Hackers have mounted an attack on the Large Hadron Collider

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GetEnTheKitchen
GetEnTheKitchen

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 GetEnTheKitchen
Member since 2008 • 192 Posts

[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.tocklestein2005

Totally correct! We should use all the money wasted by research to build more bombs, planes, guns, tanks, missiles, and bullets!

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

Avatar image for TristanShand
TristanShand

1400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 TristanShand
Member since 2008 • 1400 Posts

Aren't they using an Intranet? They can't have it plugged to the Internet can they? oh my god that project is so going to fail. Anyone who's read my other posts will know what I mean. They'll be better off turning all that space they dug up into a giant underground McDonalds.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Hungry_bunny"]Sounded like a stupid attempt of gaining e-cred. I doubt they'd want to screw something up, not sure if they'd know how to screw something up even if they wanted to.FalcoLX
If they can hack into CERN, the people who invented the internet, I'm betting they could screw something up if they wanted to.

The World-Wide Web was developed at CERN (HTTP and HTML, specifically), decades after the Internet was created...
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

GetEnTheKitchen

This isn't just a "stunt" though. This is the modern age equivilant of the cavemen who banged two pieces of flint together and made fire. Yes, no-one knows exactly how this will turn out, but it certainly isn't a waste.

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.GetEnTheKitchen

Totally correct! We should use all the money wasted by research to build more bombs, planes, guns, tanks, missiles, and bullets!

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

Wow, this is the most depressing post I've seen in days; please stop using any technology, antibiotics or anything else that was developed out of pure, undirected research. Maybe then you will understand how insanely provincial your perspective is.
Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.GetEnTheKitchen

Totally correct! We should use all the money wasted by research to build more bombs, planes, guns, tanks, missiles, and bullets!

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

i care about it. and i dont think the us spent any money on this so i dont see why you care.

proving theres water on a planet means there might have been life, then u goto the planet to study it further

Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts

Wow, this is the most depressing post I've seen in days; please stop using any technology, antibiotics or anything else that was developed out of pure, undirected research. Maybe then you will understand how insanely provincial your perspective is.xaos

Excellent point. Just like the first person who milked a cow. We're greatful but makes you wonder why they did it.

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

Two possibilities:
1) Great leaps in physics research are made and my life is unaffected

2) everything and everyone spontaneously cease to exist and I don't care because I'm dead.

gamer_10001
Wrong.
Avatar image for JumpingMirrior
JumpingMirrior

11495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#59 JumpingMirrior
Member since 2004 • 11495 Posts

Hopefully it doesn't get hacked while the machine is doing its thing. Although it would be funny if the hackers ended up making the machine kill us all.

Well, it would be funny till i'm dead. Than i would have no opinion.

Avatar image for GetEnTheKitchen
GetEnTheKitchen

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 GetEnTheKitchen
Member since 2008 • 192 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.xaos

Totally correct! We should use all the money wasted by research to build more bombs, planes, guns, tanks, missiles, and bullets!

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

Wow, this is the most depressing post I've seen in days; please stop using any technology, antibiotics or anything else that was developed out of pure, undirected research. Maybe then you will understand how insanely provincial your perspective is.

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

Avatar image for DeeJayInphinity
DeeJayInphinity

13415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 DeeJayInphinity
Member since 2004 • 13415 Posts
[QUOTE="gamer_10001"]

Two possibilities:
1) Great leaps in physics research are made and my life is unaffected

2) everything and everyone spontaneously cease to exist and I don't care because I'm dead.

angelkimne
Wrong.

I wish he wasn't, though. Scientists should invent a science switch that can be implanted on people's brains. That way, we can decide when science can and can't affect them so ungrateful people can be taught a good lesson.
[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.GetEnTheKitchen

Totally correct! We should use all the money wasted by research to build more bombs, planes, guns, tanks, missiles, and bullets!

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

He should be the first test subject.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

I imagine that you are not anywhere near the particle collider in question, so your mind is probably not 'here', wherever you are. The machine will not destroy the universe. The people who would know the most about what could end the universe happen to be the ones who built the damn thing, and I don't know physicists to be suicidal especially.

The understanding of physics is essential to any further progress for human civilization. It has the potential to drastically improve human life. as xaos said, if you don't care for science, don't both with medicine or automobiles in the future. you're more affected even by things like nuclear power more than you would think (20% of US power is derived from this) and were it not for what was then theoretical physics, you wouldn't be at a computer like the one you're at now.

Avatar image for xfactor19990
xfactor19990

10917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 xfactor19990
Member since 2004 • 10917 Posts
give them a chance if they meant no harm this could show them good stuff like protecting themselves more
Avatar image for GetEnTheKitchen
GetEnTheKitchen

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 GetEnTheKitchen
Member since 2008 • 192 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

AirGuitarist87

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

"is dark matter toxic?"

lol

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

Thanks for your spectacularly uninformed opinions
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#68 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Haha that's pretty neat. And apparently they are not afraid of the LHC, they're simply doing what hackers do best; proving they can hack into something. DeeJayInphinity

This, and for attention.

Avatar image for GetEnTheKitchen
GetEnTheKitchen

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 GetEnTheKitchen
Member since 2008 • 192 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

H8sMikeMoore

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

"is dark matter toxic?"

lol

Do you know what dark matter is? I thought so...

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts

people seriouly think this thing will destroy the universe?? high energy protons have been colliding with each other for billions of years... and we're still here.

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

"is dark matter toxic?"

lol

Do you know what dark matter is? I thought so...

its matter that dosent interact with light. thats what the theory states at least.

Avatar image for GetEnTheKitchen
GetEnTheKitchen

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 GetEnTheKitchen
Member since 2008 • 192 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

H8sMikeMoore

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

"is dark matter toxic?"

lol

Do you know what dark matter is? I thought so...

its matter that dosent interact with light. thats what the theory states at least.

Its not even known if dark matter exists. I just dont see why people thing this machine is going to start producing huge amount of dark matter that we can pour into our gas tanks and get 1000 miles to the gallon with.

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

2 - No. The machine doesn't produce nearly enough power to do even a tenth of what the media is hyping.

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like? For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

"is dark matter toxic?"

lol

Do you know what dark matter is? I thought so...

its matter that dosent interact with light. thats what the theory states at least.

Its not even known if dark matter exists. I just dont see why people thing this machine is going to start producing huge amount of dark matter that we can pour into our gas tanks and get 1000 miles to the gallon with.

i think the project is worth doing just to find out if dark matter exists in the first place

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

Its not even known if dark matter exists. I just dont see why people thing this machine is going to start producing huge amount of dark matter that we can pour into our gas tanks and get 1000 miles to the gallon with.

GetEnTheKitchen
No one with a brain thinks that. Also, some people look beyond their gas tanks for what is and is not worthwhile. It's emblematic of, you know, "real change".
Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#75 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts

[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.GetEnTheKitchen

Feel free to call up CERN and explain that their research will never yield new technology. I'm sure your high level of expertise on particle physics will convince without any effort.

The people working on it even say it might not reveal the "god particle" their looking for.

Oh dear, better just never bother trying.

You know, McCain mightn't even win the election, why bother even trying to campaign in the first place? :roll:

Hey Ugg, hitting those pieces of flint together might not do anything at all, why even bother attempting to try it?

Mr. Edison, there's a chance your lightbulb might not even work, why are you wasting money trying to invent it?

You have some truly awful logic. You seem to think that they shouldn't bother with scientific research if it doesn't affect you personally in your lifetime, way to have a keen interest in the human race's advancement.

Avatar image for DeeJayInphinity
DeeJayInphinity

13415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76 DeeJayInphinity
Member since 2004 • 13415 Posts

Im pretty sure its in the BILLIONS, not millions.

GetEnTheKitchen
Which further proves Guitarist's point..

I dont think it will destroy the world, but who knows? They're trying to recreate what happened at the begining of the universe, who knows what that was like?

GetEnTheKitchen
:lol: We have a good idea.

For all we, or anybody, knows, the machine could turn the universe into a pile of dog crap.

GetEnTheKitchen
For all you know. let's not speak for everyone here. The people working on the LHC have years.. dozens.. of years worth of knowledge and they have ideas as to what will happen. None of which line up with what you think will happen. How many years of training do you have again?

Can we reproduce Dark Matter?

GetEnTheKitchen
Not necessary; it's abundant.

Can we harvest it?

GetEnTheKitchen
Possibly, yes. Would we know how if we didn't what it was in the first place? DUH. :roll:
Who will control this? GetEnTheKitchen
Control what? The harvesting? Companies, people, robots, nanobots, whatever. It wont be much different from the way we harvest oil, or natural gas.

Can we build an engine or recator running on it?

GetEnTheKitchen
It's perfectly possible.

Is it toxic? Is it radioactive?GetEnTheKitchen

I wouldn't worry about it. :lol:

Is it even real?

GetEnTheKitchen
That's what current theories say.

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

GetEnTheKitchen
I dunno, but it seems like a good idea to understand gravity. I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, but it's just a good idea to know the thing which keeps us tied to this Earth. :?
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
Somehow I always manage to read that device name with the 'r' and 'd' rearranged.
Avatar image for tman93
tman93

7769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 tman93
Member since 2006 • 7769 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.GetEnTheKitchen

Totally correct! We should use all the money wasted by research to build more bombs, planes, guns, tanks, missiles, and bullets!

Atleast that would actually effect us. This is just a stunt. Its like proving that theirs water on some planet. Ok, theres water on it, what now?

If this was actually going to provide something benefical to humanity, you would see this all over the news, people would be excited. Guess what, no one cares about it.

Wow, this is the most depressing post I've seen in days; please stop using any technology, antibiotics or anything else that was developed out of pure, undirected research. Maybe then you will understand how insanely provincial your perspective is.

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

Its a prusit of knowlage, we don't really know how it will affect us yet, but we didn't know how stuff people did research on centurys ago would effect us today, and they do.
Avatar image for shoeman12
shoeman12

8744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 shoeman12
Member since 2005 • 8744 Posts
they need some better security.
Avatar image for Harshvardhan666
Harshvardhan666

1960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Harshvardhan666
Member since 2008 • 1960 Posts
Somehow I always manage to read that device name with the 'r' and 'd' rearranged.CptJSparrow
You're not the only one.
Avatar image for FalcoLX
FalcoLX

4452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 FalcoLX
Member since 2007 • 4452 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.ithilgore2006

Feel free to call up CERN and explain that their research will never yield new technology. I'm sure your high level of expertise on particle physics will convince without any effort.

The people working on it even say it might not reveal the "god particle" their looking for.

Oh dear, better just never bother trying.

You know, McCain mightn't even win the election, why bother even trying to campaign in the first place? :roll:

Hey Ugg, hitting those pieces of flint together might not do anything at all, why even bother attempting to try it?

Mr. Edison, there's a chance your lightbulb might not even work, why are you wasting money trying to invent it?

You have some truly awful logic. You seem to think that they shouldn't bother with scientific research if it doesn't affect you personally in your lifetime, way to have a keen interest in the human race's advancement.

I remember hearing a quote by Edison about the light bulb that goes something like this. "I didn't fail at making the light bulb 200 times. I just succeeded in 200 ways of how not to make a light bulb."
Avatar image for _LiquidFlame_
_LiquidFlame_

13736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 _LiquidFlame_
Member since 2007 • 13736 Posts
That's crazy! :shock:
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]I dont see why they have to spend billions just to smash to bits of matter together. IT MIGHT NOT EVEN SHOW ANYTHING! Even if they do, it will only explain to them some stuff they didnt know before. It cant be practically used to advance technology or anything.GetEnTheKitchen

Feel free to call up CERN and explain that their research will never yield new technology. I'm sure your high level of expertise on particle physics will convince without any effort.

The people working on it even say it might not reveal the "god particle" their looking for.

The God particle is not their sole purpose.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

Its not even known if dark matter exists. I just dont see why people thing this machine is going to start producing huge amount of dark matter that we can pour into our gas tanks and get 1000 miles to the gallon with.

GetEnTheKitchen
dude, it's a particle accelerator. it's not producing anything, just destroying subatomic particles and studying that. dark matter does exist, but the reason it's funny you ask if it's toxis is because dark matter anhilates upon contact with regular matter.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

Its not even known if dark matter exists. I just dont see why people thing this machine is going to start producing huge amount of dark matter that we can pour into our gas tanks and get 1000 miles to the gallon with.

quiglythegreat
dude, it's a particle accelerator. it's not producing anything, just destroying subatomic particles and studying that. dark matter does exist, but the reason it's funny you ask if it's toxis is because dark matter anhilates upon contact with regular matter.

That's antimatter, as far as we know, different than dark matter :)
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

AirGuitarist87

Wait...what?!

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts
This reminds me of the movie Contact. Anyone else get those vibes?
Avatar image for fanboy-buster
fanboy-buster

4594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#88 fanboy-buster
Member since 2006 • 4594 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

GetEnTheKitchen

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.


3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

Imagine you are a long time ago and scientists wasted $100 million dollars (hypotethically) to make a big drill in order to see what is inside of our Planet. A new compound is discovered oil. People were skeptic, like you making those questions of "is it toxic?" "can we harvest it?".

Now look today all the benefits brought by oil!

Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

MrGeezer

Wait...what?!

Maybe bacteria wasn't the best example, but certainly microscopic organisms.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

Its not even known if dark matter exists. I just dont see why people thing this machine is going to start producing huge amount of dark matter that we can pour into our gas tanks and get 1000 miles to the gallon with.

xaos
dude, it's a particle accelerator. it's not producing anything, just destroying subatomic particles and studying that. dark matter does exist, but the reason it's funny you ask if it's toxis is because dark matter anhilates upon contact with regular matter.

That's antimatter, as far as we know, different than dark matter :)

I'm just going to go skulk in the corner now and not discuss physics anymore...
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

AirGuitarist87

Wait...what?!

Maybe bacteria wasn't the best example, but certainly microscopic organisms.

And you are basing this on what, exactly?

Avatar image for DeathHeart95
DeathHeart95

2541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#92 DeathHeart95
Member since 2008 • 2541 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

MrGeezer

Wait...what?!

Maybe bacteria wasn't the best example, but certainly microscopic organisms.

And you are basing this on what, exactly?

Water=H2O. H2= 2 parts hydrogen, O= 1 part oxygen. That means that if there's water somewhere, there must also be oxygen because you need oxygen to have water.

Comprende?

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts
Oxygen is one of the most abundant element in the Earth's crust, so the presence of life doesn't necessarily imply the presence of life (whether microbes, virus or more complex organisms).
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#94 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
More proof that even hackers can be retarded...
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

DeathHeart95

Wait...what?!

Maybe bacteria wasn't the best example, but certainly microscopic organisms.

And you are basing this on what, exactly?

Water=H2O. H2= 2 parts hydrogen, O= 1 part oxygen. That means that if there's water somewhere, there must also be oxygen because you need oxygen to have water.

Comprende?

you can have water without having lifeforms. that's what he's getting at.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

And proving water is on a planet proves that there's oxygen, which in turn proves there's at least bacterial lifeforms there.

DeathHeart95

Wait...what?!

Maybe bacteria wasn't the best example, but certainly microscopic organisms.

And you are basing this on what, exactly?

Water=H2O. H2= 2 parts hydrogen, O= 1 part oxygen. That means that if there's water somewhere, there must also be oxygen because you need oxygen to have water.

Comprende?

You do realize that that wasn't the only claim that you made, right?

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#97 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"]

I would rather worry about the here and now than some machine that cant really do anything for me. Heres what can happen:

1: Nothing happens.

2: World ends.

3: Machine breaks.

4: We discover something amazing that has no practical benefits.

Can anyone answer this one question? What will this do to help humanity?

fanboy-buster

1 - Perfectly possible. But I'm sure that £9 million wouldn't be spent on something that might not work.


3 - Nothing's perfect.

4 - We could discover dark matter, which in theory can be a new fuel source, or the Higg Boson which can explain the origins of our universe.

Can we reproduce Dark Matter? Can we harvest it? Who will control this? Can we build an engine or recator running on it? Is it toxic? Is it radioactive? Is it even real?

Ok, we discover the Higgs Boson. We know some stuff about the begining of the universe. Can this particle be used? From what I have heard about it, this particle will only exsist for billionths of billionths of a second. It cant realistically be used.

Imagine you are a long time ago and scientists wasted $100 million dollars (hypotethically) to make a big drill in order to see what is inside of our Planet. A new compound is discovered oil. People were skeptic, like you making those questions of "is it toxic?" "can we harvest it?".

Now look today all the benefits brought by oil!

The irony and sarcasm in your statement is very dry

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#98 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts

You do realize that that wasn't the only claim that you made, right?

MrGeezer

Okay, let me explain. In nearly all the places on our earth where there is some form of water, there has been life reported. Everywhere from near underwater volcano's that reach boiling temperatures, to alaska where plants can grow in -20 degree temperatures with ice, to places where the water is highly acidic (water + acid) We have found life. So it's VERY likely that if there is somewhere in our universe where there is some for of water and a lot of it. It is very likely that would should find life there. Albiet only if the temperatures/conditions aren't too extreme.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

You do realize that that wasn't the only claim that you made, right?

munu9

Okay, let me explain. In nearly all the places on our earth where there is some form of water, there has been life reported. Everywhere from near underwater volcano's that reach boiling temperatures, to alaska where plants can grow in -20 degree temperatures with ice, to places where the water is highly acidic (water + acid) We have found life. So it's VERY likely that if there is somewhere in our universe where there is some for of water and a lot of it. It is very likely that would should find life there. Albiet only if the temperatures/conditions aren't too extreme.

That's life on ONE PLANET. As in, every living thing on earth IS RELATED. Life didn't arise from nonlife independently in every scenario, it EVOLVED to tolerate different conditions. :|

Okay...think of it like this. All sugar cookies contain sugar, correct? All over the world, every sugar cookie ever seen contains sugar (since by definition it's not a sugar cookie unless it has sugar in it). Now suppose that you're one day walking through a grocery store and you see lots of 5 pound bags of sugar neatly stacked on a shelf. Does it stand to reason that these bags of sugar must also have sugar cookies in them?

Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts
They were basically telling CERN their security is awful and they should fix it before the collider goes live and someone actually does some damage.