we were to reverse the situation (Japans dropping nukes on U.S. cities) you wouldn't defend their actions...
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....LJS9502_basic

Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...

An economic center is NOT a military center. Period. Don't care how your bias spins it...that's bull ****

Yes it is, it's like a resource center. In all wars militaries attack targets that weaken their enemy economically.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Better topic would be "Do you respect soldiers?" I'd be more interested to see what people think of soldiers from their own country and not a potential foreign nation.

sonicare
My country doesn't have an army but talking from a Latinamerican perspective (since I consider myself a Latinamerican more than a Costa Rican) many consider them a necessary evil but many times just an evil. Armies for Latinamerica have been mainly tools to control and oppress their own populations. They have served more as tools for the US foreign policy than actual protectors of their own people.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#207 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Better topic would be "Do you respect soldiers?" I'd be more interested to see what people think of soldiers from their own country and not a potential foreign nation.

kuraimen
My country doesn't have an army but talking from a Latinamerican perspective (since I consider myself a Latinamerican more than a Costa Rican) many consider them a necessary evil but many times just an evil. Armies for Latinamerica have been mainly tools to control and oppress their own populations. They have served more as tools for the US foreign policy than actual protectors of their own people.

Our soldiers aren't corrupt themselves, but obviously, sometimes the wars they fight in can be corrupt. I feel bad that so many of these young kids will sacrifice their lives for somebody else's benefit.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180074 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]

To be fair, the Japanese Imperial Army perpetrated numerous atrocities/genocides against the peoples they conquered. That still doesn't justify the bombings of Hiro/Naga though.

Nayef_shroof
Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....

...They were predominantly civilian areas with military infrastructure scattered throughout. Don't try to justify the slaughter of over 400,000 individuals. In fact, if we were to reverse the situation (Japans dropping nukes on U.S. cities) you wouldn't defend their actions...

Wrong. Hiroshima, an embarkation port and industrial center that was the site of a major military headquarters; A number of military camps were located nearby, including the headquarters of Field Marshal Shunroku Hata's 2nd General Army Headquarters, which commanded the defense of all of southern Japan.[Also present in Hiroshima was the headquarters of the Fifty-Ninth Army, and most of the 224th Division, Hiroshima was a minor supply and logistics base for the Japanese military. The city was a communications center, a storage point, and an assembly area for troops. It was one of several Japanese cities left deliberately untouched by American bombing, allowing a pristine environment to measure the damage caused by the atomic bomb Nagasaki....The city of Nagasaki had been one of the largest sea ports in southern Japan and was of great wartime importance because of its wide-ranging industrial activity, including the production of ordnance, ships, military equipment, and other war materials. Assorted copy and paste about the importance of the cities.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180074 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...kuraimen

An economic center is NOT a military center. Period. Don't care how your bias spins it...that's bull ****

Yes it is, it's like a resource center. In all wars militaries attack targets that weaken their enemy economically.

Bull sh*t man. They were civilian towers. Period. Don't you ever get tired of justifying terrorism? For that matter ALL 4 PLANES WERE CIVILIAN that were hijacked. Your hypocrisy is appalling.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sonicare"]

Better topic would be "Do you respect soldiers?" I'd be more interested to see what people think of soldiers from their own country and not a potential foreign nation.

sonicare
My country doesn't have an army but talking from a Latinamerican perspective (since I consider myself a Latinamerican more than a Costa Rican) many consider them a necessary evil but many times just an evil. Armies for Latinamerica have been mainly tools to control and oppress their own populations. They have served more as tools for the US foreign policy than actual protectors of their own people.

Our soldiers aren't corrupt themselves, but obviously, sometimes the wars they fight in can be corrupt. I feel bad that so many of these young kids will sacrifice their lives for somebody else's benefit.

