for the first time I completely disagree with you Mr. Obama

  • 141 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="clubsammich91"]I don't like the fact that we are starving ourselves of something that we absolutely need because of the environment. The Earth has been around for around 4 billion years, what little effect we humans have on the environment, the planet could just shrug off after a few hundred years. Now I'm all for alternative fuels to loose are dependence on getting oil from dirtbag misogynistic nations that still show public executions, but I know that alternative fuels are still pretty far away. topgunmv

From everything I've heard, there are several options available ready to go, some of which are easily adoptable to current engiens and gas stations. The reason we haven't made the shift to alternative fuels? We don't have to.

that's another thing I wonder about. Have we really found a solution, but we are just waiting until we have to? Or do we have no true solution? If we do have a solution why must we continue to harm the environment without need for it? I hate that so much it makes me want to scream.
Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#52 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts
I fully support the President! Drill baby, drill!
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#53 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"]

Obama isa joke!

do you have reasons behind this? or is it just a random bashing post?

Change. Hope. etc etc. Never saw it from him.
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts
I disagree with his decision as well. We should be building more nuclear plants. Clean energy and no war required.
Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts

Lets screw the environment over so we can get a minor amount of oil rather than investing in future fuels.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"][QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"]

Obama isa joke!

do you have reasons behind this? or is it just a random bashing post?

Change. Hope. etc etc. Never saw it from him.

*raises eyebrow* he changed the healthcare system and he has strengthened foreign relations, just saying.
Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#57 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts
[QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"][QUOTE="Serraph105"] do you have reasons behind this? or is it just a random bashing post?Serraph105
Change. Hope. etc etc. Never saw it from him.

*raises eyebrow* he changed the healthcare system and he has strengthened foreign relations, just saying.

I want something much more than that... Something really good we haven't had in a long time.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"] Change. Hope. etc etc. Never saw it from him.Gaming-Planet
*raises eyebrow* he changed the healthcare system and he has strengthened foreign relations, just saying.

I want something much more than that... Something really good we haven't had in a long time.

jetpacks maybe?
Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#59 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts
[QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"][QUOTE="Serraph105"] *raises eyebrow* he changed the healthcare system and he has strengthened foreign relations, just saying.Serraph105
I want something much more than that... Something really good we haven't had in a long time.

jetpacks maybe?

OH OH!!! I know! A Collosseum! with tigers, gladiators, lions, elephant killings! It will be awesome! /sarcasm. what can Obama do? he is taking a multilateral approach to impending energy crisis, first president to ok construction of new nuclear power plans, and oil plants. AND plans on large research funding for new energy sources. he's winding down Iraq operations, to eventually pull out all together. keep fighting Al-Qaeda, and Taliban in Afghanistan. etc. i mean what can he do that is so amazing? I still give him mad props.. on his 4th day as President, he sent out George Mitchell (a man who helped with the North Ireland peace process) to Israel/Palestine as special envoy. Most of the times, Presidents put most of their efforts near the end of their Presidencies or not at all....
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"] I want something much more than that... Something really good we haven't had in a long time.

jetpacks maybe?

OH OH!!! I know! A Collosseum! with tigers, gladiators, lions, elephant killings! It will be awesome! /sarcasm. what can Obama do? he is taking a multilateral approach to impending energy crisis, first president to ok construction of new nuclear power plans, and oil plants. AND plans on large research funding for new energy sources. he's winding down Iraq operations, to eventually pull out all together. keep fighting Al-Qaeda, and Taliban in Afghanistan. etc. i mean what can he do that is so amazing? I still give him mad props.. on his 4th day as President, he sent out George Mitchell (a man who helped with the North Ireland peace process) to Israel/Palestine as special envoy. Most of the times, Presidents put most of their efforts near the end of their Presidencies or not at all....

true. I still believe he is doing a good job. I just happen to disagree with this.
Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts
I also am not too excited about this. More oil? That's not exactly what the world needs right now.
Avatar image for Captain_Auburn
Captain_Auburn

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Captain_Auburn
Member since 2009 • 82 Posts
If it makes gas prices go down, I'm fine with it.
Avatar image for SunofVich
SunofVich

4665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 SunofVich
Member since 2004 • 4665 Posts

I agree with offshore drilling.

Avatar image for Elephant_Couple
Elephant_Couple

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Elephant_Couple
Member since 2010 • 1404 Posts

If it's any consolation, he's not really expanding drilling at all. He's closing off other important areas while he opens up the new ones. It's a complete show game designed to win him sympathy from the right.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, we should be drilling everywhere until oil runs out. There is no way we will be independent of fossil fuels in the next 50 years. Too much of our country relies on it, and we should accept that fact. We should also, however, continue developing renewable energy.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
im mixed on the issue
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

If it's any consolation, he's not really expanding drilling at all. He's closing off other important areas while he opens up the new ones. It's a complete show game designed to win him sympathy from the right.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, we should be drilling everywhere until oil runs out. There is no way we will be independent of fossil fuels in the next 50 years. Too much of our country relies on it, and we should accept that fact. We should also, however, continue developing renewable energy.

Elephant_Couple
it is some consolation actually, but we should be putting more effort towards clean energy.
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#67 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Its one of the first things he's done that I've really opposed. His lack of action on LGBT issues is one thing, but actively damaging the environment is another.
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#68 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Well hell...it's as good of time as any to trot this bad boy out.
In the grand tradition of Admiral Ackbar...IT'S A TRAP! Watch the Republican Leadership refuse to outright endorse this. They'll say it's "a positive sign" or "a step in the right direction" but stop short of actually thanking him for doing something that they've wanted for years. My guess? This is another way for Obama to paint Republicans as being obstructionists/party of no.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
I also am not too excited about this. More oil? That's not exactly what the world needs right now. Acemaster27
Actually, yes it is :o
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Gulf of Mexico is where it's at Obama! Suck this puppy dry!
Avatar image for hungry_pirate
hungry_pirate

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 hungry_pirate
Member since 2010 • 264 Posts

Drilling your own oil from the shores is better for the environment then waging wars for oil. BTW the environment crap is all bull

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

Yeah I disagree here too.

Doesn't seem to me the environmental risks are worth it for something that we won't benefit from for at least a decade and even then will only knock like a few cents off gas prices.

Lets just go invade some other country and take their oil....

Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
so u think he should just let us be 100 percent dependant upon foreign oil? i dont get you libs. you say we shouldnt bother with the mid east but when we try to find our oil u cry about that too. we have to get oil somewhere....
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#74 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

We can't let our children deal with the effects of Obamas horrible healthcare plan in the future!

But the effects of totally destroying the enviroment and making it nigh uninhabitable for people? Yeah, kids can deal with that. lol who cares, we'll be dead by then amirite?

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

so u think he should just let us be 100 percent dependant upon foreign oil? i dont get you libs. you say we shouldnt bother with the mid east but when we try to find our oil u cry about that too. we have to get oil somewhere....Trollsters

Or we could, you know, stop using oil.

It's going to be gone eventually. Most likely sooner than later. It is not an infinite supply.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#76 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

Obama is alll over the place. he cant seem to make uo his mind about where he stands .

dontshackzmii
unlike how the right tends to portray him, Obama is not an ideologue. it's a political pragmatist.
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts

[QUOTE="Trollsters"]so u think he should just let us be 100 percent dependant upon foreign oil? i dont get you libs. you say we shouldnt bother with the mid east but when we try to find our oil u cry about that too. we have to get oil somewhere....Pixel-Pirate

Or we could, you know, stop using oil.

It's going to be gone eventually. Most likely sooner than later. It is not an infinite supply.

yea because we can just snap our fingers and make it so. it will be 20-30 years minimum before we could even think about completely stopping the use of oil. In the meantime, we have to find a way to get it.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Trollsters"]so u think he should just let us be 100 percent dependant upon foreign oil? i dont get you libs. you say we shouldnt bother with the mid east but when we try to find our oil u cry about that too. we have to get oil somewhere....Trollsters

Or we could, you know, stop using oil.

It's going to be gone eventually. Most likely sooner than later. It is not an infinite supply.

yea because we can just snap our fingers and make it so. it will be 20-30 years minimum before we could even think about completely stopping the use of oil. In the meantime, we have to find a way to get it.

