[QUOTE="ThePlothole"][QUOTE="thegerg"] We refer to people as we would refer to animals everyday, it's not inherently rude. You have no idea what you're talking about. If my dog died I would say "my dog died." If my boss dies I would say "my boss died." As you can see, I am referring to my boss in the same manner in which I referred to a dog. In what way is that rude to my boss? There is a difference between referring to people and animals in the same manner, and referring to people as if they were animals. I have not done the latter. Stop being silly.
As for your questions: If the refrences were true then I would not feel insulted at all. If someone said "Christians were responsible for the Crusades" I wouldn't be irked at all, why should I? If someone said "Americans are responsible for the creation of Ford Motor Company" I would have no reason to be upset.
thegerg
There is a difference when you refer to a group.
And what if I said both Christians and Americans are guilty of mass genocide?
Yes, there is a difference when you are referring to groups. This does not mean that it is in any way insulting or demeaning.If you said that people are responsible for genocide and those people were, indeed, responsible for genocide then I would agree with you.
Sure it is.
I could make the statement "Christians Bomb Abortion Clinics"
While yes, in 2007 Christian extremests did leave an IED outside an Abortion clinic. That is too small a group to generalize it as mearly "Christians" doing that.
It suggests that other christians have the same beliefs and that they supported the action.
Log in to comment