Many people, both religious and non religous, believe that eating meat is morally wrong.
I for one believe that we have the power and right to manipulate them into a source of vital nutrients, as the superior species of this world.
And you, OT?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Many people, both religious and non religous, believe that eating meat is morally wrong.
I for one believe that we have the power and right to manipulate them into a source of vital nutrients, as the superior species of this world.
And you, OT?
Just like how I should be able to eat people that I'm superior to. Tasty animals and people.I for one believe that we have the power and right to manipulate them into a source of vital nutrients, as the superior species of this world.
Pretty much as always Gabu wins the threadIf eating meat was "wrong", one would imagine that there wouldn't be so many carnivorous animals in nature.
GabuEx
For me, eating meat not grilled nor fried is okay if you eat it within the appropriate amount. Also, I believe eating meat is also considered wrong if the source of a certain type of meat is rare, since the animals are risking extinction due to overhunting because for meat and other things used as tools.
Um...yeah. :|
Humans are omnivorous animals, meaning we eat both animals (meat) and plants (vegetables).
Sure, an alligator biting the leg of a wildebeest and dragging the whole animal into the water is much more humane than a human slaughtering a cow with a machete.:roll:
I'll never understand these people who think eating meat is "wrong". I don't understand vegetarians and vegans (WTF is the difference between the two?) because...
...
...
[spoiler] how the flying **** can they live off only vegetables?:o:? [/spoiler]
EDIT: It's really annoying when people bring up morals and ethics to topics like this; seriously. Humans eating meat is NATURAL.
If eating meat is wrong, so is eating plants. They both are alive, after all. The point of nature is to fight or become a meal so other species can survive. I think the "morals" thing comes from people who forgot how nature runs things.ProjectTrinity
Kinda depends on who you are. Plants are (mostly) all peaceful and live and let live; they don't need to deprive others of sustenance to survive. It's only we animals who for whatever reason felt we had to be jerks to everyone as a part of life. :P
This :D If we didn't eat animals they'd be everywhere...in our libraries, getting in everyone's wayOf course I do. Animals taste too damn good for it not to be right.
Pirate700
Many people, both religious and non religous, believe that eating meat is morally wrong.
I for one believe that we have the power and right to manipulate them into a source of vital nutrients, as the superior species of this world.
And you, OT?
Our teeth say yes its ok to eat meatI don't want it to be wrong.
Given that I as a human being, evolved to be an omnivore, I will continue to eat meat until the day I die. And honestly, given a survival situation, I wouldn't think twice about resorting to cannibalism (i.e. the kind that doesn't involve murder, see: Alive (1993 film)).
Animals are life, plants are life. Either way, you're eating life. It's natural.CRS98
Logic for the WIN...If eating meat was "wrong", one would imagine that there wouldn't be so many carnivorous animals in nature.
GabuEx
If eating meat is wrong, so is eating plants. They both are alive, after all. The point of nature is to fight or become a meal so other species can survive. I think the "morals" thing comes from people who forgot how nature runs things.ProjectTrinityYes, but the sentience is what differentiates it. If you follow your rationale, then eating humans is also right.
I don't want it to be wrong.
Given that I as a human being, evolved to be an omnivore, I will continue to eat meat until the day I die. And honestly, given a survival situation, I wouldn't think twice about resorting to cannibalism (i.e. the kind that doesn't involve murder, see: Alive (1993 film)).foxhound_fox
Well cannibalism does have other non-moral issues to it, such as the fact that if you're in a situation where cannibalism is necessary, it would also be probably rather difficult to ensure that the meat is in any way sanitary.
(Although I suppose if the other option is dying from starvation...)
If eating meat is wrong, so is eating plants. They both are alive, after all. The point of nature is to fight or become a meal so other species can survive. I think the "morals" thing comes from people who forgot how nature runs things.ProjectTrinityTo play devil's advocate, the difference is that (some) animals are argued to be sentient beings.
On the other hand, cannot recall anyone ever saying the same for plants.
Well cannibalism does have other non-moral issues to it, such as the fact that if you're in a situation where cannibalism is necessary, it would also be probably rather difficult to ensure that the meat is in any way sanitary.(Although I suppose if the other option is dying from starvation...)
GabuEx
[QUOTE="CRS98"] Having a better chance as dominant species...tofu-lion91Yeh right - I'd like to see a cow playing TF2 or posting on GS :P I'm a cow.
[QUOTE="ProjectTrinity"]If eating meat is wrong, so is eating plants. They both are alive, after all. The point of nature is to fight or become a meal so other species can survive. I think the "morals" thing comes from people who forgot how nature runs things.LiftedHeadshotYes, but the sentience is what differentiates it. If you follow your rationale, then eating humans is also right.
Well as far as nature is concerned, nothing wrong about that either. :P
To play devil's advocate, the difference is that (some) animals are argued to be sentient beings.On the other hand, cannot recall anyone ever saying the same for plants.
Link256
Well cannibalism does have other non-moral issues to it, such as the fact that if you're in a situation where cannibalism is necessary, it would also be probably rather difficult to ensure that the meat is in any way sanitary.Cannibalism worked for the survivors of the Andes flight disaster.(Although I suppose if the other option is dying from starvation...)GabuEx
One of the few things that I agree with Pirate on. Amen brother.Of course I do. Animals taste too damn good for it not to be right.
Pirate700
All I know is that it's an extremely inefficient use of caloric consumption. It's also impractical in terms of being sustainable as population levels increase, and is one of the major causes of our planets deteriorating ecosystem. And.. the one reason we wont do anything about it.. is because of privatized business and easily influenced population that doesn't use rational thought in order to guide their deceision making
. The concept of supply and demand.. though practical in terms of sustainable economics centralized around capitalism.. is not practical in terms of human behavior. What is demanded.. is not what is necessary, sustainable, or efficient. Food addiction is another problem that should be considered with this behavior as well. Foods are loaded with sodium, and sugars.. not because it's necessary to do this.. but because a company can get consumers addicted to them.. and they will have more cravings for a companies food, and the company will then make more money. Food tastes fine without these things.. but people are so over exsposed to them that they dont' know better. And have a hard time identifying the behavior because ignorant parents feed them this way from an early age.
I can't really comment on whether or not eating meat is morally right. Though I can conceptualize the concepts of good and evil.. I've yet to discover their application in the reality of the physical world.. in other words.. they're simply ideas applied by humans to assign or asses the value of something. Because for some reason or another it's in our nature to be obessed with measuring and quantifying.
[QUOTE="grape_of_wrath"] I'm a cow.tofu-lion91No you're a grape :x [spoiler] of wrath :o [/spoiler]
Until carrots taste like beef and brocolli tastes like chicken, I'll keep eating my meat 8) .
Eating meat isn't wrong, we're omnivores.
Too many posts for individual replies. :P Morals is up to the law and each individual. I won't argue either or. So I leave it up to you all and the law to decide that little dispute. :P Cannibalism, after all the rights and wrongs of life, is just subjective. Humans made right and wrong, according to a variety of peeps, so I won't say if it's morally wrong to eat other humans or not. =p
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment