Do you think man will ever leave our solar system?

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TF626
TF626

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TF626
Member since 2010 • 593 Posts

I think this is a pretty interesting question regarding our race, I mean technically look at how much we have accomplished and learned in a matter of 100 years. So many great inventions, such as the computer, jet engines, television, and also made vast leaps in terms of space exploration. We have a broader knowledge regarding our universe, and our finding planets that are share some similarities to our own planet, we've also found gas giants that are much larger than Jupiter, a real life Tatooine(although it most likely doesn't support life). I think the universe is perhaps one of the most fascinating things the human mind can explore or dig deep into... I mean it blew my mind the first time I ever seen the Milky Way, and made me wonder will we ever reach to farthest reaches of space?

The universe is a pretty daunting size, and it's something that by mathematics just straight up blows your mind. Even some of our nearest stars would take an eternity for our current technology, and the Voyager 1 & 2 is just leaving our Solar System and it was launched in 1979... how amazing? You can also send a radio message from Earth and it would never reach the end of the universe.

My question is if humans don't destroy themselves, and continue to gain rapid knowledge of technology, do you think will be able to travel to other galaxies? I mean in a way it's impossible too-- your body can't handle 186,000+ the speed of light, and as interesting as the universe is it's even more interesting how much dark matter exists in the universe. If light travels at the speed of 186,000, how fast does dark matter travel if at all? Amazing stuff if you ask me.

Or would Albert Einsteins theories of wormholes across the universe actually true? It just boggles my mind!

Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
Absolutely. I think given enough time, a lot of science fiction with regards to space travel will become reality. Mostly just on faith. I think we'll find ways.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
For starters, numbers are worthless when not accompanied by units of measurement. Secondly...hell no. Do you have any idea how vast space is? Mankind is never leaving our solar system.
Avatar image for Jolt_counter119
Jolt_counter119

4226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Jolt_counter119
Member since 2010 • 4226 Posts

Space is amazing, really amazing, and I am so intrigued at the universe and how it works...But seriously, I think we need to figure out our own damn planet before worrying about anything past Jupiter.

And yes, I think it's a pretty safe bet that mankind will eventually figure out a way to leave the solar system. Maybe in another century or so.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#5 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

I feel that Mankind will unfortunately destroy this planet before we get to that stage! As well as Ourselves in the process. Maybe just maybe we will kill ourselves off and the planet barely survive.

The systems across this planet are laughable.

Until we as a race get our heads out of our asses, and remove these leaders that don't even remotely deserve the title, No we will not make it out of this Solar System.

Though I still have a small amount of hope.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#6 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

When the time we build a space ship that travels at speeds where it takes mere minutes to get to the moon, or hrs get to mars, Then possibility YES. but at insane speeds speeds like that will need to build some type of system to allow someone to survive that. In 100 years i think it's possible BUT will resources be put in to do it? no. right know they are more worried about be able go to the moon and turning it into a miners dream. and putting condos on the moon that only bill gates can afford. Also gravity is on their side lol. in space once speeds are reached. only time fuel needs be used is to steering. but hey lets be 4real at those speeds you would want a force field to be your shield lol.

BUT then again we are detroying are selfs... Once a war breaks out say good by to the world. it's estimated only 500 nukes the size what happan in japan would flatten the world. Guess how many u.s has? only estimated 30,000-50,000...

Avatar image for TF626
TF626

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TF626
Member since 2010 • 593 Posts

For starters, numbers are worthless when not accompanied by units of measurement. Secondly...hell no. Do you have any idea how vast space is? Mankind is never leaving our solar system.MrGeezer

Yes space is extremely vast hence my reference that you can send a radio signal from Earth and it would never reach the end of the universe.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

If by some chance we do end up doing it, we probably wouldn't be using human bodies anymore.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

If by some chance we do end up doing it, we probably wouldn't be using human bodies anymore.

