Hot Teacher Victimizes Two 18-Year-Olds with booze and sex

  • 84 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

Yes, that is the actual title of the story. Only slightly edited so I could fit it in the topic title.

Tiffany Leiseth, a substitute teacher for the New Brighton Area School District in Pennsylvania, invited two different 18-year old seniors into her apartment for booze and sex while her husband was out of town on business. Even though they were 18 she faces charges because she was in a position of authority over the students and they haven't officially graduated.

Thoughts?

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Very unprofessional

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

Well that was dumb of her.

Avatar image for googleandroid
GoogleAndroid

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By GoogleAndroid
Member since 2013 • 162 Posts

Not too far from me, saw this on the local news. Anyways, that is an awful headline and I can't believe a website like Yahoo would allow it. I think it is a stupid arrest. They were both 18 and consented. At the very least, charging her with a class 3 felony seems a little extreme.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#5 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

>victimized with booze and sex

rofl

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16892 Posts
@chessmaster1989 said:

>victimized with booze and sex

rofl

Hey, they could have been given some cheap booze and bad lovin'. If that's not criminal, i don't know what is.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Wow the actual titles is worse. "Banging them, giving them beer"

Yay, journalism

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

@lostrib said:

Wow the actual titles is worse. "Banging them, giving them beer"

Yay, journalism

I tried to put the whole title but the 60 character limit struck again. What pisses me off about the new website is the old one would make you stop typing after you pass the character limit but the new website lets you keep typing and just alerts you that you went to far after you hit submit.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#9 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

That is a headline for a tabloid source.

@JangoWuzHere said:

Very unprofessional

Agreed.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#10 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62955 Posts

What an out... holy shit.

Would.

Avatar image for ShepardCommandr
ShepardCommandr

4939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 ShepardCommandr
Member since 2013 • 4939 Posts

Misleading title,she is not hot.

Avatar image for golden_cupcake
Golden_Cupcake

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13 Golden_Cupcake
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

Dear diary... Jackpot.

Avatar image for MuD3
MuD3

2192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 MuD3
Member since 2011 • 2192 Posts

firstly, substitutes hold no position of authority. ask anyone who ever went to school. also, they are fucking 18... at most she should lose her job.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

I wonder if the title would be the same if the teacher was a male.

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#17 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

that is just stupid.

Avatar image for yokofox33
yokofox33

30775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 yokofox33
Member since 2004 • 30775 Posts

@toast_burner said:

I wonder if the title would be the same if the teacher was a male.

Of course not.

Avatar image for Boddicker
Boddicker

4458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 Boddicker
Member since 2012 • 4458 Posts

I thought at 18 all bets are off. What's this "position of authority" crap?

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45493 Posts

well, she did get them drunk so they couldn't consent so yeah that's rape too ignoring the authority thingy

plus providing alcohol to people under age isn't exactly a light matter either

but she's a women, she'll probably get off easy

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#21 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

They were 18.

Why is this even a thing?

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

Lock her up!

Avatar image for bforrester420
bforrester420

3480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24 bforrester420
Member since 2014 • 3480 Posts

@chessmaster1989 said:

>victimized with booze and sex

rofl

This. When I was 18, I would have felt anything but victimized.

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

'd bang 9/10

Avatar image for mercuria1_king
Mercuria1_King

278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#26 Mercuria1_King
Member since 2014 • 278 Posts

She knew what she was doing so she deserves to pay for the crime.

Avatar image for elkoldo
elkoldo

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 elkoldo
Member since 2009 • 1832 Posts
@bforrester420 said:

@chessmaster1989 said:

>victimized with booze and sex

rofl

This. When I was 18, I would have felt anything but victimized.

Not only wouldn't I feel victimized , but I'd actually be grateful ! :P

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#28 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

Please abuse me.

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

@elkoldo said:
@bforrester420 said:

@chessmaster1989 said:

>victimized with booze and sex

rofl

This. When I was 18, I would have felt anything but victimized.

Not only wouldn't I feel victimized , but I'd actually be grateful ! :P

My thougts =P

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Legal age to drink in the US is 21. Duh!

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@jasean79 said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Legal age to drink in the US is 21. Duh!