Half the cars in Brazil run on ethanol, the rest run on a gas/ethanol blend. If Brazil can do it, I have a hard time believing that the U.S. can't.

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

To be honest, I don't understand how this will put a significant dent in our demand for energy in the future. I still think it is a good idea though. I am sure people will have a keen eye out to make sure the local environments are not oliterated. :P However, I think a lot of states will have a "NIMBY" attitude when it comes to the offshore drilling, either because of health or security concerns.

I wholeheartedly agree with Pixel Pirate that there should be a concerted effort between the scientific community and the government to find a sustainable alternative energy technology and strengthen it's infrastructure.

The way things are going now though, I think the U.S. will default to coal and "clean coal" technology in times of crisis which does not sit well with me. We have to find a way to power the transportation sector and right now, oil is the way.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#80 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Trollsters"]so u think he should just let us be 100 percent dependant upon foreign oil? i dont get you libs. you say we shouldnt bother with the mid east but when we try to find our oil u cry about that too. we have to get oil somewhere....Trollsters

Or we could, you know, stop using oil.

It's going to be gone eventually. Most likely sooner than later. It is not an infinite supply.

yea because we can just snap our fingers and make it so. it will be 20-30 years minimum before we could even think about completely stopping the use of oil. In the meantime, we have to find a way to get it.

We'll probably run out by then. Perhaps I'd be less appaled at this "lol the enviroment juzt gunna fix itzelf" ideology if the government and the world started making an honest effort to ditch oil. But that won't happen. Oil companies wouldn't care for it, and they would rather the world burn than lose profit.

America and alot of the world sound like drug addicts "I can't just quit that easy, man! I'll quit, I just need my fix till then!"

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

For anyone remotely interested, I've had the pleasure to attend a few lectures and speak with by Prof. Nate Lewis. He is equally concerned about our energy needs and powering the planet in the foreseeable future. He has compiled a lot of reading and presentation material concerning the subject, which I wish to share with all of you - Global Energy Perspective.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Or we could, you know, stop using oil.

It's going to be gone eventually. Most likely sooner than later. It is not an infinite supply.

Pixel-Pirate

yea because we can just snap our fingers and make it so. it will be 20-30 years minimum before we could even think about completely stopping the use of oil. In the meantime, we have to find a way to get it.

We'll probably run out by then. Perhaps I'd be less appaled at this "lol the enviroment juzt gunna fix itzelf" ideology if the government and the world started making an honest effort to ditch oil. But that won't happen. Oil companies wouldn't care for it, and they would rather the world burn than lose profit.

America and alot of the world sound like drug addicts "I can't just quit that easy, man! I'll quit, I just need my fix till then!"

I heard last night that there is a company that spent $50 million dollars to spread that ideology

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

I heard last night that there is a company that spent $50 million dollars to spread that ideology

Serraph105

While they are technically right that the earth will "self-correct" they fail to mention the timescale in which this happens. :P

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

To be honest, I don't understand how this will put a significant dent in our demand for energy in the future. I still think it is a good idea though. I am sure people will have a keen eye out to make sure the local environments are not oliterated. :P However, I think a lot of states will have a "NIMBY" attitude when it comes to the offshore drilling, either because of health or security concerns.

I wholeheartedly agree with Pixel Pirate that there should be a concerted effort between the scientific community and the government to find a sustainable alternative energy technology and strengthen it's infrastructure.

The way things are going now though, I think the U.S. will default to coal and "clean coal" technology in times of crisis which does not sit well with me. We have to find a way to power the transportation sector and right now, oil is the way.

entropyecho

Interestingly enough, there are two industries that are rising in big ways here in Michigan: Entertainment (We are poised to become a new Hollywood) and Green industries.