Many regard soldiers as people who just follow rules without questioning and thinking (which is in part their job) so they're really dangerous for a functioning and just society. The same happens in my country with the police. Sometimes they do a job that is basically helping a few benefit over everyone else but they fail to realize it.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] An economic center is NOT a military center. Period. Don't care how your bias spins it...that's bull ****LJS9502_basic
Yes it is, it's like a resource center. In all wars militaries attack targets that weaken their enemy economically.

Bull sh*t man. They were civilian towers. Period. Don't you ever get tired of justifying terrorism? For that matter ALL 4 PLANES WERE CIVILIAN that were hijacked. Your hypocrisy is appalling.

I'm not justifying it I'm just using your same reasoning. I see the 9/11 attacks and the Hiroshima/Nagasaki attacks equally disgusting acts of terrorism. But normally those who attack use euphemisms to justify massacres. A massacre is a massacre.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180074 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yes it is, it's like a resource center. In all wars militaries attack targets that weaken their enemy economically.

Bull sh*t man. They were civilian towers. Period. Don't you ever get tired of justifying terrorism? For that matter ALL 4 PLANES WERE CIVILIAN that were hijacked. Your hypocrisy is appalling.

I'm not justifying it I'm just using your same reasoning. I see the 9/11 attacks and the Hiroshima/Nagasaki attacks equally disgusting acts of terrorism. But normally those who attack use euphemisms to justify massacres. A massacre is a massacre.

A military target is just that. An economic tower is not. If you don't see the difference there is not help for you. And thus any discussion with you is pointless.
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Better topic would be "Do you respect soldiers?" I'd be more interested to see what people think of soldiers from their own country and not a potential foreign nation.

sonicare

A military career is a valid option if you live in a country that isn't at war. Three meals every day, a roof over your head, a chance to get a degree and, if you are good at it and get to go through all the hard times, you can become a Colonel or something, which means you will make a pretty damn nice living.

Now, if your country is at war and you actually choose a military career knowing that there's a big chance that you'll be sent to another country to kill people, you are either a sociopath or a full-blown moron. Problem is, of course, that 'Murrica seems to be at war all the time, so... This, of course, doesn't apply if your country is at war because it's being invaded; then you are doing an admirable thing.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Bull sh*t man. They were civilian towers. Period. Don't you ever get tired of justifying terrorism? For that matter ALL 4 PLANES WERE CIVILIAN that were hijacked. Your hypocrisy is appalling.

I'm not justifying it I'm just using your same reasoning. I see the 9/11 attacks and the Hiroshima/Nagasaki attacks equally disgusting acts of terrorism. But normally those who attack use euphemisms to justify massacres. A massacre is a massacre.

A military target is just that. An economic tower is not. If you don't see the difference there is not help for you. And thus any discussion with you is pointless.

Glad we disagree. The minute I agree with you I'm gonna start to get worried...
Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#215 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

Well, the few Ive met were rather respectable if not a bit strange, and stiff in thier ways. Had fairly good food too ^^ Of the Different Nationalities of Soldiers Ive met, the US, German, and UK soldiers were by far the most polite and helpful.

Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

I feel sad reading all these hate messages towards soldiers..

Avatar image for slipknot0129
slipknot0129

5832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 slipknot0129
Member since 2008 • 5832 Posts

Ive never thought of soldiers as people who protect our freedom.

Its our country as a whole that protects our freedom.

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#218 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="m25105"] So why are you saying that the current soldiers provide you with freedom of speech?BossPerson
Well, one way to look at it is if current Soldiers didn't volunteer to enlist then we might have a draft. Soldiers are limited in their own freedom of speech.

So they defend freedom by enlisting in place of other people who would have their freedom obstructed by their own government? How do the wars themselves defend american freedom?

In terms of people enlisting keeping you free from military service, yes and no. Yes, because if nobody volunteered then Congress would just reinstate the draft to make up for those missing volunteers. No because a draft doesn't automatically mean every male in the country will be forced to serve.

Right now the military has around two million people serving spread out between active duty, Reserves, and the National Guard. On the other hand, over four million males turn 18 every year in the US. Even if you cut that number in half to represent people who would be unqualified to serve only a fraction of the remaining two million would be drafted because we would only need a few thousand of them a year to replace people leaving.

