Has Gamespot made you change your religious views?

[QUOTE="BATTOSAI76"]

Why worry. If your belief is strong then you shouldn't care what I say. I come on here and see many offensive things, and I take it in stride because I know some people roll a different way, and I can't do anything about it. I don't see why my post should be any different, I mean we're all mature adults here, I can take your beliefs, I hope you can take mine.

BiancaDK

haha nah, you cant take my beliefs son (; you havent the slightest clue what they are, so how can you say with confidence that you can take them

and that right there is a painfully obvious logical fallacy, just sayin

I guess my OP was easily misinterpreted. If it offended you then I'm sorry. Anyway I'm not going to ask what you believe because the way you make it out I don't think my innocent mind could take it.:P

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Perhaps he's saying he's tolerant of others having their own beliefs. BiancaDK

i dunno man, seems too soon to call it

F*** no.

Not really, it have reinforced my athiest views a bit I think.

I guess my OP was easily misinterpreted. If it offended you then I'm sorry. Anyway I'm not going to ask what you believe because the way you make it out I don't think my innocent mind could take it.:P

BATTOSAI76

hey your op never offended me (: i just saw where theone86 was coming from with his observation pertaining to said op, that's all. ;d im good, no need to apologize to my clown ass :p

[QUOTE="BATTOSAI76"]

I guess my OP was easily misinterpreted. If it offended you then I'm sorry. Anyway I'm not going to ask what you believe because the way you make it out I don't think my innocent mind could take it.:P

BiancaDK

hey your op never offended me (: i just saw where theone86 was coming from with his observation pertaining to said op, that's all. ;d im good, no need to apologize to my clown ass :p

Glad to hear it.:)

Not really, it have reinforced my athiest views a bit I think.

tenaka2

i do hope some people at least started questioning some of the beliefs that dont make any sense instead of just taking everything blindfolded just because someone else told them to.

i do hope some people at least started questioning some of the beliefs that dont make any sense instead of just taking everything blindfolded just because someone else told them to.

Krelian-co

Changing your religious views because of gamespot is like changing your political views because of FML.

So no, my religious beliefs are unnaffected.

No because there is zero proof either way to prove 100% of something.

I have faith and will always have faith that God exist and unless there is proof no random person I will never meet on the internet can convice me otherwise

No because there is zero proof either way to prove 100% of something.

I have faith and will always have faith that God exist and unless there is proof no random person I will never meet on the internet can convice me otherwise

fueled-system

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

No because there is zero proof either way to prove 100% of something.

I have faith and will always have faith that God exist and unless there is proof no random person I will never meet on the internet can convice me otherwise

tenaka2

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

No because there is zero proof either way to prove 100% of something.

I have faith and will always have faith that God exist and unless there is proof no random person I will never meet on the internet can convice me otherwise

LJS9502_basic

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

seriously? because i will bet NO ONE has experienced most of what is described in the bible, God used to "talk" so much in the old testament and now it remains silent i wonder why. There used to be prophets and angels and everything but they just "vanished"? And tell me please some REAL experiences, not experiences you accomodate to validate your beliefs because deep down you know they dont have any basis besides what they tell you to believe

So can you please share a real experience?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

No because there is zero proof either way to prove 100% of something.

I have faith and will always have faith that God exist and unless there is proof no random person I will never meet on the internet can convice me otherwise

lowkey254

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

its like santa, everybody ahs heard of him but nobody has seen him or heard him, so that makes him nonexistent. You cant see him you cant hear him, what more proof do you need? whats the best proof you have? oh right a book writen by people who burned people for saying the earth is not the center of the universe. Awesome

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

tenaka2

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

tenaka2

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

Not even close

[QUOTE="lowkey254"][QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

There are ways to prove things, 1 + 1 = 2, this is a fact it is 100% true.

Gravity is 100% true.

While a Gods may exist there is currently 0% proof that they do.

Krelian-co

its like santa, everybody ahs heard of him but nobody has seen him or heard him, so that makes him nonexistent. You cant see him you cant hear him, what more proof do you need? whats the best proof you have? oh right a book writen by people who burned people for saying the earth is not the center of the universe. Awesome

Its just so great when I hear someone talk about how annoying bible thumping southerners are right before they slam my face in with smug revelations of science I apparently didn't already know without an ounce of self awareness. I never even tell anyone my religion/non religion and I have to deal with this in real life somehow.

[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

And 0% that they don't...

SPYDER0416

Its just so great when I hear someone talk about how annoying bible thumping southerners are right before they slam my face in with smug revelations of science I apparently didn't already know without an ounce of self awareness. I never even tell anyone my religion/non religion and I have to deal with this in real life somehow.

Somehow I was added to this string... I did not say the above statement.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] And 0% that they don't....LJS9502_basic

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

Krelian-co

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]If you look through scientific advancements you will find many things discovered that were thought not to exist. We only know what we can perceive. It's entirely possible we are still missing the reality. It's not accurate to try to use science to pursue one's opinion while not allowing that we don't know everything and could be quite wrong. Or was the earth flat before science answered that question? Did the sun orbit the earth before science answered that question? Did microscopic entities not exist? Etc.LJS9502_basic

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

i agree with you, no one can say it exists or doesnt exists 100%, our knowledge is still primitive i think compared with what we have to discover, BUT i cant go on saying santa exists without seeing him can i? and as i see it, you cant say something exists until you have any kind of evidence it does.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

Krelian-co

i agree with you, no one can say it exists or doesnt exists 100%, our knowledge is still primitive i think compared with what we have to discover, BUT i cant go on saying santa exists without seeing him can i? and as i see it, you cant say something exists until you have any kind of evidence it does.

Not in a way that sparked a total revolution of my belief system, but I think thanks to some posters, I have taken a liking to the idea of agnosticism (in its epistemological and not colloquial form).

No. Anyone who has is frankly idiotic.Solid_Snake325

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

Krelian-co

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

A lot of religious sites don't recommend using the negative argument as it is self defeating and circular.

Going by your argument you have to give the same credence to the flying Spagetti monster, santa claus and the tooth fairy as there is 0% of them not existing either.

LJS9502_basic

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

"science cannot say something doesn't exist without evidence for that."

what would be an example of evidence that something doesn't exist ?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

dkdk999

"science cannot say something doesn't exist without evidence for that."

what would be an example of evidence that something doesn't exist ?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

yes but science is all about finding the truth, the beliefs of science change with time according we go finding new things, but religion doesnt need that, according to religion you dont need science to find god, we dont have to fiund this other reality to find god, just by being here we should be able to communicate with him, and know him, isnt that what religion says? guess what no matter how hard you try you cant see, hear or in any way communicate with him other than people trying to see him in events that are not related to him.

Wasnt religion the one that said humans were the center of the universe? that it was blasphemy to say the earth was not the center of the universe? that big flood and volcan eruptions were the warth of god?

dkdk999

"science cannot say something doesn't exist without evidence for that."

what would be an example of evidence that something doesn't exist ?

I now believe that the church of the flying spaghetti monster has more logic in it than all other religions put together.

Yes. Before i came here i knew nothing of religion and did not wish to know anything. After being here for 8 years i know a little bit about religion but i wish i didn't.

It definitely hasn't, I still believe in a God, but I do think more on my beliefs and what and why I believe it.

Nope, I still believe in God and follow the teachings in the bible.

No. That would be pretty sad if it did. But I was never one for religion though.