The green thinking seems to be growing at least and there is alot of interest in green technology so I hope that we can stop our use of oil and such in not too long of time. I personally hope some big breakthrough's happen so those green industries can grow and help create lots of jobs and such here in Michigan.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#85 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38925 Posts

[QUOTE="clubsammich91"]I don't like the fact that we are starving ourselves of something that we absolutely need because of the environment. The Earth has been around for around 4 billion years, what little effect we humans have on the environment, the planet could just shrug off after a few hundred years. Now I'm all for alternative fuels to loose are dependence on getting oil from dirtbag misogynistic nations that still show public executions, but I know that alternative fuels are still pretty far away. Pirate700

Same here. I'm ALL for the development of alternative CHEAPER fuels, but screwing the American people by making them pay way too much for gas is not the way to go about change. Gas prices can/will plummet with off shore drilling...until Obama raises the taxes on that too.

states are more responsible for gasoline taxes than the fed. govt. is. and the price of oil is deteremined on the global market. so unless we're pumpoing enough to make an impact on global supply. the price will not plummet.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="entropyecho"]

To be honest, I don't understand how this will put a significant dent in our demand for energy in the future. I still think it is a good idea though. I am sure people will have a keen eye out to make sure the local environments are not oliterated. :P However, I think a lot of states will have a "NIMBY" attitude when it comes to the offshore drilling, either because of health or security concerns.

I wholeheartedly agree with Pixel Pirate that there should be a concerted effort between the scientific community and the government to find a sustainable alternative energy technology and strengthen it's infrastructure.

The way things are going now though, I think the U.S. will default to coal and "clean coal" technology in times of crisis which does not sit well with me. We have to find a way to power the transportation sector and right now, oil is the way.

LostProphetFLCL

Interestingly enough, there are two industries that are rising in big ways here in Michigan: Entertainment (We are poised to become a new Hollywood) and Green industries.

The green thinking seems to be growing at least and there is alot of interest in green technology so I hope that we can stop our use of oil and such in not too long of time. I personally hope some big breakthrough's happen so those green industries can grow and help create lots of jobs and such here in Michigan.

It's odd having all those movies filmed here. 50 Cent just filmed the trailer for his new movie at my University not too long ago.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

I heard last night that there is a company that spent $50 million dollars to spread that ideology

entropyecho

While they are technically right that the earth will "self-correct" they fail to mention the timescale in which this happens. :P

that and previous self corrections lead to mass extinctions.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="entropyecho"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

I heard last night that there is a company that spent $50 million dollars to spread that ideology

Ontain

While they are technically right that the earth will "self-correct" they fail to mention the timescale in which this happens. :P

that and previous self corrections lead to mass extinctions.

interestingly enough so does screwing up the earth to begin with
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38925 Posts

[QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Or we could, you know, stop using oil.

It's going to be gone eventually. Most likely sooner than later. It is not an infinite supply.

topgunmv

yea because we can just snap our fingers and make it so. it will be 20-30 years minimum before we could even think about completely stopping the use of oil. In the meantime, we have to find a way to get it.

Half the cars in Brazil run on ethanol, the rest run on a gas/ethanol blend. If Brazil can do it, I have a hard time believing that the U.S. can't.

brazil has a huge sugar industry that the us does not have which they can use in their ethanol generation. my understanding is corn is not as well suited for ethanol as sugar.
Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]

[QUOTE="entropyecho"]

To be honest, I don't understand how this will put a significant dent in our demand for energy in the future. I still think it is a good idea though. I am sure people will have a keen eye out to make sure the local environments are not oliterated. :P However, I think a lot of states will have a "NIMBY" attitude when it comes to the offshore drilling, either because of health or security concerns.

I wholeheartedly agree with Pixel Pirate that there should be a concerted effort between the scientific community and the government to find a sustainable alternative energy technology and strengthen it's infrastructure.

The way things are going now though, I think the U.S. will default to coal and "clean coal" technology in times of crisis which does not sit well with me. We have to find a way to power the transportation sector and right now, oil is the way.

topgunmv

Interestingly enough, there are two industries that are rising in big ways here in Michigan: Entertainment (We are poised to become a new Hollywood) and Green industries.

The green thinking seems to be growing at least and there is alot of interest in green technology so I hope that we can stop our use of oil and such in not too long of time. I personally hope some big breakthrough's happen so those green industries can grow and help create lots of jobs and such here in Michigan.