As for the wars themselves, that is obviously debatable and for the most part building schools in Afghanistan isn't doing to much good for us here in the US. However, if nothing else troops are a deterrent. Just like a bully probably won't beat up the kid who's big brother is a black belt in Karate it's unlikely a country wanting to invade us will do it knowing he has the US military (as well as millions of licensed American gun owners) to go through.

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]

To be fair, the Japanese Imperial Army perpetrated numerous atrocities/genocides against the peoples they conquered. That still doesn't justify the bombings of Hiro/Naga though.

kuraimen

Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....

Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...

There's a big difference between bombing a city in order to end a war and save lives, while already at war and attacking civilians to start a war for religious reasons.

my god, how can you be against the nuclear bombings? The basically ended the war and saved millions on both sides.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#221 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
now days and age? no. WHY i don't believe anyone should fight for politics... days where other nations was going crazy and u.s had step in lend a helping hand to the east? ya
Avatar image for slamminjammin69
slamminjammin69

1599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 slamminjammin69
Member since 2006 • 1599 Posts

I respect only the US Soldiers that fought during World War I, World War II, Korean War and the Operation Desert Storm.

I don't respect the soldiers of today. They only sign up so they can kill or harass middle easterns in their homelands. Plus I am kind of glad todays kids that are in the military get maimed from the Improvised explosives. Watch where you step kid

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#223 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

I respect only the US Soldiers that fought during World War I, World War II, Korean War and the Operation Desert Storm.

I don't respect the soldiers of today. They only sign up so they can kill or harass middle easterns in their homelands. Plus I am kind of glad todays kids that are in the military get maimed from the Improvised explosives. Watch where you step kid

slamminjammin69

There's a difference between not respecting somebody and outright wishing they was dead....

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

I respect only the US Soldiers that fought during World War I, World War II, Korean War and the Operation Desert Storm.

I don't respect the soldiers of today. They only sign up so they can kill or harass middle easterns in their homelands. Plus I am kind of glad todays kids that are in the military get maimed from the Improvised explosives. Watch where you step kid

slamminjammin69

please find the nearest sharp object and insert it into your jugular.

Avatar image for Ghost_702
Ghost_702

7405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#225 Ghost_702
Member since 2006 • 7405 Posts

In a general sense, yes. However, there are the oddballs that commit atrocities or otherwise don't deserve respect. I'm not going to hate my country's entire military for their actions though. I find it disgraceful for anyone to not have at least a degree of respect for their country's military, certain countries excluded.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#226 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

Yes I do. The same way I respect the person who takes my order at McDonald's. Or absolutely any one else, for that matter.

Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#227 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts

Not in the least.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

Kuraidiot, you do realize that there were no smart bombs back in WWII so the Axis and Allies had to drop loads of bombs onto cities. That's the way it was back then. I don't understand how some people are okay with dropping a ton of small bombs on cities in WWII yet when only one big bomb is dropped it's suddenly "wrong". Especially when no one really had the concept of what a nuclear bomb entailed and it didn't carry the same weight as dropping one today would.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"] Just to correct, the actual number killed is MUCH more than 7000 civilians. Actual 3rd party sources state that the figure is over 1 million civilians dead due, exclusively, to violent excess deaths. http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/ http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/01/30/us-iraq-deaths-survey-idUSL3048857920080130

Nayef_shroof

You do know that that is total civilians killed in total and not by the US? Which means the insurgents are responsible for many of those? Dishonest post is dishonest.

Even if it was, most deaths have obviously resulted in U.S. aggression, since the U.S. both initiated the war and indiscriminately targets "suspects" at the cost of inumerable civilian deaths

Ignorance is bliss.

Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#230 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts

I respect only the US Soldiers that fought during World War I, World War II, Korean War and the Operation Desert Storm.

