[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPralineWhen is Barry Obama's trial date?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]I wanna sig that its so cuteThere are definitely some cover ups out there but to believe any military personnel can just kill someone because they want to and not face extreme punishment is blatant stupidity.
HouseMuzik4Life
Feel free
[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPralineWhen is Barry Obama's trial date?
Very good. In that case, I will consider this a victory for the rest of us.Not sure what I was thinking, I forgot where I was. I think I am finished with diplomacy, you are all not worth my time.
Pretty much agree with this.death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.
whipassmt
Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.
Pretty much agree with this.[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.
MakeMeaSammitch
Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.
There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder
Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough
Pretty much agree with this.[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.
whiskeystrike
Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.
There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder
Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough
lol, he went crazy, pretty strait forward.These things happen in war.
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.
Pretty much agree with this.Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.
There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder
Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough
Well none of us truely know our limits when, or if we ever do, truely snap. However when he snapped he killed kids. It is one way to see that he snapped in a very stressful situation and killed potential threats. As in adults. However since he also killed the little kids it shows that deep down what kind of animal he is. So I agree that seeking the death penalty is fine with me.[QUOTE="ad1x2"]I always find it funny when clueless people make assumptions that hold very little in truth. People are acting like Staff Sergeant Bales is the only US Soldier who has faced the death penalty for the murder of foreign nationals. He is far from the only one. Google Steven Dale Green, you will see he is serving life in prison for raping and murdering a 14-year old Iraqi girl. If the US really wanted to murder a bunch of Afghans they would just pull all troops out and bomb the place until there is a crater where every major city used to be.Some of you have no idea what kind of punishment troops can face under the UCMJ. Where else in the US can you go to jail for cheating on your wife, or having sex with a married woman even though you are single yourself? Or go to jail for telling your boss to fvck off, for being late for work, or coming up positive on a urine test (things a civilian could at worst face being fired for)?kuraimenWhat happened to Green is the exception not the norm. The majority of those who do stuff like that that I've seen get ridiculous sentences or go free. Also the US army hasn't enforced the death penalty on anyone since 1961. The last person the military executed was sentenced to death for the rape and attempted murder of an an Austrian (not American) girl. The girl who was raped and her mom begged President Kennedy not to execute him and they did it anyway. Not to mention the vast majority of the men on death row right now are there for killing Americans (to include Hasan Akbar, who killed an Army captain and Air Force major in Kuwait prior to the invasion of Iraq), people you would assume they would want to hurry up and kill. The biggest reason for a light sentence in foreign murder cases is either a lack of evidence or a plea bargain, not some conspiracy to go light on murderers who are killing foreign nationals.
[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]Pretty much agree with this.
Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.
MakeMeaSammitch
There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder
Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough
lol, he went crazy, pretty strait forward.These things happen in war.
Still doesn't excuse what he did. He isn't any better than Nidel Hasan in my opinion. Granted there are Afghan forces shooting Americans but that doesn't give him the excuse to take it out on innocent families.[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPralineWhen is Barry Obama's trial date?
He's only on trial because it went public. His superiors would have gladly swept this under the rug if they could have. They would do anything to avoid the media finding out.
There's a flaw in your logic here somewhere. You're saying that they only try the cases that the public hears about. So, you know for certain that there's a huge pile of cases that no has ever heard of. That seems a little... baseless.He's only on trial because it went public. His superiors would have gladly swept this under the rug if they could have. They would do anything to avoid the media finding out.
junglist101
When is Barry Obama's trial date? For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. GrayF0X786
[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court. Ethics>morals>law[QUOTE="MrPraline"] When is Barry Obama's trial date?ad1x2
and the amount of times US soldiers have killed civilians then said they were mistaken for enemy combatants?
[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]kuraimenFor all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court. Ethics>morals>law but whose morality?
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]They don't specifically target civilians, that's just silly. However they don't give a sh*t if they do get caught up on the crossfire.whiskeystrike
Quite a lot actually. There is nothing inherently different about someone when they put on the uniform. The military gets all types
The military weeds out undesirables.[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]kuraimenFor all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court. Ethics>morals>law Ethics and morals don't hold up in a court of law unless the action is illegal. So the haters have nothing. And I'm saying this as a guy who has very little in common with the President in terms of political opinions.
[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court. Failing to investigate/prosecute the war crimes of the previous administration is in and of itself a war crime. Also many of the tactics used in relation to drone strikes are of dubious legality. Bush, Cheney and Co. have found it very difficult to travel abroad since retiring, and Obama will most likely face that same reality.[QUOTE="MrPraline"] When is Barry Obama's trial date?ad1x2
[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"][QUOTE="tagyhag"]They don't specifically target civilians, that's just silly. However they don't give a sh*t if they do get caught up on the crossfire.LJS9502_basic
Quite a lot actually. There is nothing inherently different about someone when they put on the uniform. The military gets all types
The military weeds out undesirables.Well yeah I know. I should have said that the military was comprised of normal people. To say we don't care about civilian deaths is a little bit insulting. On a grand scheme of things its easy to say tragedies are irrelevant but thats something that could be said of the human race in general
[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]-Sun_Tzu-For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court. Failing to investigate/prosecute the war crimes of the previous administration is in and of itself a war crime. Also many of the tactics used in relation to drone strikes are of dubious legality. Bush, Cheney and Co. have found it very difficult to travel abroad since retiring, and Obama will most likely face that same reality. An honest set of questions to that then? Do you actually think, using logic and context of our justice system's biased nature, that there'd be a real chance of both landing the charges and persecution? If no chance of actually succeeding, but you'd suggest still the attempt as a symbolic gesture to justice, wouldn't it of turned the majority of the nation against Obama? If he turned them against him then he'd of had no chance at a second term. So he'd of traded potential successes through two terms for an symbolic one of morality. You think it of been worth it?
The military is a bureaucracy, and like all bureaucracies it has no incentive to highlight its failures, or to police itself particularly stringently. Seeking the death penalty for one case is like saying "Internal affairs sought prosecution on a corrupt cop, therefore police corruption doesn't exist!" Silly. RhazaknaHowever more often than not, soldiers are not punished for their actions until it hits the media. Take that video of soldiers urinating on corpses as an example, nothing was done until the video became viral and ended up on the news.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....Nibroc420You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo The US military kills civilians on a daily basis. Sometimes soldiers are punished if the media finds out. It's not hard to understand. I agree but I was mostly referring to the conversation about ethics, morals and law. I seriously don't think ljs can grasp those concepts.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....LJS9502_basicYou can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convoOh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again. Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convokuraimenOh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again. Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy So you misspoke...yet again.
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen
Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen
I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.
Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy So you misspoke...yet again.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.LJS9502_basic
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen
Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen
I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.
Paraphrasing? Could you quote exactly perhaps? Some people have an extreme habit of... hyperbolizing their paraphrases.Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy So you misspoke...yet again.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.LJS9502_basic
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen
Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen
I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.
Are you blind or just incredibly dumb and dishonest. The last quote was referencing a post on morals not ethics[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]So you misspoke...yet again.[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummykuraimen
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen
Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen
I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.
Are you blind or just incredibly dumb and dishonest. The last quote was referencing a post on morals not ethicsLiar. It was in response to this....Ethics and morals don't hold up in a court of law unless the action is illegal. So the haters have nothing. And I'm saying this as a guy who has very little in common with the President in terms of political opinions.someone saidThere is nothing in that exchange that veers into morality as the topic per se. He mentioned BOTH morals and ethics in response to your initial post.
[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]Pretty much agree with this.
Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.
MakeMeaSammitch
There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder
Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough
lol, he went crazy, pretty strait forward.These things happen in war.
he did turn himself in after doing so too, so I imagine he regreted his actions.[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPralineWhen is Barry Obama's trial date? I don't know, when George Dubya Bush takes back his White House he'll try Barry. Matter of fact, I hear it's the second thing on Bush's to do list, only after deposing Deval Patrick and restoring Mitt Romney to his rightful place as governor of Massachusetts. Then he'll try Obama.
-Sun_Tzu-
I don't believe any of that sh*t, and I don't even like Obama. Do you really think Obama - knowingly - kills hundreds of innocent people through his drone strikes? Really? This guy has kids, is a family man-and, mind you, Obama is the same person who was crying about the Newtown Massacre. I doubt Obama is a "mass murderer"....
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] kingkong0124
I don't believe any of that sh*t, and I don't even like Obama. Do you really think Obama - knowingly - kills hundreds of innocent people through his drone strikes? Really? This guy has kids, is a family man-and, mind you, Obama is the same person who was crying about the Newtown Massacre. I doubt Obama is a "mass murderer"....
People don't usually apply the same emotional weight they give to their close ones to others. Specially when you don't have to be present when those others die and you just have to give an order and a bomb drops. Like Stalin said one death is a tragedy, 1000 deaths a statistic. There has even been serial killers who were considered loving parents. Hitler was good with kids and dogs etc etc. Besides politicians make a living out of lying. Obama knows the drones kill innocents but he somehow rationalizes it to be worthy.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] kingkong0124
I don't believe any of that sh*t, and I don't even like Obama. Do you really think Obama - knowingly - kills hundreds of innocent people through his drone strikes? Really? This guy has kids, is a family man-and, mind you, Obama is the same person who was crying about the Newtown Massacre. I doubt Obama is a "mass murderer"....
Yeah, It's a little harsh on Obama. I don't think him, or Bush, are evil men that like slaughtering people.[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court. Failing to investigate/prosecute the war crimes of the previous administration is in and of itself a war crime. Also many of the tactics used in relation to drone strikes are of dubious legality. Bush, Cheney and Co. have found it very difficult to travel abroad since retiring, and Obama will most likely face that same reality. C'mon. Face it, no country would try to arrest a former U.S. president or VP.-Sun_Tzu-
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment