This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Barbariser"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I support gay rights, but I'm not "pro gay I think being gay is wrong yes, I do not hate them, it's just a life style I disagree with. But I support their right to live in safety and free from discrimination.
Incest is just disgusting and it should be completely illegal. Lock them all up and throw away the key, or just kill them, sick fvcks like that have no place in society. OT disagrees but this is because OT is full of sick people who live small lives and not in reality. This is a fringe community really.
Blood-Scribe
ITT: Crazy man advocates mass imprisonment and homicide on a group of people because he doesn't like them, accuses other people of being "sick" and/or unrealistic.
It's kinda hard to be legitimately offended considering how hilariously ironic it is that a jew of all people would so eagerly call for genocide over something so small and irrelevant. What are you some kind of anti-zionist!? Seriously though Shadow is extremely fringe. Damn glad too, genocide is among my least favorite of things.[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]If you want to bang your sister, who is stopping you? And I find you clumping incest and being gay together to be offensive and ignorant. Ringx55How would that even be arrogant? It's simply showing that it's easy for people to be okay with LBGT rights while condemning others such as incest and cousin relationships. Two consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want. If they want to have an offspring so be it, they will face the consequences it's not illegal to have a child with a genetic defect. Want to make an acceptance speech for biggest comprehension fail of the week award? You earned it. I called clumping Homosexuality and Incest together ignorant, not arrogant. Jesus. ha! And compare your last sentence to my first sentence and laugh at yourself.
[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="champion837"] It is psychologically abnormal to have sex with someone who is in your family.IveDatedUrMomSo something is immoral and unethical because it's abnormal? Is being left handed unethical and immoral too? Oh hey, condescending pseudo-philosopher pricks ganging up on someone with non-politically correct opinions. That's almost routine. "How do you define normal?" "Don't you think that one is subjective?" derpSo are you criticizing me for thinking and questioning assumed values/beliefs in order to see if they have any merit? Or to rephrase that question, are you an anti-intellectual bigot?
I guess things haven't changed much since Socrates was executed for doing the same thing.
How can you be straight and be anti-gay? That is the question I always find myself asking.Smatmat
That makes much more sense as Heterosexuality and Homosexuality are both sexual orientations while incest is a completely different thing altogether.
What exactly is the gay lifestyle?[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I support gay rights, but I'm not "pro gay I think being gay is wrong yes, I do not hate them, it's just a life style I disagree with. But I support their right to live in safety and free from discrimination.
Incest is just disgusting and it should be completely illegal. Lock them all up and throw away the key, or just kill them, sick fvcks like that have no place in society. OT disagrees but this is because OT is full of sick people who live small lives and not in reality. This is a fringe community really.
ShadowMoses900
It is self explanatory.
Every straight person disagrees with it to when they get down to it, if you were to be completely honest with yourself you would agree with me.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHAAHAHAHAHA
[QUOTE="Blood-Scribe"][QUOTE="Barbariser"]It's kinda hard to be legitimately offended considering how hilariously ironic it is that a jew of all people would so eagerly call for genocide over something so small and irrelevant. What are you some kind of anti-zionist!? Seriously though Shadow is extremely fringe. Damn glad too, genocide is among my least favorite of things.ITT: Crazy man advocates mass imprisonment and homicide on a group of people because he doesn't like them, accuses other people of being "sick" and/or unrealistic.
Ace6301
Genocide would be p. cool, but there's no way to kill millions of people without actually killing millions of people, so, it sucks in reality. Video games are a fair substitute.
[QUOTE="IveDatedUrMom"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]So something is immoral and unethical because it's abnormal? Is being left handed unethical and immoral too?MannyDelgadoOh hey, condescending pseudo-philosopher pricks ganging up on someone with non-politically correct opinions. That's almost routine. "How do you define normal?" "Don't you think that one is subjective?" derpi.e. 'isn't it awful that I can't say sh*tty, obnoxious things and not get called out on it; it's political correctness gone mad' that's a cool opinion, hey let me ask you to explain your morality through a socrates reference! cause you know, im such an intellectual philosopher.
Oh hey, condescending pseudo-philosopher pricks ganging up on someone with non-politically correct opinions. That's almost routine. "How do you define normal?" "Don't you think that one is subjective?" derpSo are you criticizing me for thinking and questioning assumed values/beliefs in order to see if they have any merit? Or to rephrase that question, are you an anti-intellectual bigot?[QUOTE="IveDatedUrMom"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]So something is immoral and unethical because it's abnormal? Is being left handed unethical and immoral too?Laihendi
I guess things haven't changed much since Socrates was executed for doing the same thing.
No I'm criticizing your poor use of philosophical references and your overall condescending stand on the matter. Leave the questioning to those actually able to derive something out of it, go play your pokemans and stop making Socrates roll in his grave with your terrible analogy.[QUOTE="IveDatedUrMom"][QUOTE="MannyDelgado"]i.e. 'isn't it awful that I can't say sh*tty, obnoxious things and not get called out on it; it's political correctness gone mad'MannyDelgadothat's a cool opinion, hey let me ask you to explain your morality through a socrates reference! cause you know, im such an intellectual philosopher. 0/10 Not only are you extremely stupid, you also have no gift whatsoever for satire > asked for morality definition / explanation in an opinions thread Can't help if you can't see the fallacy, go back to school and learn some stuff peasant. Also satire =/= sarcasm. Retards on ot *smh*
[QUOTE="MannyDelgado"][QUOTE="IveDatedUrMom"] that's a cool opinion, hey let me ask you to explain your morality through a socrates reference! cause you know, im such an intellectual philosopher. IveDatedUrMom0/10 Not only are you extremely stupid, you also have no gift whatsoever for satire > asked for morality definition / explanation in an opinions thread Can't help if you can't see the fallacy, go back to school and learn some stuff peasant. Also satire =/= sarcasm. Retards on ot *smh*LOL, this is gold.
