Do you think Donald Trump is racist?

  • 150 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51583 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]Yes. Why else would he be asking for a birth certificate? If the bloke was white would he be asking for it? Of course not. GreySeal9

Maybe he's asking because he wants to run for President? Nah, must be because of race!

I don't think Donald Trump's birther crusade has anything to do with race, but becoming a conspiracy theorist is not exactly the conventional way someone would run for President. I think he has some kind of other motive with this. I personally think he's not going to run.

I think he's just trying to get into the spotlight for if he runs or not. Either that, or he's just trying to get better ratings for his show.
Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts
[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"] That is was fail logic.. That is all.. And I'm no banana.. I prefer Pineapples.00-Riddick-00

"He's a muslim," "He's a terrorist," "He wasn't born in America," are all just their way of lashing out because they can't call him a ******, which rhymes with Tigger.

First off, he isn't black, he is bi-racial. Second, I'm pretty sure some similar things were said about Bush by people.

he saids hes black ,he favors more of his father ,and will go down in history as the first black president. Though if one was to get technical, in america, most that are labeled "african american"/black, are not 100% "black". But w/e. This is why I think people should drop the whole race thing and should be wherever their parents are from.
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts
[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Maybe he's asking because he wants to run for President? Nah, must be because of race!Chutebox

I don't think Donald Trump's birther crusade has anything to do with race, but becoming a conspiracy theorist is not exactly the conventional way someone would run for President. I think he has some kind of other motive with this. I personally think he's not going to run.

I think he's just trying to get into the spotlight for if he runs or not. Either that, or he's just trying to get better ratings for his show.

Oh there is no ifs about it. He's claimed he would run in every presidential election since 2000. He never does, he never will.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51583 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I don't think Donald Trump's birther crusade has anything to do with race, but becoming a conspiracy theorist is not exactly the conventional way someone would run for President. I think he has some kind of other motive with this. I personally think he's not going to run.

ThePlothole

I think he's just trying to get into the spotlight for if he runs or not. Either that, or he's just trying to get better ratings for his show.

Oh there is no ifs about it. He's claimed he would run in every presidential election since 2000. He never does, he never will.

It's settled then, it's for his show!?

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePlothole"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] I think he's just trying to get into the spotlight for if he runs or not. Either that, or he's just trying to get better ratings for his show.Chutebox

Oh there is no ifs about it. He's claimed he would run in every presidential election since 2000. He never does, he never will.

It's settled then, it's for his show!?

It's for the show and also just because Trump is a man who thrives on publicity.
Avatar image for stanleycup98
stanleycup98

6144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#107 stanleycup98
Member since 2006 • 6144 Posts

He's obviously just getting publicity. He probably doesn't even believe what he says. But he knows how to get attention. Would we be talking about him right now if not?

Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts
The ONION has a little something something on Donald Trump :lol:
Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#109 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
Its pretty sad when people who oppose our president is considered racist. :x
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Dude, this is just getting silly. neither bill or I never said all Muslims. What don't you understand? Watch the video and move on.

Buttons1990

It's clearly implied when you dont specify, and instead group everyone together and blame the group.

So if I run a convenience store... And two black men rob me... And I say "black men robbed me"... Am I implying that all black people are criminals who rob stores? Because by your logic that seems to be the case?

Thats different, You can visibly see the difference between a Caucasian man, and a Black man You CANNOT visibly see the difference between an extremist and a Muslim extremist without them having a painted T-shirt saying "Hey i'm Muslim" Yet people continue to say "Muslims" when they should be saying "extremists" or "Terrorists", Heck "Muslim Terrorists" would work too.

Knowing they're Muslim doesn't help the search, they're just trying to connect the ties between extremists and Muslims.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] It's clearly implied when you dont specify, and instead group everyone together and blame the group.

Buttons1990

So if I run a convenience store... And two black men rob me... And I say "black men robbed me"... Am I implying that all black people are criminals who rob stores? Because by your logic that seems to be the case?

Actually that would seem to imply that you are implicating all black men. It would be more appropriate to add a determiner like "two" or "those".

No, it's not clearly implied. If I say "birds crapped on my truck" do you feel that I am implying that all birds crapped on my truck? You're just being silly.

thegerg

Birds are not people. A bird doesn't understand what you say, let alone feel insulted by it. People are expected to be treated with a level of respect.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180144 Posts

[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] It's clearly implied when you dont specify, and instead group everyone together and blame the group.

