Give me proof that God is real

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#401 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]Tell me why divine intervention is the best explanation.
notconspiracy
He believes that because the other theories contradict information in the bible, the one that we do not know to be possible is the best explanation. Clearly it has become customary to return to ancient customs of resorting to and imagining fantastical conjectures to explain what one cannot fathom otherwise -- or as some call it the logic of "2 + 2 = unknown".

sorry CptJsparrow, but you have severly misconstrued my argument. The reason divine intervention would be the most plausible explanation is that there is simply no natural catalyst for a dead corpse coming back from the dead.

You misunderstood mine: the only reason you believe that someone can come back from the dead is because the Gospels say that someone divine did and you cannot fathom the naturalistic explanations to be true because of second-hand anecdotes of alleged witnesses.

cptJsparrow we have multiple independent sources attesting to this event. second we have multiple independent witnesses to the resurrected Jesus like Paul or James or the twelve. we have the martyrdom of the aforementioned figures. The historical evidence strongly supports the resurrection.
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]Tell me why divine intervention is the best explanation.
swizz-the-gamer
He believes that because the other theories contradict information in the bible, the one that we do not know to be possible is the best explanation. Clearly it has become customary to return to ancient customs of resorting to and imagining fantastical conjectures to explain what one cannot fathom otherwise -- or as some call it the logic of "2 + 2 = unknown".

sorry CptJsparrow, but you have severly misconstrued my argument. The reason divine intervention would be the most plausible explanation is that there is simply no natural catalyst for a dead corpse coming back from the dead.

Indeed. Thus it didn't happen. You would apply this logic to any other situation, why not this?

perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?

But a giant conspiracy is possible. Agreed?

it's possible. but it is not the best explanation

It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#402 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer
Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#403 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy
Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Well, given the prevalence of religion in the world....
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#404 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]Tell me why divine intervention is the best explanation.
swizz-the-gamer
He believes that because the other theories contradict information in the bible, the one that we do not know to be possible is the best explanation. Clearly it has become customary to return to ancient customs of resorting to and imagining fantastical conjectures to explain what one cannot fathom otherwise -- or as some call it the logic of "2 + 2 = unknown".

sorry CptJsparrow, but you have severly misconstrued my argument. The reason divine intervention would be the most plausible explanation is that there is simply no natural catalyst for a dead corpse coming back from the dead.

You misunderstood mine: the only reason you believe that someone can come back from the dead is because the Gospels say that someone divine did and you cannot fathom the naturalistic explanations to be true because of second-hand anecdotes of alleged witnesses.

cptJsparrow we have multiple independent sources attesting to this event. second we have multiple independent witnesses to the resurrected Jesus like Paul or James or the twelve. we have the martyrdom of the aforementioned figures. The historical evidence strongly supports the resurrection.
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]Tell me why divine intervention is the best explanation.
swizz-the-gamer
He believes that because the other theories contradict information in the bible, the one that we do not know to be possible is the best explanation. Clearly it has become customary to return to ancient customs of resorting to and imagining fantastical conjectures to explain what one cannot fathom otherwise -- or as some call it the logic of "2 + 2 = unknown".

sorry CptJsparrow, but you have severly misconstrued my argument. The reason divine intervention would be the most plausible explanation is that there is simply no natural catalyst for a dead corpse coming back from the dead.

Indeed. Thus it didn't happen. You would apply this logic to any other situation, why not this?

perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?

But a giant conspiracy is possible. Agreed?

it's possible. but it is not the best explanation

It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.

why is the supernatural not a logical explanation again?
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#405 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
swizz-the-gamer
I will let it go if he admits that we at least know that a naturalistic explanation is possible while we do not know in the case of the supernatural. How about yourself?
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#406 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#407 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?CptJSparrow
Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Well, given the prevalence of religion in the world....

well then it should be easy to produce an example of a supernatural event with multiple independent attestation. then we have to ask is the supernatural the best explanation in this particular example
Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#408 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
In the crown of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.
swizz-the-gamer
You're obviously joking, but still losing credibility quickly.
Avatar image for Darth_Tyrev
Darth_Tyrev

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#409 Darth_Tyrev
Member since 2005 • 7072 Posts

Well, beer is proof that God loves us, so if he loves us, he must be real. So, beer is indeed proof off God!

Thanks Ben Franklin!

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#410 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
well then it should be easy to produce an example of a supernatural event with multiple independent attestation. then we have to ask is the supernatural the best explanation in this particular examplenotconspiracy
Muhammad went to heaven before writing the Koran. Go.
Avatar image for espoac
espoac

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#411 espoac
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
[QUOTE="espoac"]If there was proof of God than why is their such a emphasis put on faith in Christianity and so many other religions? Blind faith is a fundamental component of most theistic philosophies. Therefore, any theist who tries to offer proof of God or any non-theist who asks for proof must be seriously confused. notconspiracy
you must be seriously ignorant of the vast amount of work done by the vast amount of christian apologists

I'm not ignorant of their work, I just think they're wrong. I've never seen a logical argument for the probable existence of a deity. Much less for the probable existence of a particular deity.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#412 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
CptJSparrow
I will let it go if he admits that we at least know that a naturalistic explanation is possible while we do not know in the case of the supernatural. How about yourself?

I am personally in awe that an intelligent human being would not put absolutely any scientific logical explanation before God.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#413 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#414 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]In the crown of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.
blackngold29
You're obviously joking, but still losing credibility quickly.

Really don't care.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#415 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]well then it should be easy to produce an example of a supernatural event with multiple independent attestation. then we have to ask is the supernatural the best explanation in this particular exampleCptJSparrow
Muhammad went to heaven before writing the Koran. Go.

alright. make a case for it. Im all ears
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#416 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
swizz-the-gamer
I will let it go if he admits that we at least know that a naturalistic explanation is possible while we do not know in the case of the supernatural. How about yourself?

I am personally in awe that an intelligent human being would not put absolutely any scientific logical explanation before God.

right because the conspiracy theory, an idea abandoned by all serious scholars, is a logical scientific explanation.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#417 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#418 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#419 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
notconspiracy
I will let it go if he admits that we at least know that a naturalistic explanation is possible while we do not know in the case of the supernatural. How about yourself?

I am personally in awe that an intelligent human being would not put absolutely any scientific logical explanation before God.

right because the conspiracy theory, an idea abandoned by all serious scholars, is a logical scientific explanation.

No I do not belive it was a conspiracy.

Btw switch around what I said in that post.

Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#420 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?
swizz-the-gamer
I don't get what you're trying to prove, is it 100% chance that they did not see a ghost? no
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#421 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
swizz-the-gamer

I will let it go if he admits that we at least know that a naturalistic explanation is possible while we do not know in the case of the supernatural. How about yourself?

I am personally in awe that an intelligent human being would not put absolutely any scientific logical explanation before God.

right because the conspiracy theory, an idea abandoned by all serious scholars, is a logical scientific explanation.

No I do not belive it was a conspiracy.

Btw switch around what I said in that post.

you claimed that the whole resurrection was "one big lie". the ONLY explanation you offered was the conspiracy theory.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#422 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.
Avatar image for MindFreeze
MindFreeze

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#423 MindFreeze
Member since 2007 • 2814 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"][QUOTE="sheeprcute"][QUOTE="Taiko88"][QUOTE="Samwel_X"]

Give me proof he isn't.

I'm not religious, but you can argue either way.

sheeprcute

Well religion is the one trying to impose on us that it exists, therefore they should try to prove to us that it exists, not the other way around. So for anyone using that justification of "Give me proof he isn't", makes no sense.

hey next time why dont you attack someone who is still in this discussion

Anyways evolution is what needs to be proven. I through out facts and evidence. You know what happens? You guys say its not convincing enough. Then you turn around and say there is no proof.

Evolution is the one that has evidence that contradicts it.

Go on...

He can't. Religious people aren't fans of evidence.

For starters Carbon 14 has a existence of 11,000 years.

Scientists can test the age of things by testing how much Carbon 14 is on there.

Objects that evolutionists claim to be millions of years old have carbon 14 integrated into them.

Thats just one of the simpler things that disproves evolution

First, Carbon 14 does not have an existence of 11,000 years. It has a halflife of 5700 years, which does not mean in twice that it will be gone.

Second, Carbon 14 is NOT used to date things that old.

It does not in any way disprove evolution, read up on half lives and the methods that ARE used to date things that old.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#424 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]well then it should be easy to produce an example of a supernatural event with multiple independent attestation. then we have to ask is the supernatural the best explanation in this particular examplenotconspiracy
Muhammad went to heaven before writing the Koran. Go.

alright. make a case for it. Im all ears

Muhammad and the similar prophet Yeshua could not have been lying because the latter could not possibly die for a lie and the former's cult of personality is too adamant in their beliefs for him to have been lying. Plus, many people independent of the author attest to the Koran's accuracy. Therefore, it is better than a naturalistic explanation because I cannot fathom that he would lie about such a thing and that the latter would die for it and many after him.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#425 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] It's one of the many logical explanations though. God is not a logical explanation for it.
notconspiracy

I will let it go if he admits that we at least know that a naturalistic explanation is possible while we do not know in the case of the supernatural. How about yourself?

I am personally in awe that an intelligent human being would not put absolutely any scientific logical explanation before God.

right because the conspiracy theory, an idea abandoned by all serious scholars, is a logical scientific explanation.

No I do not belive it was a conspiracy.

Btw switch around what I said in that post.

you claimed that the whole resurrection was "one big lie". the ONLY explanation you offered was the conspiracy theory.

No. I personally believe that Jesus either did not exist, or was just some of the many crazy people that this world has been blessed with and in an insane series of events became the subject of your worship :)
Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#426 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
Why are we still arguing? Everyone has made up their mind and is not going to budge.
Avatar image for foggy666
foggy666

1123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#427 foggy666
Member since 2003 • 1123 Posts

i have one, plus very easy to do:

go to your local supermarket, and get peanut butter can, now make sure its tightly closed and that it wasn't opened.
buy it
open it at home
do you see any life forms in there? like a dog or a shark?
if not, it means that the evolution theory is wrong, meaning that someone created everything, meaning that god exist.

2nd proof:
its says so in the bible, never mind that you first need to believe in god in order to validate the bible...

3rd proof:
so many people believe in god, they can't be wrong

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#428 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#429 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#430 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

For starters Carbon 14 has a existence of 11,000 years.

Scientists can test the age of things by testing how much Carbon 14 is on there.

Objects that evolutionists claim to be millions of years old have carbon 14 integrated into them.

Thats just one of the simpler things that disproves evolution

sheeprcute
Clearly that is not the only form of radiometric dating.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#431 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="sheeprcute"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"][QUOTE="sheeprcute"][QUOTE="Taiko88"][QUOTE="Samwel_X"]

Give me proof he isn't.

I'm not religious, but you can argue either way.

MindFreeze

Well religion is the one trying to impose on us that it exists, therefore they should try to prove to us that it exists, not the other way around. So for anyone using that justification of "Give me proof he isn't", makes no sense.

hey next time why dont you attack someone who is still in this discussion

Anyways evolution is what needs to be proven. I through out facts and evidence. You know what happens? You guys say its not convincing enough. Then you turn around and say there is no proof.

Evolution is the one that has evidence that contradicts it.

Go on...

He can't. Religious people aren't fans of evidence.

For starters Carbon 14 has a existence of 11,000 years.

Scientists can test the age of things by testing how much Carbon 14 is on there.

Objects that evolutionists claim to be millions of years old have carbon 14 integrated into them.

Thats just one of the simpler things that disproves evolution

First, Carbon 14 does not have an existence of 11,000 years. It has a halflife of 5700 years, which does not mean in twice that it will be gone.

Second, Carbon 14 is NOT used to date things that old.

It does not in any way disprove evolution, read up on half lives and the methods that ARE used to date things that old.

I think Sheeprcute is the one person in this thread I can safely say is useless arguing with.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#432 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
The voice of the original Dante: "31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. 32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come."
Avatar image for MindFreeze
MindFreeze

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#433 MindFreeze
Member since 2007 • 2814 Posts

i have one, plus very easy to do:

go to your local supermarket, and get peanut butter can, now make sure its tightly closed and that it wasn't opened.
buy it
open it at home
do you see any life forms in there? like a dog or a shark?
if not, it means that the evolution theory is wrong, meaning that someone created everything, meaning that god exist.

2nd proof:
its says so in the bible, never mind that you first need to believe in god in order to validate the bible...

3rd proof:
so many people believe in god, they can't be wrong

foggy666

:) That video was awesome

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#434 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#435 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts


Life is not a dream. Dreams are dreams. Thus, when we are not dreaming, we are in reality...reality as defined by us. When in reality, our own existaece is proof of our own existence.

Tell me, are you always this awkward? I'm beginning to think you are.

*********************************************************************

not quite. life is a dream. life appears to be reality, much like in a dream a dream appears to be reality. when your life is no more, you will wake up.

Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#436 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#438 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.

im sorry, but how is that a superior explanation?
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#439 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.

im sorry, but how is that a superior explanation?

If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.
Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#440 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts
i find that all existence is proof of god. an extension of that will. be it trees, cars or that deek that cut you off.
Avatar image for MindFreeze
MindFreeze

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#441 MindFreeze
Member since 2007 • 2814 Posts
[QUOTE="Hinata237"]

I've heard people say "God is all around us. You just have to open your eyes" or something like that.

But I want PROOF. Give me proof that this 'god' figure is real and not just an figment of your imagination.

cryptosopoidium

Can you give me proof that he isn't?

Thought so.

That doesn't make saying he Does exist any more true. We are all just making a guess in the end.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#442 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

I am sorry. I do not understand this in the slightest. What kind of zany rebuttal is this? Our own existence is evidence of our own existence. :|

I cannot fathom your thinking behind this.

luke1889
You sound disingenuous to me. How is our existence evidence of our existence when we do not know that the other person truly exists? When you are dreaming, you generally believe that the dream is real -- until you awake, when you can compare the unconscious world to the conscious world -- but what if the "conscious" world is also an illusion? What if you never woke up from your dream? How then would you be able to discern the difference between the dream world and the real world, when you generally can only infer that you had a dream after you wake up?
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#443 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.
swizz-the-gamer
And it is an explanation that we do not know to be possible. If someone is in a loon ward because they believe that they are Napoleon Bonaparte reincarnated, we can believe that this is true and we cannot disprove it, but we do not know it to be possible and thus the explanation that he is mad is the better explanation. This has nothing to do with it being true or false.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#444 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.

im sorry, but how is that a superior explanation?

If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.

I dont base my faith on it because it SEEMS like the best explanation, I say it happened because it IS the best explanation. and if you were a little bit more open-minded and honest you'd realize that yourself.
Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#445 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.
swizz-the-gamer
So Thomas was a lie?
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#446 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.
CptJSparrow
And it is an explanation that we do not know to be possible.

its possible if the existence of the supernatural is possible.
Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#447 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?notconspiracy

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.

im sorry, but how is that a superior explanation?

If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.

I dont base my faith on it because it SEEMS like the best explanation, I say it happened because it IS the best explanation. and if you were a little bit more open-minded and honest you'd realize that yourself.

But it is not the best explanation. They could have accidently killed the wrong person and Jesus just sat in a cave for a while and then walked out. Makes sense. So many possible explanations.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#448 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]perhaps because the other explanations that involve the supernatural aren't necessarily the best explanations?swizz-the-gamer

Why not, when they have people attesting to their actuality?

wait, just how many of these other supernatural events have multiple independent attestation?

Go watch most haunted live! For Christs sake i'm actually watching a guy possessed live! It must be real!

wait, what?

well if we have multiple independent attestation this begs the question

what is the best explanation?

In the crowd of most haunted live like 10 of them said they saw a ghost. 10 people=truth.

10 people who were EXPECTING a ghost who were very prone to hallucinating.

Wait why the hell would you assume that! It could have also been a ghost. Why is it more logical that they where hallucinating?

because they were prone to hallucinating it. they were expecting it (sight of the ghost)

Proof that every account of the Resurrection of Jesus was not a lie.

the disciples were not expecting to see the risen Jesus. there was no concept of a dying messiah in Judaism. everyone thought that the messiah would throw out the Romans, reestablish the line of david and reign forever. Everyone thought that the first resurrection would be the eschtological resurrection after the end of the world. no one was expecting for a historical individual to rise from the dead, let alone appear to everyone.

In what universe would that be considered to be proof they where not telling a total lie.

im sorry, but was that a question?

and do you want proof that they believed they saw the risen jesus? how about the fact that they were ****ing MARTYRED!?

Okay maybe someone took the body out of the tomb and then dressed up as Jesus and everyone believed the guy. Seems a bit silly but not half as silly as god doing it.

im sorry, but how is that a superior explanation?

If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.

I dont base my faith on it because it SEEMS like the best explanation, I say it happened because it IS the best explanation. and if you were a little bit more open-minded and honest you'd realize that yourself.

But it is not the best explanation. They could have accidently killed the wrong person and Jesus just sat in a cave for a while and then walked out. Makes sense. So many possible explanations.

so many possible explanations, but the resurrection is the best one because it best explains the evidence.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#449 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"] If God did stuff like that often then yeah, I would say that the Resurrection is more likely. But in this one particular instance you base your faith upon because it seems the best explanation.
notconspiracy
And it is an explanation that we do not know to be possible.

its possible if the existence of the supernatural is possible.

Deliberate misreading of my post: we do not know it to be possible.
Avatar image for foggy666
foggy666

1123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#450 foggy666
Member since 2003 • 1123 Posts
[QUOTE="Hinata237"]

I've heard people say "God is all around us. You just have to open your eyes" or something like that.

But I want PROOF. Give me proof that this 'god' figure is real and not just an figment of your imagination.

cryptosopoidium

Can you give me proof that he isn't?

Thought so.

so basically you believe in god because you can't disprove his existence? proof me that we should not listen to an invisible 5 legged horse that wants all of us to dance tango with a dog, and burn our underwear daily. would you do it if a book was written claiming to be written by this horse?

Thought so.