They are not making discoveries as a result of being atheists. They are atheists due to their discoveries. Besides, no matter how much you would want that to be true, the discoveries are based on observable data. Scientists do not write down whatever comes to their head and then the rest of the scientic community claps it's hands in joy.[QUOTE="Teenaged"]
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]Doesnt change the "fact" that most of them are atheists and unquestionably biased towards things that lead to no-God.
Maybe desperate is a wrong word, I guess eager?
Stranger_4
There are studies, evidence, continuous research, results and credibility. And most importantly: will to improve and being more accurate.
Now let's compare that to religious scripture shall we.
Credibility is not yet proven 100%
Religions do not accept new information, that is proven, easily. What does that mean? Oh yeah, that it's beliefs are not based on facts but faith.
Scripture is based on the sayings of people 2000 years ago, even older. Now lets compare the means of media then and now. Do you want to start counting? It would take forever to see those major differences.
But the will to prove God is certainly lacking, this is a major thing, I am not saying that scientists can go on make stories and get away with it, I know it doesnt work that way but you get my point.And quran is a 100% credible book as it's never been proven wrong.
Yeah, no, the fact that the Qu'ran has not been proven wrong does not make it credible. Just because something has not been proven wrong, does not make it right.
Log in to comment