I keep forgetting that. It's so incredibly stupid I find it hard to believe. Here there is no drinking age. You have to be 18 to buy alcohol but it's never illegal for you to drink alcohol.

However if that was the case she would have only been charged with supplying them alcohol. Not having sex with them.

Avatar image for Renevent42
Renevent42

6654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Renevent42
Member since 2010 • 6654 Posts

Victimized...what a joke.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@thegerg said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Because the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21) in the US state of PA, where this crime took place.

the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21)

under the legal age

under age

Then why is the fact she had sex with them relevant? If the only problem is that they were too young to drink shouldn't she have only been charged with that?

I'm pretty sure the age of consent in America isn't 21

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@thegerg said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Because the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21) in the US state of PA, where this crime took place.

the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21)

under the legal age

under age

Then why is the fact she had sex with them relevant? If the only problem is that they were too young to drink shouldn't she have only been charged with that?

I'm pretty sure the age of consent in America isn't 21

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Because the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21) in the US state of PA, where this crime took place.

the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21)

under the legal age

under age

Then why is the fact she had sex with them relevant? If the only problem is that they were too young to drink shouldn't she have only been charged with that?

I'm pretty sure the age of consent in America isn't 21

Because she was their teacher in a position of "knowing better". Come on, man. Get with it!

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@jasean79 said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Because the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21) in the US state of PA, where this crime took place.

the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21)

under the legal age

under age

Then why is the fact she had sex with them relevant? If the only problem is that they were too young to drink shouldn't she have only been charged with that?

I'm pretty sure the age of consent in America isn't 21

Because she was their teacher in a position of "knowing better". Come on, man. Get with it!

They were all in a position of knowing better.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#40 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

Why weren't the students arrested for under age drinking?

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@jasean79 said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@toast_burner said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox said:

Why is this even a thing?

Because a teacher supplied alcohol to underage studnets and then had sex with them.

How were they under-age? The title clearly states that they were 18.

Because the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21) in the US state of PA, where this crime took place.

the age that the title states (18) is under the legal drinking age (21)

under the legal age

under age

Then why is the fact she had sex with them relevant? If the only problem is that they were too young to drink shouldn't she have only been charged with that?

I'm pretty sure the age of consent in America isn't 21

Because she was their teacher in a position of "knowing better". Come on, man. Get with it!

They were all in a position of knowing better.

Yes, I suppose they were. But, as their teacher and the "responsible adult" in that scenario, she took advantage of her position as a teacher and corrupted the minors. All the fault is on her.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@jasean79 said:

@toast_burner said:

@jasean79 said:

Because she was their teacher in a position of "knowing better". Come on, man. Get with it!

They were all in a position of knowing better.

Yes, I suppose they were. But, as their teacher and the "responsible adult" in that scenario, she took advantage of her position as a teacher and corrupted the minors. All the fault is on her.

Except they aren't minors

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#45 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

@thegerg said:

@SolidSnake35 said:

Why weren't the students arrested for under age drinking?

People generally aren't arrested for simply having drank underage.

My point is, unless she rammed that beer down their throats, that crime is on them and not her.

Avatar image for jasean79
jasean79

2593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 jasean79
Member since 2005 • 2593 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@jasean79 said:

@toast_burner said:

@jasean79 said:

Because she was their teacher in a position of "knowing better". Come on, man. Get with it!

They were all in a position of knowing better.

Yes, I suppose they were. But, as their teacher and the "responsible adult" in that scenario, she took advantage of her position as a teacher and corrupted the minors. All the fault is on her.

Except they aren't minors

In a way they are. They are still her students in high school (hadn't graduated), so that puts them in the "minor" category which makes the act illegal.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

Such an ordeal rofl

On a more serious note though, she broke the law and abused her position of authority so despite the fact that she pampered those two guys with sex and booze she deserves to be indicted and persecuted to the fullest possible extent of the law.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#49 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

@thegerg said:

@SolidSnake35 said:

@thegerg said:

@SolidSnake35 said:

Why weren't the students arrested for under age drinking?

People generally aren't arrested for simply having drank underage.

My point is, unless she rammed that beer down their throats, that crime is on them and not her.

Right. That doesn't mean that she didn't commit other crimes.

Perhaps, but I disagree with the article's take on things.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

Forgot to say: what a slut.