Barbariser
As always, robots. People always say, "why don't we go to Mars?" Well, we sort of have. We just send robots instead of going there ourselves. Because it's a whole lot cheaper sending a robot to another planet than it is to send a human and then have to maintain all of the ****required to keep him alive. And furthermore, when that robot dies, people complain about wasted money. They don't fly into a moral outrage about sending people on a uicide mission, which is exactly the sort of **** that has a good chance of killing the project in the first place. So yeah...robots.
Avatar image for Meinhard1
Meinhard1

6790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Meinhard1
Member since 2010 • 6790 Posts

Sure, if flu pandemics, nuclear weapons or global warming don't finish us off.

Also worth noting - the more advanced technology gets the more potentially dangerous it could be in the wrong hands.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45423 Posts
maybe if we scrap our military and replace it with a space industrial complex
Avatar image for LORD_BLACKGULT
LORD_BLACKGULT

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 LORD_BLACKGULT
Member since 2006 • 947 Posts

Hard to say for certain. On a technological scale, we are still in our infancy... whether or not we live to "adulthood" is a different matter entirely. For all the information we posses, we know the equivalent of nothing. To say we will never make it out of our solar system seems rather naive. Never is a very, very long time...

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

When the time we build a space ship that travels at speeds where it takes mere minutes to get to the moon, or hrs get to mars, Then possibility YES. but at insane speeds speeds like that will need to build some type of system to allow someone to survive that. In 100 years i think it's possible BUT will resources be put in to do it? no. right know they are more worried about be able go to the moon and turning it into a miners dream. and putting condos on the moon that only bill gates can afford. Also gravity is on their side lol. in space once speeds are reached. only time fuel needs be used is to steering. but hey lets be 4real at those speeds you would want a force field to be your shield lol.

BUT then again we are detroying are selfs... Once a war breaks out say good by to the world. it's estimated only 500 nukes the size what happan in japan would flatten the world. Guess how many u.s has? only estimated 30,000-50,000...

k2theswiss

Say what?

On topic; at our current level of understanding of physics, and technology, no. Who knows what 100 years would bring, I bet the people living in 1911 wouldn't have dreamed of half the stuff we have today (Internet, mobile phones etc)

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
Probably, but not for a long, long time. The distances are pretty vast even at high speeds (look at how long it's taken the voyager probes to exit the solar system; actually I think they're still in the process of it). We not only need better technology, but completely new and different technology, and in more areas than just propulsion too. I think the farthest we'll ever make it is to alpha centauri, but that won't be for thousands of years. And even if we do make it there, it would have to be via a colony ship and the colony there would be effectively cut off from Earth (if you sent a message to Earth it would take 8 years before you got a reply back, nevermind the time it would take for a physical object like a ship to travel the distance).
Avatar image for Matthew-first
Matthew-first

3318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Matthew-first
Member since 2005 • 3318 Posts

First of all...
Ppl can't fly even on the moon...
Coz of the Belts that cause death to ppl...
If they r gonna construct ships made of LEAD and thick like half meter... and pulling it up with some strong engines...
THEN you can think about ppl to travel around the galaxy...
But for now its not possible... PROOFS?
THIS: (If you didn't know already that Moon flight was fake...)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_9gMn1OYPw

HOAX ;) My dear american friends... a Hoax.
THere are more parts that tells you what really happend...

Also the big Hadron Collider made some amazing stuff...
He carried a matter with some weight from point A to point B faster then LIGHT SPEED...
We knew before that anything that has got weight can't move faster then light speed... TILL NOW.

So evrything can change...
Still to travel at already known speed to the TATOOINE You mention here...
Would take around 8,000~ years to get there...

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts


THIS: (If you didn't know already that Moon flight was fake...)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_9gMn1OYPw

HOAX ;) My dear american friends... a Hoax.
THere are more parts that tells you what really happend...

Matthew-first

Oh dear

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#17 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

First of all...
Ppl can't fly even on the moon...
Coz of the Belts that cause death to ppl...
If they r gonna construct ships made of LEAD and thick like half meter... and pulling it up with some strong engines...
THEN you can think about ppl to travel around the galaxy...
But for now its not possible... PROOFS?
THIS: (If you didn't know already that Moon flight was fake...)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_9gMn1OYPw

HOAX ;) My dear american friends... a Hoax.
THere are more parts that tells you what really happend...