I'm bisexual, so obviously i'm pro-homosexuality. As for incest, i don't really have a problem with it, i would never do it but if someone else wants to... Well whatever. I don't support incestual procreation though, theres a chance that some terrible mutation would happen to the child.cfstarcould just get a surrogate mother/father to prevent the mutation. pretty sure some homosexuals do that (and adopt a kid as well)
Two very different things. Incest is not a sexuality , you can't start by dating your brother , then your cousin and then your uncle lol! Maybe some people have a fantasy of sleeping with their cute cousin or hot aunt , where homosexuals are attracted to people of the same gender.
could just get a surrogate mother/father to prevent the mutation. pretty sure some homosexuals do that (and adopt a kid as well) Still how will that work? "Honey , i'm your mother/aunt and this is your father/uncle"?[QUOTE="cfstar"]I'm bisexual, so obviously i'm pro-homosexuality. As for incest, i don't really have a problem with it, i would never do it but if someone else wants to... Well whatever. I don't support incestual procreation though, theres a chance that some terrible mutation would happen to the child.TheShadowLord07
[QUOTE="BuryMe"]genetic disorder with incest is something like 35%. with that logic you could say "Low income/inner city births are criminals waiting to grow up"Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.
mingmao3046
Um no.
Theoretically its 50% , and thats just on paper.
genetic disorder with incest is something like 35%. with that logic you could say "Low income/inner city births are criminals waiting to grow up"[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]
Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.
TehFuneral
Um no.
Theoretically its 50% , and thats just on paper.
OT_geneticist[QUOTE="Laihendi"]So are you criticizing me for thinking and questioning assumed values/beliefs in order to see if they have any merit? Or to rephrase that question, are you an anti-intellectual bigot?[QUOTE="IveDatedUrMom"] Oh hey, condescending pseudo-philosopher pricks ganging up on someone with non-politically correct opinions. That's almost routine. "How do you define normal?" "Don't you think that one is subjective?" derpIveDatedUrMom
I guess things haven't changed much since Socrates was executed for doing the same thing.
No I'm criticizing your poor use of philosophical references and your overall condescending stand on the matter. Leave the questioning to those actually able to derive something out of it, go play your pokemans and stop making Socrates roll in his grave with your terrible analogy. I didn't make any philosophical references, I'm just asking questions. I don't see anything wrong with being condescending considering how many people here are incapable of rationalizing their beliefs. If you can't support your statements with any reason or logic, why should you be taken seriously? Also, I'm pretty sure Socrates approved of people asking questions and challenging conventional beliefs, considering that that's what he's famous for doing. And FYI it's Pokémon, not pokemans.I just think incest is weird. And I don't have any statistics or any facts to rule it out. I just don't want it legalised.
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]No, it's not self explanatory. Please explain it to me.If by "life-style" you mean their sexuality then how the fvck can you disagree with that?
DroidPhysX
Having sex with the same gender, having anal sex with men, wearing women's clothing if your a guy etc....I disagree with all of that, that is the gay life style. I don't think it's right to be gay if they wish to live their lives that way that's their business, doesn't mean I have to agree with it.
Like smoking, I disagree with that lifestyle too. I don't think smoking is healthy, I don't think it's right. But just like my view on gay people, I support their right to do what they want with their lives and live in peae without discrimination.
I'm not a bigot either. So don't call me one.
whats wrong with his opinion?How would that even be arrogant? It's simply showing that it's easy for people to be okay with LBGT rights while condemning others such as incest and cousin relationships. Two consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want. If they want to have an offspring so be it, they will face the consequences it's not illegal to have a child with a genetic defect.[QUOTE="Ringx55"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]If you want to bang your sister, who is stopping you? And I find you clumping incest and being gay together to be offensive and ignorant. thegerg
Eh, I wouldn't go that far. Simply because 2 people consent to partake in an activity doesn't mean that it should be lawfully allowed.
Why shouldn't it be allowed? They aren't harming any innocent third parties. And don't try to say the potential child could suffer (genetic problems, or whatever). The potential child wouldn't even exist without the parents being sexually active. The incest results in life. It might not be life that you approve of, but it's still life that otherwise would not have had the chance of living.[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="Ringx55"] How would that even be arrogant? It's simply showing that it's easy for people to be okay with LBGT rights while condemning others such as incest and cousin relationships. Two consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want. If they want to have an offspring so be it, they will face the consequences it's not illegal to have a child with a genetic defect.Laihendi
Eh, I wouldn't go that far. Simply because 2 people consent to partake in an activity doesn't mean that it should be lawfully allowed.
Why shouldn't it be allowed? They aren't harming any innocent third parties. And don't try to say the potential child could suffer (genetic problems, or whatever). The potential child wouldn't even exist without the parents being sexually active. The incest results in life. It might not be life that you approve of, but it's still life that otherwise would not have had the chance of living. Anyone can have children, that isn't the point. It is about how you have children.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="thegerg"]Why shouldn't it be allowed? They aren't harming any innocent third parties. And don't try to say the potential child could suffer (genetic problems, or whatever). The potential child wouldn't even exist without the parents being sexually active. The incest results in life. It might not be life that you approve of, but it's still life that otherwise would not have had the chance of living.If by "it" you mean incest, I don't think it should be disallowed. I am simply saying that the statement "[t]wo consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want" is taking it too far.Okay. I apologize for my assumptions.Eh, I wouldn't go that far. Simply because 2 people consent to partake in an activity doesn't mean that it should be lawfully allowed.
thegerg
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment