Enough with lies, this is what happens when US troops set out to kill civilians

  • 186 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts
[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPraline
When is Barry Obama's trial date?

Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

There are definitely some cover ups out there but to believe any military personnel can just kill someone because they want to and not face extreme punishment is blatant stupidity.

HouseMuzik4Life

I wanna sig that its so cute

Feel free

Avatar image for thebest31406
thebest31406

3775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 thebest31406
Member since 2004 • 3775 Posts
[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPraline
When is Barry Obama's trial date?

Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#54 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

Not sure what I was thinking, I forgot where I was. I think I am finished with diplomacy, you are all not worth my time.

Very good. In that case, I will consider this a victory for the rest of us.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
So your saying this happened once ? Well i've gotta say, you've got a strong case.
Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.

whipassmt

Pretty much agree with this.

Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.

Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.

MakeMeaSammitch

Pretty much agree with this.

Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.

There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder

Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough

Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.

whiskeystrike

Pretty much agree with this.

Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.

There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder

Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough

lol, he went crazy, pretty strait forward.

These things happen in war.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

death penalty seems kind of harsh for this guy. Yeah he killed 16 people, but I think he probably snapped from stress or something and had a mental breakdown. If I recall correctly, the soldier shot up the Afghan villagers a short while after a group of Afghan soldiers and policeman that the U.S. army was training gunned down a the American troops that were training them.

Pretty much agree with this.

Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.

There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder

Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough

Well none of us truely know our limits when, or if we ever do, truely snap. However when he snapped he killed kids. It is one way to see that he snapped in a very stressful situation and killed potential threats. As in adults. However since he also killed the little kids it shows that deep down what kind of animal he is. So I agree that seeking the death penalty is fine with me.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="ad1x2"]I always find it funny when clueless people make assumptions that hold very little in truth. People are acting like Staff Sergeant Bales is the only US Soldier who has faced the death penalty for the murder of foreign nationals. He is far from the only one. Google Steven Dale Green, you will see he is serving life in prison for raping and murdering a 14-year old Iraqi girl. If the US really wanted to murder a bunch of Afghans they would just pull all troops out and bomb the place until there is a crater where every major city used to be.

Some of you have no idea what kind of punishment troops can face under the UCMJ. Where else in the US can you go to jail for cheating on your wife, or having sex with a married woman even though you are single yourself? Or go to jail for telling your boss to fvck off, for being late for work, or coming up positive on a urine test (things a civilian could at worst face being fired for)?kuraimen
What happened to Green is the exception not the norm. The majority of those who do stuff like that that I've seen get ridiculous sentences or go free. Also the US army hasn't enforced the death penalty on anyone since 1961.

The last person the military executed was sentenced to death for the rape and attempted murder of an an Austrian (not American) girl. The girl who was raped and her mom begged President Kennedy not to execute him and they did it anyway. Not to mention the vast majority of the men on death row right now are there for killing Americans (to include Hasan Akbar, who killed an Army captain and Air Force major in Kuwait prior to the invasion of Iraq), people you would assume they would want to hurry up and kill. The biggest reason for a light sentence in foreign murder cases is either a lack of evidence or a plea bargain, not some conspiracy to go light on murderers who are killing foreign nationals.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]Pretty much agree with this.

Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.

MakeMeaSammitch

There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder

Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough

lol, he went crazy, pretty strait forward.

These things happen in war.

Still doesn't excuse what he did. He isn't any better than Nidel Hasan in my opinion. Granted there are Afghan forces shooting Americans but that doesn't give him the excuse to take it out on innocent families.
Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPraline
When is Barry Obama's trial date?

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

He's only on trial because it went public. His superiors would have gladly swept this under the rug if they could have. They would do anything to avoid the media finding out.

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#64 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

He's only on trial because it went public. His superiors would have gladly swept this under the rug if they could have. They would do anything to avoid the media finding out.

junglist101
There's a flaw in your logic here somewhere. You're saying that they only try the cases that the public hears about. So, you know for certain that there's a huge pile of cases that no has ever heard of. That seems a little... baseless.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. GrayF0X786

When is Barry Obama's trial date?

For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

[QUOTE="MrPraline"] When is Barry Obama's trial date?ad1x2

For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Ethics>morals>law
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

and the amount of times US soldiers have killed civilians then said they were mistaken for enemy combatants?

Avatar image for pie-junior
pie-junior

2866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 pie-junior
Member since 2007 • 2866 Posts
[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]kuraimen
For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Ethics>morals>law

but whose morality?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="pie-junior"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="ad1x2"] For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Ethics>morals>law

but whose morality?

Depends on the group that's why ethics is above
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]They don't specifically target civilians, that's just silly. However they don't give a sh*t if they do get caught up on the crossfire.whiskeystrike

Quite a lot actually. There is nothing inherently different about someone when they put on the uniform. The military gets all types

The military weeds out undesirables.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="pie-junior"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Ethics>morals>law

but whose morality?

Depends on the group that's why ethics is above

Then basically you've got nothing.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts
[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]kuraimen
For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Ethics>morals>law

Ethics and morals don't hold up in a court of law unless the action is illegal. So the haters have nothing. And I'm saying this as a guy who has very little in common with the President in terms of political opinions.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="pie-junior"] but whose morality?

Depends on the group that's why ethics is above

Then basically you've got nothing.

This conversation is not for your level sorry
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="ad1x2"] For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Ethics>morals>law

Ethics and morals don't hold up in a court of law unless the action is illegal. So the haters have nothing. And I'm saying this as a guy who has very little in common with the President in terms of political opinions.

The law can say many things but the ethical judgments are still valid even if we can't prosecute anyone. Relying on the law to decide what's good or bad can be simple but not what a respectable human being should do.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

[QUOTE="MrPraline"] When is Barry Obama's trial date?ad1x2

For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Failing to investigate/prosecute the war crimes of the previous administration is in and of itself a war crime. Also many of the tactics used in relation to drone strikes are of dubious legality. Bush, Cheney and Co. have found it very difficult to travel abroad since retiring, and Obama will most likely face that same reality.
Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]They don't specifically target civilians, that's just silly. However they don't give a sh*t if they do get caught up on the crossfire.LJS9502_basic

Quite a lot actually. There is nothing inherently different about someone when they put on the uniform. The military gets all types

The military weeds out undesirables.

Well yeah I know. I should have said that the military was comprised of normal people. To say we don't care about civilian deaths is a little bit insulting. On a grand scheme of things its easy to say tragedies are irrelevant but thats something that could be said of the human race in general

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]-Sun_Tzu-
For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Failing to investigate/prosecute the war crimes of the previous administration is in and of itself a war crime. Also many of the tactics used in relation to drone strikes are of dubious legality. Bush, Cheney and Co. have found it very difficult to travel abroad since retiring, and Obama will most likely face that same reality.

An honest set of questions to that then?

Do you actually think, using logic and context of our justice system's biased nature, that there'd be a real chance of both landing the charges and persecution? If no chance of actually succeeding, but you'd suggest still the attempt as a symbolic gesture to justice, wouldn't it of turned the majority of the nation against Obama? If he turned them against him then he'd of had no chance at a second term. So he'd of traded potential successes through two terms for an symbolic one of morality.

You think it of been worth it?
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
The military is a bureaucracy, and like all bureaucracies it has no incentive to highlight its failures, or to police itself particularly stringently. Seeking the death penalty for one case is like saying "Internal affairs sought prosecution on a corrupt cop, therefore police corruption doesn't exist!" Silly.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
The military is a bureaucracy, and like all bureaucracies it has no incentive to highlight its failures, or to police itself particularly stringently. Seeking the death penalty for one case is like saying "Internal affairs sought prosecution on a corrupt cop, therefore police corruption doesn't exist!" Silly. Rhazakna
However more often than not, soldiers are not punished for their actions until it hits the media. Take that video of soldiers urinating on corpses as an example, nothing was done until the video became viral and ended up on the news.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Depends on the group that's why ethics is above

Then basically you've got nothing.

This conversation is not for your level sorry

Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Then basically you've got nothing.LJS9502_basic
This conversation is not for your level sorry

Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....

You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] This conversation is not for your level sorry

Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....

You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo

The US military kills civilians on a daily basis. Sometimes soldiers are punished if the media finds out. It's not hard to understand.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] This conversation is not for your level sorry

Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....

You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo

Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....Nibroc420
You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo

The US military kills civilians on a daily basis. Sometimes soldiers are punished if the media finds out. It's not hard to understand.

I agree but I was mostly referring to the conversation about ethics, morals and law. I seriously don't think ljs can grasp those concepts.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yeah it is a bit beneath me.....LJS9502_basic
You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo

Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.

Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo

The US military kills civilians on a daily basis. Sometimes soldiers are punished if the media finds out. It's not hard to understand.

I agree but I was mostly referring to the conversation about ethics, morals and law. I seriously don't think ljs can grasp those concepts.

Dude...your intelligence is vastly below mine.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convo

The US military kills civilians on a daily basis. Sometimes soldiers are punished if the media finds out. It's not hard to understand.

I agree but I was mostly referring to the conversation about ethics, morals and law. I seriously don't think ljs can grasp those concepts.

LJS trolls all the time. He just responds with page long posts no-one wants to read or critique, he's really not worth the time.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] The US military kills civilians on a daily basis. Sometimes soldiers are punished if the media finds out. It's not hard to understand.

I agree but I was mostly referring to the conversation about ethics, morals and law. I seriously don't think ljs can grasp those concepts.

LJS trolls all the time. He just responds with page long posts no-one wants to read or critique, he's really not worth the time.

I agree his posts show very little thought process behind them.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] You can't even understand the basic concepts much less the entire convokuraimen
Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.

Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy

So you misspoke...yet again.
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen

Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen

I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.LJS9502_basic

Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy

So you misspoke...yet again.
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen

Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen

I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.

Paraphrasing? Could you quote exactly perhaps? Some people have an extreme habit of... hyperbolizing their paraphrases.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Oh I understood it. You said ethics matter. Then you said it depends on the individual ethical valuations. Which, in effect, means you said nothing of substance. Again.LJS9502_basic

Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummy

So you misspoke...yet again.
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen

Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen

I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.

Are you blind or just incredibly dumb and dishonest. The last quote was referencing a post on morals not ethics
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180239 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yeah like I figured you didn't understand anything. Morals is not the same as ethics. Morals depend on each group ethics is a rational evaluation of what's right and wrong and laws also change between groups dummykuraimen

So you misspoke...yet again.
Ethics>morals>lawkuraimen

Depends on the group that's why ethics is abovekuraimen

I paraphrased your f*cking comments dude.

Are you blind or just incredibly dumb and dishonest. The last quote was referencing a post on morals not ethics

Liar. It was in response to this....
Ethics and morals don't hold up in a court of law unless the action is illegal. So the haters have nothing. And I'm saying this as a guy who has very little in common with the President in terms of political opinions.someone said
There is nothing in that exchange that veers into morality as the topic per se. He mentioned BOTH morals and ethics in response to your initial post.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#93 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]Pretty much agree with this.

Also the amount of anti americanism in this thread is shameful.

MakeMeaSammitch

There is nothing justifiable about premeditated murder

Oh he only killed 16 people but give him a break guys. he had it rough

lol, he went crazy, pretty strait forward.

These things happen in war.

he did turn himself in after doing so too, so I imagine he regreted his actions.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#95 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="vfibsux"]This is what America stands for, when one of our own does wrong, he or she WILL face the consequences. MrPraline
When is Barry Obama's trial date?

I don't know, when George Dubya Bush takes back his White House he'll try Barry. Matter of fact, I hear it's the second thing on Bush's to do list, only after deposing Deval Patrick and restoring Mitt Romney to his rightful place as governor of Massachusetts. Then he'll try Obama.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
@LJS This is the exchange I had on the last page and the context of the quote you posted. [QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="pie-junior"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Ethics>morals>law

but whose morality?

Depends on the group that's why ethics is above

Do yourself a favor and stop being such a fvcking liar LJS, you look dumb enough even without lying.
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

-Sun_Tzu-

I don't believe any of that sh*t, and I don't even like Obama. Do you really think Obama - knowingly - kills hundreds of innocent people through his drone strikes? Really? This guy has kids, is a family man-and, mind you, Obama is the same person who was crying about the Newtown Massacre. I doubt Obama is a "mass murderer"....

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] kingkong0124

I don't believe any of that sh*t, and I don't even like Obama. Do you really think Obama - knowingly - kills hundreds of innocent people through his drone strikes? Really? This guy has kids, is a family man-and, mind you, Obama is the same person who was crying about the Newtown Massacre. I doubt Obama is a "mass murderer"....

People don't usually apply the same emotional weight they give to their close ones to others. Specially when you don't have to be present when those others die and you just have to give an order and a bomb drops. Like Stalin said one death is a tragedy, 1000 deaths a statistic. There has even been serial killers who were considered loving parents. Hitler was good with kids and dogs etc etc. Besides politicians make a living out of lying. Obama knows the drones kill innocents but he somehow rationalizes it to be worthy.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#99 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] kingkong0124

I don't believe any of that sh*t, and I don't even like Obama. Do you really think Obama - knowingly - kills hundreds of innocent people through his drone strikes? Really? This guy has kids, is a family man-and, mind you, Obama is the same person who was crying about the Newtown Massacre. I doubt Obama is a "mass murderer"....

Yeah, It's a little harsh on Obama. I don't think him, or Bush, are evil men that like slaughtering people.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#100 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"]

-Sun_Tzu-

For all of the people who keep quoting this as well as the original person who posted this, what charges would you propose get pressed against the President? I'm talking about legitimate charges, not some made-up "moral" charges that wouldn't hold up in an impeachment hearing or Federal court.

Failing to investigate/prosecute the war crimes of the previous administration is in and of itself a war crime. Also many of the tactics used in relation to drone strikes are of dubious legality. Bush, Cheney and Co. have found it very difficult to travel abroad since retiring, and Obama will most likely face that same reality.

C'mon. Face it, no country would try to arrest a former U.S. president or VP.