Heath Ledger's Joker or Tom Hiddleston's Loki?

Loki was a bland, derivitive villain, drivien by shallow greed. The only reasion were talking about him was because the Avengers is bloody good film.

Joker was a far more interesting character, with questionable intentions and brilliantly portrayed by Ledger.

Its such a shame he had to pass away, or I think we would have seen more of the character.

Loki was a bland, derivitive villain, drivien by shallow greed. The only reasion were talking about him was because the Avengers is bloody good film.

Joker was a far more interesting character, with questionable intentions and brilliantly portrayed by Ledger.

Its such a shame he had to pass away, or I think we would have seen more of the character.

D1zzyCriminal

I agree

Put it this way. I didn't go to the Dark Knight to see Batman, I went to see the Joker as millions of others did. And when we left he was the highlight of the whole movie.

For the Avengers I didn't go to see Loki and when I left the cinema he was one of the last things on my mind. He was good but far from Ledger's Joker.

Loki was a bland, derivitive villain, drivien by shallow greed. D1zzyCriminal

Also TC is forgetting Ledger got an Oscar for his acting in TDK. And that wasn't cos he died it was cos he did a superb job.

Hiddleston wouldn't even get nominated for the acting in the Avengers. He was good but not Oscar worthy

[QUOTE="D1zzyCriminal"]

Loki was a bland, derivitive villain, drivien by shallow greed. mrmusicman247

It works for The Avengers, they had to concentrate on the development of the team. That meant less screen time and focus for the antagonist. If there was a super involved deep story with a classic graphic novel shadowy villain, the film wouldnt have worked.

For that reason Loki, in the case of the Avengers will never be one of the great vilains.

ledger without question, you're alone on this one buray....

Joker's better than Loki.

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="D1zzyCriminal"]

Loki was a bland, derivitive villain, drivien by shallow greed. D1zzyCriminal

It works for The Avengers, they had to concentrate on the development of the team. That meant less screen time and focus for the antagonist. If there was a super involved deep story with a classic graphic novel shadowy villain, the film wouldnt have worked.

For that reason Loki, in the case of the Avengers will never be one of the great vilains.

Heath Ledger's Joker has more charisma.

Why someone would compare these performances is just crazy

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

Fail. In Tim Burton's Batman, in Batman: The Animated Series, in the Batman games, and in the comics, The Joker does make jokes. YOU don't know what you're talking about.

BluRayHiDef

Sorry, I left out the word good. He doesn't make good jokes, is my point. He's not funny in that regard.

None of that, however, changes the fact that I still disagree with you on this premise that you are a bandwagon fan if you liked Ledger's performance in TDK.

It doesn't matter if the jokes are good or bad. The fact is that Ledger's Joker made only ONE joke. WTF?

Hiddleston did a pretty good job as Loki, considering the film was focused almost entirely on the heroes.

Ledger just completely stole the show in The Dark Knight though, so I'd give him the nod.

Hiddleston did a pretty good job as Loki, considering the film was focused almost entirely on the heroes.

Ledger just completely stole the show in The Dark Knight though, so I'd give him the nod.

xerxes5678

Heth's Joker was that once in a decade villian performance where they steal the franchise.

Just like Anthony Hopkins did before him with Lecter in Silence of the Lambs

Heck, on top of that I preferred the sympathetic Loki in Thor, as he had more depth than the simple "I'm evil and I know it" Loki in Avengers.

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"] I was merely joking.BluRayHiDef

You ask people an open question and their opinion but get pissy everytime they disagree with you and say "Oh no no no THIS is why Loki is much better"

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"][QUOTE="mrmusicman247"] Five. Year old. Status. seanmcloughlin

You ask people an open question and their opinion but get pissy everytime they disagree with you and say "Oh no no no THIS is why Loki is much better"

Heth's Joker was that once in a decade villian performance where they steal the franchise.dercoo

Anton Chigurh >

EDIT: Yes, I realize it's not a franchise. Just sayin'.

Are you still choosing to not respond to me TC?dave123321

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Are you still choosing to not respond to me TC?sammyjenkis898

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"] Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.BluRayHiDef

You ask people an open question and their opinion but get pissy everytime they disagree with you and say "Oh no no no THIS is why Loki is much better"

I really enjoyed Heath's Joker but Mark Hamill is the best Joker, even if it was just his voice performance.Kurushio

Let's see, one won an Oscar for his performance so you can't really compare them.

Let's see, one won an Oscar for his performance so you can't really compare them.

soulless4now

[QUOTE="soulless4now"]

Let's see, one won an Oscar for his performance so you can't really compare them.

BluRayHiDef

What do you guys think of Samuel L. Jackson's performance as Nick Fury?BluRayHiDef

He does what he has too. Not bad but not outstanding either

What do you guys think of Samuel L. Jackson's performance as Nick Fury?BluRayHiDef

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"] Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.BluRayHiDef

You ask people an open question and their opinion but get pissy everytime they disagree with you and say "Oh no no no THIS is why Loki is much better"

Only it's not having a discussion, it's you throwing a pissy fit when someone doesn't share your opinion.