ThePlothole

So if I run a convenience store... And two black men rob me... And I say "black men robbed me"... Am I implying that all black people are criminals who rob stores? Because by your logic that seems to be the case?

Actually that would seem to imply that you are implicating all black men. It would be more appropriate to add a determiner like "two" or "those".

It doesn't mean that at all.:|

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Is he saying that his race is better?

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePlothole"][QUOTE="Buttons1990"] Actually that would seem to imply that you are implicating all black men. It would be more appropriate to add a determiner like "two" or "those". [QUOTE="thegerg"]

No, it's not clearly implied. If I say "birds crapped on my truck" do you feel that I am implying that all birds crapped on my truck? You're just being silly.

thegerg

Birds are not people. A bird doesn't understand what you say, let alone feel insulted by it. People are expected to be treated with a level of respect.

My comment has nothing to do with respect or insult. The fact is that if 2 birds crapped on my truck it is correct to say "birds crapped on my truck." That does not imply all birds crapped on my truck. The fact is that if 2 black dudes robbed me it is correct to say "black dudes robbed me." That does not imply all black duded robbed me. The fact is that if 2 Muslim guys are reesponsible for a certain act it is correct to say "Muslims are responsible for that act." That does not imply all Muslims are responsible for that act.

You clearly dont understand the PC world we live in.
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#116 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45444 Posts
if he's not racist he's definitely fanning the flames of it to gain popularity among birthers
Avatar image for Dogswithguns
Dogswithguns

11359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#117 Dogswithguns
Member since 2007 • 11359 Posts
I don't think he's a racist. He has hideous hair, but he's not a racist.JustPlainLucas
Yeah.. what's with his hair anyway?!..I've never nothing like that in my life!!
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="thegerg"] My comment has nothing to do with respect or insult. The fact is that if 2 birds crapped on my truck it is correct to say "birds crapped on my truck." That does not imply all birds crapped on my truck. The fact is that if 2 black dudes robbed me it is correct to say "black dudes robbed me." That does not imply all black duded robbed me. The fact is that if 2 Muslim guys are reesponsible for a certain act it is correct to say "Muslims are responsible for that act." That does not imply all Muslims are responsible for that act.

thegerg

You clearly dont understand the PC world we live in.

I certainly do understand this PC world. Political correctness has nothing to do with my comments. My comments are about factual correctness.

By saying Muslim it's suggesting all Muslims are capable of such an issue. Saying "Muslims Bombed us on 9/11" creates a fear for Muslims,which Muslims do not appreciate. Not all Muslims are extremists, and not all extremists are Muslim. DO NOT GROUP THEM TOGETHER. Doing so is an ignorant generalization that fuels more hate than is needed.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="thegerg"] I certainly do understand this PC world. Political correctness has nothing to do with my comments. My comments are about factual correctness.

thegerg

By saying Muslim it's suggesting all Muslims are capable of such an issue. Saying "Muslims Bombed us on 9/11" creates a fear for Muslims,which Muslims do not appreciate. Not all Muslims are extremists, and not all extremists are Muslim. DO NOT GROUP THEM TOGETHER. Doing so is an ignorant generalization that fuels more hate than is needed.

I am not grouping anyone together.

The racist claims to not be racist. Lets believe him. PS. Not saying you're racist, just saying that that is exactly what a racist WOULD say 8)
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

My comment has nothing to do with respect or insult. The fact is that if 2 birds crapped on my truck it is correct to say "birds crapped on my truck." That does not imply all birds crapped on my truck. The fact is that if 2 black dudes robbed me it is correct to say "black dudes robbed me." That does not imply all black duded robbed me. The fact is that if 2 Muslim guys are reesponsible for a certain act it is correct to say "Muslims are responsible for that act." That does not imply all Muslims are responsible for that act.

thegerg
You're not getting what I said. You don't refer to a human being the same way you would an animal. At best it's rude. At worst it's discriminatory. And you are saying you wouldn't feel even the slightest bit irked if someone said that *people of your faith* are responsible for that act? Or perhaps if someone said *people from your state/country* were?
Avatar image for edgewalker16
edgewalker16

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#123 edgewalker16
Member since 2005 • 2286 Posts

He's doing it for the publicity and that's the bottom line...which, I'm sure, is a field he's quite experienced in.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePlothole"][QUOTE="thegerg"]

My comment has nothing to do with respect or insult. The fact is that if 2 birds crapped on my truck it is correct to say "birds crapped on my truck." That does not imply all birds crapped on my truck. The fact is that if 2 black dudes robbed me it is correct to say "black dudes robbed me." That does not imply all black duded robbed me. The fact is that if 2 Muslim guys are reesponsible for a certain act it is correct to say "Muslims are responsible for that act." That does not imply all Muslims are responsible for that act.

thegerg

You're not getting what I said. You don't refer to a human being the same way you would an animal. At best it's rude. At worst it's discriminatory. And you are saying you wouldn't feel even the slightest bit irked if someone said that *people of your faith* are responsible for that act? Or perhaps if someone said *people from your state/country* were?

We refer to people as we would refer to animals everyday, it's not inherently rude. You have no idea what you're talking about. If my dog died I would say "my dog died." If my boss dies I would say "my boss died." As you can see, I am referring to my boss in the same manner in which I referred to a dog. In what way is that rude to my boss? There is a difference between referring to people and animals in the same manner, and referring to people as if they were animals. I have not done the latter. Stop being silly.

As for your questions: If the refrences were true then I would not feel insulted at all. If someone said "Christians were responsible for the Crusades" I wouldn't be irked at all, why should I? If someone said "Americans are responsible for the creation of Ford Motor Company" I would have no reason to be upset.

There is a difference when you refer to a group.

And what if I said both Christians and Americans are guilty of mass genocide?

Avatar image for PerfectCircles
PerfectCircles

2359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 PerfectCircles
Member since 2009 • 2359 Posts
No he justs says what'll get him attention.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePlothole"][QUOTE="thegerg"] We refer to people as we would refer to animals everyday, it's not inherently rude. You have no idea what you're talking about. If my dog died I would say "my dog died." If my boss dies I would say "my boss died." As you can see, I am referring to my boss in the same manner in which I referred to a dog. In what way is that rude to my boss? There is a difference between referring to people and animals in the same manner, and referring to people as if they were animals. I have not done the latter. Stop being silly.

As for your questions: If the refrences were true then I would not feel insulted at all. If someone said "Christians were responsible for the Crusades" I wouldn't be irked at all, why should I? If someone said "Americans are responsible for the creation of Ford Motor Company" I would have no reason to be upset.

thegerg

There is a difference when you refer to a group.

And what if I said both Christians and Americans are guilty of mass genocide?

Yes, there is a difference when you are referring to groups. This does not mean that it is in any way insulting or demeaning.

If you said that people are responsible for genocide and those people were, indeed, responsible for genocide then I would agree with you.

Sure it is.

I could make the statement "Christians Bomb Abortion Clinics"

While yes, in 2007 Christian extremests did leave an IED outside an Abortion clinic. That is too small a group to generalize it as mearly "Christians" doing that.

It suggests that other christians have the same beliefs and that they supported the action.

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

What's your position on it? Do you think he himself is racist? Or perhaps just fanning the flames of racial hatred, or neither?

KeitekeTokage
You forgot "Knowingly fanning..." I think that is what the republican party does. The let their base get all riled up, but when it get's out of hand or something comes to light in the press, they try to distance themselves from it.
Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts
We all have a little bit of racism in us. So yes. i5750at4Ghz
I am so sick of this common lie.
Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts
[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"] First off, he isn't black, he is bi-racial. Second, I'm pretty sure some similar things were said about Bush by people.00-Riddick-00

Why are you explaining that to me?

I'm not an ignorant Republican who thinks he's not American.

So all Republicans are ignorant?

Nope, just 40 whatever percent...
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes, there is a difference when you are referring to groups. This does not mean that it is in any way insulting or demeaning.

If you said that people are responsible for genocide and those people were, indeed, responsible for genocide then I would agree with you.

thegerg

Sure it is.

I could make the statement "Christians Bomb Abortion Clinics"

While yes, in 2007 Christian extremests did leave an IED outside an Abortion clinic. That is too small a group to generalize it as mearly "Christians" doing that.

It suggests that other christians have the same beliefs and that they supported the action.

That statement is 100% correct. Christians were responsible for bombing that clinic. That doesn't mean that all Christians are responsible for doing so.

Again, it seems you like to generalize and make it seem as though the entire group supports the actions of it's fellow members.
Avatar image for Easports48
Easports48

1761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Easports48
Member since 2005 • 1761 Posts
I voted the 3rd choice. Maybe he is not a racist. BUT why bring the junk up.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="thegerg"] That statement is 100% correct. Christians were responsible for bombing that clinic. That doesn't mean that all Christians are responsible for doing so.

thegerg

Again, it seems you like to generalize and make it seem as though the entire group supports the actions of it's fellow members.

It's not my fault that you take it that way.

It's not my fault that society takes it that way. Also your assertion is the same as "It's not your fault that you take the N word offensively"
Avatar image for DucksBrains
DucksBrains

1146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 DucksBrains
Member since 2007 • 1146 Posts

Of course not, don't be silly.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Not at all. He's just a RL troll who has a really hot wife and an extremely hot daughter.

I'm so voting for him.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#140 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="thegerg"] It's not my fault that you take it that way.

thegerg

It's not my fault that society takes it that way. Also your assertion is the same as "It's not your fault that you take the N word offensively"

"It's not your fault that you take the N word offensively" No, that assertion is not the same. A similar assertion would be "it's not my fault you take the N word offesively."

If I make a true statement in a factual manner I am not to blame for another taking offense.

You're holding the collective group accountable for the actions of a few. "Muslims" refers to Muslims everywhere, you cannot change.
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

Yes, there is a difference when you are referring to groups. This does not mean that it is in any way insulting or demeaning.

If you said that people are responsible for genocide and those people were, indeed, responsible for genocide then I would agree with you.

thegerg
You and I are just going to have to agree to disagree
Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
I do not think that he is a racist for what he has said about Obama.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#144 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
no but he knows who he is talking to.
Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#145 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

Donald Trump is not a racist, he's just a dumbass.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts
^ I'd say he's pretty smart actually. He knows how to use controversial subjects to get the media to focus their attention on him.
Avatar image for resevl4rlz
resevl4rlz

3848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 resevl4rlz
Member since 2005 • 3848 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

I'm certain i saw Donald Trump make that statement.

Yes, He said Muslims, not "Extremist Muslims" or "Radical Muslims" Just "Muslims" He clearly feels they're all the same.

And now you're claiming all Musliims are responsible for 9/11, and as such there's "Nothing to apologize for"

No comment...

Nibroc420

Again, you're wrong. It was Bill and he even clarified, but it seems some people needed the clarification....that he was referring to radical Muslims. Watch the whole interview.

You can comment after you actually watch it.

I've seen the show. I just choose not to comment on your clearly discriminatory generalizations that Muslims are responsible for 9/11

how does Donald Trump look like Bill O' Reilly?

Avatar image for GD-1369211121
GD-1369211121

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#148 GD-1369211121
Member since 2006 • 4087 Posts

No, why are you emplying that he is?

Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes, there is a difference when you are referring to groups. This does not mean that it is in any way insulting or demeaning.

If you said that people are responsible for genocide and those people were, indeed, responsible for genocide then I would agree with you.

thegerg

Sure it is.

I could make the statement "Christians Bomb Abortion Clinics"

While yes, in 2007 Christian extremests did leave an IED outside an Abortion clinic. That is too small a group to generalize it as mearly "Christians" doing that.

It suggests that other christians have the same beliefs and that they supported the action.

That statement is 100% correct. Christians were responsible for bombing that clinic. That doesn't mean that all Christians are responsible for doing so.

Sorry but I have to agree with them... Regardless of what your intentions were it does sound like you're saying all in both of the religious statements... Saying Muslims =/= black dudes... It's the same as saying Americans are blind because one American person is... While it may be grammaticality correct(maybe?) it's certainly not responsible...
Avatar image for metallica_fan42
metallica_fan42

21143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#150 metallica_fan42
Member since 2006 • 21143 Posts
No, he is just a goof. Wicked he is successful and all, but anytime I hear him do any public speaking, all I can think of is throwing a pie at him, and I love pie.