I don't respect the soldiers of today. They only sign up so they can kill or harass middle easterns in their homelands. Plus I am kind of glad todays kids that are in the military get maimed from the Improvised explosives. Watch where you step kid

slamminjammin69
That is a pretty odd war list, especially given how hostile you feel towards contemporary troops.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#231 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

Absolutely. I have too many people I knew from high school that went into the military and served proudly. Everyone should support the troops, even if you don't support the wars they are fighting.

Avatar image for Vac87
Vac87

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 Vac87
Member since 2012 • 297 Posts

Yes. It's a hard job. Thankful there are people to volunteer for it.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180074 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] I'm not justifying it I'm just using your same reasoning. I see the 9/11 attacks and the Hiroshima/Nagasaki attacks equally disgusting acts of terrorism. But normally those who attack use euphemisms to justify massacres. A massacre is a massacre.

A military target is just that. An economic tower is not. If you don't see the difference there is not help for you. And thus any discussion with you is pointless.

Glad we disagree. The minute I agree with you I'm gonna start to get worried...

Logic worries you then....
Avatar image for Darksonic666
Darksonic666

3482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#234 Darksonic666
Member since 2009 • 3482 Posts

I don't like or agree with war.

But I do respect our soldiers because they are doing a job that I don't have the guts for.

Avatar image for slamminjammin69
slamminjammin69

1599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 slamminjammin69
Member since 2006 • 1599 Posts

Today's soldiers I just dont show respect since most of them only join up so they can kill kill kill random middle easterns for the hell of it. That makes me sick. That and they're so America gung ho fighting for the USA in their own effed up way.

And look what happens to the soldiers when they come back. All maimed and stuff

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

Today's soldiers I just dont show respect since most of them only join up so they can kill kill kill random middle easterns for the hell of it. That makes me sick. That and they're so America gung ho fighting for the USA in their own effed up way.

And look what happens to the soldiers when they come back. All maimed and stuff

slamminjammin69

Please put a bullet in ur head.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Kuraidiot, you do realize that there were no smart bombs back in WWII so the Axis and Allies had to drop loads of bombs onto cities. That's the way it was back then. I don't understand how some people are okay with dropping a ton of small bombs on cities in WWII yet when only one big bomb is dropped it's suddenly "wrong". Especially when no one really had the concept of what a nuclear bomb entailed and it didn't carry the same weight as dropping one today would.

SpartanMSU
So you are ok with 9/11 then? since those guys didn't have smart bombs I guess it's ok they used planes to attack those buildings by your moronic logic...
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Saved more lives than tradition bombing would have. Both cities were military targets. Not civilian populations in total. Read a bit of history....TopTierHustler

Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...

There's a big difference between bombing a city in order to end a war and save lives, while already at war and attacking civilians to start a war for religious reasons.

my god, how can you be against the nuclear bombings? The basically ended the war and saved millions on both sides.

Prove it. Many people at the time and afterwards were convinced the bombs were unnecessary and the US only used them for intimidation.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#239 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

Today's soldiers I just dont show respect since most of them only join up so they can kill kill kill random middle easterns for the hell of it. That makes me sick. That and they're so America gung ho fighting for the USA in their own effed up way.

And look what happens to the soldiers when they come back. All maimed and stuff

slamminjammin69

Actually, most people enlist because they need money for college or they are otherwise unemployed or underemployed. You don't see Miley Cyrus, Mark Zuckerberg, or Bill Gates' children running to the recruiting office. There are patriotic people who enlist but most enlist for benefits.

Psychopaths who want to enlist just to kill "brown people" usually don't even pass the ASVAB because they're too dumb to make it through school. Not to mention less than ten percent of troops deployed even fired their weapon outside of a qualification range.

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Just like the 9/11 attacks... they attacked a military center, an economic center and a political center... military targets...kuraimen

There's a big difference between bombing a city in order to end a war and save lives, while already at war and attacking civilians to start a war for religious reasons.

my god, how can you be against the nuclear bombings? The basically ended the war and saved millions on both sides.

Prove it. Many people at the time and afterwards were convinced the bombs were unnecessary and the US only used them for intimidation.

So it would have been better to invade and have 3 million Americans die and 10 million Japanese die as was estimated?

Sounds smart to me.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#241 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]There's a big difference between bombing a city in order to end a war and save lives, while already at war and attacking civilians to start a war for religious reasons.

my god, how can you be against the nuclear bombings? The basically ended the war and saved millions on both sides.

TopTierHustler

Prove it. Many people at the time and afterwards were convinced the bombs were unnecessary and the US only used them for intimidation.

So it would have been better to invade and have 3 million Americans die and 10 million Japanese die as was estimated?

Sounds smart to me.

Japan presented a different situation from say, Germany. Back then, Japan's Emperor Hirohito was considered Divine. The Japanese regarded him as a living god. If Japan's military rulers (using the Emperor's name) ordered all Japanese civilians to take up arms and repel the Allied invaders, they probably would and would have died for the Emperor without hesitation.

Japan still had a sizable Home army. Add countless Japanese civilians who would become combatants plus the manner in which most Japanese soldiers fought to the last man, and the scope of difficulty should the Allies invade becomes clear. All the Axis powers aside from Japan had already surrendered. Everyone knew it was just a matter of time before Japan fell. She was given the opportunity to surrender unconditionally. And yet, Japan refused. By refusing to surrender when everything is already lost, they themselves resigned Hiroshima and Nagasaki to their fate.

Avatar image for l34052
l34052

3906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#242 l34052
Member since 2005 • 3906 Posts

.....We don't target civilians, however. That's a major distinction that you seem to be ignoring. Terrorists purposefully targeted civilians.

airshocker

Errr... Hiroshima, Nagasaki.....

Avatar image for coolkid93
coolkid93

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#243 coolkid93
Member since 2007 • 6749 Posts
Yes of course.
Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#244 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
I do. One showed up at work so I shook his hand and said thank you.
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#245 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

Today's soldiers I just dont show respect since most of them only join up so they can kill kill kill random middle easterns for the hell of it. That makes me sick. That and they're so America gung ho fighting for the USA in their own effed up way.

And look what happens to the soldiers when they come back. All maimed and stuff

slamminjammin69

That's the dumbest thing I've heard yet. I think I lost two IQ points. Your post is a war crime.

Avatar image for xLFTMx
xLFTMx

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 xLFTMx
Member since 2010 • 987 Posts

Do I believe in the generalization that all soldiers deserve respect? No.

Do I believe that there are massive ammounts of people in the military that are more than deserving of respect? Yes.

The military (especially at war time) is a means for people to do incredibly heroic and honorable things. On the other side of that coin they have the opportunity to do incredibly inhumane and barbaric things.

As with all things, the decisions the people involved make determines how much they should be respected.

Opinions on the war aside, a young man or woman fighitng for something they truly believe in is a powerful thing. Some of them truly believe they are fighitng for their countries freedom. True or not, they have faith in their convictions.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#247 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I sure do, many are my friends...marines, army, air force, navy, you name it i know at least one

Avatar image for Vaultboy-101
Vaultboy-101

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#248 Vaultboy-101
Member since 2009 • 1778 Posts

Not as much as I used to.

Avatar image for l34052
l34052

3906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#250 l34052
Member since 2005 • 3906 Posts

[QUOTE="l34052"]

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

.....We don't target civilians, however. That's a major distinction that you seem to be ignoring. Terrorists purposefully targeted civilians.

Conno08

Errr... Hiroshima, Nagasaki.....



Hiroshima: 'An embarkation port and industrial center that was the site of a major military headquarters'
Nagasaki: 'One of the largest sea ports in southern Japan and was of great wartime importance because of its wide-ranging industrial activity, including the production of ordnance, ships, military equipment, and other war materials.'

Yet another brain washed zombie spouting govt propagander to justify their genocidal actions:roll: Im sure the hundreds of thousands of dead japanese civillians will take great solace in your words.