It's odd having all those movies filmed here. 50 Cent just filmed the trailer for his new movie at my University not too long ago.

As someone with aspirations for film and music (The tax cuts causing all this go for music too), it is amazing!

I am actually a production assistant on a movie right now that is being looked at by Lions Gate and another huge movie company!

It was a brilliant idea on our state governments part to pass those tax cuts (and it is propbably the only thing they have done right...). If the industries grow here like expected it could completely turn our states economy around.

After all, it isn't just creating jobs for the filming, but boosting local businesses an insane amount (as after all, people need places to stay, need to get food, might need materials for the filming, etc.) and attracting more people to possibly move here to Michigan after we have been having people leave the state en masse.

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

brazil has a huge sugar industry that the us does not have which they can use in their ethanol generation. my understanding is corn is not as well suited for ethanol as sugar.comp_atkins
Additionally, the land required to produce enough ethanol or biodiesel from crops to make a significant dent in our power needs would be larger than the acreage of a few states combined.

Avatar image for SeanDog123
SeanDog123

1327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 SeanDog123
Member since 2005 • 1327 Posts
Alternatively, this is the first time Sarah Palin completely agrees with him. DRILL BABY DRILL.SteveTabernacle
I'm sorry, I just had to go off topic and say that your sig made me laugh hysterically.
Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#93 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

I don't like this idea either...

I'm not surprised though. Through his campaign, he never really had any stong ideas for energy. I didn't know it would get this bad that he has to go to offshore drilling though, which is the equivalent of saying "I have no idea what do with the future of America's energy sources".

Avatar image for kidsmelly
kidsmelly

5692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 kidsmelly
Member since 2009 • 5692 Posts

Its something we must do for the time being America at the moment is way to dependent on oil. Until we can start producing alternative energy efficiently its about the only option we got.

I'm also still waiting how the far right will try to play this against him haha.

Avatar image for Oblivionfan10
Oblivionfan10

6327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#95 Oblivionfan10
Member since 2008 • 6327 Posts
[QUOTE="SteveTabernacle"]Alternatively, this is the first time Sarah Palin completely agrees with him. DRILL BABY DRILL.Serraph105
give it a couple of days. I'm sure she will disagree with him soon enough

You betcha. I'm so proud of you Serraph, you've turned to the good side :P
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#96 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="entropyecho"]While they are technically right that the earth will "self-correct" they fail to mention the timescale in which this happens. :P

Serraph105

that and previous self corrections lead to mass extinctions.

interestingly enough so does screwing up the earth to begin with

But...but...we need the oils! Or we might have to change!

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Ontain"] that and previous self corrections lead to mass extinctions.Pixel-Pirate

interestingly enough so does screwing up the earth to begin with

But...but...we need the oils! Or we might have to change!

Of course we should develop new energy sources. I don't see the need to starve ourselves of the ones currently availible though.

Avatar image for kidsmelly
kidsmelly

5692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 kidsmelly
Member since 2009 • 5692 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="SteveTabernacle"]Alternatively, this is the first time Sarah Palin completely agrees with him. DRILL BABY DRILL.Oblivionfan10
give it a couple of days. I'm sure she will disagree with him soon enough

You betcha. I'm so proud of you Serraph, you've turned to the good side :P

"Sarah Palin is alleging that White House plans to expand offshore oil-and-gas drilling are an effort to "shore up fading support" for climate change legislation and said the proposal creates roadblocks to new energy production."

link

Well you know she couldn't stay quiet for to long.

Avatar image for Jfisch93
Jfisch93

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#99 Jfisch93
Member since 2008 • 3557 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Ontain"] that and previous self corrections lead to mass extinctions.Pixel-Pirate

interestingly enough so does screwing up the earth to begin with

But...but...we need the oils! Or we might have to change!

Do you not get that it will take YEARS to even start to convert to an alternate energy source? Science has not even found a substance that is better and more available than oil. You cannot simply go "Oh I think the whole country should ditch oil and switch to something else." and have it just happen. We probably still have hundreds of years of oil left untapped because the government won't let us drill on our own land.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51571 Posts

The first time you disagree with him?

I didn't think that was possible after 6 months.