Also the big Hadron Collider made some amazing stuff...
He carried a matter with some weight from point A to point B faster then LIGHT SPEED...
We knew before that anything that has got weight can't move faster then light speed... TILL NOW.

So evrything can change...
Still to travel at already known speed to the TATOOINE You mention here...
Would take around 8,000~ years to get there...

Matthew-first

Oh where to start, not even going to bother with your little conspiracy theory :lol:

The LHC has not achieved speeds faster than the speed of light, infact the particles don't even reach that speed, it's a little slower

Also, it's 200 light years away, however I have no idea what "already known speed" is referring to..

Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
if we dont kill our planet, yea. its definitely possible.
Avatar image for CRS98
CRS98

9036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 CRS98
Member since 2004 • 9036 Posts
Scientific progress is exponential, so it'll be time.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

given our current knowledge on the laws of physics and such....no. But i am a firm believer in a multi-planet civilization, just not amongst other stars. Unless we manage some groundbreak new physics descovery that lets us travel such vast distances...a la Mass Effect

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]

[QUOTE="Matthew-first"]

First of all...
Ppl can't fly even on the moon...
Coz of the Belts that cause death to ppl...
If they r gonna construct ships made of LEAD and thick like half meter... and pulling it up with some strong engines...
THEN you can think about ppl to travel around the galaxy...
But for now its not possible... PROOFS?
THIS: (If you didn't know already that Moon flight was fake...)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_9gMn1OYPw

HOAX ;) My dear american friends... a Hoax.
THere are more parts that tells you what really happend...

Also the big Hadron Collider made some amazing stuff...
He carried a matter with some weight from point A to point B faster then LIGHT SPEED...
We knew before that anything that has got weight can't move faster then light speed... TILL NOW.

So evrything can change...
Still to travel at already known speed to the TATOOINE You mention here...
Would take around 8,000~ years to get there...

Matthew-first

Oh where to start, not even going to bother with your little conspiracy theory :lol:

The LHC has not achieved speeds faster than the speed of light, infact the particles don't even reach that speed, it's a little slower

Also, it's 200 light years away, however I have no idea what "already known speed" is referring to..



A CONSPIRACY THEORY ?
What are you 10?
Look at the video...
When they shows (recording)
Earth from far distances while they record this in a dark place thru window... with a piece of paper to show that they are far...
When they were just on the earths orbit...

Its not a conspiracy... its true ... ur just IGNORANT. :)


EDIT: TO pass those 200 light years u need around 8,000 years to travel with speed of 2,193 MPH :)
(for now its a record of well known black bird ;) )

:lol: Sure thing champ

Oh wow, your maths is so so so so so so so so so so so far off

200 light years = 200 x 365 x 24 x 60 x 60 x 186,000 = 1175725074636721.5 Miles

Blackbird = 1175725074636721.5 / 2193 = 61,067,031.46 years ;)

Also, why did you choose the Blackbird over a space shuttle which can travel at about 17,000 MPH?

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#24 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]

:lol: Sure thing champ

Oh wow, your maths is so so so so so so so so so so so far off

200 light years = 200 x 365 x 24 x 60 x 60 x 186,000 = 1175725074636721.5 Miles

Black bird = 1175725074636721.5 / 2193 = 61,067,031.46 years ;)

Matthew-first


I meant 1 light year 8,000 years to travel (around)
LOL you actually took the effort to calculate this Hahahah :D
I got really nice fun of ya xd


now... to make it your way...
1x 365 x24 x60 x60 x186,000 = 31536000
Black Bird = 31536000 / 3528 KM/h = 8800~


You blind sir ?


EDIT: IGNORANT :D

EDIT: TO pass those 200 light years u need around 8,000 years to travel with speed of 2,193 MPH :)
(for now its a record of well known black bird ;) )

Matthew-first

Just a tiny contradiction

Also, your maths is still wrong. The speed of light is 186,000 MILES per second, then in your time calculation you switched the speed to kilometres. So let's try this again...

1 light year = 365 x 24 x 60 x 60 x 186,000 = 5878625373183.607 miles

Blackbird = 5878625373183.607 / 2193 = 305,335.16 years

Or, if you are feeling lazy

Just divide the 61,067,031.46 by 200

Is your calculator broken sir? :D

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts
I don't see why not, for all we know man already has due to being kidnapped by aliens. :P
Avatar image for hippiesanta
hippiesanta

10301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 hippiesanta
Member since 2005 • 10301 Posts
we dont want society dress up like Dolce n Gabbana, Christian Dior in space
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
we dont want society dress up like Dolce n Gabbana, Christian Dior in spacehippiesanta
...I uhhhh...ok?
Avatar image for galfasanta1111
galfasanta1111

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 galfasanta1111
Member since 2011 • 32 Posts
It could happen, but vastly different from what we know of right now.
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

hopefully in my lifetime, but most likely afterwards.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#30 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

If by some chance we do end up doing it, we probably wouldn't be using human bodies anymore.

MrGeezer

As always, robots. People always say, "why don't we go to Mars?" Well, we sort of have. We just send robots instead of going there ourselves. Because it's a whole lot cheaper sending a robot to another planet than it is to send a human and then have to maintain all of the ****required to keep him alive. And furthermore, when that robot dies, people complain about wasted money. They don't fly into a moral outrage about sending people on a uicide mission, which is exactly the sort of **** that has a good chance of killing the project in the first place. So yeah...robots.

If we use robots to do it, then technically we aren't fulfilling the "man leaving" part of "man leaving the solar system".

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

In the sense that the OP means, it's unbelievably unlikely, and a lot of people here don't seem to understand exactly how large the solar system is, beyond the orbit of Pluto mind you. I mean, Voyager1 is only just past our Sol's termination shock, which is still a looong way from the heliopause, and that's in the direction of the bow shock (the thinnest part of the heliosphere).

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]For starters, numbers are worthless when not accompanied by units of measurement. Secondly...hell no. Do you have any idea how vast space is? Mankind is never leaving our solar system.TF626


Yes space is extremely vast hence my reference that you can send a radio signal from Earth and it would never reach the end of the universe.

That isn't a function of size, but a matter of recession speeds; there is a cosmic event horizon that defines a region which, relative to our postion, is receeding so quickly and for such a long time that when you factor in the expansion of space you would need to send a signal faster than 'c' (light) to reach it. The reverse is true, and in a very real way it represents a true event horizon; a point where nothing on this "side" can effect the other, and visa versa, in any way.

As for the velocity of dark matter, whatever it is DM seems to behave like normal matter except that (as far as anyone can tell) it only participates in the gravitational interaction. In theory, it's no more able to reach 'c' than normal matter. As for wormholes, you should keep in mind that Einstein's version, the ERB (Einstein-Rosen Bridge) is NOT traversable. That is to say, even a single photon couldn't pass through it, never mind a person. Theories of traversable wormholes involve some pretty exotic quantum effect (even by the standards of QM) to provide a force counter to gravity to hold open the throat of the wormhole. Having a negative energy solution on paper within the ergosphere of a black hole isn't the same as massing it in a given region, or even physical reality.

Beyond that, you still have to pass the event horizon of a black hole to get to the wormhole, and unless we're talking about a supermassive (as in, galactic core) black hole, doing so would expose you to lethal gravitational shear and tidal forces. Could these have formed at a time early in the universe's history when spacetime curvature was pronounced? Maybe. Would they still be around? No. Wormholes are a valid solution, but not in this universe at this time or any time in its future as expansion leads to even LESS pronounced curvature.

To all who think we're going to be able to travel FTL: do you think that we'll build time machines?... do you realize you're talking about the exact same thing?

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="TF626"]If light travels at the speed of 186,000, how fast does dark matter travel if at all?TDSE
Relative to what? Also if you can go arbitrarily close to the speed of light, you can travel as far as you want. But as a result, you'll end up far into the future. Oh and use units for Christ's sake.

You can remain stationary and end up "far into the future" if you live long enough. Speaking of relative measurements, when you talk about what I assume is time dilation, you may want to refer to the relative clocks from your origin point and relatively "slower" moving objects vs. you.Travel forward in time isn't in any way prohibited, but if you want to get back to when you started, that IS verboten.
Avatar image for TDSE
TDSE

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 TDSE
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="TDSE"][QUOTE="TF626"]If light travels at the speed of 186,000, how fast does dark matter travel if at all?Frame_Dragger
Relative to what? Also if you can go arbitrarily close to the speed of light, you can travel as far as you want. But as a result, you'll end up far into the future. Oh and use units for Christ's sake.

You can remain stationary and end up "far into the future" if you live long enough. Speaking of relative measurements, when you talk about what I assume is time dilation, you may want to refer to the relative clocks from your origin point and relatively "slower" moving objects vs. you.Travel forward in time isn't in any way prohibited, but if you want to get back to when you started, that IS verboten.

I thought it was pretty obvious what I meant.
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="TDSE"]Relative to what? Also if you can go arbitrarily close to the speed of light, you can travel as far as you want. But as a result, you'll end up far into the future. Oh and use units for Christ's sake.TDSE
You can remain stationary and end up "far into the future" if you live long enough. Speaking of relative measurements, when you talk about what I assume is time dilation, you may want to refer to the relative clocks from your origin point and relatively "slower" moving objects vs. you.Travel forward in time isn't in any way prohibited, but if you want to get back to when you started, that IS verboten.

I thought it was pretty obvious what I meant.

This, from someone who wanted units? Yeah, it was obvious to me at least, but I wouldn't assume that it is to anyone. I also wouldn't apply standards to others that you don't attempt to meet yourself. I think it was obvious as well that TF626 was asking what the maximum velocity of dark matter is, or if it represents an absolute reference... or when you gave him a non-answer did not see that?
Avatar image for TDSE
TDSE

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 TDSE
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] This, from someone who wanted units? Yeah, it was obvious to me at least, but I wouldn't assume that it is to anyone. I also wouldn't apply standards to others that you don't attempt to meet yourself. I think it was obvious as well that TF626 was asking what the maximum velocity of dark matter is, or if it represents an absolute reference... or when you gave him a non-answer did not see that?

Why would you assume he was asking that? I mean why would anyone who doesn't know about special relativity even have such a concept in their mind? The fact that he seemed to think one can meaningfully talk about stuff being stationary without providing a reference frame doesn't exactly support your inference.
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] This, from someone who wanted units? Yeah, it was obvious to me at least, but I wouldn't assume that it is to anyone. I also wouldn't apply standards to others that you don't attempt to meet yourself. I think it was obvious as well that TF626 was asking what the maximum velocity of dark matter is, or if it represents an absolute reference... or when you gave him a non-answer did not see that?TDSE
Why would you assume he was asking that? I mean why would anyone who doesn't know about special relativity even have such a concept in their mind? The fact that he seemed to think one can meaningfully talk about stuff being stationary without providing a reference frame doesn't exactly support your inference.

For the same reason you assumed that people who presumably know nothing about SR/GR would understand that travel forward in time is ubiquitous, and only the reverse is expressly forbidden, or that you meant time dilation relative to your origin point, etc. What can I say, you seem as though you like precision, but without offering it yourself. I generally try to not make the same mistakes I'm chewing someone else out for, so maybe it's just a matter of taste? I also enjoy points of reference, and saying, "far into the future" without discussing the mechanism or in relation to a point in time is both lacking in a frame of reference, AND generally uninformative unless you DO know about time dilation a la SR/GR.
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts

Unless some visitors from other planets come along and lend us the technology to hop from galaxy to galaxy, the sun would probably go supernova before we develop the technology on our own...

I mean we'd develop the technology to maybe leave the solar system, but I doubt it would be a 2 way trip...

Avatar image for TDSE
TDSE

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 TDSE
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="TDSE"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] This, from someone who wanted units? Yeah, it was obvious to me at least, but I wouldn't assume that it is to anyone. I also wouldn't apply standards to others that you don't attempt to meet yourself. I think it was obvious as well that TF626 was asking what the maximum velocity of dark matter is, or if it represents an absolute reference... or when you gave him a non-answer did not see that?Frame_Dragger
Why would you assume he was asking that? I mean why would anyone who doesn't know about special relativity even have such a concept in their mind? The fact that he seemed to think one can meaningfully talk about stuff being stationary without providing a reference frame doesn't exactly support your inference.

For the same reason you assumed that people who presumably know nothing about SR/GR would understand that travel forward in time is ubiquitous, and only the reverse is expressly forbidden, or that you meant time dilation relative to your origin point, etc. What can I say, you seem as though you like precision, but without offering it yourself. I generally try to not make the same mistakes I'm chewing someone else out for, so maybe it's just a matter of taste? I also enjoy points of reference, and saying, "far into the future" without discussing the mechanism or in relation to a point in time is both lacking in a frame of reference, AND generally uninformative unless you DO know about time dilation a la SR/GR.

Somehow I doubt that most people would consider a rate of one second per second to constitute time travel. Coincidentally I recall watching a program by Stephen Hawking aimed at a lay-audience in which he made a similar point to me and didn't clarify that the travel into the future is as measured in the reference frames of earth/your destination. If it's good enough for him, it's good enough for me.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#41 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Matthew-first"]

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]


I meant 1 light year 8,000 years to travel (around)
LOL you actually took the effort to calculate this Hahahah :D
I got really nice fun of ya xd


now... to make it your way...
1x 365 x24 x60 x60 x186,000 = 31536000
Black Bird = 31536000 / 3528 KM/h = 8800~


You blind sir ?


EDIT: IGNORANT :D

chaoscougar1

EDIT: TO pass those 200 light years u need around 8,000 years to travel with speed of 2,193 MPH :)
(for now its a record of well known black bird ;) )

Matthew-first

Just a tiny contradiction

Also, your maths is still wrong. The speed of light is 186,000 MILES per second, then in your time calculation you switched the speed to kilometres. So let's try this again...

1 light year = 365 x 24 x 60 x 60 x 186,000 = 5878625373183.607 miles

Blackbird = 5878625373183.607 / 2193 = 305,335.16 years

Or, if you are feeling lazy

Just divide the 61,067,031.46 by 200

Is your calculator broken sir? :D

I find it funny that The Blackbird was choosen over the Aurora... (which is faster) But I find it even more funny that a BlackBird was used over a Space Shuttle which can easily multiply the speed of a blackbird several times over!

Also the shuttle can seat considerably more people, and or equipment!

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#42 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
Certainly some day. Although by the time we develop technology that allows us to get to another star in a somewhat short amount of time I'll probably be gone from this world.
Avatar image for Celifrog
Celifrog

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 Celifrog
Member since 2011 • 44 Posts
My guess probably in about 400-500 years. In our lifetime probably man will walk the surface of mars.
Avatar image for punkpunker
punkpunker

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 punkpunker
Member since 2006 • 3383 Posts

we still technically can go out our solar system today, the ship needs a gravitational pull from a bigger planet and just wait for 30 years(?) like the voyager

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#45 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

No I don't think so.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#46 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts
My guess probably in about 400-500 years. In our lifetime probably man will walk the surface of mars.Celifrog
lol in 400-500 years everyone will be dead along with all organisms, maybe excluding insects and bacteria.
Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts
Maybe if we reproduce on the giant ship and call it home for the remainder of our evolution. Thats only thinking with the tech we might have in a thousand or more years though...for all I know we will be able to jump dimensions someday.
Avatar image for Pikdum
Pikdum

2244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Pikdum
Member since 2010 • 2244 Posts

Yes. Or we will completely wipe our selves out before we get to that stage in our species.

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

Yes. Or we will completely wipe our selves out before we get to that stage in our species.

Pikdum
If we manage not to kill ourselves off the Sun will.We really have no choice but to become spacemen.
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
Not in our lifetime.